Mapping landscape values and exploring sense of place in a threatened mangrove biodiversity hotspot: the Sundarbans delta, Bangladesh

References

• Alessa L (Naia), Kliskey A, Brown G. 2008. Social-ecological hotspots mapping: a spatial approach for identifying coupled social-ecological space. Landsc Urban Plan. 85(1):27–13. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayeb-Karlsson S, van der Geest K, Ahmed I, Huq S, Warner K. 2016. A people‐centred perspective on climate change, environmental stress, and livelihood resilience in Bangladesh. Sustainability Sci. 11(4):679–694. doi: 10.1007/s11625-016-0379-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee S, Ladd CJT, Chanda A, Shil S, Ghosh T, Large A, Balke T. 2023. Securing the sustainable future of tropical deltas through mangrove restoration: lessons from the Indian Sundarban. One Earth. 6(3):190–194. doi: 10.1016/J.ONEEAR.2023.02.015.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister CF, Gerstenberg T, Plieninger T, Schraml U. 2020. Exploring cultural ecosystem service hotspots: linking multiple urban forest features with public participation mapping data. Urban For Urban Greening. 48(March 2019):126561. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126561.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister CF, Gerstenberg T, Plieninger T, Schraml U. 2022. Geography of disservices in urban forests: Public participation mapping for closing the loop. Ecosyst People. 18(1):44–63. doi: 10.1080/26395916.2021.2021289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown G, Montag JM, Lyon K. 2012. Public participation GIS: a method for identifying ecosystem services. Soc Natur Resour. 25(7):633–651. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2011.621511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown G, Raymond CM, Corcoran J. 2015. Mapping and measuring place attachment. Appl Geogr. 57:42–53. doi: 10.1016/J.APGEOG.2014.12.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown G, Reed P. 2000. Validation of a forest values typology for use in national forest planning. For Sci. 46(2):240–247. doi: 10.1093/forestscience/46.2.240.
   Google Scholar
• Brown G, Reed P. 2009. Public participation GIS: a new method for use in national forest planning. For Sci. 55(2):166–182. doi: 10.1093/forestscience/55.2.166.
   Google Scholar
• Brown G, Reed P, Raymond CM. 2020. Mapping place values: 10 lessons from two decades of public participation GIS empirical research. Appl Geogr. 116:102156. doi: 10.1016/J.APGEOG.2020.102156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown G, Weber D. 2011. Public participation GIS: a new method for national park planning. Landsc Urban Plan. 102(1):1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown G, Weber D, De Bie K. 2014. Assessing the value of public lands using public participation GIS (PPGIS) and social landscape metrics. Appl Geogr. 53:77–89. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEGIS. 2016. Joint landscape narrative by India and Bangladesh. Center for Environmental and Geographic Information Services (CEGIS), unpublished report.
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhury MS, Hafsa B. 2022. Multi-decadal land cover change analysis over Sundarbans mangrove forest of Bangladesh: a GIS and remote sensing based approach. Global Ecol Conserv. 37:e02151. doi: 10.1016/J.GECCO.2022.E02151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins L, Kelly A, Tait C, Zhang S, Li Y, Bondre N, editors. 2023. Keeping pace with changing deltas. In: One earth. Vol. 6. p. 183–184. doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2023.03.002.
   Google Scholar
• Cross JE, Keske CM, Lacy MG, Hoag DLK, Bastian CT. 2011. Adoption of conservation easements among agricultural landowners in Colorado and Wyoming: The role of economic dependence and sense of place. Landsc Urban Plan. 101(1):75–83. doi: 10.1016/J.LANDURBPLAN.2011.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cusens J, Barraclough AMD, Måren IE. 2021. Participatory mapping reveals biocultural and nature values in the shared landscape of a Nordic UNESCO biosphere reserve. People Nat. 4:365–381. doi: 10.1002/pan3.10287.
   Google Scholar
• Dasgupta R, Hashimoto S, Basu M, Okuro T, Johnson BA, Kumar P, Dhyani S. 2021. Spatial characterization of non-material values across multiple coastal production landscapes in the Indian Sundarban delta. Sustain Sci. 17:725–738. doi: 10.1007/s11625-020-00899-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta S, Wheeler D, Sobhan MI, Bandyopadhyay S, Paul T. 2020. Coping with Climate Change in the Sundarbans: Lessons from Multidisciplinary Studies. In: International Development in Focus. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1587-4.
   Google Scholar
• Díaz S, Pascual U, Stenseke M, Martín-López B, Watson RT, Molnár Z, Hill R, Chan KMA, Baste IA, Brauman KA, et al. 2018. Supplementary material for assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science. 359(6373):270–272. doi: 10.1126/science.aap8826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmonds DA, Caldwell RL, Brondizio ES, Siani SMO. 2020. Coastal flooding will disproportionately impact people on river deltas. Nat Commun. 11(1):1–8. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18531-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerholm N, García-Martín M, Torralba M, Bieling C, Plieninger T. 2022. Public participation geographical information systems (PPGIS): participatory research methods for sustainability‐toolkit# 1. GAIA-Ecol Perspect Sci Soc. 31(1):46–48. doi: 10.14512/gaia.31.1.10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Martin M, Fagerholm N, Bieling C, Gounaridis D, Kizos T, Printsmann A, Müller M, Lieskovský J, Plieninger T. 2017. Participatory mapping of landscape values in a Pan-European perspective. Landscape Ecol. 32(11):2133–2150. doi: 10.1007/s10980-017-0531-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh T, Loc HH, Park E, Mortreux C, Okoh R, Nesterenko M, Dubey SK, Gain AK, Le DP, Giosan L, et al. 2023. Adaptation for changing deltas. One Earth. 6(3):185–189. doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2023.02.014.
   Google Scholar
• GoB. 2010. Integrated resources management plans for the Sundarbans: volume 1. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Forest Department, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of the people’s republic of Bangladesh.
   Google Scholar
• Gottwald S, Albert C, Fagerholm N. 2022. Combining sense of place theory with the ecosystem services concept: empirical insights and reflections from a participatory mapping study. Landscape Ecol. 37(2):633–655. doi: 10.1007/s10980-021-01362-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagger V, Worthington TA, Lovelock CE, Adame MF, Amano T, Brown BM, Friess DA, Landis E, Mumby PJ, Morrison TH, et al. 2022. Drivers of global mangrove loss and gain in social-ecological systems. Nat Commun. 13(1):6373. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33962-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausmann A, Slotow ROB, Burns JK, Di Minin E. 2016. The ecosystem service of sense of place: benefits for human well-being and biodiversity conservation. Environ Conserv. 43(2):117–127. doi: 10.1017/S0376892915000314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawthorne TL, Toohy KR, Yang B, Graham L, Lorenzo EM, Torres H, McDonald M, Rivera F, Bouck K, Walters LJ. 2022. Mapping emotional attachment as a measure of sense of place to identify coastal restoration priority areas. Appl Geogr. 138:102608. doi: 10.1016/J.APGEOG.2021.102608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewitt RJ, Pera FA, García-Martín M, Gaudry-Sada KH, Hernández-Jiménez V, Bieling C. 2020. Mapping adolescents’ sense of place and perceptions of change in an urban–rural transition area. Environ Manage. 65(3):334–354. doi: 10.1007/s00267-019-01249-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain ANM, Lynam AJ, Ngoprasert D, Barlow A, Barlow CG, Savini T. 2018. Identifying landscape factors affecting tiger decline in the Bangladesh Sundarbans. Global Ecol Conserv. 13:e00382. doi: 10.1016/J.GECCO.2018.E00382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inskip C, Ridout M, Fahad Z, Tully R, Barlow A, Barlow CG, Islam MA, Roberts T, MacMillan D. 2013. Human-tiger conflict in context: risks to lives and livelihoods in the Bangladesh Sundarbans. Hum Ecol. 41(2):169–186. doi: 10.1007/s10745-012-9556-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iqbal MH, Hossain ME. 2022. Tourists’ willingness to pay for restoration of Sundarbans mangrove forest ecosystems: a contingent valuation modelling study. Environ Dev Sus. 0123456789. doi: 10.1007/s10668-022-02140-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam MM, Hossain MM. 2017. Community dependency on the ecosystem services from the Sundarbans mangrove wetland in Bangladesh. In: Prusty BAK, editor. Wetland Science: Perspectives from South Asia. New Delhi, India: Springer; p. 301–316. doi: 10.1007/978-81-322-3715-0_16.
   Google Scholar
• Islam MM, Sunny AR, Hossain MM, Friess DA. 2018. Drivers of mangrove ecosystem service change in the Sundarbans of Bangladesh. Singap J Trop Geogr. 39(2):244–265. doi: 10.1111/sjtg.12241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James GK, Adegoke JO, Osagie S, Ekechukwu S, Nwilo P, Akinyede J. 2013. Social valuation of mangroves in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria. Int J Of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services And Management. 9(4):311–323. doi: 10.1080/21513732.2013.842611.
   Google Scholar
• Jones L, Holland RA, Ball J, Sykes T, Taylor G, Ingwall-King L, Snaddon JL, Peh KS-H. 2020. A place-based participatory mapping approach for assessing cultural ecosystem services in urban green space. People Nat. 2(1):123–137. doi: 10.1002/pan3.10057.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgensen BS, Stedman RC. 2006. A comparative analysis of predictors of sense of place dimensions: attachment to, dependence on, and identification with lakeshore properties. Journal Of Environmental Management. 79(3):316–327. doi: 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2005.08.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadykalo AN, López-Rodriguez MD, Ainscough J, Droste N, Ryu H, Ávila-Flores G, Le Clec’h S, Muñoz MC, Nilsson L, Rana S, et al. 2019. Disentangling ‘ecosystem services’ and ‘nature’s contributions to people’. Ecosyst People. 15(1):269–287. doi: 10.1080/26395916.2019.1669713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MNI, Khatun S, Azad MS, Mollick AS. 2020. Leaf morphological and anatomical plasticity in Sundri (Heritiera fomes Buch. -Ham.) along different canopy light and salinity zones in the Sundarbans mangrove forest, Bangladesh. Global Ecol Conserv. 23:e01127. doi: 10.1016/J.GECCO.2020.E01127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallick B, Priodarshini R, Kimengsi JN, Biswas B, Hausmann AE, Islam S, Huq S, Vogt J. 2021. Livelihoods dependence on mangrove ecosystems: empirical evidence from the Sundarbans. Curr Res Environ Sustain. 3:100077. doi: 10.1016/J.CRSUST.2021.100077.
   Google Scholar
• Masterson VA, Stedman RC, Enqvist J, Tengö M, Giusti M, Wahl D, Svedin U. 2017. The contribution of sense of place to social-ecological systems research: a review and research agenda. Ecol Soc. 22(1). doi: 10.5751/ES-08872-220149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra A, Sengupta K, Banerjee K. 2012. Spatial and temporal trends in biomass and carbon sequestration potential of Sonneratia Apetala Buch. -Ham in Indian Sundarbans. Proc Natl Acad Sci, India, Sect B Biol Sci. 82(2):317–323. doi: 10.1007/s40011-012-0021-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MoEFC. 2022. Ministry of environment, forest and climate change. Government of Bangladesh. The Sundarbans (Bangladesh). (N 798). progress report on the decisions of 44 COM 7B.91 the world heritage committee on the Sundarbans world heritage site.
   Google Scholar
• Mook A, Goyke N, Dwivedi P. 2022. Conservation intentions and place attachment among male and female forest landowners*. Rural Sociol. 87(3):817–846. doi: 10.1111/ruso.12434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullendore ND, Ulrich-Schad JD, Prokopy LS. 2015. U.S. farmers’ sense of place and its relation to conservation behavior. Landsc Urban Plan. 140:67–75. doi: 10.1016/J.LANDURBPLAN.2015.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munang R, Thiaw I, Alverson K, Liu J, Han Z. 2013. The role of ecosystem services in climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 5(1):47–52. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasrin S, Mahmood H, Rahman MM. 2021. Parental influences on salt adaptive divergence of Sonneratia apetala (Buch. -Ham.) seedlings along the salinity gradient in the Sundarbans of Bangladesh. Environ Challenges. 4:100121. doi: 10.1016/J.ENVC.2021.100121.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Ramírez I, García-Llorente M, Benito A, Castro AJ. 2019. Exploring sense of place across cultivated lands through public participatory mapping. Landscape Ecol. 34(7):1675–1692. doi: 10.1007/s10980-019-00816-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plieninger T, Dijks S, Oteros-Rozas E, Bieling C. 2013. Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy. 33(July):118–129. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.013.
   Google Scholar
• Plieninger T, Rana HÁA, Fagerholm N, Ellingsgaard GF, Magnussen E, Raymond CM, Olafsson AS, Verbrugge LNH. 2018. Identifying and assessing the potential for conflict between landscape values and development preferences on the Faroe Islands. Global Environ Change. 52(May):162–180. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.07.006.
   Google Scholar
• Poe MR, Donatuto J, Satterfield T. 2016. “Sense of place”: human wellbeing considerations for ecological restoration in Puget sound. Coastal Manage. 44(5):409–426. doi: 10.1080/08920753.2016.1208037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prusty BAK, Chandra R, Azeez PA. 2017 Apr. Perspectives from South Asia. In: Wetland Science. 1–587. 10.1007/978-81-322-3715-0.
   Google Scholar
• Rädiker S, Kuckartz U. 2020. Focused analysis of qualitative interviews with MAXQDA: step by step. Berlin: MAXQDA Press. 10.36192/978-3-948768072.
   Google Scholar
• Roy AKD. 2016. Local community attitudes towards mangrove forest conservation: lessons from Bangladesh. Mar Policy. 74(September):186–194. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.09.021.
   Google Scholar
• Roy AKD, Alam K, Gow J. 2013. Community perceptions of state forest ownership and management: a case study of the Sundarbans mangrove forest in Bangladesh. Journal Of Environmental Management. 117:141–149. doi: 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2012.12.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito O, Subramanian SM, Hashimoto S, Takeuchi K. 2020. Managing socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes for sustainable communities in Asia: mapping and navigating stakeholders, policy and action 179. Springer Nature. 10.1007/978-981-15-1133-2.
   Google Scholar
• Sannigrahi S, Zhang Q, Pilla F, Joshi PK, Basu B, Keesstra S, Roy PS, Wang Y, Sutton PC, Chakraborti S, et al. 2020. Responses of ecosystem services to natural and anthropogenic forcings: a spatial regression based assessment in the world’s largest mangrove ecosystem. Sci Total Environ. 715:137004. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarker SK, Reeve R, Thompson J, Paul NK, Matthiopoulos J. 2016. Are we failing to protect threatened mangroves in the Sundarbans world heritage ecosystem? Sci Rep. 6(October 2015):1–12. doi: 10.1038/srep21234.
   Google Scholar
• Sherrouse BC, Clement JM, Semmens DJ. 2011. A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services. Appl Geogr. 31(2):748–760. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoyama K, Yamagata Y. 2016. Local perception of ecosystem service bundles in the Kushiro watershed, Northern Japan – application of a public participation GIS tool. Ecosyst Serv. 22(July):139–149. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.009.
   Google Scholar
• Solecka I, Rinne T, Caracciolo Martins R, Kytta M, Albert C. 2022. Important places in landscape – investigating the determinants of perceived landscape value in the suburban area of Wrocław, Poland. Landsc Urban Plan. 218:104289. doi: 10.1016/J.LANDURBPLAN.2021.104289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunny AR. 2017. Impact of oil spill in the Bangladesh Sundarbans. Int J Fish Aquat Stud. 5(5):365–368.
   Google Scholar
• Swanwick C. 2009. Society’s attitudes to and preferences for land and landscape. Land Use Policy. 26:S62–S75. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapsuwan S, Leviston Z, Tucker D. 2011. Community values and attitudes towards land use on the Gnangara groundwater system: a sense of place study in Perth, Western Australia. Landsc Urban Plan. 100(1–2):24–34. doi: 10.1016/J.LANDURBPLAN.2010.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VERBI Software. 2022. MAXQDA, software for qualitative data analysis, 1989 – 2024. Berlin, Germany: VERBI Software. Consult. Sozialforschung GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Wartmann FM, Purves RS. 2018. Investigating sense of place as a cultural ecosystem service in different landscapes through the lens of language. Landsc Urban Plan. 175(March):169–183. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.03.021.
   Google Scholar
• Williams DR. 2014. Making sense of ‘place’: reflections on pluralism and positionality in place research. Landsc Urban Plan. 131:74–82. doi: 10.1016/J.LANDURBPLAN.2014.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang YE, Passarelli S, Lovell RJ, Ringler C. 2018. Gendered perspectives of ecosystem services: a systematic review. Ecosyst Serv. 31:58–67. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar