Shouldering the burden: social-ecological scale mismatches in wetland ecosystem management in Aotearoa New Zealand

References

• Aggestam F. 2014. Wetland restoration and the involvement of stakeholders: an analysis based on value-perspectives. Landscape Res. 39(6):680–17. doi: 10.1080/01426397.2013.819076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ausseil A-GE, Jamali H, Clarkson BR, Golubiewski NE. 2015. Soil carbon stocks in wetlands of New Zealand and impact of land conversion since European settlement. Wetlands Ecol Manage. 23(5):947–961. doi: 10.1007/s11273-015-9432-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baggio JA, Freeman J, Coyle TR, Nguyen TT, Hancock D, Elpers KE, Nabity S, Dengah HF II, Pillow D. 2019. The importance of cognitive diversity for sustaining the commons. Nat Commun. 10(1):875. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08549-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ban NC, Eckert L, McGreer M, Frid A. 2017. Indigenous knowledge as data for modern fishery management: a case study of Dungeness crab in Pacific Canada. Ecosyst Health Sustainability. 3(8):1379887. doi: 10.1080/20964129.2017.1379887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bataille CY, Malinen SK, Yletyinen J, Scott N, Lyver POB. 2021. Relational values provide common ground and expose multi-level constraints to cross-cultural wetland management. People Nat. 3(4):941–960. doi: 10.1002/pan3.10244.
   Google Scholar
• Bergsten A, Galafassi D, Bodin Ö. 2014. The problem of spatial fit in social-ecological systems: detecting mismatches between ecological connectivity and land management in an urban region. Ecol Soc. 19(4). doi: 10.5751/ES-06931-190406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolger D. 2021. Christchurch city council would opt out of the three waters reform in current model. NZ Herald. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/christchurch-city-council-would-opt-out-of-three-waters-reform-in-current-model-says-report/5ZN43PRF3UIA4JUABLO7GRQ4W4/.
   Google Scholar
• Boonstra WJ. 2016. Conceptualizing power to study social-ecological interactions. Ecol Soc. 21(1). doi: 10.5751/ES-07966-210121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 3(2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Bridgewater P, Rotherham ID. 2019. A critical perspective on the concept of biocultural diversity and its emerging role in nature and heritage conservation. People Nat. 1(3):291–304. doi: 10.1002/pan3.10040.
   Google Scholar
• Caillon S, Cullman G, Verschuuren B, Sterling E. 2017. Moving beyond the human–nature dichotomy through biocultural approaches: including ecological well-being in resilience indicators. Ecol Soc. 22(4). doi: 10.5751/ES-09746-220427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campion R, Stephenson J. 2010. The ‘right to roam’: lessons for New Zealand from Sweden’s allemansrätt. Australas J Environ Manag. 17(1):18–26. doi: 10.1080/14486563.2010.9725245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarkson BR, Ausseil A-GE, Gerbeaux P. 2013. Wetland ecosystem services. In: Dymond JR, editor. Ecosystem services in New Zealand: conditions and trends. Lincoln, NZ: Manaaki Whenua Press; [accessed 2021 Jan]. http://www.mwpress.co.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/77042/1_14_Clarkson.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen A, Bakker K. 2014. The eco-scalar fix: rescaling environmental governance and the politics of ecological boundaries in Alberta, Canada. Environ Plan D. 32(1):128–146. doi: 10.1068/d0813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen N, Arieli T. 2011. Field research in conflict environments: methodological challenges and snowball sampling. J Peace Res. 48(4):423–435. doi: 10.1177/0022343311405698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conservation Act. 1987. http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1987/0065/latest/DLM103610.html?search=sw_096be8ed8182dc1d_give+effect_25_se&p=1&sr=0.
   Google Scholar
• Cronin MA, Weingart LR. 2019. Conflict across representational gaps: threats to and opportunities for improved communication. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 116(16):7642–7649. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805866116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming GS, Allen CR. 2017. Protected areas as social‐ecological systems: perspectives from resilience and social‐ecological systems theory. Ecol Appl. 27(6):1709–1717. doi: 10.1002/eap.1584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming GS, David HMC, Redman CL. 2006. Scale mismatches in social-ecological systems: causes, consequences, and solutions. Ecol Soc. 11(1):14. doi: 10.5751/ES-01569-110114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming GS, Dobbs KA. 2020. Quantifying social-ecological scale mismatches suggests people should be managed at broader scales than ecosystems. One Earth. 3(2):251–259. doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.07.007.
   Google Scholar
• Cyphers LA, Schultz CA. 2019. Policy design to support cross-boundary land management: the example of the joint Chiefs landscape restoration partnership. Land Use Policy. 80:362–369. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.09.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dacks R, Ticktin T, Mawyer A, Caillon S, Claudet J, Fabre P, Jupiter SD, McCarter J, Mejia M, Pascua PA. 2019. Developing biocultural indicators for resource management. Conserv Sci Pract. 1(6):e38. doi: 10.1111/csp2.38.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson NC. 2014. How much wetland has the world lost? Long-term and recent trends in global wetland area. Mar Freshw Res. 65(10):934–941. doi: 10.1071/MF14173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Leersnyder J, Gündemir S, Ağirdağ O. 2022. Diversity approaches matter in international classrooms: how a multicultural approach buffers against cultural misunderstandings and encourages inclusion and psychological safety. Stud Higher Educ. 47(9):1903–1920. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2021.1983534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DIA. 2021. Three waters reform programme overview. https://www.dia.govt.nz/diawebsite.nsf/Files/Three-waters-reform-programme/$file/three-waters-reform-programme-overview-a3-30-june-2021.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• DIA. 2022. Three waters reform programme: iwi/Māori interests. https://www.dia.govt.nz/three-waters-reform-programme-iwi-maori-interests.
   Google Scholar
• DIA. 2023. Water services reform programme. https://www.dia.govt.nz/Three-Waters-Reform-Programme.
   Google Scholar
• ECAN. 2020. Te Mana o Te Wai and resource consents: our initial advice. https://www.ecan.govt.nz/your-region/your-environment/water/essential-freshwater-package/te-mana-o-te-wai-and-resource-consents-our-advice/.
   Google Scholar
• ECAN. 2021. Resource consents. https://www.ecan.govt.nz/do-it-online/resource-consents/.
   Google Scholar
• ECAN. 2022. Direct Ngāi Tahu representation. https://www.ecan.govt.nz/about/your-council/our-team/mana-whenua-representation/.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein G, Pittman J, Alexander SM, Berdej S, Dyck T, Kreitmair U, Rathwell KJ, Villamayor-Tomas S, Vogt J, Armitage D. 2015. Institutional fit and the sustainability of social–ecological systems. Curr Opin Env Sust. 14:34–40. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabinyi M, Evans L, Foale SJ. 2014. Social-ecological systems, social diversity, and power: insights from anthropology and political ecology. Ecol Soc. 19(4). doi: 10.5751/ES-07029-190428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabinyi M, Foale S, Macintyre M. 2015. Managing inequality or managing stocks? An ethnographic perspective on the governance of small-scale fisheries. Fish And Fisheries. 16(3):471–485. doi: 10.1111/faf.12069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falco FL, Preiss-Bloom S, Dayan T. 2022. Recent evidence of scale matches and mismatches between ecological systems and management actions. Curr Landscape Ecol Rep. 7(4). doi: 10.1007/s40823-022-00076-5.
   Google Scholar
• Finlayson C, Davies GT, Moomaw WR, Chmura G, Natali SM, Perry J, Roulet N, Sutton-Grier AE. 2019. The second warning to humanity: providing a context for wetland management and policy. Wetlands. 39(1):1–5. doi: 10.1007/s13157-018-1064-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer AP. 2018. Forest landscapes as social-ecological systems and implications for management. Landsc Urban Plan. 177:138–147. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fish and Game Council Elections Regulations. 1990. http://www.legislation.govt.nz/regulation/public/1990/0361/latest/DLM143459.html
   Google Scholar
• Fish and Game NZ. 2021. Home page. https://fishandgame.org.nz/.
   Google Scholar
• Fisheries NZ. 2021. Tangata Tiaki. https://fs.fish.govt.nz/Page.aspx?pk=78&dk=1806.
   Google Scholar
• Fougères D, Andrade A, Jones M, McElwee PD. 2020. Transformative conservation in social-ecological systems. https://www.iucn.org/sites/dev/files/content/documents/cem_2020_-_transformative_conservation.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gavin M, McCarter J, Mead A, Berkes F, Stepp JR, Peterson D, Tang R. 2015. Defining biocultural approaches to conservation. Trends Ecol Evol. 30(3):140–145. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.12.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greer LL, Dannals JE. 2017. Conflict in teams. In: Salas E, Rico R, Passmore J, editors. The Wiley Blackwell handbook of the psychology of team working and collaborative processes. p. 317–343. doi: 10.1002/9781118909997.ch14.
   Google Scholar
• Herse MR, Tylianakis JM, Scott NJ, Brown D, Cranwell I, Henry J, Pauling C, McIntosh AR, Gormley AM, Lyver POB, et al. 2021. Effects of customary egg harvest regimes on hatching success of a culturally important waterfowl species. People Nat. 3(2):499–512. doi: 10.1002/pan3.10196.
   Google Scholar
• Ingalls ML. 2017. Not just another variable: untangling the spatialities of power in social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc. 22(3). doi: 10.5751/ES-09543-220320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPBES. 2019. Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services. https://ipbes.net/global-assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Jager NW, Newig J, Challies E, Kochskämper E. 2020. Pathways to implementation: evidence on how participation in environmental governance impacts on environmental outcomes. J Publ Adm Res Theor. 30(3):383–399. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muz034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janse JH, van Dam AA, Hes EM, de Klein JJ, Finlayson CM, Janssen AB, van Wijk D, Mooij WM, Verhoeven JT. 2019. Towards a global model for wetlands ecosystem services. Curr Opin Env Sust. 36:11–19. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jay M, Morad M. 2007. Crying over spilt milk: a critical assessment of the ecological modernization of New Zealand’s dairy industry. Soc Nat. 20(5):469–478. doi: 10.1080/08941920701211991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehn K, Rispens S, Jonsen K, Greer L. 2013. Conflict contagion: a temporal perspective on the development of conflict within teams. Int J Conflict Manage. 24(4):352–373. doi: 10.1108/IJCMA-05-2011-0039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joy M. 2019. The environmental and human health impacts of dairy intensification: a Canterbury case stud [Online]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335854308_The_environmental_and_human_health_impacts_of_dairy_intensification_A_CASE_STUDY_-_CANTERBURY.
   Google Scholar
• Kingi T. 2008. Maori landownership and land management in New Zealand. Making Land Work. https://www.sprep.org/att/IRC/eCOPIES/Pacific_Region/251.pdf#page=135.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch K, Malpass L. 2021. The contentious he puapua plan explained. [accessed 2021 July 15]. https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/explained/125740914/the-contentious-he-puapua-plan-explained.
   Google Scholar
• Lyver POB, Ruru J, Scott N, Tylianakis JM, Arnold J, Malinen SK, Bataille CY, Herse MR, Jones CJ, Gormley AM. 2018. Building biocultural approaches into Aotearoa–New Zealand’s conservation future. J Roy Soc New Zeal. 49(3):1–18. doi: 10.1080/03036758.2018.1539405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magallanes CJI. 2017. Access to environmental justice for Māori. Yearbook of New Zealand Jurisprudence. 15:141–181. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3093816.
   Google Scholar
• Martin A, McGuire S, Sullivan S. 2013. Global environmental justice and biodiversity conservation. Geogr J. 179(2):122–131. doi: 10.1111/geoj.12018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matike Mai Aotearoa. 2016. The report of Matike Mai Aotearoa–the Independent working group on constitutional transformation. Auckland: Matike Mai Aotearoa. https://nwo.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/MatikeMaiAotearoa25Jan16.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McCarter J, Sterling EJ, Jupiter SD, Cullman GD, Albert S, Basi M, Betley E, Boseto D, Bulehite ES, Harron R. 2018. Biocultural approaches to developing well-being indicators in Solomon Islands. Ecol Soc. 23(1). doi: 10.5751/ES-09867-230132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod C. 2007. Dreadful/delightful killing: the contested nature of duck hunting. Soc Anim. 15(2):151–167. doi: 10.1163/156853007X187108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurdo Hamilton T, Canessa S, Clark K, Gleeson P, Mackenzie F, Makan T, Moses-Te Kani G, Oliver S, Parker KA, Ewen JG. 2021. Applying a values-based decision process to facilitate comanagement of threatened species in Aotearoa New Zealand. Conserv Biol. 35(4):1162–1173. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MfE. 2019. New Zealand’s environmental reporting series. Environment Aotearoa. https://environment.govt.nz/publications/environment-aotearoa-2019/.
   Google Scholar
• MfE. 2021. Values and attributes: national objectives framework. https://environment.govt.nz/acts-and-regulations/freshwater-implementation-guidance/nof/values-and-attributes/.
   Google Scholar
• MfE. 2022. Environment Aotearoa 2022: New Zealand’s environmental reporting series. https://environment.govt.nz/assets/publications/environment-aotearoa-2022.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Myers S, Clarkson BR, Reeves P, Clarkson BD. 2013. Wetland management in New Zealand: are current approaches and policies sustaining wetland ecosystems in agricultural landscapes? Ecol Eng. 56:107–120. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.12.097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Network Waitangi. 2018. Treaty of Waitangi questions and answers. Christchurch New Zealand: Network Waitangi.
   Google Scholar
• Ngāi Tahu. 2020. Ngāi Tahu rangatiratanga over freshwater. https://ngaitahu.iwi.nz/environment/ngai-tahu-rangatiratanga-over-freshwater/.
   Google Scholar
• NPSFM. 2017. National policy statement for freshwater management 2014 (updated 2017). https://www.mfe.govt.nz/publications/fresh-water/national-policy-statement-freshwater-management-2014-amended-2017.
   Google Scholar
• NPSFM. 2020. National policy statement for freshwater management 2020. https://environment.govt.nz/acts-and-regulations/national-policy-statements/national-policy-statement-freshwater-management/.
   Google Scholar
• Orange C. 2018. Te Titiri: the treaty. http://www.teara.govt.nz/en/treaty-of-waitangi/page-1.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsar Convention. 2014. The ramsar convention and its mission. https://www.ramsar.org/about/the-ramsar-convention-and-its-mission.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. 2018. Global wetland outlook: state of the world’s wetlands and their services to people. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3261606.
   Google Scholar
• Resource Management Act. 1991. http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1991/0069/latest/DLM230265.html.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson SJ, Clayton R, Rance BD, Broadbent H, McGlone MS, Wilmshurst JM, Middleton B. 2015. Small wetlands are critical for safeguarding rare and threatened plant species. Appl Veg Sci. 18(2):230–241. doi: 10.1111/avsc.12144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RNZ. 2021. What is He Puapua? https://www.rnz.co.nz/programmes/the-detail/story/2018795469/what-is-he-puapua.
   Google Scholar
• Robards MD, Lovecraft AL. 2010. Evaluating comanagement for social‐ecological fit: indigenous priorities and agency mandates for Pacific Walrus. Policy Stud J. 38(2):257–279. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00361.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts M, Norman W, Minhinnick N, Wihongi D, Kirkwood C. 1995. Kaitiakitanga: māori perspectives on conservation. Pac Conserv Biol. 2(1):7–20. doi: 10.1071/PC950007.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson HA. 2016. Wetland reserves in New Zealand: the status of protected areas between 1990 and 2013. NZ J Ecol. 40(1):1–11. doi: 10.20417/nzjecol.40.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson HA, Ausseil A-G, Rance B, Betts H, Pomeroy E. 2019. Loss of wetlands since 1990 in Southland, New Zealand. NZJE. 43. doi: 10.20417/nzjecol.43.3.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson LA, Blincow HL, Culhane FE, O’Higgins T. 2019. Identifying barriers, conflict and opportunity in managing aquatic ecosystems. Sci Total Environ. 651:1992–2002. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldana J. 2016. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon G. 2019. Freshwater decline. Policy Q. 15(3):8–16. doi: 10.26686/pq.v15i3.5682.
   Google Scholar
• Sangha KK, Le Brocque A, Costanza R, Cadet-James Y. 2015. Application of capability approach to assess the role of ecosystem services in the well-being of Indigenous Australians. Global Ecol Conserv. 4:445–458. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2015.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayles JS. 2018. Effects of social-ecological scale mismatches on estuary restoration at the project and landscape level in Puget Sound, USA. Ecological Rest. 36(1):62–75. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323812405_Effects_of_social-ecological_scale_mismatches_on_estuary_restoration_at_the_project_and_landscape_level_in_puget_sound_USA.
   Google Scholar
• Sayles JS, Baggio JA. 2017. Social–ecological network analysis of scale mismatches in estuary watershed restoration. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 114(10):E1776–E1785. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1604405114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simms R, Harris L, Joe N, Bakker K. 2016. Navigating the tensions in collaborative watershed governance: water governance and Indigenous communities in British Columbia, Canada. Geoforum. 73:6–16. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith CW, Mayorga-Gallo S. 2017. The new principle-policy gap: how diversity ideology subverts diversity initiatives. Sociol Perspect. 60(5):889–911. doi: 10.1177/0731121417719693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics New Zealand. 2018. Change in use of Māori land for primary production. https://www.stats.govt.nz/indicators/change-in-use-of-maori-land-for-primary-production.
   Google Scholar
• Sterling EJ, Filardi C, Toomey A, Sigouin A, Betley E, Gazit N, Newell J, Albert S, Alvira D, Bergamini N. 2017. Biocultural approaches to well-being and sustainability indicators across scales. Nat Ecol Evol. 1(12):1798–1806. doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0349-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart‐Harawira MW. 2020. Troubled waters: Maori values and ethics for freshwater management and New Zealand’s fresh water crisis. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water. 7(5):e1464. doi: 10.1002/wat2.1464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taura Y, van Schravendijk-Goodman C, Clarkson B. 2017. Te reo o te repo: the voice of the wetland. Hamilton, Manaaki Whenua-Landcare Research And Waikato Raupatu River Trust. https://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/publications/te-reo-o-te-repo.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor LB, Fenemor A, Mihinui R, Sayers TA, Porou T, Hikuroa D, Harcourt N, White P, O’Connor M. 2020. Ngā Puna Aroha: towards an indigenous-centred freshwater allocation framework for Aotearoa New Zealand. Australas J Water Resour. 25(1):1–13. doi: 10.1080/13241583.2020.1792632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Te Aho L, Betsan M, New Zealand Māori Council. 2020. Waterways, governance, rangatiratanga research discussion paper. http://www.response.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Waterways-Governance-Discussion-Paper-final-6Nov20.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Te Arawhiti. 2022. Crown engagement with Māori framework. https://www.tearawhiti.govt.nz/assets/Tools-and-Resources/Crown-engagement-with-Maori-Framework.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Te Kāhui Wai Māori. 2019. Kāhui Wai Māori report to hon minister David Parker. https://environment.govt.nz/assets/Publications/Files/kahui-wai-maori-report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Te Puni Kōkiri. 2019. He Puapua: report of the working group on a plan to realise the UN declaration on the rights of Indigenous peoples in Aotearoa New Zealand. https://www.tpk.govt.nz/docs/undrip/tpk-undrip-he-puapua.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Trimble M, Plummer R. 2019. Participatory evaluation for adaptive co-management of social–ecological systems: a transdisciplinary research approach. Sustain Sci. 14(4):1091–1103. doi: 10.1007/s11625-018-0602-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vodosek M. 2007. Intragroup conflict as a mediator between cultural diversity and work group outcomes. Int J Conflict Manage. 18(4):345–375. doi: 10.1108/10444060710833469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waimakariri District Council. 2021. Inaccurate and out of touch: three waters reform. https://www.waimakariri.govt.nz/your-council/news-and-information/2021/09/inaccurate-and-out-of-touch-three-waters-reform.
   Google Scholar
• Waitangi Tribunal. 2011. Ko Aotearoa Tēnei: a report into claims concerning New Zealand law and policy affecting Māori culture and identity. https://waitangitribunal.govt.nz/news/ko-aotearoa-tenei-report-on-the-wai-262-claim-released/.
   Google Scholar
• Waitangi Tribunal. 2016. The treaty of Waitangi, Te Tiriti o Waitangi. https://www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz/treaty-of-waitangi/english-version/.
   Google Scholar
• Wildlife Act. 1953. http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1953/0031/72.0/DLM276814.html.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler KJ, Dade MC, Rieb JT. 2021. Mismatches in the ecosystem services literature—a review of spatial, temporal, and functional-conceptual mismatches. Curr Landscape Ecol Rep. 6(2):1–12. doi: 10.1007/s40823-021-00063-2.
   Google Scholar