1,629
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Quantification of porosity in composite resins delivered by injectable syringes using X-ray microtomography

, &
Pages 86-95 | Received 19 Feb 2020, Accepted 08 Jun 2020, Published online: 06 Jul 2020

References

  • Heintze SD, Rousson V. Clinical effectiveness of direct class II restorations – a meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2012;14:407–431.
  • Anusavice KJ, Phillips RW, Shen CS, et al. Phillips’ science of dental materials. 12th ed. St. Louis (MO): Elsevier Saunders; 2013.
  • Darvell B. Materials science for dentistry. 9th ed. Abingdon (UK): Woodhead Publishing, CRC press; 2009.
  • McCabe JF, Ogden AR. The relationship between porosity, compressive fatigue limit and wear in composite resin restorative materials. Dent Mater. 1987;3:9–12.
  • Baudin C, Osorio R, Toledano M, et al. Work of fracture of a composite resin: fracture-toughening mechanisms. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009;89:751–758.
  • Santerre JP, Shajii L, Leung BW. Relation of dental composite formulations to their degradation and the release of hydrolyzed polymeric-resin-derived products. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2001;12:136–151.
  • Göpferich A. Mechanisms of polymer degradation and erosion. Biomaterials. 1996;17:103–114.
  • Curtis AR, Shortall AC, Marquis PM, et al. Water uptake and strength characteristics of a nanofilled resin-based composite. J Dent. 2008;36:186–193.
  • Maske TT, Hollanders ACC, Kuper NK, et al. A threshold gap size for in situ secondary caries lesion development. J Dent. 2019;80:36–40.
  • Nilsen B, Jensen E, Örtengren U, et al. Analysis of organic components in resin-modified pulp capping materials: critical considerations. Eur J Oral Sci. 2017;125:112–183.
  • Hirata R, Pacheco R, Caceres E, et al. Effect of sonic resin composite delivery on void formation assessed by micro-computed tomography. Oper Dent. 2018;43:144–150.
  • Demirel G, Baltacıoğlu İH, Kolsuz ME, et al. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of internal void formation of bulk-fill resin composites in Class II restorations. Polym Compos. 2019;40:2984–2992.
  • Ogden AR. Porosity in composite resins-an Achilles’ heel? J Dent. 1985;13:331–340.
  • Balthazard R, Jager S, Dahoun A, et al. High-resolution tomography study of the porosity of three restorative resin composites. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18:1613–1618.
  • Opdam NJM, Roeters JJM, De Boer T, et al. Voids and porosities in class I micropreparations filled with various resin composites. Oper Dent. 2003;28:9–14.
  • Alshali RZ, Salim NA, Satterthwaite JD, et al. Long-term sorption and solubility of bulk-fill and conventional resin-composites in water and artificial saliva. J Dent. 2015;43:1511–1518.
  • Lagouvardos P, Nikolinakos N, Oulis C. Volume fraction and location of voids and gaps in ultraconservative restorations by X-ray computed micro-tomography. Dent Res J. 2015;12:520–527.
  • Soares C, Rosatto C, Carvalho V, et al. Radiopacity and porosity of bulk-fill and conventional composite posterior restorations—digital X-ray analysis. Oper Dent. 2017;42:616–625.
  • Samet N, Kwon KR, Good P, et al. Voids and interlayer gaps in Class 1 posterior composite restorations: a comparison between a microlayer and a 2-layer technique. Quintessence Int (Berl). 2006;37:803–809.
  • Maret D, Telmon N, Peters OA, et al. Effect of voxel size on the accuracy of 3D reconstructions with cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012;41:649–655.
  • Costella AM, Trochmann JL, Oliveira WS. Water sorption and diffusion coefficient through an experimental dental resin. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010;21:67–72.