Hindsight 2020: Reflections of community visions from the past

References

• Alexander, E. R., & Faludi, A. (1989). Planning and plan implementation: Notes on evaluation criteria. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 16(2), 127–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altes, W. K. K. (2006). Stagnation in housing production: another success in the Dutch ‘planner's paradise’?. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 33(1), 97–114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, W. C. (1997). General plan evaluation criteria: An approach to making better plans. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(3), 329–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, S. D., & Highfield, W. E. (2005). Does planning work?: Testing the implementation of local environmental planning in Florida. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2), 159–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• City of Springfield, MO. (2004). Vision 20/20: The future is now. Retrieved from https://www.springfieldmo.gov/DocumentCenter/View/9999/Complete-Strategic-Plan-PDF
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, V. P. M., Edwards, G. C., & Sharkansky, I. (1978). The policy predicament: Making and implementing public policy. San Francisco: WH Freeman
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (1989). Conformance vs. performance: Implications for evaluation. Impact Assessment, 7(2–3), 135–151.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1980). Critical theory and planning practice. Journal of the American Planning Association, 46(3), 275–286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1982). Planning in the face of power. Journal of the American Planning Association, 48(1), 67–80
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1984). Lest planning be seen as a tool …. Built Environment, 1978, 124–131.
   Google Scholar
• Helling, A. (1998). Collaborative visioning: Proceed with caution!: Results from evaluating Atlanta’s vision 2020 project. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(3), 335–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, L. D. (2001). Urban development: The logic of making plans (Vol. 166). Washington DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (1999). Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: A framework for evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of American Planning Association, 65(4), 412–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, W. R., Benson, V. L., Andersen, J., Plumb, P., Davis, N., & Herr, P. B. (1993). Visions of things to come (public involvement in city planning). Planning, 59(5), 10.
   Google Scholar
• Laurian, L., Day, M., Backhurst, M., Berke, P., Ericksen, N., Crawford, J., Chapman, S. (2004). What drives plan implementation? Plans, planning agencies and developers. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 47(4), 555–577
   Google Scholar
• Laurian, L., Day, M., Berke, P., Ericksen, N., Backhurst, M., Crawford, J., & Dixon, J. (2004b). Evaluating plan implementation: A conformance-based methodology. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(4), 471–480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, H. L. (1985). Towards a Subjective Approach to Policy Planning & Evaluation: Common-Sense Structured. Winnipeg, Canada: Ronald P. Frye & Company
   Google Scholar
• Littrel, D. W., & Littrell, D. P. (2016). Practicing community development. Columbia, MO: University Missouri Extension.
   Google Scholar
• Mazmanian, D. A., & Sabatier, P. A. (1989). Implementation and public policy. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, V., & Pinho, P. (2010). Evaluation in urban planning: Advances and prospects. Journal of Planning Literature, 24(4), 343–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo, D. J. (1987). The Politics of Program Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Yearbooks on Public Policy Studies
   Google Scholar
• Patton, C., Sawicki, D., & Clark, J. (2016). Basic methods of policy analysis and planning (3rd ed.). Oxon; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pigg, K., Gasteyer, S., Martin, K., Apaliya, G., & Keating, K. (2015). Community effects of leadership development education: Citizen empowerment for civic engagement. Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, H. W., & Gordon, P. (1993). Market planning oxymoron or common sense?. Journal of the American Planning Association, 59(3), 347–352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P., & Mazmanian, D. (1980). The implementation of public policy: A framework of analysis. Policy Studies Journal, 8(4), 538–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seasons, M. (2003). Monitoring and evaluation in municipal planning: Considering the realities. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(4), 430–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shipley, R., Feick, R., Hall, B., & Earley, R. (2004). Evaluating municipal visioning. Planning Practice and Research, 19(2), 195–210.
   Google Scholar
• Shipley, R., & Newkirk, R. (1998). Visioning: Did anybody see where it came from? Journal of Planning Literature, 12(4), 407–416.
   Google Scholar
• Simmie, J. (1993). Planning at the Crossroads. London, UK: UCL Press
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. H. (1991). Planning America's communities: Paradise Found? Paradise Lost?. Planners Press
   Google Scholar
• Talen, E. (1996). Do plans get implemented? A review of evaluation in planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 10(3), 248–259.
   Google Scholar
• Talen, E. (1996b). After the plans: Methods to evaluate the implementation success of plans. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 16(2), 79–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talen, E. (1997). Success, failure, and conformance: An alternative approach to planning evaluation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24(4), 573–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldner, L. S. (2004). Planning to perform: Evaluation models for city planners. Berkeley Planning Journal, 17(1), 1-28.
   Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A. (1973). If planning is everything, maybe it's nothing. Policy sciences, 4(2), 127–153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar