Core build-up resin composites: an in-vitro comparative study

References

• Scotti N, Cavalli G, Gagliani M, et al. New adhesives and bonding techniques. Why and when? Int J Esthet Dent. 2017;12(4):524–535.
   Google Scholar
• Grutter L, Vailati F. Full-mouth adhesive rehabilitation in case of severe dental erosion, a minimally invasive approach following the 3-step technique. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2013;8(3):358–375.
   Google Scholar
• Morimoto S, Rebello de Sampaio FB, Braga MM, et al. Survival rate of resin and ceramic inlays, onlays, and overlays: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2016;95(9):985–994.
   Google Scholar
• Vagropoulou GI, Klifopoulou GL, Vlahou SG, et al. Complications and survival rates of inlays and onlays vs complete coverage restorations: a systematic review and analysis of studies. J Oral Rehabil. 2018;45(11):903–920.
   Google Scholar
• Dietschi D, Duc O, Krejci I, et al. Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of the literature–Part 1. Composition and micro- and macrostructure alterations. Quintessence Int. 2007;38(9):733–743.
   Google Scholar
• Leprince JG, Leloup G, Hardy CMF. Considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated molars. In: Peters OA, editor. The guidebook to molar endodontics. 1st ed. New York, USA: Springer Publishing; 2017. p. 169–205.
   Google Scholar
• Reeh ES, Messer HH, Douglas WH. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod. 1989;15(11):512–516.
   Google Scholar
• Larson TD. Core restoration for crown preparation. Northwest Dent. 2004;83(5):22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar G, Shivrayan A. Comparative study of mechanical properties of direct core build-up materials. Contemp Clin Dent. 2015;6(1):16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Figueiredo FE, Martins-Filho PR, Faria ESAL. Do metal post-retained restorations result in more root fractures than fiber post-retained restorations? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod. 2015;41(3):309–316.
   Google Scholar
• Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003;28(3):215–235.
   Google Scholar
• Ruttermann S, Alberts I, Raab WH, et al. Physical properties of self-, dual-, and light-cured direct core materials. Clin Oral Invest. 2011;15(4):597–603.
   Google Scholar
• Soares CJ, da Silva NR, Fonseca RB. Influence of the feldspathic ceramic thickness and shade on the microhardness of dual resin cement. Oper Dent. 2006;31(3):384–389.
   Google Scholar
• Meng X, Yoshida K, Atsuta M. Influence of ceramic thickness on mechanical properties and polymer structure of dual-cured resin luting agents. Dent Mater. 2008;24(5):594–599.
   Google Scholar
• Ilie N, Hickel R. Correlation between ceramics translucency and polymerization efficiency through ceramics. Dent Mater. 2008;24(7):908–914.
   Google Scholar
• Acquaviva PA, Cerutti F, Adami G, et al. Degree of conversion of three composite materials employed in the adhesive cementation of indirect restorations: a micro-Raman analysis. J Dent. 2009;37(8):610–615.
   Google Scholar
• Flury S, Peutzfeldt A, Lussi A. The effect of polymerization procedure on Vickers hardness of dual-curing resin cements. Am J Dent. 2011;24(4):226–232.
   Google Scholar
• Passos SP, Kimpara ET, Bottino MA, et al. Effect of ceramic shade on the degree of conversion of a dual-cure resin cement analyzed by FTIR. Dent Mater. 2013;29(3):317–323.
   Google Scholar
• Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Sahafi A. Finite element analysis of stresses in endodontically treated, dowel-restored teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94(4):321–329.
   Google Scholar
• Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Class I and Class II restorations of resin composite: an FE analysis of the influence of modulus of elasticity on stresses generated by occlusal loading. Dent Mater. 2008;24(5):600–605.
   Google Scholar
• Panitiwat P, Salimee P. Effect of different composite core materials on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with FRC posts. J Appl Oral Sci. 2017;25(2):203–210.
   Google Scholar
• Randolph LD, Palin WM, Leloup G, et al. Filler characteristics of modern dental resin composites and their influence on physico-mechanical properties. Dent Mater. 2016;32(12):1586–1599.
   Google Scholar
• Karakis D, Yildirim-Bicer AZ, Dogan A, et al. Effect of self and dual-curing on degree of conversion and crosslink density of dual-cure core build-up materials. J Prosthodont Res. 2017;61(2):210–216.
   Google Scholar
• Kournetas N, Tzoutzas I, Eliades G. Monomer conversion in dual-cured core buildup materials. Oper Dent. 2011;36(1):92–97.
   Google Scholar
• Gregor L, Bouillaguet S, Onisor I, et al. Microhardness of light- and dual-polymerizable luting resins polymerized through 7.5-mm-thick endocrowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(4):942–948.
   Google Scholar
• Ilie N, Hilton TJ, Heintze SD, et al. Academy of Dental Materials guidance-Resin composites: part I-Mechanical properties. Dent Mater. 2017;33(8):880–894.
   Google Scholar
• Heintze SD, Ilie N, Hickel R, et al. Laboratory mechanical parameters of composite resins and their relation to fractures and wear in clinical trials – a systematic review. Dent Mater. 2017;33(3):e101–e14.
   Google Scholar
• Masouras K, Silikas N, Watts DC. Correlation of filler content and elastic properties of resin-composites. Dent Mater. 2008;24(7):932–939.
   Google Scholar
• Leprince J, Palin WM, Mullier T, et al. Investigating filler morphology and mechanical properties of new low-shrinkage resin composite types. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37(5):364–376.
   Google Scholar
• Ferracane JL. Resin composite-state of the art. Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):29–38.
   Google Scholar
• Combe EC, Shaglouf AM, Watts DC, et al. Mechanical properties of direct core build-up materials. Dent Mater. 1999;15(3):158–165.
   Google Scholar
• Kinney JH, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW. The mechanical properties of human dentin: a critical review and re-evaluation of the dental literature. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2003;14(1):13–29.
   Google Scholar
• Goracci C, Ferrari M. Current perspectives on post systems: a literature review. Aust Dent J. 2011;56(Suppl 1):77–83.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vichi A, et al. Bonding to root canal: structural characteristics of the substrate. Am J Dent. 2000;13(5):255–260.
   Google Scholar
• Bouillaguet S, Troesch S, Wataha JC, et al. Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root canal dentin. Dent Mater. 2003;19(3):199–205.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Omiri MK, Mahmoud AA, Rayyan MR, et al. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with post-retained restorations: an overview. J Endod. 2010;36(9):1439–1449.
   Google Scholar
• Naumann M, Schmitter M, Frankenberger R, et al. ‘Ferrule comes first. post is second!’ Fake news and alternative facts? A systematic review. J Endod. 2018;44(2):212–219.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz RS, Robbins JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. J Endod. 2004;30(5):289–301.
   Google Scholar
• Juloski J, Radovic I, Goracci C, et al. Ferrule effect: a literature review. J Endod. 2012;38(1):11–19.
   Google Scholar
• Pierrisnard L, Bohin F, Renault P, et al. Corono-radicular reconstruction of pulpless teeth: a mechanical study using finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88(4):442–448.
   Google Scholar
• Zicari F, Van Meerbeek B, Scotti R, et al. Effect of ferrule and post placement on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth after fatigue loading. J Dent. 2013;41(3):207–215.
   Google Scholar
• Batista VES, Bitencourt SB, Bastos NA, et al. Influence of the ferrule effect on the failure of fiber-reinforced composite post-and-core restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123(2):239–245.
   Google Scholar