References
- Allard, S. W., Rosen, D., & Tolman, R. M. (2003). Access to mental health and substance abuse services among women receiving welfare in Detroit. Urban Affairs Review, 38, 787–807. doi:10.1177/1078087403038006002
- Amundson, K., Zajicek, A. M., & Hunt, V. H. (2014). Pathologies of the poor: What do the war on drugs and welfare reform have in common. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 41, 5–28. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw/vol41/iss1/2
- Amundson, K., Zajicek, A. M., & Kerr, B. (2015). A social metamorphosis: Constructing drug addicts from the poor. Sociological Spectrum, 35, 442–464. doi:10.1080/02732173.2015.1064799
- Bjorklund, E., Davis, A. P., & Pfaffendorf, J. (2018). Urine or you’re out: Racialized economic threat and the determinants of welfare drug testing policy in the United States, 2009–2015. The Sociological Quarterly, 59, 407–423. doi:10.1080/00380253.2018.1479195
- Blank, R., & Ruggles, P. (1996). When do women use AFDC and food stamps? The dynamics of eligibility vs. participation. Journal of Human Resources, 24, 54–87. doi:10.2307/145933
- Bonett, D. G., & Price, R. M. (2015). Varying coefficient meta-analysis methods for odds ratios and risk ratios. Psychological Methods, 20, 394–406. doi:10.1037/met0000032
- Buchholz, S. W., Linton, D. M., Courtney, M. R., & Schoeny, M. E. (2016). Systematic reviews. In J. R. Bloch, M. R. Courtney, & M. L. Clark (Eds.), Practice-based clinical inquiry in nursing: Looking beyond traditional methods for PhD and DNP research (pp. 45–66). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
- Carey, C. A. (1998). Crafting a challenge to the practice of drug testing welfare recipients: Federal welfare reform and state response as the most recent chapter in the war on drugs. Buffalo Law Review, 46, 281–282.
- Carpenter, D. H. (2015). Constitutional analysis of suspicionless drug testing requirements for the receipt of governmental benefits. Retrieved from https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42326.pdf
- Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. (2017). 2016 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Methodological summary and definitions. Retrieved from https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/NSDUH-MethodSummDefs-2016/NSDUH-MethodSummDefs-2016.htm
- Center for Law and Social Policy. (2013). TANF policy brief: Random drug testing of TANF recipients is costly, ineffective and hurts families. Retrieved from https://www.clasp.org/sites/default/files/public/resources-and-publications/files/520.pdf
- Center for Law and Social Policy. (2014). A new year’s resolution: Stop the push for drug testing applicants of public benefits. Retrieved from https://www.clasp.org/blog/new-year%E2%80%99s-resolution-stop-push-drug-testing-applicants-public-benefits-0
- Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (2018). Policy basics: An introduction to TANF. Retrieved from https://www.cbpp.org/research/policy-basics-an-introduction-to-tanf
- Chen, H., Cohen, P., & Chen, S. (2010). How big is a big odds ratio? Interpreting the magnitudes of odds ratios in epidemiological studies. Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation, 39(4), 860–864. doi:10.1080/03610911003650383
- Cherlin, A. J., Bogen, K., Quane, J. M., & Burton, L. (2002). Operating within the rules: Welfare recipients’ experiences with sanctions and case closings. Social Service Review, 76, 387–405. doi:10.1086/341181
- Council on Social Work Education (2015). 2015 educational policy and accreditation standards. Retrieved from https://www.cswe.org/getattachment/Accreditation/Accreditation-Process/2015-EPAS/2015EPAS_Web_FINAL.pdf.aspx
- Covert, B., & Israel, J. (2017a). States spend millions to drug test the poor, turn up few positive results. https://thinkprogress.org/states-spend-millions-to-drug-test-the-poor-turn-up-few-positive-results-81f826a4afb7/
- Covert, B., & Israel, J. (2017b). What 7 states discovered after spending more than $1 million drug testing welfare recipients. Retrieved from https://thinkprogress.org/what-7-states-discovered-after-spending-more-than-1-million-drug-testing-welfare-recipients-c346e0b4305d/
- Crew, R. E., Jr, & Davis, B. C. (2003). Assessing the effects of substance abuse among applicants for TANF benefits: The outcome of a demonstration project in Florida. Journal of Health & Social Policy, 17, 39–53. doi:10.1300/J045v17n01_03
- Delva, J., Neumark, Y. D., Furr, C. D., & Anthony, J. C. (2000). Drug use among welfare recipients in the United States. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 26, 335–342.
- Floyd, I., Burnside, A., & Schott, L. (2018). TANF reaching few poor families. Retrieved from https://www.cbpp.org/research/family-income-support/tanf-reaching-few-poor-families
- Gomez, A. M., & Isreal, J. (2018). States waste hundreds of thousands on drug testing for welfare, but have little to show for it. Retrieved from https://thinkprogress.org/states-waste-hundreds-of-thousands-on-drug-testing-for-welfare-3d17c154cbe8/
- Grant, B. F., & Dawson, D. A. (1996). Alcohol and drug use, abuse, and dependence among welfare recipients. American Journal of Public Health, 86(10), 1450–1454.
- Gutman, M. A., Mckay, J., Ketterlinus, R. D., & McLellan, A. T. (2003). Potential barriers to work for substance-abusing women on welfare: Findings from the CASAWORKS for families pilot demonstration. Evaluation Review, 27, 681–706. doi:10.1177/0193841X03259030
- Hall, R. (2016a). Evidence mounts that drug testing for public assistance is costly and ineffective. Retrieved from https://www.clasp.org/blog/evidence-mounts-drug-testing-public-assistance-costly-and-ineffective
- Hall, R. (2016b). Drug testing and public assistance. Retrieved from https://www.clasp.org/sites/default/files/public/resources-and-publications/publication-1/2016.02.04-Drug-Testing-and-Public-Assistance-Brief-FINAL.pdf
- Hasenfeld, Y., Ghose, T., & Larson, K. (2004). The logic of sanctioning welfare recipients: An empirical assessment. Social Service Review, 78, 304–319. doi:10.1086/382771
- Jayakody, R., Danziger, S., & Pollack, H. (2000). Welfare reform, substance use, and mental health. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 25, 623–652.
- Joseph, R. (2018). The welfare/self-sufficiency gap among single mothers through theoretical lenses. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 28, 731–745. doi:10.1080/10911359.2018.1458678
- Joseph, R., Potocky, M., Girard, C., Stuart, P., & Thomlison, B. (2018). Concurrent participation in federally-funded welfare programs and empowerment toward economic self-sufficiency. Journal of Social Service Research. doi:10.1080/01488376.2018.1480558
- Lower-Basch, E., & Mohan, L. (2014). Drug testing of safety-net applicants stigmatizes poor families. Retrieved from https://www.clasp.org/blog/drug-testing-safety-net-applicants-stigmatizes-poor-families
- McLellan, A. T., Gutman, M., Lynch, K., McKay, J. R., Keterlinus, R., Morgenstern, J., & Woolis, D. (2003). One-year outcomes from the CASAWORKS for families intervention for substance-abusing women on welfare. Evaluation Review, 27, 656–680. doi:10.1177/0193841X03259029
- McNeece, C. A., & Thyer, B. A. (2004). Evidence-based practice and social work. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 1, 7–25. doi:10.1300/J394v01n01_02
- Metsch, L. R., McCoy, C. B., Miller, M., McAnany, H., & Pereyra, M. (1999). Moving substance-abusing women from welfare to work. Journal of Public Health Policy, 20, 36–55.
- Moffitt, R. (1983). An economic model of welfare stigma. The American Economic Review, 73, 1023–1035.
- Mohan, L. (2013). Few TANF applicants test positive for drug use; Testing is costly and ineffective. Retrieved from https://www.clasp.org/blog/few-tanf-applicants-test-positive-drug-use-testing-costly-and-ineffective
- Morgenstern, J., & Blanchard, K. A. (2006). Welfare reform and substance abuse treatment for welfare recipients. Alcohol Research and Health, 29, 63–67.
- Morgenstern, J., McCrady, B. S., Blanchard, K. A., McVeigh, K. H., Riordan, A., & Irwin, T. W. (2003). Barriers to employability among substance dependent and nonsubstance-affected women on federal welfare: Implications for program design. Journal of Studies of Alcohol, 64, 239–246. doi:10.15288/jsa.2003.64.239
- Nam, Y. (2005). The roles of employment barriers in welfare exits and reentries after welfare reform: Event history analyses. Social Service Review, 79, 268–293. doi:10.1086/428956
- National Association of Social Workers. (2017). Code of Ethics of the National Association of Social Workers. Washington, DC: NASW Press.
- National Association of Social Workers (2019). Evidence-based practice: NASW practice snapshot. Retrieved from https://www.socialworkers.org/News/Research-Data/Social-Work-Policy-Research/Evidence-Based-Practice
- National Conference of State Legislatures (2017). Drug testing for welfare recipients and public assistance. Retrieved from http://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/drug-testing-and-public-assistance.aspx
- National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (2002). Substance use among persons in families receiving government assistance. Retrieved from https://www.datafiles.samhsa.gov/study-publication/substance-use-among-persons-families-receiving-government-assistance-nid14027
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (n.d.). National Survey of Drug Use and Health: Trends in prevalence of various drugs for ages 12 or older, ages 12 to 17, ages 18 to 25, and ages 26 or older; 2015 – 2017. Retrieved from https://www.drugabuse.gov/national-survey-drug-use-health
- Olson, K. K., & Pavetti, L. (1996). Personal and family challenges to the successful transition from welfare to work. Retrieved from http://webarchive.urban.org/publications/406850.html
- Osteen, P., & Bright, C. (2010, January). Effect sizes and intervention research. Workshop delivered at 2010 Society for Social Work and Research (SSWR) Conference, San Francisco, CA.
- Palacio, V. (2017). Drug testing SNAP applicants is ineffective and perpetuates stereotypes. Retrieved from https://www.clasp.org/sites/default/files/publications/2017/08/Drug-testing-SNAP-Applicants-is-IneffectivePerpetuates-Stereotypes.pdf.
- Pollack, H., Khoshnood, K., & Altice, F. (1999). Health care delivery strategies for criminal offenders. Journal of Health Care Finance, 26, 63–77.
- Pollack, H. A., Danziger, S., Seefeldt, K. S., & Jayakody, R. (2002). Substance use among welfare recipients: Trends and policy responses. Social Service Review, 76, 256–274. doi:10.1086/339669
- Schmidt, L., Zabkiewicz, D., Jacobs, L., & Wiley, J. (2007). Substance abuse and employment among welfare mothers: From welfare to work and back again? Substance Use & Misuse, 42, 1069–1087. doi:10.1080/10826080701409644
- Schram, S. F., Soss, J., Fording, R. C., & Houser, L. (2009). Deciding to discipline: Race, choice, and punishment at the frontlines of welfare reform. American Sociological Review, 74, 398–422. doi:10.1177/000312240907400304
- Scott, R. (2011, June 5). Interview with CNN anchor Loutelious “T. J.” Holmes, Jr. on welfare drug tests. Available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2PGyr9XtJM
- Sico, C. B., & Pearson, C. L. (1994). Prevalence of alcoholism and drug abuse among female AFDC recipients. Health & Social Work, 19, 75–77. doi:10.1093/hsw/19.1.75
- Spencer, T. D., Detrich, R., & Slocum, T. A. (2012). Evidence-based practice: A framework for making effective decisions. Education and Treatment of Children, 35, 127–151. doi:10.1353/etc.2012.0013
- Stuber, J., & Kronebusch, K. (2004). Stigma and other determinants of participation in TANF and Medicaid. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23, 509–530. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6688
- Stuber, J., & Schlesinger, M. (2006). Sources of stigma for means-tested government programs. Social Science & Medicine 63(4), 933–945. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.01.012
- Thompson, D. (2019). Drug testing and public assistance. Retrieved from https://www.clasp.org/sites/default/files/publications/2019/02/2019_drug%20testing%20and%20public%20_0.pdf
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2011). Drug testing welfare recipients: Recent proposals and continuing controversies. Retrieved from http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/11/drugTesting/ib.shtml
- United Department of Health and Human Services (2019). TANF caseload data 2018. Retrieved from https://www.acf.hhs.gov/ofa/resource/tanf-caseload-data-2018
- United States Department of Health and Human Services (2004). Caseload data 1995. Retrieved from https://www.acf.hhs.gov/ofa/resource/caseload-data-afdc-1995-total
- Woodbury, M. G., & Kuhnke, J. L. (2014). Evidence-based practice vs. evidence-informed practice: What’s the difference? Wound Care Canada, 12(1), 26–29.
- Wu, C. F., Cancian, M., Meyer, D. R., & Wallace, G. L. (2006). How do welfare sanctions work? Social Work Research, 30, 33–50. doi:10.1093/swr/30.1.33
- Wu, C. F., Cancian, M., & Wallace, G. (2014). The effect of welfare sanctions on TANF exits and employment. Children and Youth Services Review, 36, 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.10.022
- Wurman, I. (2013). Drug testing welfare recipients as a constitutional condition. Stanford Law Review, 65, 1153–1193.
- Yacoubian, G. S., Jr, Peters, R. J., Jr, Urbach, B. J., & Johnson, R. J. (2002). Comparing drug use between welfare-receiving arrestees and non-welfare-receiving arrestees. Journal of Drug Education, 32, 139–147. doi:10.2190/J9P8-2MP4-6CU7-P004
- Yacoubian, G. S., Jr, & Urbach, B. J. (2002). A comparison of drug use between welfare-receiving arrestees and non-welfare-receiving arrestees. Health & Social Work, 27, 230–333. doi:10.1093/hsw/27.3.230