Effect of silica nano-spheres on adhesion of oral bacteria and human fibroblasts

References

• Aas JA, Paster BJ, Stokes LN, et al. Defining the normal bacterial flora of the oral cavity. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(11):5721–5732.
   Google Scholar
• Lamolle SF, Monjo M, Rubert M, et al. The effect of hydrofluoric acid treatment of titanium surface on nanostructural and chemical changes and the growth of MC3T3-E1 cells. Biomaterials. 2009;30(5):736–742.
   Google Scholar
• Lamolle SF, Monjo M, Lyngstadaas SP, et al. Titanium implant surface modification by cathodic reduction in hydrofluoric acid: surface characterization and in vivo performance. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009;88(3):581–588.
   Google Scholar
• Taxt-Lamolle SF, Rubert M, Haugen HJ, et al. Controlled electro-implementation of fluoride in titanium implant surfaces enhances cortical bone formation and mineralization. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(3):1025–1032.
   Google Scholar
• Galli S, Jimbo R, Andersson M, et al. Surface characterization and clinical review of two commercially available implants. Implant Dent. 2013;22(5):507–518.
   Google Scholar
• Øilo M, Bakken V. Biofilm and dental biomaterials. Materials. 2015;8(6):2887–2900.
   Google Scholar
• Dhir S. Biofilm and dental implant: the microbial link. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2013;17(1):5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Høiby N, Ciofu O, Johansen HK, et al. The clinical impact of bacterial biofilms. Int J Oral Sci. 2011;3(2):55–65.
   Google Scholar
• Buddula A. Bacteria and dental implants: a review. J Dent Implant. 2013;3(1):58–61.
   Google Scholar
• Shahabouee M, Rismanchian M, Yaghini J, et al. Microflora around teeth and dental implants. Dent Res J. 2012;9(2):215–220.
   Google Scholar
• Busscher HJ, van der Mei HC, Subbiahdoss G, et al. Biomaterial-associated infection: locating the finish line in the race for the surface. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4(153):153rv10.
   Google Scholar
• Liang X, Chen YY, Ruiz T, et al. New cell surface protein involved in biofilm formation by Streptococcus parasanguinis. Infect Immun. 2011;79(8):3239–3248.
   Google Scholar
• Nyvad B, Kilian M. Microbiology of the early colonization of human enamel and root surfaces in vivo. Scand J Dent Res. 1987;95(5):369–380.
   Google Scholar
• Abranches J, Zeng L, Kajfasz JK, et al. Biology of oral Streptococci. Microbiol Spectr. 2018;6(5):226–243.
   Google Scholar
• Kreth J, Merritt J, Qi F. Bacterial and host interactions of oral streptococci. DNA Cell Biol. 2009;28(8):397–403.
   Google Scholar
• Furst MM, Salvi GE, Lang NP, et al. Bacterial colonization immediately after installation on oral titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(4):501–508.
   Google Scholar
• Mensi M, Cochis A, Sordillo A, et al. Biofilm removal and bacterial re-colonization inhibition of a novel erythritol/chlorhexidine air-polishing powder on titanium disks. Materials (Basel. 2018;11(9):1510.
   Google Scholar
• Frojd V, de Paz LC, Andersson M, et al. In situ analysis of multispecies biofilm formation on customized titanium surfaces. Mol Oral Microbiol. 2011;26(4):241–252.
   Google Scholar
• Potera C. Antibiotic resistance: biofilm dispersing agent rejuvenates older antibiotics. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118(7): A288.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart PS. Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in bacterial biofilms. Int J Med Microbiol. 2002;292(2):107–113.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart PS, Costerton JW. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet. 2001;358(9276):135–138.
   Google Scholar
• Gunn JS, Bakaletz LO, Wozniak DJ. What's on the outside matters: the role of the extracellular polymeric substance of Gram-negative biofilms in evading host immunity and as a target for therapeutic intervention. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(24):12538–12546.
   Google Scholar
• Sanz-Martin I, Doolittle-Hall J, Teles RP, et al. Exploring the microbiome of healthy and diseased peri-implant sites using *Illumina sequencing. J Clin Periodontol. 2017;44(12):1274–1284.
   Google Scholar
• Abraham W-R. Implant related infections, biomedical technology. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015. p. 163–174.
   Google Scholar
• Mombelli A, Decaillet F. The characteristics of biofilms in peri-implant disease. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38 (Suppl 11):203–213.
   Google Scholar
• Persson GR, Renvert S. Cluster of bacteria associated with peri-implantitis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16(6):783–793.
   Google Scholar
• Rams TE, Feik D, Slots J. Staphylococci in human periodontal diseases. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1990;5(1):29–32.
   Google Scholar
• Renvert S, Lindahl C, Renvert H, et al. Clinical and microbiological analysis of subjects treated with Branemark or AstraTech implants: a 7-year follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(4):342–347.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlen G, Wikstrom M. Occurrence of enteric rods, staphylococci and Candida in subgingival samples. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1995;10(1):42–46.
   Google Scholar
• Fine DH. Microbial identification and antibiotic sensitivity testing, an aid for patients refractory to periodontal therapy. A report of 3 cases. J Clin Periodontol. 1994;21(2):98–106.
   Google Scholar
• Helovuo H, Hakkarainen K, Paunio K. Changes in the prevalence of subgingival enteric rods, staphylococci and yeasts after treatment with penicillin and erythromycin. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1993;8(2):75–79.
   Google Scholar
• Rams TE, Babalola OO, Slots J. Subgingival occurrence of enteric rods, yeasts and staphylococci after systemic doxycycline therapy. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1990;5(3):166–168.
   Google Scholar
• Dhotre S, Jahagirdar V, Suryawanshi N, et al. Assessment of periodontitis and its role in viridans streptococcal bacteremia and infective endocarditis. Indian Heart J. 2018;70(2):225–232.
   Google Scholar
• Hori K, Matsumoto S. Bacterial adhesion: from mechanism to control. Biochem Eng J. 2010;48(3):424–434.
   Google Scholar
• Rams TE, Degener JE, van Winkelhoff AJ. Antibiotic resistance in human peri-implantitis microbiota. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(1):82–90.
   Google Scholar
• Mombelli A, Buser D, Lang N. Colonization of osseointegrated titanium implants in edentulous patients. Early results. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1988;3(3):113–120.
   Google Scholar
• Heuer W, Elter C, Demling A, et al. Analysis of early biofilm formation on oral implants in man. J Oral Rehabil. 2007;34(5):377–382.
   Google Scholar
• Xing R, Lyngstadaas SP, Ellingsen JE, et al. The influence of surface nanoroughness, texture and chemistry of TiZr implant abutment on oral biofilm accumulation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(6):649–656.
   Google Scholar
• Xing R, Salou L, Taxt-Lamolle S, et al. Surface hydride on titanium by cathodic polarization promotes human gingival fibroblast growth. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014;102(5):1389–1398.
   Google Scholar
• Wang L, Hu C, Shao L. The antimicrobial activity of nanoparticles: present situation and prospects for the future. Int J Nanomedicine. 2017;12:1227–1249.
   Google Scholar
• Dhull N, Nidhi Gupta V, Tomar M. Antimicrobial properties of metallic nanoparticles: a qualitative analysis. Mater Today: Proc. 2019;17:155–160.
   Google Scholar
• Smirnov NA, Kudryashov SI, Nastulyavichus AA, et al. Antibacterial properties of silicon nanoparticles. Laser Phys Lett. 2018;15(10):105602.
   Google Scholar
• Asefa T, Tao Z. Biocompatibility of mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Chem Res Toxicol. 2012;25(11):2265–2284.
   Google Scholar
• Sviridov AP, Osminkina LA, Kharin AY, et al. Cytotoxicity control of silicon nanoparticles by biopolymer coating and ultrasound irradiation for cancer theranostic applications. Nanotechnology. 2017;28(10):105102.
   Google Scholar
• Tamarov KP, Osminkina LA, Zinovyev SV, et al. Radio frequency radiation-induced hyperthermia using Si nanoparticle-based sensitizers for mild cancer therapy. Sci Rep. 2015;4(1):7034.
   Google Scholar
• Gristina AG, Naylor PT, Myrvik Q. The race for the surface: microbes, tissue cells, and biomaterials. New York, NY: Springer New York; 1989. p. 177–211.
   Google Scholar
• Ventre M, Causa F, Netti PA. Determinants of cell-material crosstalk at the interface: towards engineering of cell instructive materials. J R Soc Interface. 2012;9(74):2017–2032.
   Google Scholar
• Vassilakos N, Kalfas S, Arnebrant T, et al. A simple flow cell system to evaluate in vitro bacterial adhesion on solids. Colloids Surf, B. 1993;1(6):341–347.
   Google Scholar
• Busscher HJ, van der Mei HC. Microbial adhesion in flow displacement systems. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006;19(1):127–141.
   Google Scholar
• Hulander M, Valen-Rukke H, Sundell G, et al. Influence of fibrinogen on Staphylococcus epidermidis adhesion can be reversed by tuning surface nanotopography. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2019;5(9):4323–4330.
   Google Scholar
• Hulander M, Lundgren A, Faxalv L, et al. Gradients in surface nanotopography used to study platelet adhesion and activation. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2013;110:261–269.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Abraham M, Claudio DV, Stefano S, et al. Contact angles and wettability: towards common and accurate terminology. Surf Innovations. 2017;5(1):3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Svanborg LM, Andersson M, Wennerberg A. Surface characterization of commercial oral implants on the nanometer level. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater. 2010;92(2):462–469.
   Google Scholar
• Busscher HJ, Rinastiti M, Siswomihardjo W, et al. Biofilm formation on dental restorative and implant materials. J Dent Res. 2010;89(7):657–665.
   Google Scholar
• Yue C, Zhao B, Ren Y, et al. The implant infection paradox: why do some succeed when others fail? Opinion and discussion paper. Eur Cell Mater. 2015;29:303–313.
   Google Scholar
• Shah FA, Trobos M, Thomsen P, et al. Commercially pure titanium (cp-Ti) versus titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) materials as bone anchored implants – Is one truly better than the other? Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016;62:960–966.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzello L, Cingolani R, Pompa PP. Nanotechnology tools for antibacterial materials. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2013;8(5):807–821.
   Google Scholar
• Leonhardt A, Renvert S, Dahlen G. Microbial findings at failing implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999;10(5):339–345.
   Google Scholar
• Sriramulu D, Reed EL, Annamalai M, et al. Synthesis and characterization of superhydrophobic, self-cleaning NIR-reflective silica nanoparticles. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):35993.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer J, Flint S, Brooks J. Bacterial cell attachment, the beginning of a biofilm. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;34(9):577–588.
   Google Scholar
• Brink GHt, Hof PJvh, Chen B, et al. Control surface wettability with nanoparticles from phase-change materials. Appl Phys Lett. 2016;109(23):234102.
   Google Scholar
• Puckett SD, Taylor E, Raimondo T, et al. The relationship between the nanostructure of titanium surfaces and bacterial attachment. Biomaterials. 2010;31(4):706–713.
   Google Scholar
• Caous JS, Lovenklev M, Faldt J, et al. Adhesion of Streptococcus mitis and Actinomyces oris in co-culture to machined and anodized titanium surfaces as affected by atmosphere and pH. BMC Oral Health. 2013;13:4.
   Google Scholar
• Narendrakumar K, Kulkarni M, Addison O, et al. Adherence of oral streptococci to nanostructured titanium surfaces. Dent Mater. 2015;31(12):1460–1468.
   Google Scholar
• Applerot G, Lellouche J, Perkas N, et al. ZnO nanoparticle-coated surfaces inhibit bacterial biofilm formation and increase antibiotic susceptibility. RSC Adv. 2012;2(6):2314–2321.
   Google Scholar
• Lellouche J, Friedman A, Lahmi R, et al. Antibiofilm surface functionalization of catheters by magnesium fluoride nanoparticles. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:1175–1188.
   Google Scholar
• Lipski AM, Pino CJ, Haselton FR, et al. The effect of silica nanoparticle-modified surfaces on cell morphology, cytoskeletal organization and function. Biomaterials. 2008;29(28):3836–3846.
   Google Scholar