Effect on composition and quantity of extracellular polymeric substances in an innovative hybrid membrane bioreactor under different sludge retention times

References

• Park D, Yun Y-M, Kim H, et al. Mechanism of biofouling mitigation on nanofiltration membrane by non-oxidizing biocide. Desalin Water Treat. 2017;99:102–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong TH, Fane AG. Implications of critical flux and cake enhanced osmotic pressure (CEOP) on colloidal fouling in reverse osmosis: modeling approach. Desalin Water Treat. 2009;8:68–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam M, Charfi A, Lesage G, et al. Membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment: a review of of mechanical cleaning by scouring agents to control membrane fouling. Chem Eng J. 2017;307:897—913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu C, Yue X, Shi X, et al. Membrane fouling between a membrane bioreactor and a moving bed membrane bioreactor: effects of solid retention time. Chem Eng J. 2017;309:397—408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tijing LD, Woo YC, Choi JS, et al. Fouling and its control in membrane distillation: a review. J Membr Sci. 2015;475:215–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Wang XC, Liu Y, et al. Performance of a hybrid membrane bioreactor in municipal wastewater treatment. Desalination. 2010;258(1/3):143—147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Wang XC. Membrane fouling control mechanism of a hybrid membrane bioreactor. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;35(7):12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce GK. Fouling behaviour for different module formats in membrane filtration applications for surface water treatment. Desalin Water Treat. 2009;8:48–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang I-S, Field R, Cui Z. Limitations of resistance-in-series model for fouling analysis in membrane bioreactors: a cautionary note. Desalin Water Treat. 2009;8:31–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Yan JW, Xu DL, et al. Effect and mechanism of sludge retention time on menbrane fouling in a hybrid membrane bioreactor on the basis of extracellular polymeric substances analysis. Environ Eng. 2018;36(1):32–36.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Fu S, Du YJ. Study on pollutants removal performance of an innovative submerged hybrid membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. China Water Wastewater. 2007;23(5):10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Wang XC. Effect of bond extracellular polymeric substances on membrane fouling control property of a HMBR. Chin J Environ Eng. 2012;6(12):4395–4398.
   Google Scholar
• de la Torre T, Harff M, Lesjean B, et al. Characterisation of polysaccharide fouling of an ultrafiltration membrane using model solutions. Desalin Water Treat. 2009;8:17–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang ZW, Tang SJ, Zhu YF, et al. Fluorescent dissolved organic matter variations in a submerged membrane bioreactor under different sludge retention times, J. Membr Sci. 2010;355:151–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang S, Zhao Y, Liu C, et al. Effect of solution chemistry on the fouling potential of dissolved organic matter in membrane bioreactor systems, J. Membr Sci. 2008;310:503—511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura K, Naruse T, Watanabe Y. Changes in characteristics of soluble microbial products in membrane bioreactors associated with different solid retention times: relationto membrane fouling, J. Water Res. 2009;43:1033—1039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chabalina LD, Pastor MR, Rico DP. Characterization of soluble and bound EPS obtained from 2 submerged membrane bioreactor by 3D-EEM and HPSEC. Talanta. 2013;115:706–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janus T, Paul P, Ulanicki B. Modelling and simulation of short and long term membrane filtration experiments. Desalin Water Treat. 2009;8:37–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil DS, Kennedy Oubagaranadi JU, Chavan SM. Studies on the removal of manganese from synthetic wastewaters by nanofiltration—a parametric and modeling study. Desalin Water Treat. 2017;88:93–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger U, Le-Clech P, Stuetz RM, et al. Characterisation of polymeric fouling in membrane bioreactors and the effect of different filtration modes, J. Membr Sci. 2007;301:180–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang BK, Lee WN, Park PK, et al. Effect of membrane fouling reducer on cake structure and membrane permeability in membrane bioreactor. J Membr Sci. 2007;288:149–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang S, Liu C, Song L. Soluble microbial products in membrane bioreactor operation: behaviors, characteristics, and fouling potential. Water Res. 2007;41:95–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long TR, Luo TZ, Long XY, et al. Research on extraction of extra cellular polymeric substances from activated sludge by ultra sonic and cation resin. Water Wastewater Eng. 2008;34(5):34–37.
   Google Scholar
• Chang D, Tong PR, Gao ZY. Comparative study on sludge extracellular polymer and microorganism hydrophobic nature by A/O process. Ind Water Treat. 2014;34(2):62–64.
   Google Scholar
• Wu Q, Zhang Y, Zheng B, et al. Research on infiuence factors of membrane fouling in the A/O-MBR. J Anhui AgricSci. 2011;39(28):l7491—17493.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Liu Yon J, Liu Z, et al. Influence of poly aluminium chloride dosing time on formation and EPS of aerobic granular sludge. Chem Ind Eng Prog. 2015;1(34):278–284.
   Google Scholar
• Wang JC, Sun BS. Relationship between extracellular polymeric substance and soluble microbial products. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;31(11):18–20.
   Google Scholar
• Gao ZY, Tong PR, Xu TT. Comparative study on extracellular polymeric substances of sludge under two working conditions in the A/O process. J Xi’an Polytech Univ. 2014;28(4):464–468.
   Google Scholar
• Iatspidou CS, Rittmann BE. Non-steady state modeling of extracellular polymeric substances,soluble microbial products, and active and inert biomass. Water Res. 2004;38(1):255–266.
   Google Scholar
• Wang QZ, Fang ZD, Long XY. Effects of SRT and DO on composition and distribution of microbial metabolites. Urban Environ Urban Ecol. 2012;25(6):1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Kimura K, Yamato N, Yamamura H, et al. Membrane fouling in pilot-scale membrane bioreactors (MBRs) treating municipal wastewater. Environ Sci Technol. 2005;39(16):6293–6299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian J, Mathias EC, Cuia F, et al. Correlations of relevant membrane foulants with UF membrane fouling in different waters. Water Res. 2013;47:1218–1228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei FS, Bi T, Qi W Q, et al. Method for monitoring and analyzing water and wastewater. Beijing (China): China Environmental Science Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Lenore SC, Arnold EG, Andrew DE, et al. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater: including bottom sediments and sludges. New York: American Public Health Association; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Murthy SN, Novak JT. Effects of potassium ion on sludge settling, dewatering and effluent properties. Water Sci Technol. 1998;37(425):317–324.
   Google Scholar
• Wang XM, Liu Y, Hua ZH, et al. Effect of extracellular polymeric substances in SMBR on membrane filtration. Acta Sci Circumstantiae. 2005;25(12):1602–1607.
   Google Scholar
• Yu JY, Jiang Y, Wang SL. Biochemical experiment technology. Beijing (China): Chemical Industry Press; 2005. p. 137—138, 175—177, 243—244.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Wang XC. Membrane fouling control mechanism of a hybrid membrane bioreactor. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;35(7):12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Helmer C, Kunst S, Juretschko S, et al. Nitrogen loss in a nitrifying biofilm system. Water Sci Technol. 1999;39(7):13–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pochanna K, Kella J, Lant P. Model development for simultaneous nitrification and denitrification. Water Sci Technol. 1999;39(1):235–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali A, Khan SJ, Pillay L, et al. Optimization of filtration to relaxation mode using woven fiber microfiltration system for water and wastewater treatment. Desalin Water Treat. 2017;96:69–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornboonraksa T, Lee SH. Factors affecting the performance of membrane bioreactor for piggery wastewater treatment. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100:2926–2932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germain E, Stephenson T. Biomass characteristics, aeration and oxygen transfer in membrane bioreactors: their interrelations explained by a review of aerobic biological process. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol. 4:223–233.
   Google Scholar