1,673
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Short Communication

Comparison of the 3D triple-scan protocol and the impression replica technique for 3-unit tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses

ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 32-34 | Received 07 Feb 2019, Accepted 10 Oct 2019, Published online: 30 Oct 2019

References

  • Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, et al. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;62(4):405–408.
  • Holst S, Karl M, Wichmann M, et al. A new triple-scan protocol for 3D fit assessment of dental restorations. Quintessence Int. 2011;42(8):651–657.
  • Svanborg P, Skjerven H, Carlsson P, et al. Marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses generated from digital and conventional impressions. Int Dent J. 2014;2014:534382.
  • Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E, et al. Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005;113(2):174–179.
  • Segerstrom S, Wiking-Lima de Faria J, Braian M, et al. A validation study of the impression replica technique. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(2):e609–e16.
  • Falk A, von Steyern P, Fransson H, et al. Reliability of the impression replica technique. Int J Prosthodont. 2015;28(2):179–180.
  • Fransson B, Oilo G, Gjeitanger R. The fit of metal-ceramic crowns, a clinical study. Dent Mater. 1985;1(5):197–199.
  • Dahl BE, Ronold HJ, Dahl JE. Internal fit of single crowns produced by CAD-CAM and lost-wax metal casting technique assessed by the triple-scan protocol. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(3):400–404.