Understanding the spatial dynamics of values and disvalues in the Kaskaskia River Watershed, USA through a social-ecological lens

References

• Acero JS, Chu ML, Shipley NJ, van Riper CJ, Stewart WP, Suski CD. 2022. A decision-making framework for evaluating environmental tradeoffs in enhancing ecosystem services across complex agricultural landscapes. J Environ Manage. 314:115077. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acero Triana JS, Chu ML, Stein JA. 2021. Assessing the impacts of agricultural conservation practices on freshwater biodiversity under changing climate. Ecol Modell. 453:109604. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adger WN, Hughes TP, Folke C, Carpenter SR, Rockstrom J. 2005. Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science. 309(5737):1036–15. doi: 10.1126/science.1112122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alessa L, Kliskey A, Brown G. 2008. Social–ecological hotspots mapping: a spatial approach for identifying coupled social–ecological space. Landsc Urban Plan. 85(1):27–39. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade R, van Riper CJ, Goodson DJ, Johnson DN, Stewart W, López-Rodríguez MD, Raymond CM. 2023. Values shift in response to social learning through deliberation about protected areas. Glob Environ Chan. 78:102630. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assandri G, Bogliani G, Pedrini P, Brambilla M. 2018. Beautiful agricultural landscapes promote cultural ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 256:200–210. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2018.01.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey TC, Gatrell AC. 1995. Interactive spatial data analysis. Vol. 413. No. 8. Essex: Longman Scientific & Technical.
   Google Scholar
• Berka C, Schreier H, Hall K. 2001. Linking water quality with agricultural intensification in a rural watershed. Water Air Soil Pollut. 127(1/4):389–401. doi: 10.1023/A:1005233005364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C, editors. 2008. Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braslow J, Cordingley JE, Snyder KA. (2016). A guide for participatory mapping of ecosystem services in multiuse agricultural landscapes: how to conduct a rapid spatial assessment of ecosystem services.
   Google Scholar
• Brown G, Fagerholm N. 2015. Empirical PPGIS/PGIS mapping of ecosystem services: a review and evaluation. Ecosyst Serv. 13:119–133. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown G, Reed P, Raymond CM. 2020. Mapping place values: 10 lessons from two decades of public participation GIS empirical research. Appl Geogr. 116:102156. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown G, Rhodes J, Dade M. 2018. An evaluation of participatory mapping methods to assess urban park benefits. Landsc Urban Plan. 178:18–31. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown G, Weber D. 2012. Measuring change in place values using public participation GIS (PPGIS). Appl Geogr. 34:316–324. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carolan MS. 2006. Sustainable agriculture, science and the co-production of ‘expert’ knowledge: the value of interactional expertise. Local Environ. 11(4):421–431. doi: 10.1080/13549830600785571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan KM, Guerry AD, Balvanera P, Klain S, Satterfield T, Basurto X, Woodside U. 2012. Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement. BioScience. 62(8):744–756. doi: 10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinner JE, Barnes ML. 2019. Social dimensions of resilience in social-ecological systems. One Earth. 1(1):51–56. doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2019.08.003.
   Google Scholar
• Cusens J, Barraclough AM, Måren IE. 2022. Participatory mapping reveals biocultural and nature values in the shared landscape of a Nordic UNESCO Biosphere Reserve. People Nat. 4(2):365–381. doi: 10.1002/pan3.10287.
   Google Scholar
• DeClerck FA, Jones SK, Attwood S, Bossio D, Girvetz E, Chaplin-Kramer B, Zhang W. 2016. Agricultural ecosystems and their services: the vanguard of sustainability? Curr Opin Env Sust. 23:92–99. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.11.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz S, Pascual U, Stenseke M, Martín-López B, Watson RT, Molnár Z, Shirayama Y. 2018. Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science. 359(6373):270–272. doi: 10.1126/science.aap8826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dziegielewski B, Thomas T. 2011. Future water demands and coal development potential in Kaskaskia River basin in Illinois. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Carbondale.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer RA, Byerlee D, Edmeades GO. 2014. Crop yields and global food security: will yield increase continue to feed the world? ACIAR Monograph No. 158. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research: Canberra: p. xxii + 634.
   Google Scholar
• Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J. 2005. Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 30(1):441–473. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garbach K, Milder JC, DeClerck FAJ, Montenegro de Wit M, Driscoll L, Gemmill-Herren B. 2017. Examining multi-functionality for crop yield and ecosystem services in five systems of agroecological intensification. Int J Agric Sustain. 15(1):11–28. doi: 10.1080/14735903.2016.1174810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Martin M, Fagerholm N, Bieling C, Gounaridis D, Kizos T, Printsmann A, Müller M, Lieskovský J, Plieninger T. 2017. Participatory mapping of landscape values in a Pan-European perspective. Landsc Ecol. 32(11):2133–2150. doi: 10.1007/s10980-017-0531-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Nieto AP, Quintas-Soriano C, García-Llorente M, Palomo I, Montes C, Martín-López B. 2015. Collaborative mapping of ecosystem services: the role of stakeholders’ profiles. Ecosyst Serv. 13:141–152. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnett ST, Burgess ND, Fa JE, Fernández-Llamazares Á, Molnár Z, Robinson CJ, Leiper I, Zander KK, Austin B, Brondizio ES, Collier NF. 2018. A spatial overview of the global importance of indigenous lands for conservation. Nat Sustain. 1(7):369–374. doi: 10.1038/s41893-018-0100-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling E, Williams KJ. 2010. Connectedness to nature, place attachment and conservation behaviour: testing connectedness theory among farmers. J Environ Psychol. 30(3):298–304. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould RK, Pai M, Muraca B, Chan KM. 2019. He ʻike ʻana ia i ka pono (it is a recognizing of the right thing): how one indigenous worldview informs relational values and social values. Sustain Sci. 14(5):1213–1232. doi: 10.1007/s11625-019-00721-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale RL, Cook EM, Beltrán BJ. 2019. Cultural ecosystem services provided by rivers across diverse social-ecological landscapes: a social media analysis. Ecol Indic. 107:105580. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanaček K, Rodríguez-Labajos B. 2018. Impacts of land-use and management changes on cultural agroecosystem services and environmental conflicts—a global review. Glob Environ Chan. 50:41–59. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.02.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hein L, van Koppen K, De Groot RS, van Ierland EC. 2006. Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol Econ. 57(2):209–228. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henle K, Alard D, Clitherow J, Cobb P, Firbank L, Kull T, Young J. 2008. Identifying and managing the conflicts between agriculture and biodiversity conservation in Europe–a review. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 124(1–2):60–71. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2007.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirons M, Comberti C, Dunford R. 2016. Valuing cultural ecosystem services. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 41(1):545–574. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hölting L, Komossa F, Filyushkina A, Gastinger MM, Verburg PH, Beckmann M, Cord AF. 2020. Including stakeholders’ perspectives on ecosystem services in multifunctionality assessments. Ecosyst People. 16(1):354–368. doi: 10.1080/26395916.2020.1833986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King E, Cavender-Bares J, Balvanera P, Mwampamba TH, Polasky S. 2015. Trade-offs in ecosystem services and varying stakeholder preferences: evaluating conflicts, obstacles, and opportunities. Ecol Soc. 20(3). doi: 10.5751/ES-07822-200325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klain SC, Chan KM. 2012. Navigating coastal values: participatory mapping of ecosystem services for spatial planning. Ecol Econ. 82:104–113. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krohe J Jr. 2001. The Kaskaskia River basin: an inventory of the region’s resources. Springfield: Illinois Department of Natural Resources Office of Realty and Environmental Planning.
   Google Scholar
• Lamarque P, Tappeiner U, Turner C, Steinbacher M, Bardgett RD, Szukics U, Schermer M, Lavorel S. 2011. Stakeholder perceptions of grassland ecosystem services in relation to knowledge on soil fertility and biodiversity. Reg Environ Chan. 11(4):791–804. doi: 10.1007/s10113-011-0214-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee YC, Ahern J, Yeh CT. 2015. Ecosystem services in peri-urban landscapes: the effects of agricultural landscape change on ecosystem services in Taiwan’s western coastal plain. Landsc Urban Plan. 139:137–148. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitschuh B, Stewart WP, van Riper CJ. 2022. Place-making in the Corn Belt: the productivist landscapes of the “good farmer”. J Rural Stud. 92:415–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lescourret F, Magda D, Richard G, Adam-Blondon AF, Bardy M, Baudry J, Soussana JF. 2015. A social–ecological approach to managing multiple agro-ecosystem services. Curr Opin Env Sust. 14:68–75. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Dietz T, Carpenter SR, Alberti M, Folke C, Moran E, Taylor WW. 2007. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science. 317(5844):1513–1516. doi: 10.1126/science.1144004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lliso B, Lenzi D, Muraca B, Chan KM, Pascual U. 2022. Nature’s disvalues: what are they and why do they matter? Curr Opin Env Sust. 56:101173. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobao L, Meyer K. 2001. The great agricultural transition: crisis, change, and social consequences of twentieth century US farming. Annu Rev Sociol. 27(1):103–124. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.103.
   Google Scholar
• Matson PA, Parton WJ, Power AG, Swift MJ. 1997. Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science. 277(5325):504–509. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5325.504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald BA, Stukenbrock EH. 2016. Rapid emergence of pathogens in agro-ecosystems: global threats to agricultural sustainability and food security. Phil Trans R Soc B. 371(1709):20160026. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehryar S, Sliuzas R, Sharifi A, Reckien D, van Maarseveen M. 2017. A structured participatory method to support policy option analysis in a social-ecological system. J Environ Manage. 197:360–372. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milcu AI, Hanspach J, Abson D, Fischer J. 2013. Cultural ecosystem services: a literature review and prospects for future research. Ecol Soc. 18(3). doi: 10.5751/ES-05790-180344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullendore ND, Ulrich-Schad JD, Prokopy LS. 2015. US farmers’ sense of place and its relation to conservation behavior. Landsc Urban Plan. 140:67–75. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom E. 2009. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science. 325(5939):419–422. doi: 10.1126/science.1172133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascual U, Balvanera P, Anderson CB, Chaplin-Kramer R, Christie M, González-Jiménez D, Martin A, Raymond CM, Termansen M, Vatn A, et al. 2023. Diverse values of nature for sustainability. Nature. 620(7975):813–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Ramírez I, García-Llorente M, Saban de la Portilla C, Benito A, Castro AJ. 2021. Participatory collective farming as a leverage point for fostering human-nature connectedness. Ecosyst People. 17(1):222–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Modell. 190(3–4):231–259. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimentel D, McNair S, Janecka J, Wightman J, Simmonds C, O’Connell C, Wong E, Russel L, Zern J, Aquino T, et al. 2001. Economic and environmental threats of alien plant, animal, and microbe invasions. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 84(1):1–20. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00178-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plieninger T, Schleyer C, Schaich H, Ohnesorge B, Gerdes H, Hernández‐Morcillo M, Bieling C. 2012. Mainstreaming ecosystem services through reformed European agricultural policies. Conserv Lett. 5(4):281–288. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00240.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter J, Costanza R, Sandhu H, Sigsgaard L, Wratten S. 2009. The value of producing food, energy, and ecosystem services within an agro-ecosystem. Ambio. 38(4):186–193. doi: 10.1579/0044-7447-38.4.186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prokopy LS, Genskow K. 2016. Social indicator variations across watersheds: implications for developing outreach and technical assistance programs. Soc Nat. 29(5):617–627. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2015.1081310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prokopy LS, Morton LW, Arbuckle JG Jr, Mase AS, Wilke AK. 2015. Agricultural stakeholder views on climate change: implications for conducting research and outreach. Bull Am Meteorol Soc. 96(2):181–190. doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00172.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robards MD, Schoon ML, Meek CL, Engle NL. 2011. The importance of social drivers in the resilient provision of ecosystem services. Glob Environ Chan. 21(2):522–529. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling KE, Anderson E, Streeter MT, Theiling C. 2023. Long-term nitrate-nitrogen reductions in a large flood control reservoir. J Hydrol. 620:129533. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz C, Shaaban M, Bellingrath-Kimura SD, Piorr A. 2021. Participatory mapping of demand for ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes. Agriculture. 11(12):1–20. doi: 10.3390/agriculture11121193.
   Google Scholar
• Sherrouse BC, Clement JM, Semmens DJ. 2011. A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services. Appl Geogr. 31(2):748–760. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherrouse BC, Semmens DJ, Clement JM. 2014. An application of Social Values for Ecosystem Services (SolVES) to three national forests in Colorado and Wyoming. Ecol Indic. 36:68–79. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shipley NJ, Johnson DN, van Riper CJ, Stewart WP, Chu ML, Suski CD, Stein JA, Shew JJ. 2020. A deliberative research approach to valuing agro-ecosystem services in a worked landscape. Ecosyst Serv. 42:101083. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shipley NJ, Stewart WP, van Riper CJ. 2022. Negotiating agricultural change in the Midwestern US: seeking compatibility between farmer narratives of efficiency and legacy. Agric Human Values. 39(4):1465–1476. doi: 10.1007/s10460-022-10339-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh BK, Fraser ED, Arnold T, Biermayr-Jenzano P, Broerse JE, Brunori G, Webb P, De Schutter O, Fabbri K, Fan S, Fanzo J. 2023. Food systems transformation requires science–policy–society interfaces that integrate existing global networks and new knowledge hubs. Nat Food. 4(1):1–3. doi: 10.1038/s43016-022-00664-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Slemp C, Davenport MA, Seekamp E, Brehm JM, Schoonover JE, Williard KW. 2012. “Growing too fast:” local stakeholders speak out about growth and its consequences for community well-being in the urban–rural interface. Landsc Urban Plan. 106(2):139–148. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.02.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steger C, Hirsch S, Evers C, Branoff B, Petrova M, Nielsen-Pincus M, Wardropper C, van Riper CJ. 2018. Ecosystem services as boundary objects for transdisciplinary collaboration. Ecol Econ. 143:153–160. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinhoff-Knopp B, Kuhn TK, Burkhard B. 2021. The impact of soil erosion on soil-related ecosystem services: development and testing a scenario-based assessment approach. Environ Monit Assess. 193(S1). doi: 10.1007/s10661-020-08814-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stewart WP, Gobster PH, Rigolon A, Strauser J, Williams DA, van Riper CJ. 2019. Resident-led beautification of vacant lots that connects place to community. Landsc Urban Plan. 185:200–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swets JA. 1988. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science. 240(4857):1285–1293. doi: 10.1126/science.3287615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinton SM, Lupi F, Robertson GP, Hamilton SK. 2007. Ecosystem services and agriculture: cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits. Ecol Econ. 64(2):245–252. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.09.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor J, Stemler J. 2006. The Kaskaskia Watershed: a case study on cooperation, conflicting project purposes, and the watershed approach. In: Zimbelman D, Loehlein WC, editors. Operating reservoirs in changing conditions. Sacramento, CA: Environmental and Water Resources Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers; p. 156–165.
   Google Scholar
• Thiele J, Albert C, Hermes J, von Haaren C. 2020. Assessing and quantifying offered cultural ecosystem services of German river landscapes. Ecosyst Serv. 42:101080. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tubiello FN, Fischer G. 2007. Reducing climate change impacts on agriculture: global and regional effects of mitigation, 2000–2080. Technol Forecast Soc. 74(7):1030–1056. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2006.05.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Berkel DB, Verburg PH. 2014. Spatial quantification and valuation of cultural ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape. Ecol Indic. 37:163–174. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.06.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Riper CJ, Kyle GT, Sherrouse BC, Bagstad KJ, Sutton SG. 2017. Toward an integrated understanding of perceived biodiversity values and environmental conditions in a national park. Ecol Indic. 72:278–287. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.07.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker B, Carpenter S, Anderies J, Abel N, Cumming G, Janssen M, Pritchard R. 2002. Resilience management in social-ecological systems: a working hypothesis for a participatory approach. Conserv Ecol. 6(1). doi: 10.5751/ES-00356-060114.
   Google Scholar
• Wardropper CB, Chang C, Rissman AR. 2015. Fragmented water quality governance: constraints to spatial targeting for nutrient reduction in a Midwestern USA watershed. Landsc Urban Plan. 137:64–75. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.12.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardropper CB, Mase AS, Qiu J, Kohl P, Booth EG, Rissman AR. 2020. Ecological worldview, agricultural or natural resource-based activities, and geography affect perceived importance of ecosystem services. Landsc Urban Plan. 197:103768. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West S, Haider LJ, Stålhammar S, Woroniecki S. 2020. A relational turn for sustainability science? Relational thinking, leverage points and transformations. Ecosyst People. 16(1):304–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelm JA, Smith RG, Jolejole-Foreman MC, Hurley S. 2020. Resident and stakeholder perceptions of ecosystem services associated with agricultural landscapes in New Hampshire. Ecosyst Serv. 45:101153. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeakley JA, Ervin D, Chang H, Granek EF, Dujon V, Shandas V, Brown D. 2016. Ecosystem services of streams and rivers. In: Gilvear GJ, Greenwood MT, Thoms MC, Wood PJ, editors. River science: research and management for the 21st century. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; p. 335–352.
   Google Scholar
• Zagata L, Uhnak T, Hrabák J. 2021. Moderately radical? Stakeholders’ perspectives on societal roles and transformative potential of organic agriculture. Ecol Econ. 190:107208. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Ricketts TH, Kremen C, Carney K, Swinton SM. 2007. Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture. Ecol Econ. 64(2):253–260. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zook L. 1994. The Amish farm and alternative agriculture: a comparison. J Sustain Agr. 4(4):21–30. doi: 10.1300/J064v04n04_04.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar