A systematic review on the accuracy of zirconia crowns and fixed dental prostheses

References

• McLean JW. Polycarboxylate cements. Five years’ experience in general practice. Br Dent J. 1972;132(1):9–15.
   Google Scholar
• Felton DA, Kanoy BE, Bayne SC, et al. Effect of in vivo crown margin discrepancies on periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;65(3):357–364.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca JC, Henriques GE, Sobrinho LC, et al. Stress-relieving and porcelain firing cycle influence on marginal fit of commercially pure titanium and titanium-aluminum-vanadium copings. Dent Mater. 2003;19(7):686–691.
   Google Scholar
• Han HS, Yang HS, Lim HP, et al. Marginal accuracy and internal fit of machine-milled and cast titanium crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;106(3):191–197.
   Google Scholar
• McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J. 1971;131(3):107–111.
   Google Scholar
• Fransson B, Øilo G, Gjeitanger R. The fit of metal-ceramic crowns, a clinical study. Dent Mater. 1985;1(5):197–199.
   Google Scholar
• Borba M, Cesar PF, Griggs JA, et al. Adaptation of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Dent Mater. 2011;27(11):1119–1126.
   Google Scholar
• Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E, et al. Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005;113(2):174–179.
   Google Scholar
• Keul C, Stawarczyk B, Erdelt KJ, et al. Fit of 4-unit FDPs made of zirconia and CoCr-alloy after chairside and labside digitalization–a laboratory study. Dent Mater. 2014;30(4):400–407.
   Google Scholar
• Quante K, Ludwig K, Kern M. Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology. Dent Mater. 2008;24(10):1311–1315.
   Google Scholar
• Huang Z, Zhang L, Zhu J, et al. Clinical marginal and internal fit of metal ceramic crowns fabricated with a selective laser melting technology. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;113(6):623–627.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, et al. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;62(4):405–408.
   Google Scholar
• Colpani JT, Borba M, Della Bona A. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of ceramic crown copings. Dent Mater. 2013;29(2):174–180.
   Google Scholar
• Beuer F, Aggstaller H, Richter J, et al. Influence of preparation angle on marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated zirconia crown copings. Quintessence Int. 2009;40(3):243–250.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen JA. A standardized method for determination of crown margin fidelity. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;64(1):18–24.
   Google Scholar
• Örtorp A, Jönsson D, Mouhsen A, et al. The fit of cobalt-chromium three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated with four different techniques: a comparative in vitro study. Dent Mater. 2011;27(4):356–363.
   Google Scholar
• Groten M, Axmann D, Pröbster L, et al. Determination of the minimum number of marginal gap measurements required for practical in vitro testing. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83(1):40–49.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar MK, Chikmagalur SB, Pasha F. Marginal fit and microleakage of cast and metal laser sintered copings–an in vitro study. J Prosthodont Res. 2014;58(4):252–258.
   Google Scholar
• Falk A, von Steyern P, Fransson H, et al. Reliability of the impression replica technique. Int J Prosthodont. 2015;28(2):179–180.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura K, Mouhat M, Nergård JM, et al. Effect of cements on fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia crowns. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2016;2(1):12–19.
   Google Scholar
• Holst S, Karl M, Wichmann M, et al. A new triple-scan protocol for 3D fit assessment of dental restorations. Quintessence Int. 2011;42(8):651–657.
   Google Scholar
• Boitelle P, Mawussi B, Tapie L, et al. A systematic review of CAD/CAM fit restoration evaluations. J Oral Rehabil. 2014;41(11):853–874.
   Google Scholar
• Rödiger M, Schneider L, Rinke S. Influence of material selection on the marginal accuracy of CAD/CAM-fabricated metal- and all-ceramic single crown copings. BioMed Res Int. 2018;2018:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Cetik S, Bahrami B, Fossoyeux I, et al. Adaptation of zirconia crowns created by conventional versus optical impression: in vitro study. J Adv Prosthodont. 2017;9(3):208–216.
   Google Scholar
• Kocaağaoğlu H, Kilinç HI, Albayrak H. Effect of digital impressions and production protocols on the adaptation of zirconia copings. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(1):102–108.
   Google Scholar
• Pedroche LO, Bernardes SR, Leão MP, et al. Marginal and internal fit of zirconia copings obtained using different digital scanning methods. Braz Oral Res. 2016;30(1):e113.
   Google Scholar
• Almeida e Silva JS, Erdelt K, Edelhoff D, et al. Marginal and internal fit of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses based on digital and conventional impression techniques. Clin Oral Invest. 2014;18(2):515–523.
   Google Scholar
• Ueda K, Beuer F, Stimmelmayr M, et al. Fit of 4-unit FDPs from CoCr and zirconia after conventional and digital impressions. Clin Oral Invest. 2016;20(2):283–289.
   Google Scholar
• Su TS, Sun J. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses made with either a conventional or digital impression. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116(3):362–367.
   Google Scholar
• Haddadi Y, Bahrami G, Isidor F. Accuracy of crowns based on digital intraoral scanning compared to conventional impression-a split-mouth randomised clinical study. Clin Oral Invest. 2019;23(11):4043–4050.
   Google Scholar
• Nedelcu R, Olsson P, Nyström I, et al. Accuracy and precision of 3 intraoral scanners and accuracy of conventional impressions: a novel in vivo analysis method. J Dent. 2018;69:110–118.
   Google Scholar
• Svanborg P, Skjerven H, Carlsson P, et al. Marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses generated from digital and conventional impressions. Int Dent J. 2014;2014:534382.
   Google Scholar
• Nawafleh NA, Mack F, Evans J, et al. Accuracy and reliability of methods to measure marginal adaptation of crowns and FDPs: a literature review. J Prosthodont. 2013;22(5):419–428.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch C, Ender A, Attin T, et al. Trueness of four different milling procedures used in dental CAD/CAM systems. Clin Oral Invest. 2017;21(2):551–558.
   Google Scholar
• Wettstein F, Sailer I, Roos M, et al. Clinical study of the internal gaps of zirconia and metal frameworks for fixed partial dentures. Eur J Oral Sci. 2008;116(3):272–279.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl BE, Rønold HJ, Dahl JE. Internal fit of single crowns produced by CAD-CAM and lost-wax metal casting technique assessed by the triple-scan protocol. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(3):400–404.
   Google Scholar
• Benic GI, Sailer I, Zeltner M, et al. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Part III: marginal and internal fit. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(3):426–431.
   Google Scholar
• Segerström S, Wiking-Lima de Faria J, Braian M, et al. A validation study of the impression replica technique. J Prosthodont. 2019; 28(2):e609–e616.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn K, Ostertag S, Ostertag M, et al. Comparison of an analog and digital quantitative and qualitative analysis for the fit of dental copings. Comput Biol Med. 2015;57:32–41.
   Google Scholar
• Boitelle P, Tapie L, Mawussi B, et al. Evaluation of the marginal fit of CAD-CAM zirconia copings: comparison of 2D and 3D measurement methods. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(1):75–81.
   Google Scholar
• Svanborg P, Andersson M, Reinedahl T, et al. Comparison of the 3D triple-scan protocol and the impression replica technique for 3-unit tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses. Biomater Investig Dent. 2019;6(1):32–34.
   Google Scholar
• Kohorst P, Junghanns J, Dittmer MP, et al. Different CAD/CAM-processing routes for zirconia restorations: influence on fitting accuracy. Clin Oral Invest. 2011;15(4):527–536.
   Google Scholar
• Cunali RS, Saab RC, Correr GM, et al. Marginal and internal adaptation of zirconia crowns: a comparative study of assessment methods. Braz Dent J. 2017;28(4):467–473.
   Google Scholar
• Miura S, Inagaki R, Kasahara S, et al. Fit of zirconia all-ceramic crowns with different cervical margin designs, before and after porcelain firing and glazing. Dent Mater J. 2014;33(4):484–489.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson N, K S J, Sunny K. Marginal accuracy and internal fit of dental copings fabricated by modern additive and subtractive digital technologies. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2017;25(1):20–25.
   Google Scholar
• Lee JY, Choi SJ, Kim MS, et al. Effect of span length on the fit of zirconia framework fabricated using CAD/CAM system. J Adv Prosthodont. 2013;5(2):118–125.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl BE, Dahl JE, Rønold HJ. Internal fit of three-unit fixed dental prostheses produced by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing and the lost-wax metal casting technique assessed using the triple-scan protocol. Eur J Oral Sci. 2018;126(1):66–73.
   Google Scholar
• Memarian M, Sadighpour L, Nosratpour R, et al. Marginal adaptation and internal fit of posterior 3-unit zirconia FPDs fabricated with different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2017;25(2):79–85.
   Google Scholar