Discrepancy in alloy composition of imported and non-imported porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) crowns produced by Norwegian dental laboratories

References

• Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health Rapid Response Reports. Porcelain-Fused-to-Metal Crowns versus All-Ceramic Crowns: A Review of the Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness, Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health Ottawa 2015. [cited 2019 May]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0078477/.
   Google Scholar
• Balint A, Traistaru M, Tanase G, et al. Implications of palladium with regards to high noble and noble alloys’ metallurgy. Metal Int. 2012;17:38–42.
   Google Scholar
• Gjerdet NR. Importprotetikk–hva gjelder. ? Aktuel Nordisk Odontologi. 2012;37:167–176.
   Google Scholar
• Waddell JN, Girvan L, Aarts JM, et al. Elemental composition of imported porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns–a pilot study. N Z Dent J. 2010;106:50–54.
   Google Scholar
• Kaldestad AN, Toklum TF. Thesis: Use of imported prosthodontic service in Norway, University of Bergen The University of Bergen, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Syverud M, Austrheim EK. Import av tanntekniske arbeid. Nor Tannlegeforen Tid. 2012;122:598–599.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Medical Products Agency, Tandtekniska arbeten (Granskning av metallkeramikkronor framställda i Sverige och utanför EU, Läkemedelsverket; 2011. [cited 2019 May]. Available from: https://lakemedelsverket.se/upload/nyheter/2011/Tandtekniska-arbeten-slutrapport-2011-2002-2015.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ekblom K, Smedberg JI, Moberg LE. Clinical evaluation of fixed partial dentures made in Sweden and China. Swedish Dental J. 2011;35(3):111–122.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 22674: 2006 Dentistry – Metallic materials for fixed and removable restorations and appliances. 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Anusavice KJ. Standardizing failure, success, and survival decisions in clinical studies of ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses. Dent Mater. 2012;28(1):102–111.
   Google Scholar
• Anusavice K, Kakar K, Ferree N. Which mechanical and physical testing methods are relevant for predicting the clinical performance of ceramic‐based dental prostheses? Clin Oral Implan Res. 2007;18:218–231.
   Google Scholar
• Henriques B, Gasik M, Soares D, et al. Experimental evaluation of the bond strength between a CoCrMo dental alloy and porcelain through a composite metal-ceramic graded transition interlayer. J Mech Behav Biomed. 2012;13:206–214.
   Google Scholar
• Vilaplans J, Romaguera C, Grimalt F. Occupational and non‐occupational allergic contact dermatitis from beryllium. Contact Dermatitis. 1992;26(5):295–298.
   Google Scholar
• López-Alías JF, Martinez-Gomis J, Anglada JM, et al. Ion release from dental casting alloys as assessed by a continuous flow system: Nutritional and toxicological implications. Dent Mater. 2006;22:832–837.
   Google Scholar
• Munksgaard EC. Toxicology versus allergy in restorative dentistry. Adv Dent Res. 1992;6(1):17–21.
   Google Scholar
• Scharf B, Clement CC, Zolla V, et al. Molecular analysis of chromium and cobalt-related toxicity. Sci Rep. 2015;4(1):5729.
   Google Scholar
• ANSI/ADA. “Metal-Ceramic Dental Restorative Systems” (ANSI/ADA Specification No. 38). 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Wang H, Feng Q, Li N, et al. Evaluation of metal-ceramic bond characteristics of three dental Co-Cr alloys prepared with different fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116(6):916–923.
   Google Scholar
• Bilgin MS, Erdem A, Dilber E, et al. Ersoy, I. Comparison of fracture resistance between cast, CAD/CAM milling, and direct metal laser sintering metal post systems. J Prosthodont Res. 2016;60(1):23–28.
   Google Scholar
• Al Jabbari YS, Koutsoukis T, Barmpagadaki X, et al. Metallurgical and interfacial characterization of PFM Co-Cr dental alloys fabricated via casting, milling or selective laser melting. Dent Mater. 2014;30(4):e79–88.
   Google Scholar
• Herø H, Bergman B, Grimsdottir M, et al. Metaller i munnen-holdbart og trygt? Swe Dent J. 1999;103:148–154.
   Google Scholar
• Xin XZ, Xiang N, Chen J, et al. In vitro biocompatibility of Co-Cr alloy fabricated by selective laser melting or traditional casting techniques. Mater Lett. 2012;88:101–103.
   Google Scholar
• Kilner T, Pilliar RM, Weatherly GC, et al. Phase identification and incipient melting in a cast Co–Cr surgical implant alloy. J Biomed Mater Res. 1982;16(1):63–79.
   Google Scholar
• Hanawa T, Hiromoto S, Asami K. Characterization of the surface oxide film of a Co-Cr-Mo alloy after being located in quasi-biological environments using XPS. Appl Surf Sci. 2001;183(1–2):68–75.
   Google Scholar
• Augustyn-Pieniążek J, Lukaszczyk A, Zapala R. Microstructure and corrosion resistance characteristics of Cr-Co-Mo alloys designed for prosthetic materials. Arch Metall Mater. 2013;58(4):1281–1285.
   Google Scholar
• de Jesus Silva JW, Baldissera SC, de Felipe H, et al. Effect of recasting procedure upon corrosion behavior and metallic íon release of Co-Cr-Mo dental alloy in physiological serum. Prakt Metallogr Pr M. 2009;46(7):321–336.
   Google Scholar
• Höland W. Biocompatible and bioactive glass-ceramics—state of the art and new directions. J Non Cryst Solid. 1997;219:192–197.
   Google Scholar
• Wataha JC. Alloys for prosthodontic restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87(4):351–363.
   Google Scholar
• Asaoka K, Kuwayama N. Temperature dependence of thermal expansion coefficient for palladium-based binary alloy. Dent Mater J. 1990;9(1):47–57.
   Google Scholar
• Li D, Baba N, Brantley WA, et al. Study of Pd-Ag dental alloys: examination of effect of casting porosity on fatigue behavior and microstructural analysis. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 2010;21(10):2723–2731.
   Google Scholar
• Cart AB, Brantley WA. New high-palladium casting alloys: part 1. overview and initial studies. Int J Prosthodont. 1991;4(3):265–275.
   Google Scholar
• Manaranche C, Hornberger H. A proposal for the classification of dental alloys according to their resistance to corrosion. Dent Mater. 2007;23(11):1428–1437.
   Google Scholar
• German R. Precious-metal dental casting alloys. Inter Metal Reviews. 1982;27(1):260–288.
   Google Scholar
• Matsumura H, Taira Y, Atsuta M. Adhesive bonding of noble metal alloys with a triazine dithiol derivative primer and an adhesive resin. J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26(11):877–882.
   Google Scholar
• Hautaniemi JA. The effect of indium on porcelain bonding between porcelain and Au-Pd-in alloy. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 1995;6(1):46–50.
   Google Scholar
• Keefe JC, Rome N. A brief introduction to precious metals. AMMTIAC Quarterly. 2007;2:9–14.
   Google Scholar
• Stallybrass C, Schneider A, Sauthoff G. The strengthening effect of (Ni,Fe)Al precipitates on the mechanical properties at high temperatures of ferritic Fe-Al-Ni-Cr alloys. Intermetallics. 2005;13(12):1263–1268.
   Google Scholar
• Raap U, Stiesch M, Reh H, et al. Investigation of contact allergy to dental metals in 206 patients. Contact Dermatitis. 2009;60(6):339–343.
   Google Scholar
• van Loon LA, van Elsas PW, van Joost T, et al. Contact stomatitis and dermatitis to nickel and palladium. Contact Dermatitis. 1984;11(5):294–297.
   Google Scholar
• Downey D. Contact mucositis due to palladium. Contact Dermatitis. 1989;21(1):54–54.
   Google Scholar
• Aberer W, Holub H, Strohal R, et al. Palladium in dental alloys–the dermatologists’ responsibility to warn?. Contact Dermatitis. 1993;28(3):163–165.
   Google Scholar
• Saito M, Arakaki R, Yamada A, et al. Molecular mechanisms of nickel allergy. IJMS. 2016;17(2):202.
   Google Scholar
• Kielhorn J, Melber C, Keller D, et al. Mangelsdorf, I. Palladium – A review of exposure and effects to human health. Int J Hygiene Environ Health. 2002;205(6):417–432.
   Google Scholar
• van Joost T, Roesyanto-Mahadi ID. Combined sensitization to palladium and nickel. Contact Dermatitis. 1990;22(4):227–228.
   Google Scholar