Attitudes of political-administrative decision makers towards the implementation of nature-based solutions in water management – a case study on a hypothetical constructed wetland in the Tárcoles River basin

References

• Ajzen I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 50(2):179–14. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert C, Brillinger M, Guerrero P, Gottwald S, Henze J, Schmidt S, Ott E, Schröter B. 2020. Planning nature-based solutions: principles, steps, and insights. AMBIO. 50:1446–1461. doi: 10.1007/s13280-020-01365-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert C, Hack J, Schmidt S, Schröter B. 2021. Planning and governing nature-based solutions in river landscapes: concepts, cases, and insights. AMBIO. s13280–021–01569–z. doi: 10.1007/s13280-021-01569-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert C, Schröter B, Haase D, Brillinger M, Henze J, Herrmann S, Gottwald S, Guerrero P, Nicolas C, Matzdorf B. 2019. Addressing societal challenges through nature-based solutions: how can landscape planning and governance research contribute? Landsc Urban Plan. 182:12–21. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva M, McFadden D, Gärling T, Gopinath D, Walker J, Bolduc D, Börsch-Supan A, Delquié P, Larichev O, Morikawa T, et al. 1999. Extended framework for modeling choice behavior. Mark Lett. 10(3): 187–203. doi: 10.1023/A:1008046730291.
   Google Scholar
• Brown SR. 1980. Political subjectivity: applications of q methodology in political science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cattell RB. 1966. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behav Res. 1(2):245–276. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapa F, Pérez M, Hack J. 2020. Experimenting transition to sustainable urban drainage systems—identifying constraints and unintended processes in a tropical highly urbanized watershed. Water. 12(12):3554. doi: 10.3390/w12123554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapa F, Péréz Rubi M, Hack J. 2023. A systematic assessment for the co-design of green infrastructure prototypes—a case study in urban Costa Rica. Sustainability. 15(3):2478. doi: 10.3390/su15032478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen V, Ricardo Bonilla Brenes J, Chapa F, Hack J. 2021. Development and modelling of realistic retrofitted nature-based solution scenarios to reduce flood occurrence at the catchment Scale. AMBIO. 50:1462–1476. doi: 10.1007/s13280-020-01493-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Amato D, Droste N, Winkler K, Toppinen A. 2019. Thinking green, circular or bio: eliciting researchers’ perspectives on a sustainable economy with Q method. J Cleaner Prod. 230:460–476. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorst H, van der Jagt A, Toxopeus H, Tozer L, Raven R, Runhaar H. 2022. What’s behind the barriers? uncovering structural conditions working against urban nature-based solutions. Landsc Urban Plan. 220:104335. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinoza CE, Villalta RA. 2004. Primera etapa del plan de manejo integral del recurso hídrico: La estrategia nacional para la GIRH en Costa Rica. (ATN/WP 8467CR) Estudio de caso sobre la contaminación de la cuenca de los ríos Virilla y Grande de Tárcoles (Cuenca 24).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2015. Towards an EU research and innovation policy agenda for nature-based solutions & re-naturing cities: final report of the horizon 2020 expert group on “nature based solutions and re naturing cities.
   Google Scholar
• Frantzeskaki N, Bush J. 2021. Governance of nature-based solutions through intermediaries for urban transitions – a case study from Melbourne, Australia. Urban For Urban Greening. 64:127262. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frantzeskaki N, Vandergert P, Connop S, Schipper K, Zwierzchowska I, Collier M, Lodder M. 2020. Examining the policy needs for implementing nature-based solutions in cities: findings from city-wide transdisciplinary experiences in Glasgow (UK), Genk (Belgium) and Poznań (Poland). Land Use Policy. 96:104688. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fruchter B. 1954. Introduction to factor analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Gall S, Rodwell L. 2016. Evaluating the social acceptability of Marine protected areas. Mar Policy. 65:30–38. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guttman L. 1954. A new approach to factor analysis: the Radex. In: Lazarsfeld PF, editor. Mathematical thinking in the social sciences. New York: Free Press; p. 258–348.
   Google Scholar
• Hack J. 2021. Soluciones basadas en la naturaleza para la restauración de ríos en áreas metropolitanas: El proyecto Visión Urbana del Agua en la cuenca Quebrada Seca-Río Burío, Costa Rica. Ambientico. 280(8):42–49.
   Google Scholar
• Hack J, Schröter B. 2021. Nature-based solutions for river restoration in metropolitan areas - the example of Costa Rica. In: Brears R, editor. The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Futures. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; p. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Han S, Kuhlicke C. 2019. Reducing hydro-meteorological risk by nature-based solutions: what do we know about people’s perceptions? Water. 11(12):2599. doi: 10.3390/w11122599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández E, Germain RS-M, Birkel C, Boll J. 2018. Climate and water conflicts coevolution from tropical development and hydro-climatic perspectives: a case study of Costa Rica. J Am Water Resour Assoc. 54:451–470. doi: 10.1111/1752-1688.12617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Union for Conservation of Nature. 2020. Global standard for nature-based solutions. A user-friendly framework for the verification, design and scaling up of NbS. 1st Edition. Gland: IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Kiss B, Sekulova F, Hörschelmann K, Salk CF, Takahashi W, Wamsler C. 2022. Citizen participation in the governance of nature-based solutions. Environ Policy Gov. 32(3):247–272. doi: 10.1002/eet.1987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijerink S, Huitema D. 2017. The institutional design, politics, and effects of a bioregional approach: observations and lessons from 11 case studies of river basin organizations. Ecol Soc. 22(2). doi: 10.5751/ES-09388-220241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller FH, Kals E. 2004. Q-Sort technique and Q-Methodology—innovative methods for examining attitudes and opinions. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 5(2). doi: 10.17169/fqs-5.2.600.
   Google Scholar
• Naumann S, Kaphengst T. 2015. Erfolgsfaktoren bei der Planung und Umsetzung naturbasierter Ansätze zum Klimaschutz und zur Anpassung an den Klimawandel, BfN-Schriften-406, Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn, 22.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann VA, Hack J. 2019. A methodology of policy assessment at the municipal level: Costa Rica´s readiness for the implementation of nature-based-solutions for urban stormwater management. Sustainability. 12(1):230. doi: 10.3390/su12010230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann VA, Hack J. 2022. Revealing and assessing the costs and benefits of nature-based solutions within a real-world laboratory in Costa Rica. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 93:106737. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris J, Matzdorf B, Barghusen R, Schulze C. 2021. Viewpoints on cooperative peatland management: expectations and motives of Dutch farmers. Land. 10(12):1326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oral HV, Carvalho P, Gajewska M, Ursino N, Masi F, van Hullebusch ED, Kazak JK, Exposito A, Cipolletta G, Raaschou Andersen T, et al. 2020. A review of nature-based solutions for urban water management in European circular cities: a critical assessment based on case studies and literature. Blue-Green Syst. 2(1): 112–136. doi: 10.2166/bgs.2020.932.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez Rubí M, Hack J. 2021. Co-design of experimental nature-based solutions for decentralized dry-weather runoff treatment retrofitted in a densely urbanized area in central America. AMBIO. 50:1498–1513. doi: 10.1007/s13280-020-01457-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quesada A. 2019. Costa Rica’s waste water sector profile. Trade Commissioner - Government Of Canada; [accessed 2020 Nov 30]. https://www.tradecommissioner.gc.ca/costa-rica/market-reports-etudes-de-marches/0004215.aspx?lang=eng&.
   Google Scholar
• Quesada CA, Del Pilar Garrido Gonzalo M, Solano Quirós R, Manuel Rodríguez Echandi C, Luis Bermúdez Madriz J, Shackelford AH. 2020. Second voluntary national review, sustainable development goals, Costa Rica 2020 “Sustainable Development in Action: The Route to Sustainability.” SDG Technical secretariat – Mideplan (Ministerio de Planificación Nacional y Política Económica), San José, Costa Rica.
   Google Scholar
• Sabater S, Bregoli F, Acuña V, Barceló D, Elosegi A, Ginebreda A, Marcé R, Muñoz I, Sabater-Liesa L, Ferreira V. 2018. Effects of human-driven water stress on river ecosystems: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 8(1):11462. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29807-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sarabi E, Shahryar QH, Romme AGL, de Vries B, Wendling L. 2019. Key enablers of and barriers to the uptake and implementation of nature-based solutions in urban settings: a review. Resources. 8(3):121. doi: 10.3390/resources8030121.
   Google Scholar
• Sattler C, Rommel J, Chen C, García-Llorente M, Gutiérrez-Briceño I, Prager K, Reyes MF, Schröter B, Schulze C, Lenny GJVB, et al. 2022. Participatory research in times of COVID-19 and beyond: adjusting your methodological toolkits. One Earth. 5(1):62–73.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schröter B, Castro-Arce K, Aguilar-González BJ. 2023. Adjusted to reality? Mandate and functioning of the General Integral Commission of the grande tárcoles rivershed in Costa Rica. Ecol Soc. 28(4).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz C, Adams WM. 2020. In search of the good dam: contemporary views on dam planning in Latin America. Sustainability Sci. 16:255–269. doi: 10.1007/s11625-020-00870-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze C, Matzdorf B. 2023. The institutional design of agri-environmental contracts-how stakeholder attitudes can inform policy making. Q Open. 3(1):qoad001. doi: 10.1093/qopen/qoad001.
   Google Scholar
• Scott O, Fatoric S, Merritt R, Fulton Lee V. 2018. Engaging the private sector in green infrastructure development and financing. United States Agency for International Development and the Adaptation Thought Leadership and Assessments. 54.
   Google Scholar
• Seddon N, Chausson A, Berry P, Girardin CAJ, Smith A, Turner B. 2020a. Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges. Phil Trans R Soc B. 375(1794):20190120. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seddon N, Daniels E, Davis R, Chausson A, Harris R, Hou-Jones X, Huq S, Kapos V, Mace GM, Raza Rizvi A, et al. 2020b. Global recognition of the importance of nature-based solutions to the impacts of climate change. Global Sustainability. 3:e15. doi: 10.1017/sus.2020.8.
   Google Scholar
• Seddon N, Smith A, Smith P, Key I, Chausson A, Girardin C, House J, Srivastava S, Turner B. 2021. Getting the message right on nature-based solutions to climate change. Global Change Biol. 27:1518–1546. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sistema Costarricense de Información Jurídica. 2013. Crea Comisión de Gestión Integral de La Cuenca Del Río 1205 Grande de Tárcoles No 38071-MINAE; [accessed 2020 Nov 23]. (http://www.pgrweb.go.cr/scij/Busqueda/Normativa/Normas/nrm_texto_completo.aspx?param1=NRTC&nValor1=1&nValor2=76574&nValor3=95656&strTipM=TC).
   Google Scholar
• Spearman C. 1904. The proof and measurement of association between two things. Am J Psychol. 15(1):72–101. doi: 10.2307/1412159.
   Google Scholar
• Stefanakis AI. 2019. The role of constructed wetlands as green infrastructure for sustainable urban water management. Sustainability. 11(24):6981. doi: 10.3390/su11246981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenner P, Watts S. 2012. Doing Q methodological research: theory, method & interpretation. London: Sage Publications Ltd; p. 1–248.
   Google Scholar
• Tafel L, Ott E, Brillinger M, Schulze C, Schröter B. 2022. Attitudes of administrative decision-makers towards nature-based solutions for flood risk management in Germany. Sustainability Sci. 17(1):135–149. doi: 10.1007/s11625-021-01072-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visión Urbana del Agua and Technische Universität Darmstadt. 2020. Boletín Informativo N° 5. Enero - Julio 2020. Darmstadt: SEE-URBAN-WATER Projekt.
   Google Scholar
• Wamsler C, Alkan Olsson J, Helena Björn HF, Hanson H, Oskarsson T, Simonsson E, Zelmerlow F. 2020b. Beyond participation: when citizen engagement leads to undesirable outcomes for nature-based solutions and climate change adaptation. Clim Change. 158:235–254. doi: 10.1007/s10584-019-02557-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wamsler C, Wickenberg B, Hanson H, Alkan Olsson J, Stålhammar S, Helena Björn HF, Gerell D, Oskarsson T, Simonsson E, Torffvit F, et al. 2020a. Environmental and climate policy integration: Targeted strategies for overcoming barriers to nature-based solutions and climate change adaptation. J Cleaner Prod. 247:119154. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts S, Stenner P. 2005. Doing Q methodology: theory, method and interpretation. Qual Res Psychol. 2(1):67–91. doi: 10.1191/1478088705qp022oa.
   Google Scholar
• Zabala A. 2014. Qmethod: a package to explore human perspectives using Q methodology. R J. 6(2):163. doi: 10.32614/RJ-2014-032.
   Google Scholar
• Zabala A, Pascual U. 2016. Bootstrapping Q methodology to improve the understanding of human perspectives. PLOS ONE. 11(2):e0148087. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabala A, Sandbrook C, Mukherjee N. 2018. When and how to use Q methodology to understand perspectives in conservation research. Conservation Biology. 32(5):1185–1194. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zingraff-Hamed A, Hüesker F, Albert C, Brillinger M, Huang J, Lupp G, Scheuer S, Schlätel M, Schröter B. 2020. Governance models for nature-based solutions: seventeen cases from Germany. AMBIO. 50:1610–1627. doi: 10.1007/s13280-020-01412-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar