Bond strength between titanium and polymer-based materials adhesively cemented

References

• Buser D, Sennerby L, De Bruyn H. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions. Periodontol 2000. 2017;73(1):7–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brånemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl. 1977;16:1–132.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brunski JB. Biomechanical factors affecting the bone-dental implant interface. Clin Mater. 1992;10(3):153–201.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Romanos GE. Biomolecular cell-signaling mechanisms and dental implants: a review on the regulatory molecular biologic patterns under functional and immediate loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31(4):939–951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binon PP. Implants and components: entering the new millennium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15(1):76–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelhoff D, Schweiger J, Prandtner O, et al. Metal-free implant-supported single-tooth restorations. Part I: abutments and cemented crowns. Quintessence Int. 2019;50(3):176–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelhoff D, Schweiger J, Prandtner O, et al. Metal-free implant-supported single-tooth restorations. Part II: hybrid abutment crowns and material selection. Quintessence Int. 2019;50(4):260–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covey DA, Kent DK, St Germain HA, Jr, et al. Effects of abutment size and luting cement type on the uniaxial retention force of implant-supported crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83(3):344–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linkevicius T, Caplikas A, Dumbryte I, et al. Retention of zirconia copings over smooth and airborne-particle-abraded titanium bases with different resin cements. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(6):949–954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemos CAA, Verri FR, Gomes JML, et al. Ceramic versus metal-ceramic implant-supported prostheses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(6):879–886.e4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes ACO, Machado CM, Bonjardim LR, et al. The effect of CAD/CAM crown material and cement type on retention to implant abutments. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(2):e552–e6.
   Google Scholar
• Rosentritt M, Hahnel S, Engelhardt F, et al. In vitro performance and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM-fabricated implant supported molar crowns. Clin Oral Invest. 2017;21(4):1213–1219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayyan MM, Aboushelib M, Sayed NM, et al. Comparison of interim restorations fabricated by CAD/CAM with those fabricated manually. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114(3):414–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alt V, Hannig M, Wöstmann B, et al. Fracture strength of temporary fixed partial dentures: CAD/CAM versus directly fabricated restorations. Dent Mater. 2011;27(4):339–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns DR, Beck DA, Nelson SK. A review of selected dental literature on contemporary provisional fixed prosthodontic treatment: report of the Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;90(5):474–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tribst JPM, de Oliveira Dal Piva AM, Borges ALS, et al. Effect of framework type on the biomechanical behavior of provisional crowns: strain gauge and finite element analyses. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2020;40(1):e9–e18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tribst JPM, Dal Piva AMO, Borges ALS, et al. Survival probability, Weibull characteristics, stress distribution, and fractographic analysis of polymer-infiltrated ceramic network restorations cemented on a chairside titanium base: an in vitro and in silico study. Materials (Basel. 2020;13(8):1879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanz-Sánchez I, Sanz-Martín I, Figuero E, et al. Clinical efficacy of immediate implant loading protocols compared to conventional loading depending on the type of the restoration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2015;26(8):964–982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues VA, Dal Piva AO, Yamaguchi CA, et al. Effect of framework type on survival probability of implant-supported temporary crowns: an in vitro study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020;12(5):e433–e9.
   Google Scholar
• Rismanchian M, Davoudi A, Shadmehr E. Effect of using nano and micro airborne abrasive particles on bond strength of implant abutment to prosthesis. Braz Dent J. 2015;26(1):50–55.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall SJ, Bayne SC, Baier R, et al. A review of adhesion science. Dent Mater. 2010;26(2):e11–e6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keul C, Kohen D, Eichberger M, et al. The effect of different pretreatment methods of PMMA-based crowns on the long-term tensile bond strength to dentin abutments. Clin Oral Invest. 2015;19(1):35–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keul C, Müller-Hahl M, Eichberger M, et al. Impact of different adhesives on work of adhesion between CAD/CAM polymers and resin composite cements. J Dent. 2014;42(9):1105–1114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bähr N, Keul C, Edelhoff D, et al. Effect of different adhesives combined with two resin composite cements on shear bond strength to polymeric CAD/CAM materials. Dent Mater J. 2013;32(3):492–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stawarczyk B, Basler T, Ender A, et al. Effect of surface conditioning with airborne-particle abrasion on the tensile strength of polymeric CAD/CAM crowns luted with self-adhesive and conventional resin cements. J Prosthet Dent. 2012;107(2):94–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdullah AO, Tsitrou EA, Pollington S. Comparative in vitro evaluation of CAD/CAM vs conventional provisional crowns. J Appl Oral Sci. 2016;24(3):258–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization [ISO]. Dentistry – filling and restorative materials, ISO 11405:2015. Geneva (Switzerland): ISO; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• GüNgör M, Nemli S. The effect of resin cement type and thermomechanical aging on the retentive strength of custom zirconia abutments bonded to titanium inserts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33(3):523–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekstrand K, Ruyter IE, Oysaed H. Adhesion to titanium of methacrylate-based polymer materials. Dent Mater. 1988;4(3):111–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhesi GS, Sidhu S, Al-Haj Husain N, et al. Evaluation of adhesion protocol for titanium base abutments to different ceramic and hybrid materials. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2020; 29(1):22–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almilhatti HJ, Neppelenbroek KH, Vergani CE, et al. Adhesive bonding of resin composite to various titanium surfaces using different metal conditioners and a surface modification system. J Appl Oral Sci. 2013;21(6):590–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherrer SS, Cesar PF, Swain MV. Direct comparison of the bond strength results of the different test methods: a critical literature review. Dent Mater. 2010;26(2):e78–e93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar