Cultural Adaptation of Interventions and the a Priori Assessment of Intervention Fit: Exploring Measurement Invariance for American and Swedish Youth Leaving Care

References

• Andreassen, T. W., Lorentzen, B. G., & Olsson, U. H. (2006). The impact of non-normality and estimation methods in SEM on satisfaction research in marketing. Quality and Quantity, 40(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-4510-y
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, A. A., Powell, B. J., Kohl, P. L., Tabak, R. G., Penalba, V., Proctor, E. E., Domenech-Rodriguez, M. M., & Cabassa, L. J. (2015). Cultural adaptation and implementation of evidence-Based parent-training: A systematic review and critique of guiding evidence. Child and Youth Services Review, 1(53), 113–120. https://.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.03.025
   Google Scholar
• Bergström, M., Cederblad, M., Håkansson, K., Jonsson, A. K., Munthe, C., Vinnerljung, B., Wirtberg, I., Östlund, P., & Sundell, K. (2020). Interventions in foster family care: A systematic review. Research on Social Work Practice, 30(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731519832101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betz, N. E., Klein, K. L., & Taylor, K. M. (1996). Evaluation of a short form of the career decision-making self-efficacy scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 4(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/106907279600400103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakeslee, J. E., Powers, L. E., Schmidt, J., Nelson, M., Fullerton, A., George, K., McHugh, E., Bryant, M., & Geenen, S., the Research Consortium to Increase the Success of Youth in Foster Care. (2020). Evaluating the my life self-determination model for older youth in foster care: Establishing efficacy and exploring moderation of response to intervention. Children and Youth Services Review, 119 105419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boer, D., Hanke, K., & He, J. (2018). On detecting systematic measurement error in cross-cultural research: A review and critical reflection on equivalence and invariance tests. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(5), 713–734. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022117749042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornman, J., Sevcik, R. A., Romski, M., & Pae, H. K. (2010). Successfully translating language and culture when adapting assessment measures. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 7(2), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-1130.2010.00254.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2016). Adaptation of assessment scales in cross-national research: Issues, guidelines, and caveats. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, 5(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/ipp0000042
   Google Scholar
• Castro, F. G., Barrera, M., Jr., & Martinez, C. R., Jr. (2006). The cultural adaptation of prevention interventions: Resolving tensions between fidelity and fit. Prevention Science, 5(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PREV.0000013980.12412.cd
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F. F. (2008). What happens if we compare chopsticks with forks? The impact of making inappropriate comparisons in cross-cultural research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1005. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrer-Wreder, L., Sundell, K., & Manssory, S. (2012). Tinkering with perfection: Theory development in the intervention cultural adaptation field. Child Youth Care Forum, 41(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-011-9162-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 269–314). Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Furukawa, E., Tangney, J., & Higashibara, F. (2012). Cross-cultural continuities and discontinuities in shame, guilt, and pride: A study of children residing in Japan, Korea and the USA. Self and Identity, 11(1), 90–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2010.512748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore, R. O., Kennedy, J. L., & Adolph, K. E. (2018). Practical solutions for sharing data and materials from psychological research. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917746500
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jovanovic, V., Cummins, R. A., Weinberg, M., Kaliterna, L., & Prizmic-Larsen, Z. (2019). Personal wellbeing index: A cross-cultural measurement invariance study across four countries. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(3), 759–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-9966-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, K. (2019). More robust standard error and confidence interval for SEM parameters given incorrect model and nonnormal data. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 26(2), 260–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1505522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. Guilford press.
   Google Scholar
• Millsap, R. E. (2012). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance (1st) ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203821961
   Google Scholar
• Millsap, R. E., & Kwok, O. M. (2004). Evaluating the impact of partial factorial invariance on selection in two populations. Psychological Methods, 9(1), 93. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.1.93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, T. M., Blakeslee, J., Bergström, M., & Skoog, T. (2020). Exploring fit for the cultural adaptation of a self-determination model for youth transitioning from out-of-home care: A comparison of a sample of Swedish youth with two samples of American youth in out-of-home care. Children and Youth Services Review, 119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105484
   Google Scholar
• Powell, D. A., & Schafer, W. D. (2001). The robustness of the likelihood ratio chi-square test for structural equation models: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26(1), 105–132. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986026001105
   Google Scholar
• Powers, L. E., Turner, A., Westwood, D., Matiuszewski, J., Wilson, R., & Phillips, A. (2001). TAKE CHARGE for the future: A controlled field-test of a model to promote student involvement in transition planning. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 24(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/088572880102400107
   Google Scholar
• Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria:R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Laird, P. E., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 354–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, D., Song, H., & Lewis, M. D. (2019). The impact of partial factorial invariance on cross-group comparisons. Assessment, 26(7), 1217–1233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117711020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundell, K., Beelman, A., Hasson, H., & von Thiele Schwartz, U. (2016). Novel programs, international adoptions, or contextual adaptations? Meta-analytical results from German and Swedish intervention research. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 45(6), 784–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2015.1020540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Thiele Schwarz, U., Aarons, G. A., & Hasson, H. (2019). The value equation: Three complementary propositions for reconciling fidelity and adaptation in evidence-based practice implementation. BMC Health Services Research, 19(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4668-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagnild, G. M., & Young, H. M. (1993). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Resilience Scale. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 1, 165–178. PMID: 7850498.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wehmeyer, M. L., & Palmer, S. B. (2003). Adult outcomes for students with cognitive disabilities three years after high school: The impact of self-determination. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38(2), 131–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, M., & Lai, M. H. (2018). Testing factorial invariance with unbalanced samples. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25(2), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1387859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar