Producing Detroit: Narratives of Space and Place in the 1932 Ford Hunger March and Funeral Protest

References

• 10,000 parade peaceably at funerals for Ford rioters. Detroit Times, March 13, 1932. Box 3, Folder 8. Robert W. Dunn Collection. Walter P. Reuther Library, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• 5 Ford riot leaders are sought by police. Detroit News, March 8, 1932. Box 117, Folder 1,Sleeve 33. Maurice Sugar Papers. Walter P. Reuther Library, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Dearborn Chief appeals for federal aid in tracking leaders of River Rouge riot. March 8, 1932. Box 3, Folder 3. Robert W. Dunn Collection. Walter P. Reuther Library, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Detroit police criticized for not halting parade. Detroit News, March 8, 1932. Box 3, Folder 3. Robert W. Dunn Collection. Walter P. Reuther Library, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Four dead, 23 wounded is Ford’s answer to the demand for work, bread. Daily Worker, March 8, 1932. Box 3, Folder 4. Robert W. Dunn Collection. Walter P. Reuther Library, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Henry Ford personally directs frame-up to cover up his murders. Daily Worker, March 10, 1932. Box 3, Folder 5. Robert W. Dunn Collection. Walter P. Reuther Library, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Huge funeral today; rally masses to fight for jobless’ demands. Daily Worker, March 12, 1932. Box 3, Folder 7. Robert W. Dunn Collection. Walter P. Reuther Library, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Hunger marchers battle police. Detroit Evening Times, March 7, 1932. Box 3, Folder 1. Robert W. Dunn Collection. Walter P. Reuther Library, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Jobless councils, auto union score Ford murder of 4. Daily Worker, March 10, 1932. Box 3, Folder 5. Robert W. Dunn Collection. Walter P. Reuther Library, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Mass protest Friday; Funeral set for Saturday. Daily Worker, March 9, 1932. Box 3, Folder 4. Robert W. Dunn Collection. Walter P. Reuther Library, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Order marks Reds’ funeral. Detroit Free Press, March 13, 1932. Box 3, Folder 8. Robert W. Dunn Collection.Walter P. Reuther Library,Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Organize and defeat the Ford plan–Mass production of mass murder! Daily Worker, March 10, 1932. Box 3, Folder 5. Robert W. Dunn Collection. Walter P. Reuther Library, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Some questions for Ford’s Mayor Murphy! Daily Worker, March 11, 1932. Box 3, Folder 6. Robert W. Dunn Collection. Walter P. Reuther Library, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• The Rouge Riot. Detroit Free Press, March 8, 1932. Box 3, Folder 4. Robert W. Dunn Collection. Walter P. Reuther Library, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• The tragedy at Dearborn. Detroit News, March 9, 1932. Box 117, Folder 1, Sleeve 51. Maurice Sugar Papers. Walter P. Reuther Library, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Thousands upon thousands protest. 1932. New Force 1, no. 3: 14–5.
   Google Scholar
• Three killed, score injured in job riot at Ford plant. Detroit Mirror, March 8, 1932. Box 117, Folder 1, Sleeve 30. Maurice Sugar Papers. Walter P. Reuther Library, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Toy demands grand jury probe of Ford Riot. Detroit Mirror, March 9, 1932. Box 3, Folder 4. Robert W. Dunn Collection. Walter P. Reuther Library, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Working class of Detroit enraged by massacre of unemployed Ford workers. Daily Worker, March 8, 1932. Box 3, Folder 4. Robert W. Dunn Collection. Walter P. Reuther Library, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Agnew, J. A. 2011. Space and place. In The SAGE handbook of geographical knowledge, eds. J. A. Agnew and D. N. Livingstone, 316–30. London, UK: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Babson, S. 1986. Working Detroit. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barney, T. 2013. “‘Gulag’—Slavery, Inc.”: The power of place and the rhetorical life of a Cold War map. Rhetoric and Public Affairs 16 (2):317–54. https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.2.0317.
   Google Scholar
• Baskin, A. 1972. The Ford hunger march—1932. Labor History 13 (3):331–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00236567208584211.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, B. T. 2012. The making of black Detroit in the age of Henry Ford. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, C., G. Dickinson, and B. L. Ott. 2010. Introduction: Rhetoric/Memory/Place. In Places of public memory: The rhetoric of museums and memorials, eds. G. Dickinson, C. Blair, and B. L. Ott, 1–54. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brueggemann, J. 2000. The power and collapse of paternalism: The Ford Motor Company and black workers, 1937–1941. Social Problems 47 (2):220–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/3097199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgchardt, C. R. 1980. Two faces of American communism: Pamphlet rhetoric of the third period and the popular front. Quarterly Journal of Speech 66 (4):375–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceplair, L. 2011. Anti-communism in twentieth-century America: A critical history. 1st ed. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Chirindo, K. 2016. A (Hetero)Topology of rhetoric and Obama’s African dreams. Advances in the History of Rhetoric 19 (1):50–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/15362426.2016.1137251.
   Google Scholar
• Cisneros, J. D. 2011. (Re)Bordering the civic imaginary: Rhetoric, hybridity, and citizenship in La Gran Marcha. Quarterly Journal of Speech 97 (1):26–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2010.536564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloud, D. L. 1999. The null persona: Race and the rhetoric of silence in the uprising of ’34. Rhetoric & Public Affairs 2 (2): 177–209.
   Google Scholar
• Cloud, D. L. 2005. Fighting words: Labor and the limits of communication at Staley, 1993 to 1996. Management Communication Quarterly 18 (4):509–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318904273688.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. 2004. Place: A short introduction. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cruden, R. 1932. Bloody Monday at Ford’s. New York. Box 1. Robert W. Dunn Collection. Walter P. Reuther Library, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, J. 2016. Crowds and party. Brooklyn, NY: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Dechaine, D. R. 2009. Bordering the civic imaginary: Alienization, fence logic, and the Minuteman Civil Defense Corps. Quarterly Journal of Speech 95(1):43–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630802621078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado, F. 1999. The rhetoric of Fidel Castro: Ideographs in the service of revolutionaries. Howard Journal of Communications 10 (1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/106461799246861.
   Google Scholar
• DeLuca, K. M. 1999. Unruly arguments: The body rhetoric of Earth First!, Act Up, and Queer Nation. Argumentation and Advocacy 36 (1):9–21.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson, G. 2002. Joe’s rhetoric finding authenticity at Starbucks. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 32 (4):5–27.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson, G., B. L. Ott, and E. Aoki. 2006. Spaces of remembering and forgetting: The Reverent Eye/I at the Plains Indian Museum. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 3 (1):27–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420500505619.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson, G., B. L. Ott, and A. Eric. 2005. Memory and myth at the Buffalo Bill museum. Western Journal of Communication 69 (2): 85–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570310500076684.
   Google Scholar
• Doody, C. 2012. Detroit’s cold war: The origins of postwar conservatism. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Endres, D., and S. Senda-Cook. 2011. Location matters: The rhetoric of place in protest. Quarterly Journal of Speech 97 (3): 257–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2011.585167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewalt, J. P. 2019. Visibility and order at the Salt Lake City main public library: Commonplaces, deviant publics, and the rhetorical criticism of neoliberalism’s geographies. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 16 (2):103–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2019.1624798.
   Google Scholar
• Fenster, M. 2008. Conspiracy theories: Secrecy and power in American culture. Rev. and updated ed. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gartman, D. 1986. Auto slavery: The labor process in the American automobile industry, 1897-1950. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gatchet, A. D., and D. L. Cloud. 2013. David, Goliath, and the Black Panthers: The paradox of the oppressed militant in the rhetoric of self-defense. Journal of Communication Inquiry 37 (1): 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859912466411.
   Google Scholar
• Gossman, M. 1932. Bloody Monday at Ford’s. Labor Defender, April 1, 1932. Box 2, Folder 47. Robert W. Dunn Collection. Walter P. Reuther Library, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Heitmann, J. 2009. The automobile and American life. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, O. 1932. After the Dearborn Massacre. The New Republic, March 30.
   Google Scholar
• Keeran, R. 1980. The communist party and the auto workers’ unions. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, R. D. G. 1990. Hammer and Hoe: Alabama communists during the Great Depression. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, J. 2016. ‘Honest Toil’: Labor, the body, and citizenship in the Knights of Labor, 1880–1890. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 46 (1):66–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2015.1106576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 1991. The production of space. Trans. Henri Nicholson-Smith. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein, N. 1988. Introduction: The American automobile industry and its workers. In On the line: Essays in the history of auto work, eds. Nelson Lichtenstein and Stephen Meyer, 1–16. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luff, J. 2012. Commonsense anticommunism: Labor and civil liberties between the World Wars. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mattina, A. F. 1994. ‘Rights as well as duties’: The rhetoric of Leonora O’Reilly. Communication Quarterly 42 (2):196–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379409369926.
   Google Scholar
• May, M. S. 2013. Soapbox rebellion: The Hobo orator union and the free speech fights of the industrial workers of the world, 1909-1916. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, B. J. 2016. ‘Chrysler pulled the trigger’: The affective politics of insanity and black rage at the trial of James Johnson, Jr. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 46 (2):131–55.https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2016.1141348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow, F. 1932. Class war in Detroit. New Masses, May 1932. Box 2, Folder 50. Robert W. Dunn Collection. Walter P. Reuther Library, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• National Park Service. Ford River Rouge Complex. n.d. https://www.nps.gov/nr/travel/detroit/d38.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Neville-Shepard, R. 2018. Paranoid style and subtextual form in modern conspiracy rhetoric. Southern Communication Journal 83 (2):119–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2017.1423106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norwood, S. 1996. Ford’s brass knuckles: Harry Bennett, the cult of muscularity, and anti-labor terror–1920–1945. Labor History 37 (3):365–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/00236619612331386873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paliewicz, N. S. 2018. The country, the city, and the corporation: Rio Tinto Kennecott and the materiality of corporate rhetoric. Environmental Communication 12 (6):744–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1416421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, B. 2012. Why are all the big American car companies based in Michigan? Slate, February 29. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2012/02/why-are-all-the-big-american-car-companies-based-in-michigan.html.
   Google Scholar
• Peeples, J. A. 2003. Trashing south-central: Place and identity in a community-level environmental justice dispute. Southern Communication Journal 69 (1):82–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417940309373280.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. S. 1979. Black automobile workers in Detroit, 1910-1930. The Journal of Negro History 64 (3):177–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/2717031.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, A. M. C. 2004. Whose ‘America’? The politics of rhetoric and space in the formation of U.S. Nationalism. Radical History Review 89 (1):115–34.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, C. R. 2015. Contours of the land: Place-as-rhetoric and native American effigy mounds. Western Journal of Communication 79 (3):307–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2015.1041651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrecker, E. 1999. Many are the crimes: McCarthyism in America. Revised edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shome, R. 2003. Space matters: The power and practice of space. Communication Theory 13, no. 1: 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00281.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegfried, K. 2019. Feeling collective: The queer politics of affect in the Riot Grrrl movement. Women’s Studies in Communication 42 (1):21–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2018.1563579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soja, E. W. 2011. Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. 2nd Ed. Brooklyn, NY: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Steudeman, M. J. 2015. Indeterminacy, incipiency, and attitudes: Materialist oscillation in the 2012 chicago teachers’ strike. Quarterly Journal of Speech 101 (3):509–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2015.1055786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storch, R. 2009. Red Chicago: American communism at its grassroots, 1928–35. The working class in American history. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sugar, M. 1980. The Ford Hunger march. Berkeley, CA: Meiklejohn Civil Liberties Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. C., H. Bean, N. O’Gorman, and R. Rice. 2017. A fearful engine of power: Conceptualizing the communication–security relationship. Annals of the International Communication Association 41 (2):111–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1312482.
   Google Scholar
• Tonn, M. B. 1996. Militant Motherhood: Labor’s Mary Harris ‘Mother’ Jones. Quarterly Journal of Speech 82 (1):1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triece, M. E. 2003. Appealing to the ‘intelligent worker’: Rhetorical reconstitution and the influence of firsthand experience in the rhetoric of Leonora O’Reilly. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 33 (2):5–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773940309391251.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, G. 2004. ‘The paralysis of the labor movement’: Men, masculinity, and unions in 1920s Detroit. Michigan Historical Review 30 (1):59–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, E. A. 2005. Rhetorical spaces in memorial places: The cemetery as a rhetorical memory place/space. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 35 (4):51–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773940509391322.
   Google Scholar
• Young Communist League of Detroit. 1932. The youth in the Ford Hunger march: The story of Bloody Monday. Box 53, Folder 19. Maurice Sugar Papers. Walter P. Reuther Library, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
   Google Scholar