Celebrating diversity: A framework for urban discourses

References

• Adams, D., Tiesdell, S., & White, J. T. (2013). Smart parcelization and place diversity: Reconciling real estate and urban design priorities. Journal of Urban Design, 18(4), 459–477.
   Google Scholar
• Afroogh, E. (1997). Space and social inequality. Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University.
   Google Scholar
• Algan, Y., Hémet, C., & Laitin, D. D. (2016). The social effects of ethnic diversity at the local level: A natural experiment with exogenous residential allocation. Journal of Political Economy, 124(3), 696–733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, A., & Graham, S. (1997). The ordinary city. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 22(4), 411–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York: NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Arapoglou, V. P. (2012). Diversity, inequality and urban change. European Urban and Regional Studies, 19(3), 223–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azadeh, M. A. (2003). Residential segregation in Tehran. Journal of Humanities of Alzahra University, 44 & 45, 25–50.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, J. F., Zimmerman, F. J., Almgren, G. R., Mayer, J. D., & Huebner, C. E. (2006). Birth outcomes among urban African-American women: A multilevel analysis of the role of racial residential segregation. Social Science & Medicine, 63(12), 3030–3045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschman, S. (2012). Residential segregation and interethnic contact in the Netherlands. Urban Studies, 49(2), 353–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bove, V., & Elia, L. (2016). Migration, diversity, and economic growth. Journal of World Development, 1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.08.012
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. S. (2005). Desegregating the city: Issues, strategies and blind spots in comparative perspective. Cape Town: Isandla Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Burayidi, M. A. (2015). Cities and the diversity agenda in planning. In M. A. Burayidi (Ed.), Cities and the politics of difference: Multiculturalism and diversity in urban planning (pp. 3–19). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byrd, M. (2014). Diversity issues: Exploring “critical” through multiple lenses. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16(4), 515–528. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422314544297
   Google Scholar
• Cabrera, J. F., & Najarian, J. C. (2013). Can new urbanism create diverse communities? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 33(4), 427–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero, R., & Kockelman, K. (1997). Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2(3), 199–219. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, R. L. H. (2007). Planning, land and affordable housing in Hong Kong. Housing Studies, 22(1), 63–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, B. D., & Costello, V. (1973). The urban system and social patterns in Iranian cities. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 59(59), 99–128.
   Google Scholar
• Clavita, N., & Mallach, A. (2010). Inclusionary housing in international perspective: Affordable housing, social inclusion, and land value recapture. Cambridge: MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, I., & Goodchild, B. (2001). Social mix and the ‘balanced community’ in British housing policy - a tale of two epochs. GeoJournal, 51(4), 351–360.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, D. J. (2009). Planning and its orientation to the future. International Planning Studies, 14(1), 85–89.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, D. J. (2010). Schools of planning thought: Exploring differences through similarities. International Planning Studies, 15(4), 269–280.
   Google Scholar
• Cuomo, A. M., & Rosado, R. 2015. Zoning and the comprehensive plan. Washington: NewYork State of Opportunity: Division of Local Government Services. http://www.dos.ny.gov
   Google Scholar
• Dadashpoor, H., & Ghazaie, M. (2019). Exploring the consequences of segregation through residents’ experiences: Evidence of a neighborhood in the Tehran metropolis. Cities, 95, 102391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, J., & DiRienzo, C. E. (2010). Is ethnic diversity good for the environment? A cross-country analysis. The Journal of Environment & Development, 19(1), 91–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davy, B. (2008). Plan it without a condom! Planning Theory, 7(3), 301–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawkins, C., Jeon, J. S., & Knaap, G.-J. (2016). Creating and preserving affordable homeownership opportunities: Does inclusionary zoning make sense? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X16659763
   Google Scholar
• Day, K. (2003). New urbanism and the challenges of designing for diversity. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23(1), 83–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinesen, P. T., & Sønderskov, K. M. (2015). Ethnic diversity and social trust: Evidence from the micro-context. American Sociological Review, 1–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122415577989
   Google Scholar
• Edgington, D. W. (2017). Comprehensive planning in Japanese large cities. Planning Perspectives. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2017.1389655
   Google Scholar
• Eraydin, A., Tasan-Kok, T., & Vranken, J. (2010). Diversity matters: Immigrant entrepreneurship and contribution of different forms of social integration in economic performance of cities. European Planning Studies, 18(4), 521–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escafré-Dublet, A., & Lelévrier, C. (2018). Governing diversity without naming it: An analysis of neighbourhood policies in Paris. European Urban and Regional Studies, 1–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776417750439
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011). Cities of tomorrow: Challenges, visions, ways forward. Directorate-General for Regional Policy, European Union. doi:https://doi.org/10.2776/41803
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. S. (2005). Cities and diversity: Should we want it? Can we plan for it? Urban Affairs Review, 41(1), 3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feitosa, F. F., Le, Q. B., & Paul Vlek, L. G. (2011). Multi-agent simulator for urban segregation (MASUS): A tool to explore alternatives for promoting inclusive cities. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 35(2), 104–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fincher, R., & Iveson, K. (2008). Planning and diversity in the city: Redistribution, recognition and encounter. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fincher, R., Iveson, K., Leitner, H., & Preston, V. (2014). Planning in the multicultural city: Celebrating diversity or reinforcing difference? Progress in Planning, 92, 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fincher, R., & Jacobs, J. M. (1998). Cities of difference. New York, London: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, C. S. (1975). Toward a subcultural theory of Urbanism. American Journal of Sociology, 80(6), 1319–1341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, N., Grodach, C., & Murdoch, J. (2016). Neighborhood diversity, economic health, and the role of the arts. Journal of Urban Affairs, 1–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garasky, S. (2002). Where are they going? A comparison of urban and rural youths’ locational choices after leaving the parental home. Social Science Research, 31(3), 409–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garde, A. (2016). Affordable by design? Inclusionary housing insights from Southern California. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 36(1), 16–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghazaie, M., Rafieian, M., & Dadashpoor, M. (2020). Exploring the socio-spatial patterns of diversity and its influencing factors at a metropolitan scale. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 13(3), 325–356.
   Google Scholar
• Glynn, S. (2010). Playing the ethnic card: Politics and segregation in London’s East End. Urban Studies, 47(5), 991–1013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gundelach, B., & Freitag, M. (2014). Neighbourhood diversity and social trust: An empirical analysis of interethnic contact and group-specific effects. Journal of Urban Studies, 51(6), 1236–1256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, C., Buchmann, C. M., & Schwarz, N. (2017). Linking urban sprawl and income segregation – Findings from a stylised agent-based model. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808317719072
   Google Scholar
• Hananel, R. (2014). Can centralisation, decentralisation and welfare go together? The case of Massachusetts Affordable housing policy (Ch. 40B). Urban Studies, 51(12), 2487–2502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2000). Spaces of hope. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holtug, N., & Mason, A. (2010). Introduction: Immigration, diversity and social cohesion. Ethnicities, 10(4), 407–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchings, E., & Thomas, H. (2005). The business case for equality and diversity: A UK case study of private consultancy and race equality. Planning Practice & Research, 20(3), 263–278.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• James, S. W. (2013). Rights to the diverse city: Challenges to Indigenous participation in urban planning and heritage preservation in Sydney, Australia. Space and Culture, 16(3), 274–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jun, H.-J., & Conroy, M. M. (2013). Comprehensive planning and sustainability in Georgia’s exurbs. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 15(3), 329–351. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2013.766575
   Google Scholar
• Kalin, I. (2011). Religion, unity and diversity. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 37(4), 471–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D. H., & Woodhouse, K. (2004). Research in ethnic segregation I: Causal factors. Urban Geography, 25(6), 579–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karsten, L. (2009). From a top-down to a bottom-up urban discourse: (re)constructing the city in a family-inclusive way. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 24(3), 317–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirman, A., Markose, S., Giansante, S., & Pin, P. (2007). Marginal contribution, reciprocity and equity in segregated groups: Bounded rationality and self-organisation in social networks. Economic Dynamics and Control, 31(6), 2085–2107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korsu, E., & Wenglenski, S. (2010). Job accessibility, residential segregation and risk of long-term unemployment in the Paris region. Urban Studies, 47(11), 2279–2324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotok, S., Frankenberg, E., Schafft, K. A., Mann, B. A., & Fuller, E. J. (2015). School choice, racial segregation, and poverty concentration: Evidence from Pennsylvania. Educational Policy, 31(4), 415–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusumastuti, D., & Nicholson, A. (2017). Mixed-use development in Christchurch, New Zealand: Do you want to live there? Urban Studies, 1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017725475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurence, J. (2016). Wider-community segregation and the effect of neighbourhood ethnic diversity on social capital: An investigation into intra-neighbourhood trust in Great Britain and London. Sociology, 1–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516641867
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, L., Huang, Y., & Zhang, W. (2017). Residential segregation and perceptions of social integration in Shanghai, China. Urban Studies, 1–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098016689012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucio, J. D., Auer, J. C., & Johnston, E. W. (2013). Neighborhood diversity: Framework for municipalities. Journal of State and Local Government Review, 45(1), 48–56.
   Google Scholar
• Mady, C., & Chettiparamb, A. (2016). Planning in the face of ‘deep divisions’: A view from Beirut, Lebanon. Planning Theory, 1–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095216639087
   Google Scholar
• Marvasti, A. B., & McKinney, K. D. (2011). Does diversity mean assimilation? Critical Sociology, 37(5), 631–650.
   Google Scholar
• Mashhadi Moghadam, S. N., & Rafieian, M. (2019). If Foucault were an urban planner: An epistemology of power in planning theories. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 6(1), Article 1592065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (2001). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meshkini, A., & Rahimi, H. (2012). Spatial segregation in metropolis: An analysis of social geography of tehran metropolis. Spatial Planning (Modares Human Sciences), 15(4 (72)), 85–107.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, G. P., & Hersperger, A. M. (2015). Implementing comprehensive plans: Indicators for a task-sheet based performance evaluation process. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(11), 2056–2081.
   Google Scholar
• Nathan, M. (2012). After Florida: Towards an economics of diversity. European Urban and Regional Studies, 1–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776412463371
   Google Scholar
• Nightingale, C. H. (2012). Segregation: A global history of divided cities. New York: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, R. K. (2008). Using content analysis to evaluate local master plans and zoning codes. Land Use Policy, 25(3), 432–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyden, P., Maly, M., & Lukehart, J. (1997). The emergence of stable racially and ethnically diverse urban communities: A case study of nine U.S. cities. Housing Policy Debate, 8(2), 491–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neil, J. A., & Gallagher, C. E. (2014). Determining what is important in terms of the quality of an urban green network: A study of urban planning in England and Scotland. Planning Practice and Research, 29(2), 202–216.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, K. (2010). Being together in urban parks: Connecting public space, leisure, and diversity. Leisure Sciences, 32(5), 418–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto-Coelho, J. M., & Zuberi, T. (2015). Segregated diversity. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 1(4), 475–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PoorAhmad, A., HatamiNezhad, H., & Hadi, H. (2005). The pathology urban development master plans of Iran. Geographical Studies, 38(6), 167–180.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century the 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Journal of Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qadeer, M. A. (1997). Pluralistic planning for multicultural cities: The Canadian practice. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(4), 481–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, Z. (2011). Shaping urban form without zoning: Investigating three neighbourhoods in Houston. Planning Practice & Research, 26(1), 21–42.
   Google Scholar
• Raco, M. (2018). Living with diversity: Local social imaginaries and the politics of intersectionality in a super-diverse city. Political Geography, 62, 149–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raco, M., & Kesten, J. (2016). The politicisation of diversity planning in a global city: Lessons from London. Urban Studies, 1–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098016674869
   Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, P. (1998). Planning for diversity and change: Implications of a polyethnic society. Planning Practice & Research, 13(4), 359–369.
   Google Scholar
• Roccas, S., & Brewer, M. B. (2002). Social identity complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(2), 88–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero, H., Vásquez, A., Fuentes, C., Salgado, M., Schmidt, A., & Banzhaf, E. (2012). Assessing urban environmental segregation (UES). The case of Santiago de Chile. Ecological Indicators, 23, 76–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, D. R. (2000). Social disorganization and Parochial control: Religious institutions and their communities. Sociological Forum, 15(2), 339–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. (2000). When strangers become neighbours: Managing cities of difference. Planning Theory & Practice, 1(1), 13–30.
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, M. (2016). European cities, municipal organisations and diversity: The new politics of difference. Göttingen: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52185-9
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, K., Hewstone, M., & Ramiah, A. A. (2012). Neighborhood diversity and social identity complexity: Implications for intergroup relations. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(2), 135–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirazi, M. R. (2013). Sustainable planning for a quasi-urban region, necessities and challenges: The case of Tehran-Karaj. Planning Perspectives, 28(3), 441–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skifter Andersen, H. (2010). Excluded places. On the interaction between segregation, urban decay and deprived neighbourhoods. Housing, Theory and Society, 19(3–4), 153–169.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2002). Mixed-Income housing developments: Promise and reality. Harvard: NeighborWorks and Joint Center for Housing Studies, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Song, Y., Li, C., Olshansky, R., Zhang, Y., & Xiao, Y. (2017). Are we planning for sustainable disaster recovery? Evaluating recovery plans after the Wenchuan earthquake. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 60(12), 2192–2216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stojčić, N., Bečić, M., & Vojinić, P. (2016). The impact of migration movements on innovation activities in croatian counties. Journal for General Social Issues, 25(3), 291–307.
   Google Scholar
• Stolle, D., Soroka, S., & Johnston, R. (2008). When does diversity erode trust? Neighborhood diversity, interpersonal trust and the mediating effect of social. Political Studies, 56(1), 57–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stren, R. (2010). Diversity and urban governance. In: C. Wanjiku Kihato, M. Massoumi, B. A. Ruble, P. Subirós, & A. M. Garland (Eds.), Urban diversity space culture and inclusive pluralism in cities worldwide (pp. 258–282). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sturgis, P., Brunton-Smith, I., Kuha, J., & Jackson, J. (2014). Ethnic diversity, segregation and the social cohesion of neighbourhoods in London. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37(8), 1286–1309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talen, E. (2005). Land use zoning and human diversity: Exploring the connection. Journal of Urban Planning and Environment, 131(4), 214–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talen, E. (2006). Design that enables diversity: The complications of a planning ideal. Journal of Planning Literature, 20(3), 233–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talen, E. (2008). Design for diversity: Exploring socially mixed neighborhoods. Oxford: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Talen, E. (2012). Zoning and diversity in historical perspective. Journal of Planning History, 11(4), 330–347.
   Google Scholar
• Tasan-Kok, T., van Kempen, R., Raco, M., & Bolt, G. (2014). Towards hyper-diversified European cities: A critical literature review. Utrecht University, Faculty of Geosciences. Utrecht: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Usher, T., Gaskin, D. J., Bower, K., Rohde, C., & Thorpe, R. J., Jr. (2016). Residential segregation and hypertension prevalence in black and white older adults. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 1–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464816638788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan, L. (2007). The spatial syntax of urban segregation. Progress in Planning, 67(3), 205–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verkuyten, M., & Yogeeswaran, K. (2020). Cultural diversity and its implications for intergroup relations. Current Opinion in Psychology, 32, 1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vertovec, S. (2019). Talking around super-diversity. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 42(1), 125–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagmiller, R. L., Jr. (2013). Blacks’ and whites’ experiences of neighborhood racial and ethnic diversity: Intercohort variation in neighborhood diversity and integration in early and early middle adulthood. Urban Affairs Review, 49(1), 32–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessendorf, S. (2014). ‘Being open, but sometimes closed’. Conviviality in a super-diverse London neighbourhood. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 17(4), 392–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weston, J., & Weston, M. (2013). Inclusion and transparency in planning decision-making: Planning officer reports to the planning committee. Planning Practice & Research, 28(2), 186–203.
   Google Scholar
• Wichowsky, A. (2017). Civic life in the divided metropolis: Social capital, collective action, and residential income segregation. Urban Affairs Review, 1–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087416688097
   Google Scholar
• Wright, R., Ellis, M., Holloway, S. R., & Wong, S. (2014). Patterns of racial diversity and segregation in the United States: 1990–2010. The Professional Geographer, 66(2), 173–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavodny, M. (1999). Determinants of recent immigrants’ locational choices. The International Migration Review, 33(4), 1014–1030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zubrinsky Charles, C. (2003). The dynamics of racial residential segregation. Annual Review of Sociology, 29(1), 167–207.
   Google Scholar