Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher

References

• Barlo, S., Boyd, W. E., Pelizzon, A., & Wilson, S. (2020). Yarning as protected space: Principles and protocols. AlterNative, 16(2), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1177180120917480
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2016). (Mis)conceptualising themes, thematic analysis, and other problems with Fugard and Potts’ (2015) sample-size tool for thematic analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(6), 739–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1195588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise & Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021a). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021b). To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise & Health, 13(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021c). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022a). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022b). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cammock, R., Conn, C., & Nayar, S. (2021). Strengthening Pacific voices through Talanoa participatory action research. AlterNative, 17(1), 120–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1177180121996321
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, K. (2000). Methodolatry and qualitative health research. Journal of Health Psychology, 5(3), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910530000500306
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elliott, R., Fischer, C. T., & Rennie, D. L. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466599162782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, M., Torre, M. E., Oswald, A. G., & Avory, S. (2021). Critical participatory action research: Methods and praxis for intersectional knowledge production. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 68(3), 344–356. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlay, L. (2021). Thematic analysis: The ‘good’, the ‘bad’ and the ‘ugly. European Journal for Qualitative Research in Psychotherapy, 11, 103–116.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Folkes, L. (2022). Moving beyond ‘shopping list’ positionality: Using kitchen table reflexivity and in/visible tools to develop reflexive qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 146879412210989. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941221098922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, G., Brady, A., & Wilson, M. S. (2021). “What if I’m not trans enough? What if I’m not man enough?”: Transgender young adults’ experiences of gender-affirming healthcare readiness assessments in Aotearoa New Zealand. International Journal of Transgender Health, 22(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2021.1933669
   Google Scholar
• Frohard-Dourlent, H., MacAulay, M., & Shannon, M. (2020). Experiences of surgery readiness assessments in British Columbia. International Journal of Transgender Health, 21(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2020.1742842
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gale, N. K., Heath, G., Cameron, E., Rashid, S., & Redwood, S. (2013). Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13(1), 117. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-117[24047204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, N. (2000). Doing psychological research: Gathering and analyzing data. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, K. H. M., Chiang, V. C. L., & Leung, D. (2017). Hermeneutic phenomenological analysis: The ‘possibility’ beyond ‘actuality’ in thematic analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 73(7), 1757–1766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidder, L. H., & Fine, M. (1987). Qualitative and quantitative methods: When stories converge. In M. M. Mark & L. Shotland (Eds.), New directions for program evaluation (pp. 57–75). Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1459
   Google Scholar
• King, N., & Brooks, J. M. (2018). Thematic analysis in organisational research. In C. Cassell, A. L. Cunliffe, & G. Grandy (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative business management research methods: Methods and challenges (pp. 219–236). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Langdridge, D. (2004). Introduction to research methods and data analysis in psychology. Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Marecek, J. (2003). Dancing through minefields: Toward a qualitative stance in psychology. In P. M. Camic, J. E. Rhodes, & L. Yardley (Eds.), Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (pp. 49–69). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10595-004
   Google Scholar
• Rivas, C. (2018). Finding themes in qualitative data. In C. Seale (Ed.), Researching society and culture (4th ed., pp. 429–453). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B., & McGannon, K. R. (2018). Developing rigor in qualitative research: Problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11(1), 101–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.1317357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tebes, J. K. (2005). Community science, philosophy of science, and the practice of research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 35(3–4), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-005-3399-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trainor, L. R., & Bundon, A. (2021). Developing the craft: Reflexive accounts of doing reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(5), 705–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2020.1840423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varpio, L., Ajjawi, R., Monrouxe, L. V., O’Brien, B. C., & Rees, C. E. (2017). Shedding the cobra effect: Problematising thematic emergence, triangulation, saturation and member checking. Medical Education, 51(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varpio, L., O’Brien, B., Rees, C. E., Monrouxe, L., Ajjawi, R., & Paradis, E. (2021). The applicability of generalisability and bias to health professions education’s research. Medical Education, 55(2), 167–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware, F., Breheny, M., & Forster, M. (2018). Kaupapa Kōrero: A Māori cultural approach to narrative inquiry. AlterNative, 14(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1177180117744810
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S. (1988). The role of reflexivity in feminist psychology. Women’s Studies International Forum, 11(5), 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(88)90024-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar