Fracture resistance of resin based and lithium disilicate endocrowns. Which is better? – A systematic review of in-vitro studies

References

• Figueiredo FED, Martins-Filho PRS, Faria-E-Silv a. A. Do metal post-retained restorations result in more root fractures than fiber post-retained restorations? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod. 2015;41(3):309–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves KM, Berman LH. Cohen’s pathways of the pulp. Chapter 22. Restoration of endodontically treated tooth. 11th ed. St. Louis (MO): Missouri; 2016. p.832.
   Google Scholar
• Dogui H, Abdelmalek F, Amor A, et al. Endocrown: an alternative approach for restoring endodontically treated molars with large coronal destruction. Case Rep Dent. 2018;2018:1581952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Andrade GS, Tribst JP, Dal Piva AO, et al. study on stress distribution to cement layer and root dentin for post and cores made of CAD/CAM materials with different elasticity modulus in the absence of ferrule. J Clin Exp Dent. 2019;11(1):e1–e8.
   Google Scholar
• Awada A, Nathanson D. Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114(4):587–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sripetchdanond J, Leevailoj C. Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(5):1141–1150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, PRISMA Group, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krithikadatta J, Gopikrishna V, Datta M. CRIS guidelines (checklist for reporting in-vitro studies): a concept note on the need for standardized guidelines for improving quality and transparency in reporting in-vitro studies in experimental dental research. J Conserv Dent . 2014;17(4):301–304.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sedrez-Porto JA, Rosa WL, de O da da Silva AF, et al. Endocrown restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2016;52:8–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skalskyi V, Makeev V, Stankevych O, et al. Features of fracture of prosthetic tooth-endocrown constructions by means of acoustic emission analysis. Dent Mater Publ Acad Dent Mater. 2018;34(3):e46–55–e55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dartora G, Rocha Pereira GK, Varella de Carvalho R, et al. Comparison of endocrowns made of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic or polymer-infiltrated ceramic networks and direct composite resin restorations: fatigue performance and stress distribution. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019;100:103401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedrez-Porto JA, Münchow EA, Valente LL, et al. New material perspective for endocrown restorations: effects on mechanical performance and fracture behavior. Braz Oral Res. 2019;33:e012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedrez-Porto JA, Münchow EA, Cenci MS, et al. Which materials would account for a better mechanical behavior for direct endocrown restorations? J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020;103:103592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altier M, Erol F, Yildirim G, et al. Fracture resistance and failure modes of lithium disilicate or composite endocrowns. Niger J Clin Pract. 2018;21(7):821–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Damanhoury HM, Haj-Ali RN, Platt JA. Fracture resistance and microleakage of endocrowns utilizing three CAD-CAM blocks. Oper Dent. 2015;40(2):201–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gresnigt MMM, Özcan M, van den Houten MLA, et al. Fracture strength, failure type and Weibull characteristics of lithium disilicate and multiphase resin composite endocrowns under axial and lateral forces. Dent Mater off Publ Acad Dent Mater. 2016;32(5):607–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Ghoul W, Özcan M, Silwadi M, et al. Fracture resistance and failure modes of endocrowns manufactured with different CAD/CAM materials under axial and lateral loading. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;l31(4):378–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taha D, Spintzyk S, Sabet A, et al. Assessment of marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of endocrown restorations utilizing different machinable blocks subjected to thermomechanical aging. J Esthet Restor Dent off Publ Am Acad Esthet Dent Al. 2018;30(4):319–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali SWA, Moukarab DAA. Effect of deep marginal elevation on marginal adaptation and fracture resistance in endodontically treated teeth restored with endocrowns constructed by two different CAD/CAM ceramics: an in-vitro study. Egypt Dent Jl. 2020;66(1):541–556.
   Google Scholar
• Reeh ES, Messer HH, Douglas WH. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod. 1989;15(11):512–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietschi D, Duc O, Krejci I, et al. Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of the literature–Part 1. Composition and micro- and macrostructure alterations. Quintessence Int Berl Ger. 1985;38(9):733–743.
   Google Scholar
• Biacchi GR, Basting RT. Comparison of fracture strength of endocrowns and glass fiber post-retained conventional crowns. Oper Dent. 2012;37(2):130–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kishen A. Biomechanics of fractures in endodontically treated teeth. Endod Topics. 2015;33(1):3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Dejak B, Młotkowski A. 3D-Finite element analysis of molars restored with endocrowns and posts during masticatory simulation. Dent Mater Publ Acad Dent Mater. 2013;29(12):e309-317–e317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helal MA, Wang Z. Biomechanical assessment of restored mandibular molar by endocrown in comparison to a glass fiber post-retained conventional crown: 3D finite element analysis. J Prosthodont. 2017;28(9):988–996.
   Google Scholar
• Pissis P. Fabrication of a metal-free ceramic restoration utilizing the monobloc technique. Pract Periodontics Aesthetic Dent PPAD. 1995;7(5):83–94.
   Google Scholar
• Bindl A, Mörmann WH. Clinical evaluation of adhesively placed Cerec endo-crowns after 2 years–preliminary results. J Adhes Dent. 1999;1(3):255–265.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert H, Durand JC, Jacquot B, et al. Dental biomaterials for chairside CAD/CAM: state of the art. J Adv Prosthodont. 2017;9(6):486–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abou-Madina MM, Özcan M, Abdelaziz KM. Influence of resin cements and aging on the fracture resistance of IPS e.max press posterior crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 2012;25(1):33–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu J, Rong Q, Wang X, et al. Influence of remaining tooth structure and restorative material type on stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars: a finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(5):646–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig RG, Peyton FA. Elastic and mechanical properties of human dentin. J Dent Res. 1958;137(4):710–718.
   Google Scholar
• Gulec L, Ulusoy N. Effect of endocrown restorations with different CAD/CAM materials: 3D finite element and Weibull analyses. BioMed Res Int. 2017;2017:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dartora NR, de Conto Ferreira MB, Moris ICM, et al. Effect of intracoronal depth of teeth restored with endocrowns on fracture resistance: in vitro and 3-dimensional finite element analysis. J Endod. 2018;44(7):1179–1185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar