A comparative evaluation of resin- and varnish-based surface protective agents on glass ionomer cement – a spectrophotometric analysis

References

• Gurgan S, Kutuk ZB, Ergin E, et al. Four-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance of a glass ionomer restorative system. Oper Dent. 2015;40(2):134–143.
   Google Scholar
• Ninawe N, Nayak UA, Nagar P, et al. A comparative evaluation of microleakage of glass ionomer restoration with different surface protectors-an in-vitro study. Dental J Adv Studies. 2014;2(2):105–108.
   Google Scholar
• Khoroushi M, Keshani F. A review of glass-ionomers: from conventional glass-ionomer to bioactive glass-ionomer. Dent Res J. 2013;10(4):411–420.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson JW. Chemistry of glass-ionomer cements: a review. Biomaterials. 1998;19(6):485–494.
   Google Scholar
• Sidhu SK, Nicholson JW. A review of glass-ionomer cements for clinical dentistry. J Funct Biomater. 2016;7(3):16.
   Google Scholar
• Hankins AD, Hatch RH, Benson JH, et al. The effect of a nanofilled resin-based coating on water absorption by teeth restored with glass ionomer. J Am Dent Assoc. 2014;145(4):363–370.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson RT. Protection of glass ionomer cements during the setting reaction. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;73(4):400–401.
   Google Scholar
• Gemalmaz D, Yoruc B, Ozcan M, et al. Effect of early water contact on solubility of glass ionomer luting cements. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80(4):474–478.
   Google Scholar
• Sukumaran VG, Mensudar R. To evaluate the effect of surface coating on three different types glass ionomer restorations. Biomed Pharmacol J. 2015;8:445–449.
   Google Scholar
• Earl MS, Mount GJ, Humet WR. The effect of varnishes and other surface treatments on water movement across the glass ionomer cement surface. II. Aust Dent J. 1989;34(4):326–329.
   Google Scholar
• Williams JA, Billington RW, Pearson GJ. Effect of moisture protective coatings on the strength of a modern metal‐reinforced glass-ionomer cement. J Oral Rehabil. 1998;25(7):535–540.
   Google Scholar
• Gorseta K, Glavina D, Skrinjaric T, et al. The effect of petroleum jelly, light-cured varnish and different storage media on the flexural strength of glass ionomer dental cements. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2016;2(1):55–59.
   Google Scholar
• Serra MC, Navarro MF, Freitas SF, et al. Glass ionomer cement surface protection. Am J Dent. 1994;7(4):203–206.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher RA. Statistical methods for research workers. 13th ed. New York (NY): Hafner Publishing Co.; 1958. p. 356.
   Google Scholar
• Tukey JW. The philosophy of multiple comparisons. Statist Sci. 1991;1:100–116.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas WH, Zakariasen KL. Volumetric assessment of apical leakage utilizing a spectrophotometric, dye-recovery method. J Dent Res. 1981;60:438–438.
   Google Scholar
• França FM, Aguiar FH, Santos AJ, et al. Quantitative evaluation of microleakage in class V cavities using one-bottle and self-etching adhesive systems. Braz Oral Res. 2004;18(3):253–259.
   Google Scholar
• Bunkall PR. Applications of spectrophotometric measurement in dyeing and finishing. J Soc Dyers Colour. 2008;81(5):201–205.
   Google Scholar
• Karaoglanoglu S, Akgül N, Özdabak HN, et al. Effectiveness of surface protection for glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomer and polyacid-modified composite resins. Dent Mater J. 2009;28(1):96–101.
   Google Scholar
• Fatima N, Ali SA, Qazi FU, et al. Effectiveness of commonly available surface protecting agents in maintaining microhardness of two cements. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2013;23(5):315–318.
   Google Scholar
• Booth SE, Deacon AD, Coleman NJ. Properties of glass-ionomer cements sealed with petroleum jelly or wax. World Acad Sci Eng Technol. 2012;6:958–961.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson JW, Czarnecka B. Kinetic studies of the effect of varnish on water loss by glass–ionomer cements. Dent Mater J. 2007;23(12):1549–1552.
   Google Scholar
• Hepdeniz OK, Temel UB, Ugurlu M, et al. The effect of surface sealants with different filler content on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations. Eur J Dent. 2016;10:163–169.
   Google Scholar
• Leirskar J, Nordbø H, Mount GJ, et al. The influence of resin coating on the shear punch strength of a high strength auto-cure glass ionomer. Dent Mater J. 2003;19(2):87–91.
   Google Scholar
• Bagheri R, Taha NA, Azar MR, et al. Effect of G‐Coat Plus on the mechanical properties of glass‐ionomer cements. Aust Dent J. 2013;58(4):448–453.
   Google Scholar
• Shimada Y, Yamamoto K, Fukushima S, et al. Evaluation of wear resistance of coating materials on GI restorative. Dent Mater J. 2015;31:24–25.
   Google Scholar
• Borzabadi-Farahani A, Lynch E. Influence of thermo-light curing with dental light-curing units on the microhardness of glass-ionomer cements. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2016;36:425–430.
   Google Scholar
• Pedrini D, Candido MSM, Rodrigues AL. Analysis of surface roughness of glass–ionomer cements and compomer. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30(7):714–719.
   Google Scholar
• Sangappa VM, Kumar ND, Shivanna V. A spectrophotometric evaluation of effectiveness of surface protection for resin modified glass ionomer cement an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2005;8(2):15.
   Google Scholar