Influence of different tooth preparation and bonding techniques on the fracture resistance of tooth fragment reattachment

References

• Kovacs M, Pacurar M, Pop M, et al. Fracture resistance of tooth fragments reattached with different techniques. An in vitro study. Roman J Oral Rehabil. 2012;4(4):36–41.
   Google Scholar
• Abdulkhayum A, Munjal S, Babaji P, et al. In-vitro evaluation of fracture strength recovery of reattached anterior fractured tooth fragment using different re-attachment techniques. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(3):208–211. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
   Google Scholar
• Munksgaard EC, Højtved L, Jørgensen EH, et al. Enamel-dentin crown fractures bonded with various bonding agents. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1991;7(2):73–77.
   Google Scholar
• Stellini E, Stomaci D, Stomaci M, et al. Fracture strength of tooth fragment reattachments with postpone bevel and overcontour reconstruction. Dent Traumatol. 2008;24(3):283–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasson ST, Dahl JE. Effect of curing and silanizing on composite repair bond strength using an improved micro-tensile test method. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2017; 3(1):21–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shimada Y, Tagami J. Effects of regional enamel and prism orientation on resin bonding. Oper Dent. 2003; 28(1):20–27. PMID: 12540114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Maria R. Determining the fracture strength of the reattached fragment of anterior teeth: An invitro study. J Dent Allied Sci. 2013;2(1):16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Beltagy TM. Laboratory and clinical evaluation of uncomplicated fragment reattachment using pinholes. Tanta Dent J. 2018; 15:117–126.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzoleni S, Graf F, Salomon E, et al. Influence of root canal posts on the reattachment of fragments to endodontically treated fractured incisors: an in vitro experimental comparison. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2016; 28(2):92–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhargava M, Pandit IK, Srivastava N, et al. An evaluation of various materials and tooth preparation designs used for reattachment of fractured incisors. Dent Traumatol. 2010;26(5):409–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruschi-Alonso RC, Correr GM, Alves MC, et al. Reattachment of anterior fractured teeth: effect of materials and techniques on impact strength. Dent Traumatol. 2010;26(4):315–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis AF, Giannini M, Kavaguchi A, et al. Comparison of microtensile bond strength to enamel and dentin of human, bovine, and porcline teeth. J Adhes Dent. Pmid: 15293420. 2004;6:117–121.
   Google Scholar
• Schilke R, Lisson JA, Bauss O, et al. Comparison of the number and diameter of dentinal tubules in human and bovine dentine by scanning electron microscopic investigation. Arch Oral Biol. 2000;45(5):355–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares CJ, Barbosa LM, Santana FR, et al. Fracture strength of composite fixed partial denture using bovine teeth as a substitute for human teeth with or without fiber-reinforcement. Braz Dent J. 2010; 21(3):235–240.
   Google Scholar
• Loguercio AD, Mengarda J, Amaral R, et al. Effect of fractured or sectioned fragments on the fracture strength of different reattachment techniques. Ope Dent. Pmid: 15195730. 2004;29:295–300.
   Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Agrawal S, Sharma DK, et al. Comparison of Fracture resistance of different reattachment techniues and adhesive materials on incisal tooth fragment reattachment. Iosr Jdms. 2017; 16(06):133–138. 160603133138
   Google Scholar
• Capp CI, Roda MI, Tamaki R, et al. Reattachment of rehydrated dental fragment using two techniques. Dent Traumatol. 2009;25(1):95–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirani F, Malekipour MR, Tahririan D, et al. Effect of storage environment on the bond strength of reattachment of crown fragments to fracture teeth. J Conserv Dent. 2011;14(3):269–272.
   Google Scholar
• Demarco FF, Fay RM, Pinzon LM, et al. Fracture resistance of re-attached coronal fragments-influence of different adhesive materials and bevel preparation. Dent Traumatol. 2004;20(3):157–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho-de-Souza FH, Rocha AD, Rubini A, et al. Influence of adhesive system and bevel preparation on fracture strength of teeth restored with composite resin. Braz Dent J. 2010; 21(4):327–331.
   Google Scholar
• Peixoto RT, Poletto LT, Lanza MD, et al. The influence of occlusal finish line configuration on microleakage of indirect composite inlays. J Adhes Dent. 2002;4(2):145–150. PMID: 12236643
   Google Scholar
• Schmidlin PR, Wolleb K, Imfeld T, et al. Influence of beveling and ultrasound application on marginal adaptation of box-only class II (slot) resin composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2007;32(3):291–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baroudi K, Rodrigues JC. Flowable Resin Composites: A Systematic Review and Clinical Considerations. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(6):ZE18–ZE24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilie N, Stark K. Curing behaviour of high-viscosity bulk-fill composites. J Dent. 2014;42(8):977–985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atalay C, Yazici AR, Horuztepe A, et al. Fracture Resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with bulk fill, bulk fill flowable, fiber-reinforced, and conventional resin composite. Oper Dent. 2016; 41(5):E131–E140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patnana AK, Vanga NR, Vabbalareddy R, et al. Evaluating the fracture resistance of fiber reinforced composite restorations - An in vitro analysis. Indian J Dent Res. 2020;31(1):138–144.
   Google Scholar
• Potiket N, Chiche G, Finger IM. In vitro fracture strength of teeth restored with different all-ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92(5):491–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar