Marginal gap and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM ceramill COMP and cerasmart endocrowns for restoring endodontically treated molars bonded with two adhesive protocols: an in vitro study

References

• Magne P, Carvalho A, Bruzi G, et al. Influence of no-ferrule and no-post buildup design on the fatigue resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with resin nanoceramic CAD/CAM crowns. Oper Dent. 2014;39(6):595–602.
   Google Scholar
• Ramírez-Sebastià A, Bortolotto T, Roig M, et al. Composite vs ceramic computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacturing crowns in endodontically treated teeth: analysis of marginal adaptation. Oper Dent. 2013;38(6):663–673.
   Google Scholar
• Sevimli G, Cengiz S, Oruc MS. Endocrowns: review. J Istanbul Univ Fac Dent. 2015;49(2):57–63.
   Google Scholar
• Biacchi GR, Mello B, Basting RT. The endocrown: an alternative approach for restoring extensively damaged molars. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2013;25(6):383–390.
   Google Scholar
• Biacchi GR, Basting RT. Comparison of fracture strength of endocrowns and glass fiber post-retained conventional crowns. Oper Dent. 2012;37(2):130–136.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen JF, Migonney V, Ruse ND, et al. Properties of experimental urethane dimethacrylate-based dental resin composite blocks obtained via thermo-polymerization under high pressure. Dent Mater. 2013;29(5):535–541.
   Google Scholar
• Kurbad A, Kurbad S. A new, hybrid material for minimally invasive restorations in clinical use. Int J Comput Dent. 2013;16(1):69–79.
   Google Scholar
• Mansour CH, Kheiralla LS, Ghanem LA. Color stability and surface roughness of CAD/CAM ceramill composite and cerasmart endocrowns. J Dent Med Sci. 2018. 17(9):13–24.
   Google Scholar
• Sakaguchi R, Powers J. Craig’s restorative dental materials. 14th ed. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby Elsevier; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Stawarczyk B, Liebermann A, Eichberger M, et al. Evaluation of mechanical and optical behavior of current esthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM composites. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016;55:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Ozer F, Blatz MB. Self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems in clinical dentistry. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013;34(1):12–14,16,18.
   Google Scholar
• Lise DP, Van Ende A, De Munck J, et al. Microtensile bond strength of composite cement to novel CAD/CAM materials as a function of surface treatment and aging. Oper Dent. 2017;42(1):73–81.
   Google Scholar
• Julide O, Cumhur S, Alper Ç. The effect of aged dental ceramics on gingival cell viability. Hacettepe Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2006;30:102–107.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki T, Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, et al. Influence of etching mode on enamel bond durability of universal adhesive systems. Oper Dent. 2016;41(5):520–530.
   Google Scholar
• Masarwa N, Mohamed A, Abou-Rabii I, et al. Longevity of self-etch dentin bonding adhesives compared to etch-and-rinse dentin bonding adhesives: a systematic review. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2016;16(2):96–106.
   Google Scholar
• Uctasli S, Wilson HJ, Unterbrink G, et al. The strength of heat pressed all-ceramic restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil. 1996;23(4):257–261.
   Google Scholar
• Chang CY, Kuo JS, Lin YS, et al. Fracture resistance and failure modes of CEREC endo-crowns and conventional post and core-supported CEREC crowns. J Dent Sci. 2009;4(3):110–117.
   Google Scholar
• Yamamoto ETC, Pagani C, da Silva EG, et al. Finite element analysis and fracture resistance testing of a new intraradicular post. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012;20(4):427–434.
   Google Scholar
• El-Guindy J, El-Sherif R, Aboul-Ezz AA, et al. Evaluation of marginal discrepancy and microleakage of lava ultimate (resin nano ceramic) versus lithium disilicate (IPS E. Max. CAD) endocrowns in vitro study. Indian J Sci Res. 2016;7(1):27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Nawafleh N, Hatamleh M, Elshiyab S, et al. Lithium disilicate restorations fatigue testing parameters: a systematic review. J Prosthodont. 2016;25(2):116–126.
   Google Scholar
• Jung Y-S, Lee J-W, Choi Y-J, et al. A study on the in vitro wear of the natural tooth structure by opposing ziconia or dental porcelain. J Adv Prosthodont. 2010;2(3):111–115.
   Google Scholar
• Sakrana AA. In vitro evaluation of the marginal and internal discrepancies of different esthetic restorations. J Appl Oral Sci. 2013;21(6):575–580.
   Google Scholar
• Manoharan PS, Rajasimhan NV, Livingstone D, et al. Comparative analysis of fatigue resistance, fracture strength, and fracture patterns in ceramic crowns with zirconia and direct metal laser-sintered cores—an in vitro study. J Clin Rheumatol immunol. 2018;5(4):92–98.
   Google Scholar
• Elshahawy W, Gaser A, Seddik M. Fracture resistance of visiolign and feldspathic porcelain on zirconium core. Egy Dent J. 2019;65 (1):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Heydecke G, Peters MC. The restoration of endodontically treated, single-rooted teeth with cast or direct posts and cores: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87(4):380–386.
   Google Scholar
• Evangelinaki E, Tortopidis D, Kontonasaki E, et al. Effect of a crown ferrule on the fracture strength of endodontically treated canines restored with fiber posts and metal-ceramic or all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 2013;26(4):384–387.
   Google Scholar
• Chalifoux PR. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth: review, classification, and post design. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1998;10(2):247–254.
   Google Scholar
• Dentistry IQ Editors. Sirona introduces the New Cerec® Omnicam. 2019 [cited 2019 Aug 1]. https://www.dentistryiq.com/clinical/prosthodontics-and-labratory/article/16361183/sirona-introduces-the-new-cerec-omnicam.
   Google Scholar
• Jíra A, Němeček J. Nanoindentation of human tooth dentin. KEM. 2014;606:133–136.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu J, Rong Q, Wang X, et al. Influence of remaining tooth structure and restorative material type on stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars: a finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(5):646–655.
   Google Scholar
• Sarikaya I, Hayran Y. Effects of dynamic aging on the wear and fracture strength of monolithic zirconia restorations. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18(1):146.
   Google Scholar
• Campos F, Almeida CS, Rippe MP, et al. Resin bonding to a hybrid ceramic: effects of surface treatments and aging. Oper Dent. 2016;41(2):171–178.
   Google Scholar
• Özcan M, Volpato C. Surface conditioning and bonding protocol for polymer-infiltrated ceramic: how and why? J Adhes Dent. 2016;18(2):174–175.
   Google Scholar
• Elsaka SE. Bond strength of novel CAD/CAM restorative materials to self-adhesive resin cement: The effect of surface treatments. J Adhes Dent. 2014;16(6):531–540.
   Google Scholar
• Frankenberger R, Hartmann VE, Krech M, et al. Adhesive luting of new CAD/CAM materials. Int J Comput Dent. 2015;18(1):9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Bottino MA, Snellaert A, Bergoli CD, et al. Effect of ceramic etching protocols on resin bond strength to a feldspar ceramic. Oper Dent. 2015;40(2):E40–E46.
   Google Scholar
• ElGuindy JF, Mostafa DH, El Agroudi MA. Margin assessment and fracture resistance of adhesively luted ceramic crowns. J Am Sci. 2010;6(11):264–273.
   Google Scholar
• Ozturk N, Aykent F. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89(3):275–281.
   Google Scholar
• Magne P, Douglas WH. Porcelain veneers: dentin bonding optimization and biomimetic recovery of the crown. Int J Prosthodont. 1999;12(2):111–121.
   Google Scholar
• Roperto R, Akkus A, Akkus O, et al. Effect of different adhesive strategies on microtensile bond strength of computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing blocks bonded to dentin. Dent Res J. 2016;13(2):117–123.
   Google Scholar
• Poggio C, Pigozzo M, Ceci M, et al. Influence of different luting protocols on shear bond strength of computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing resin nanoceramic material to dentin. Dent Res J. 2016;13(2):91–97.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira SSA, Pugach MK, Hilton JF, et al. The influence of the dentin smear layer on adhesion: a self-etching primer vs. a total-etch system. Dent Mater. 2003;19(8):758–767.
   Google Scholar
• Fuentes MV, Ceballos L, González-López S. Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to different treated indirect composites. Clin Oral Invest. 2013;17(3):717–724.
   Google Scholar
• Shafiei F, Jowkar Z, Hosseini N. Influence of cavity pretreatments on the fracture resistance of premolars with self-adhesive cemented composite inlay. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019;20(7):828–833.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz J, Sousa B, Coito C, et al. Microtensile bond strength to dentin and enamel of self-etch vs. etch-and-rinse modes of universal adhesives. Am J Dent. 2019;32(4):174–182.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz MA, Luque I, Hass V, et al. Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. J Dent. 2013;41(5):404–411.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson DJ. Measurements of stress in mastication II. J Dent Res. 1956;35(5):671–673.
   Google Scholar
• De Boever JA, McCall WD, Holden S, et al. Functional occlusal forces: an investigation by telemetry. J Prosthet Dent. 1978;40(3):326–333.
   Google Scholar
• Cosme DC, Baldisserotto SM, Canabarro S. d A, et al. Bruxism and voluntary maximal bite force in young dentate adults. Int J Prosthodont. 2005;18(4):328–332.
   Google Scholar
• Ahlberg JP, Kovero OA, Hurmerinta KA, et al. Maximal bite force and its association with signs and symptoms of TMD, occlusion, and body mass index in a cohort of young adults. Cranio. 2003;21(4):248–252.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Serrao G, et al. Single tooth bite forces in healthy young adults. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31(1):18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari M, Mason PN, Goracci C, et al. Collagen degradation in endodontically treated teeth after clinical function. J Dent Res. 2004;83(5):414–419.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong SR, Vargas MA, Chung I, et al. Resin-dentin interfacial ultrastructure and microtensile dentin bond strength after five-year water storage. Oper Dent. 2004;29(6):705–712.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes AS, Dessai GS. Factors affecting the fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth: a review. Int J Prosthodont. 2001;14(4):355–363.
   Google Scholar
• Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89(3):268–274.
   Google Scholar