A systematic review on the accuracy of manufacturing techniques for cobalt chromium fixed dental prostheses

References

• McLean JW. Polycarboxylate cements. Five years' experience in general practice. Br Dent J. 1972;132(1):9–15.
   Google Scholar
• Kane LM, Chronaios D, Sierraalta M, et al. Marginal and internal adaptation of milled cobalt-chromium copings. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114(5):680–685.
   Google Scholar
• Ishikiriama A, de Freitas Oliveira J, Vieira DF, et al. Influence of some factors on the fit of cemented crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1981;45(4):400–404.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen KD. Factors affecting the film thickness of zinc phosphate cements. Acta Odontol Scand. 1960;18(4):479–490.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca JC, Henriques GE, Sobrinho LC, et al. Stress-relieving and porcelain firing cycle influence on marginal fit of commercially pure titanium and titanium-aluminum-vanadium copings. Dent Mater. 2003;19(7):686–691.
   Google Scholar
• Han HS, Yang HS, Lim HP, et al. Marginal accuracy and internal fit of machine-milled and cast titanium crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;106(3):191–197.
   Google Scholar
• McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J. 1971;131(3):107–111.
   Google Scholar
• Fransson B, Oilo G, Gjeitanger R. The fit of metal-ceramic crowns, a clinical study. Dent Mater. 1985;1(5):197–199.
   Google Scholar
• Colpani JT, Borba M, Della Bona A. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of ceramic crown copings. Dent Mater. 2013;29(2):174–180.
   Google Scholar
• Beuer F, Aggstaller H, Richter J, et al. Influence of preparation angle on marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated zirconia crown copings. Quintessence Int. 2009;40(3):243–250.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen JA. A standardized method for determination of crown margin fidelity. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;64(1):18–24.
   Google Scholar
• Groten M, Axmann D, Probster L, et al. Determination of the minimum number of marginal gap measurements required for practical in-vitro testing. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83(1):40–49.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar MK, Chikmagalur SB, Pasha F. Marginal fit and microleakage of cast and metal laser sintered copings–an in vitro study. J Prosthodont Res. 2014;58(4):252–258.
   Google Scholar
• Falk A, von Steyern P, Fransson H, et al. Reliability of the impression replica technique. Int J Prosthodont. 2015;28(2):179–180.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura K, Mouhat M, Nergård JM, et al. Effect of cements on fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia crowns. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2016;2(1):12–19.
   Google Scholar
• Holst S, Karl M, Wichmann M, et al. A new triple-scan protocol for 3D fit assessment of dental restorations. Quintessence Int. 2011;42(8):651–657.
   Google Scholar
• Ender A, Mehl A. Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions–an in-vitro study. Int J Comput Dent. 2011;14(1):11–21.
   Google Scholar
• Atkins T, Escudier M. Precision. A dictionary of mechanical engineering. 2013 Online, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moher D, The PRISMA Group, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, et al. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;62(4):405–408.
   Google Scholar
• Bajoghli F, Nosouhian S, Badrian H, et al. Effect of base metal alloys recasting on marginal integrity of castable crowns. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013;14(2):255–258.
   Google Scholar
• Uriciuc WA. Research about Precision Casting of Removable-Fixed Ensemble Applied in Dental Prosthodontics. IFMBE Proceedings. 2009: 26:379–382.
   Google Scholar
• Rammelsberg P, Pospiech P, Gernet W. Clinical performance of adhesive fixed partial dentures with CoCr- and titanium-framework. J Dent Res. 1998;77:924.
   Google Scholar
• Hansson O. Casting accuracy of a nickel and beryllium-free cobalt-chromium alloy for crown and bridge prostheses and etched-metal bridges. Swed Dent J. 1984;8(6):297.
   Google Scholar
• Shen C. Dental casting alloys and metal joining. In: Anusavice KJS, Rawls HR, editor. Phillips´ science of dental materials. 12. St. Louis: Saunders; 2013. p. 387.
   Google Scholar
• Nawafleh NA, Mack F, Evans J, et al. Accuracy and reliability of methods to measure marginal adaptation of crowns and FDPs: a literature review. J Prosthodont. 2013;22(5):419–428.
   Google Scholar
• Ishida Y, Miyasaka T. Dimensional accuracy of dental casting patterns created by 3D printers. Dent Mater J. 2016;35(2):250–256.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch C, Ender A, Attin T, et al. Trueness of four different milling procedures used in dental CAD/CAM systems. Clin Oral Invest. 2017;21(2):551–558.
   Google Scholar
• Svanborg P, Eliasson A, Stenport V. Additively manufactured titanium and cobalt-chromium implant frameworks: fit and effect of ceramic veneering. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33(3):590–596.
   Google Scholar
• Akcin ET, Guncu MB, Aktas G, et al. Effect of manufacturing techniques on the marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium implant-supported multiunit frameworks. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;120(5):715–720.
   Google Scholar
• Papadiochou S, Pissiotis AL. Marginal adaptation and CAD-CAM technology: a systematic review of restorative material and fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(4):545–551.
   Google Scholar
• Haddadi Y, Bahrami G, Isidor F. Accuracy of crowns based on digital intraoral scanning compared to conventional impression-a split-mouth randomised clinical study. Clin Oral Invest. 2019;23(11):4043–4050.
   Google Scholar
• Malik J, Rodriguez J, Weisbloom M, et al. Comparison of accuracy between a conventional and two digital intraoral impression techniques. Int J Prosthodont. 2018;31(2):107–113.
   Google Scholar
• Nedelcu RG, Persson AS. Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(6):1461–1471.
   Google Scholar
• Nedelcu R, Olsson P, Nystrom I, et al. Accuracy and precision of 3 intraoral scanners and accuracy of conventional impressions: a novel in vivo analysis method. J Dent. 2018;69:110–118.
   Google Scholar
• Ates SM, Duymus ZY. Inluence of tooth preparation design on filling accuracy o CAD-CAM based restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2016;28(4):238–246.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl BE, Ronold HJ, Dahl JE. Internal fit of single crowns produced by CAD-CAM and lost-wax metal casting technique assessed by the triple-scan protocol. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(3):400–404.
   Google Scholar
• Gunsoy S, Ulusoy M. Evaluation of marginal/internal fit of chrome-cobalt crowns: Direct laser metal sintering versus computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing. Niger J Clin Pract. 2016;19(5):636–644.
   Google Scholar
• Harish V, Mohammed Ali SA, Jagasedan N, et al. Evaluation of internal and marginal fit of two metal ceramic system - in vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(12):Zc53–6.
   Google Scholar
• Huang Z, Zhang L, Zhu J, et al. Clinical marginal and internal fit of metal ceramic crowns fabricated with a selective laser melting technology. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;113(6):623–627.
   Google Scholar
• Kim DY, Kim CM, Kim JH, et al. Evaluation of marginal and internal gaps of Ni-Cr and Co-Cr alloy copings manufactured by microstereolithography. J Adv Prosthodont. 2017;9(3):176–181.
   Google Scholar
• Kim KB, Kim WC, Kim HY, et al. An evaluation of marginal fit of three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated by direct metal laser sintering system. Dent Mater. 2013;29(7):e91–6.
   Google Scholar
• Kocaagaoglu H, Kilinc HI, Albayrak H, et al. In vitro evaluation of marginal, axial, and occlusal discrepancies in metal ceramic restorations produced with new technologies. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116(3):368–374.
   Google Scholar
• Lovgren N, Roxner R, Klemendz S, et al. Effect of production method on surface roughness, marginal and internal fit, and retention of cobalt-chromium single crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;118(1):95–101.
   Google Scholar
• Park JK, Kim HY, Kim WC, et al. Evaluation of the fit of metal ceramic restorations fabricated with a pre-sintered soft alloy. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116(6):909–915.
   Google Scholar
• Park JK, Lee WS, Kim HY, et al. Accuracy evaluation of metal copings fabricated by computer-aided milling and direct metal laser sintering systems. J Adv Prosthodont. 2015;7(2):122–128.
   Google Scholar
• Keul C, Stawarczyk B, Erdelt KJ, et al. Fit of 4-unit FDPs made of zirconia and CoCr-alloy after chairside and labside digitalization–a laboratory study. Dent Mater. 2014;30(4):400–407.
   Google Scholar
• Kim KB, Kim JH, Kim WC, et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of gaps associated with fixed dental prostheses fabricated with new technologies. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(6):1432–1436.
   Google Scholar
• Nesse H, Ulstein DM, Vaage MM, et al. Internal and marginal fit of cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses fabricated with 3 different techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114(5):686–692.
   Google Scholar
• Svanborg P, Skjerven H, Carlsson P, et al. Marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses generated from digital and conventional impressions. Int J Dent. 2014;2014:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Ueda K, Beuer F, Stimmelmayr M, et al. Fit of 4-unit FDPs from CoCr and zirconia after conventional and digital impressions. Clin Oral Invest. 2016;20(2):283–289.
   Google Scholar
• Örtorp A, Jonsson D, Mouhsen A, et al. The fit of cobalt-chromium three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated with four different techniques: a comparative in vitro study. Dental Materials. 2011;27(4):356–363.
   Google Scholar