Bibliometric analysis and systematic review of compliance with agricultural certification standards: evidence from Africa and Asia

References

• Abas A, Er AC, Tambi N, Yusoff NH. 2022. A systematic review on sustainable agricultural practices among oil palm farmers. Outlook Agric. 51(2):155–163. doi:10.1177/00307270211021875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams J, Gurney K, Hook D, Leydesdorff L. 2013. International collaboration clusters in Africa. Scientometrics. 98(1):547–556. doi:10.1007/S11192-013-1060-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams J, Johnson J, Grant J. 2022. The rise of UK–China research collaboration: trends, opportunities and challenges. Sci Public P. 49(1):132–147. doi:10.1093/SCIPOL/SCAB069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adeyeye SAO. 2022. Mycotoxins in foods: impact on health. Curr Developments Biotech Bioeng. 261–271. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-823506-5.00013-8.
   Google Scholar
• Akinwale JA, Ojerinde KD, Owoade EO. 2019. Determinants of farm certification compliance for sustainable cocoa production in Ondo state Nigeria. J Agric Environ Int Dev. 113(1):97–112. doi:10.12895/jaeid.20191.930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaboudi AR. 2022. Chemical residues: potential food safety hazards in the Middle East. Food Safety Middle East. 143–186. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-822417-5.00004-0.
   Google Scholar
• Annor BP. 2017. Global GAP standard compliance and profitability: a case study of smallholder pineapple farmers in Akuapem south of Ghana. Int J Agric Manag Dev. 7(2):165–177. doi:10.22004/ag.econ.262637.
   Google Scholar
• Annor BP. 2018. Smallholder farmers’ compliance with GlobalGAP standard: the case of Ghana. Emerald Emerging Mark Case Stud. 8(1):1–21. doi:10.1108/EEMCS-03-2017-0043.
   Google Scholar
• Annor BP, Mensah-Bonsu A, Jatoe JBD. 2016. Compliance with GLOBALGAP standards among smallholder pineapple farmers in Akuapem-south, Ghana. J Agribus Dev Emerg Econ. 6(1):21–38. doi:10.1108/JADEE-05-2013-0017.
   Google Scholar
• Ansah EO, Kaplowitz MD, Lupi F, Kerr J. 2020. Smallholder participation and procedural compliance with sustainable cocoa certification programs. Agroecology Sustain Food Syst. 44(1):54–87. doi:10.1080/21683565.2019.1579776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apriani E, Kim YS, Fisher LA, Baral H. 2020. Non-state certification of smallholders for sustainable palm oil in sumatra, Indonesia. Land Use Policy. 99:105112. doi:10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2020.105112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aria M, Misuraca M, Spano M. 2020. Mapping the evolution of social research and data science on 30 years of social indicators research. Soc Indic Res. 149(3):803–831. doi:10.1007/s11205-020-02281-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asfaw S, Mithöfer D, Waibel H. 2009. Investment in compliance with GlobalGAP standards: does it pay off for small-scale producers in Kenya? Q J Int Agric. 48(4):337–362. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-73449135793&partnerID=40&md5=b6b774e2469ceb1f3bfeac0b127946b6.
   Google Scholar
• Asfaw S, Mithöfer D, Waibel H. 2010. What impact are EU supermarket standards having on developing countries’ export of high-value horticultural products? Evidence from Kenya. J Int Food Agribus Market. 22(3):252–276. doi:10.1080/08974431003641398.
   Google Scholar
• Baas J, Schotten M, Plume A, Côté G, Karimi R. 2020. Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quant Sci Stud. 1(1):377–386. doi:10.1162/qss_a_00019.
   Google Scholar
• Bannor RK, Oppong-Kyeremeh H, Kuwornu KM. 2021. Examining the link between the theory of planned behavior and bushmeat consumption in Ghana. J Sust For. doi:10.1080/10549811.2021.1944881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovay J. 2016. FDA refusals of imported food products by country and category, 2005-2013. United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, 34. www.ers.usda.gov.
   Google Scholar
• Brandi C, Cabani T, Hosang C, Schirmbeck S, Westermann L, Wiese H. 2015. Sustainability standards for palm Oil: challenges for smallholder certification under the RSPO. J Environ Dev. 24(3):292–314. doi:10.1177/1070496515593775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briner RB, Denyer D. 2012. Systematic review and evidence synthesis as a practice and scholarship tool. In The Oxford handbook of evidence-based management. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199763986.013.0007
   Google Scholar
• Brito TP, de Souza-Esquerdo VF, Borsatto RS. 2022. State of the art on research about organic certification: a systematic literature review. Org Agric. 12(2):177–190. doi:10.1007/S13165-022-00390-6.
   Google Scholar
• Bunei E, Barclay E, Kotey B. 2021. Routine activity theory and farm produce sale in Kenya: an analysis of non-compliance with agri-food safety laws. Crime Prev Community Safety. 23(4):400–415. doi:10.1057/s41300-021-00127-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzby J, Unnevehr L, Roberts D. 2008. Food safety and imports: an analysis of FDA food-related import refusal reports (Economic Information Bulletin Number 39). In: Global agricultural imports. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service; p. 79–124.
   Google Scholar
• Buzby JC, Regmi A. 2009. FDA refusals of food imports by exporting country group. Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues. 24(2):1–5. doi:10.22004/ag.econ.94706.
   Google Scholar
• Carbonnier G, Kontinen T. 2015. Institutional learning in north-south research partnerships. Revue Tiers Monde. 221(1):149–162. doi:10.3917/rtm.221.0149.
   Google Scholar
• Carlisle L. 2016. Factors influencing farmer adoption of soil health practices in the United States: a narrative review. Agroecology Sust Food Sys. 40(6):583–613. doi:10.1080/21683565.2016.1156596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carolan MS. 2006. Social change and the adoption and adaptation of knowledge claims: whose truth do you trust in regard to sustainable agriculture? Agric Human Values. 23(3):325–339. doi:10.1007/s10460-006-9006-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalcante WQF, Coelho A, Bairrada CM. 2021. Sustainability and tourism marketing: a bibliometric analysis of publications between 1997 and 2020 using vosviewer software. Sustainability (Switzerland). 13(9). doi:10.3390/su13094987.
   Google Scholar
• Cen J, Yang D, Cao Q. 2021. Agricultural product supply chain research process and development trend analysis based on vosviewer. Conference Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Project Management, ISPM 2021, 708–715.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng P, Tang H, Dong Y, Liu K, Jiang P, Liu Y. 2021. Knowledge mapping of research on land use change and food security: a visual analysis using citespace and vosviewer. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 18(24). doi:10.3390/ijerph182413065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiputwa B, Spielman DJ, Qaim M. 2015. Food standards, certification, and poverty among coffee farmers in Uganda. World Dev. 66:400–412. doi:10.1016/J.WORLDDEV.2014.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dankers C, Liu P, Lawrence T, FAO. 2003. Environmental and social standards, certification and labelling for cash crops. Raw Materials, Tropical and Horticultural Products Service, Commodity and Trade Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• DeFries RS, Fanzo J, Mondal P, Remans R, Wood SA. 2017. Is voluntary certification of tropical agricultural commodities achieving sustainability goals for small-scale producers? A review of the evidence. Environ Res Lett. 12(3). doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aa625e.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmarchelier B, Fang ES. 2016. National culture and innovation diffusion. exploratory insights from agent-based modeling. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 105:121–128. doi:10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2016.01.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dessart FJ, Barreiro-Hurlé J, van Bavel R. 2019. Behavioural factors affecting the adoption of sustainable farming practices: a policy-oriented review. European Rev Agric Econo. 46(3):417–471. doi:10.1093/ERAE/JBZ019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding Y, Cronin B. 2011. Popular and/or prestigious? Measures of scholarly esteem. Inform Process Manag. 47(1):80–96. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2010.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elferink M, Schierhorn F. 2016. Global demand for food Is rising. Can we meet it? Harv Bus Rev. 7(4):2–6.
   Google Scholar
• Fadeyi OA, Ariyawardana A, Aziz AA. 2022. Factors influencing technology adoption among smallholder farmers: a systematic review in Africa. J Agric Rural Dev Trop. 123(1):13–30. doi:10.17170/KOBRA-202201195569.
   Google Scholar
• Fakkhong S, Suwanmaneepong S. 2017. The implementation of good agricultural practice among rice farmers in eastern region of Bangkok, Thailand. Int J Agric Tech. 13(7.3):2509–2522.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2018. The future of food and agriculture – alternative pathways to 2050. In Food and Agricultural Organization. https://www.fao.org/global-perspectives-studies/food-agriculture-projections-to-2050/en/.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2021. The state of the world’s land and water resources for food and agriculture – systems at breaking point (SOLAW 2021). Synthesis Report. 1–82. doi:10.4060/CB7654EN.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2022. FAO’s work on food safety and quality. https://www.fao.org/food-safety/background/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Feng GC. 2020. Research performance evaluation in China: a big data analysis. SAGE Open. 10(1). doi:10.1177/2158244019901257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gichuki CN, Han J, Njagi T. 2020. The impact of household wealth on adoption and compliance to GLOBAL GAP production standards: evidence from smallholder farmers in Kenya. Agriculture. 10(2):50. doi:10.3390/agriculture10020050.
   Google Scholar
• Gichuki CN, Han J, Qiang L, Njagi T, Njinju SM. 2019. Assessing compliance of conservation sustainable production standards and profit efficiency in small-sized farms in Kenya. Appl Ecol Environ Res. 17(5):10463–10474. doi:10.15666/aeer/1705_1046310474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede G. 2001. Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/unf_research/53.
   Google Scholar
• Holzapfel S, Wollni M. 2014. Is GlobalGAP certification of small-scale farmers sustainable? evidence from Thailand. J Dev Stud. 50(5):731–747. doi:10.1080/00220388.2013.874558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey J. 2017. Food safety, trade, standards and the integration of smallholders into value chains a review of the literature. IFAD Res Series. 11:1–75.
   Google Scholar
• Hutabarat S, Slingerland M, Dries L. 2019. Explaining the “certification Gap” for different types of Oil palm smallholders in Riau Province, Indonesia. J Environ Dev. 28(3):253–281. doi:10.1177/1070496519854505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ITC. 2018. Sustainability Map. https://www.sustainabilitymap.org/trends.
   Google Scholar
• ITC. 2021. The state of sustainable markets 2021. https://www.intracen.org/publication/state-sustainable-markets-2021/.
   Google Scholar
• Jaud M, Cadot O, Suwa-Eisenmann A. 2013. Do food scares explain supplier concentration? An analysis of EU agri-food imports. Eur Rev Agric Econ. 40(5):873–890. doi:10.1093/ERAE/JBS038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayne TS, Fox L, Fuglie K, Adelaja A, Anderson P, Ash J, Bertram R, Brooks K, Cohen C, Deaton B, et al. 2021. Agricultural productivity growth, resilience, and economic transformation in Sub-Saharan Africa Implications for USAID. In United States Agency for International Development/Board for International Food and Agricultural Development/Association of Public and Land-grant Universities. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0. The full report can be accessed electronically at: https://www.usaid.gov/bifad/.
   Google Scholar
• Jelsma I, Schoneveld GC, Zoomers A, van Westen ACM. 2017. Unpacking Indonesia’s independent oil palm smallholders: An actor-disaggregated approach to identifying environmental and social performance challenges. Land Use Policy. 69:281–297. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaler J, Ruston A. 2019. Technology adoption on farms: using normalisation process theory to understand sheep farmers’ attitudes and behaviours in relation to using precision technology in flock management. Prev Vet Med. 170. doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karalliyadda SMCB, Kazunari T. 2020. Compliance of small-scale organic tea farmers with organic standards: A study in Sri Lanka. J Agric Sci - Sri Lanka. 15(1):1–18. doi:10.4038/jas.v15i1.8668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kariuki IM, Loy J-P. 2016. Contractual farming arrangements, quality control, incentives, and distribution failure in Kenya’s smallholder horticulture: a multivariate probit analysis. Agribusiness. 32(4):547–562. doi:10.1002/agr.21462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassem HS, Alotaibi BA, Aldosari FO, Herab A, Ghozy R. 2021. Factors influencing smallholder orange farmers for compliance with GobalGAP standards. Saudi J Biol Sci. 28(2):1365–1373. doi:10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.11.070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersting S, Wollni M. 2012. New institutional arrangements and standard adoption: evidence from small-scale fruit and vegetable farmers in Thailand. Food Policy. 37(4):452–462. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kibet N, Obare GA, Lagat JK. 2018. Risk attitude effects on global-GAP certification decisions by smallholder French bean farmers in Kenya. J Behav Exp Finance. 18:18–29. doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2018.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutsos TM, Menexes GC, Dordas CA. 2019. An efficient framework for conducting systematic literature reviews in agricultural sciences. Sci Total Environ. 682:106–117. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause H, Lippe RS, Grote U. 2016. Adoption and income effects of public GAP standards: evidence from the horticultural sector in Thailand. Horticulturae. 2(4):18. doi:10.3390/horticulturae2040018.
   Google Scholar
• Kuit M, Waarts Y. 2014. Small-scale farmers, certification schemes and private standards: is there a business case?: costs and benefits of certification and verification systems for small-scale producers in cocoa, coffee, cotton, fruit and vegetable sectors. Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation ACP-EU (CTA). 148:9–90.
   Google Scholar
• Kuldilok K. 2021. The determination of organic practice and adoption in sugarcane farming in Thailand. Kasetsart J Soc Sci. 42(3):694–701. doi:10.34044/j.kjss.2021.42.3.35.
   Google Scholar
• Kuwornu JKM, Mustapha S. 2013. Global GAP standard compliance and smallholder pineapple farmers’ access to export markets: implications for incomes. J Econ Behav Stud. 5(2):69–81. doi:10.22610/jebs.v5i2.381.
   Google Scholar
• Ledger SN, Premier R, Othman NB, Impithuksa S, Layese G, Hoon KG, Win UK, Yusoff J. 2006. Harmonising GAP programs for fresh produce in ASEAN region. Acta Hortic. 712(I):523–525. doi:10.17660/ACTAHORTIC.2006.712.64.
   Google Scholar
• Lemeilleur S, N’Dao Y, Ruf F. 2015. The productivist rationality behind a sustainable certification process: evidence from the rainforest alliance in the Ivorian cocoa sector. Int J Sustainable Dev. 18(4):310–328. doi:10.1504/IJSD.2015.072661.
   Google Scholar
• Lin F. 2021. Agriculture exports, child labor and youth education: evidence from 68 developing countries. Rev Int Econ. 1–24. doi:10.1111/roie.12572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippe RS, Grote U. 2017. Determinants affecting adoption of GLOBALG.A.P. standards: a choice experiment in Thai horticulture. Agribusiness. 33(2):242–256. doi:10.1002/agr.21471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Q, Li W. 2018. Growing scientific collaboration between Hong Kong and mainland China since the handover: a 20-year bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics. 117(3):1479–1491. doi:10.1007/S11192-018-2916-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansor NH, Che Jaafar N, Johari MA, Kannan P, Tan SP. 2021. Acceptance of good agricultural practices (GAP) among independent oil palm smallholders In Malaysia. Int J Mod Trends Soc Sci. 4(16):1–12. doi:10.35631/IJMTSS.416001.
   Google Scholar
• Meemken E-M. 2020. Do smallholder farmers benefit from sustainability standards? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Glob Food Sec. 26. doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100373.
   Google Scholar
• Meemken EM, Qaim M. 2018. Can private food standards promote gender equality in the small farm sector? J Rural Stud. 58:39–51. doi:10.1016/J.JRURSTUD.2017.12.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier C, Sampson G, Larrea C, Schlatter B, Voora V, Dang D, Bermudez S, Wozniak J, Willer H. 2020. The State of Sustainable Markets 2020: Statistics and Emerging Trends. https://www.intracen.org/uploadedFiles/intracenorg/Content/Publications/SustainableMarkets2020-layout_20201012_web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Milder JC, Arbuthnot M, Blackman A, Brooks SE, Giovannucci D, Gross L, Kennedy ET, Komives K, Lambin EF, Lee A, et al. 2015. An agenda for assessing and improving conservation impacts of sustainability standards in tropical agriculture. Conserv Biol. 29(2):309–320. doi:10.1111/cobi.12411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell Crow J. 2022. US-China partnerships bring strength in numbers to big science projects. Nature. 603:7900. doi:10.1038/D41586-022-00570-0.
   Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. 2010. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 8(5):336–341. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monjardino M, Ridaura SL, van Loon J, Mottaleb K, Kruseman G, Zepeda A, Hernández EO, Burgueño J, Singh RG, Govaerts B, et al. 2021. Disaggregating the value of conservation agriculture to inform smallholder transition to sustainable farming: a Mexican case study. Agronomy. 11(6). doi:10.3390/agronomy11061214.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mulvaney D, Robbins P. 2011. Cash crop. In: D. Mulvaney, P. Robbins, editor. Green food: an A-to-Z guide. Vol. 1. SAGE Publications, Inc.; p. 64–66. doi:10.4135/9781412971874.N21
   Google Scholar
• Muriithi BW, Mburu J, Ngigi M. 2011. Constraints and determinants of compliance with EurepGap standards: A case of smallholder French bean exporters in Kirinyaga district, Kenya. Agribusiness. 27(2):193–204. doi:10.1002/agr.20261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ni LX, Ali F, Zainudin ZH. 2016. Factors influencing the implementation of Malaysia sustainable palm oil (MSPO) among oil palm smallholders in Malaysia. Int J Acad Res Bus Soc Sci. 6(12):2222–6990. doi:10.6007/IJARBSS/v6-i12/2495.
   Google Scholar
• Okello JJ, Swinton SM. 2007. Compliance with international food safety standards in Kenya’s green bean industry: comparison of a small- and a large-scale farm producing for export. Rev Agric Econ. 29(2):269–285. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9353.2006.00342.x.
   Google Scholar
• Oppong D, Bannor RK. 2022. Gender and power work relationships: A systematic review on the evidence from Africa and Asia. Cogent Soc Sci. 8(1):2031686. doi:10.1080/23311886.2022.2031686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouma S. 2010. Global standards, local realities: private agrifood governance and the restructuring of the Kenyan horticulture industry. Econ Geogr. 86(2):197–222. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01065.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oya C, Schaefer F, Skalidou D. 2018a. The effectiveness of agricultural certification in developing countries: A systematic review. World Dev. 112:282–312. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyetunde-Usman Z, Olagunju KO, Ogunpaimo OR. 2021. Determinants of adoption of multiple sustainable agricultural practices among smallholder farmers in Nigeria. Int Soil Water Conserv Res. 9(2):241–248. doi:10.1016/J.ISWCR.2020.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan Y, Ren Y, Luning PA. 2021. Factors influencing Chinese farmers’ proper pesticide application in agricultural products – A review. Food Control. 122 doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandit U, Nain MS, Singh R, Kumar S, Chahal VP. 2017. Adoption of good agricultural practices (GAPs) in basmati (scented) rice: A study of prospects and retrospect. Indian J Agric Sci. 87(1):36–41. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85011101221&partnerID=40&md5=47016589d12b44030a43265eabfe5471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardey PG, Alston JM, Piggott RR. 2006. Agricultural R&D in the developing world. http://web.worldbank.org/archive/website01522/WEB/IMAGES/OC51.PDF.
   Google Scholar
• Piñeiro V, Arias J, Dürr J, Elverdin P, Ibáñez AM, Kinengyere A, Opazo CM, Owoo N, Page JR, Prager SD, Torero M. 2020. A scoping review on incentives for adoption of sustainable agricultural practices and their outcomes. Nat Sustain. 3(10):809–820. doi:10.1038/s41893-020-00617-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poku K. 2002. Origin of oil palm: small-scale palm Oil processing in Africa. FAO Agric Serv Bull. 148:3.
   Google Scholar
• Pongvinyoo P, Yamao M, Hosono K. 2014. Factors affecting the implementation of good agricultural practices (GAP) among coffee farmers in chumphon province, Thailand. Am J Rural Dev. 2(2):34–39. doi:10.12691/ajrd-2-2-3.
   Google Scholar
• Potts J, Meer Jvd, Daitchman J. 2010. The state of sustainability initiatives review 2010: sustainability and transparency. 151. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.588.7910&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Qiao Y, Halberg N, Vaheesan S, Scott S. 2016. Assessing the social and economic benefits of organic and fair trade tea production for small-scale farmers in Asia: a comparative case study of China and Sri Lanka. Renewable AgricFood Syst. 31(3):246–257. doi:10.1017/S1742170515000162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin Y, Xu Z, Wang X, Škare M. 2022. Green energy adoption and its determinants: A bibliometric analysis. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 153. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen LV, Coolsaet B, Martin A, Mertz O, Pascual U, Corbera E, Dawson N, Fisher JA, Franks P, Ryan CM. 2018. Social-ecological outcomes of agricultural intensification. Nat Sustain. 1(6):275–282. doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0070-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiss-Woolever VJ, Luke SH, Stone J, Shackelford GE, Turner EC. 2021. Systematic mapping shows the need for increased socio-ecological research on oil palm. Environ Res Lett. 16(6). doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abfc77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins P. 2007. Cash crop. In: Encyclopedia of environment and society. Vol. 1. SAGE Publications, Inc.; p. 225–225. doi:10.4135/9781412953924.N153
   Google Scholar
• Rodthong W, Kuwornu JKM, Datta A, Anal AK, Tsusaka TW. 2020. Factors influencing the intensity of adoption of the roundtable on sustainable palm Oil practices by smallholder farmers in Thailand. Environ Manag. 66(3):377–394. doi:10.1007/s00267-020-01323-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruzzante S, Labarta R, Bilton A. 2021. Adoption of agricultural technology in the developing world: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. World Dev. 146:105599. doi:10.1016/J.WORLDDEV.2021.105599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleifer P, Sun Y. 2020. Reviewing the impact of sustainability certification on food security in developing countries. Glob Food Sec. 24:100337. doi:10.1016/J.GFS.2019.100337.
   Google Scholar
• Schoneveld GC, van der Haar S, Ekowati D, Andrianto A, Komarudin H, Okarda B, Jelsma I, Pacheco P. 2019. Certification, good agricultural practice and smallholder heterogeneity: differentiated pathways for resolving compliance gaps in the Indonesian oil palm sector. Glob Environ Change. 57:101933. doi:10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2019.101933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serenko A. 2013. Meta-analysis of scientometric research of knowledge management: discovering the identity of the discipline. J Knowl Manag. 17(5):773–812. doi:10.1108/JKM-05-2013-0166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields D, Huang SW. 2004. China’s fruit and vegetable. In: Sophia Wu Huang, editor. Trade global trade patterns in fruits and vegetables: Vol. WRS-04-06. Washington DC: United States Department of Agriculture; p. 52–63.
   Google Scholar
• Shih T, Forsberg E. 2022. Origins, motives, and challenges in western–Chinese research collaborations amid recent geopolitical tensions: findings from Swedish–Chinese research collaborations. High Educ. 2022:1–17. doi:10.1007/S10734-022-00859-Z.
   Google Scholar
• Siddh MM, Soni G, Jain R, Sharma MK, Yadav V. 2017. Agri-fresh food supply chain quality (AFSCQ): a literature review. Indus Manag Data Syst. 117(9):2015–2044. doi:10.1108/IMDS-10-2016-0427/FULL/PDF.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srisopaporn S, Jourdain D, Perret SR, Shivakoti G. 2015. Adoption and continued participation in a public good agricultural practices program: the case of rice farmers in the central plains of Thailand. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 96:242–253. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.03.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suwanmaneepong S, Kullachai P, Fakkhong S. 2016. An investigation of factors influencing the implementation of GAP among fruit farmers in rayong province, Thailand. Int J Agric Techn. 12(7.2):1745–1757.
   Google Scholar
• Sweileh WM. 2020. Bibliometric analysis of peer-reviewed literature on climate change and human health with an emphasis on infectious diseases. Glob Health. 16(1). doi:10.1186/s12992-020-00576-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamala JK, Maramag EI, Simeon KA, Ignacio JJ. 2022. A bibliometric analysis of sustainable oil and gas production research using VOSviewer. Clean Eng Techn. 7. doi:10.1016/j.clet.2022.100437.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tanko M, Ismaila S. 2021. How culture and religion influence the agriculture technology gap in northern Ghana. World Dev Perspect. 22:100301. doi:10.1016/J.WDP.2021.100301.
   Google Scholar
• Tayleur C, Balmford A, Buchanan GM, Butchart SHM, Corlet Walker C, Ducharme H, Green RE, Milder JC, Sanderson FJ, Thomas DHL, et al. 2018. Where are commodity crops certified, and what does it mean for conservation and poverty alleviation? Biol Conserv. 217:36–46. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2017.09.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tayleur C, Balmford A, Buchanan GM, Butchart SHM, Ducharme H, Green RE, Milder JC, Sanderson FJ, Thomas DHL, Vickery J, et al. 2017. Global coverage of agricultural sustainability standards, and their role in conserving biodiversity. Conserv Lett. 10(5):610–618. doi:10.1111/conl.12314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetra Pak Index. 2020. COVID-19 and the food safety-environment dilemma Tetra Pak Index 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Tey YS, Arsil P, Brindal M, Shamsudin MN, Radam A, Hadi AHIA, Rajendran N, Lim CD. 2015. A means-End chain approach to explaining the adoption of good agricultural practices certification schemes: The case of Malaysian vegetable farmers. J Agric Environ Ethics. 28(5):977–990. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9572-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend R. 2015. Ending poverty and hunger by 2030: an agenda for the global food system (No. 95768; 1). http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/700061468334490682/Ending-poverty-and-hunger-by-2030-an-agenda-for-the-global-food-system.
   Google Scholar
• Traldi R. 2021. Progress and pitfalls: A systematic review of the evidence for agricultural sustainability standards. Ecol Indic. 125. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran D, Goto D. 2019. Impacts of sustainability certification on farm income: evidence from small-scale specialty green tea farmers in Vietnam. Food Policy. 83:70–82. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tröster R, Hiete M. 2018. Success of voluntary sustainability certification schemes – a comprehensive review. J Cleaner Prod. 196:1034–1043. doi:10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2018.05.240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN. 2019. World population prospects 2019: highlights.
   Google Scholar
• UNIDO. 2015. Trade standards compliance report. www.unido.org/tradestandardscompliance.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine JC, Pigott TD, Rothstein HR. 2010. How many studies do you need? A primer on statistical power for meta-analysis. J Educ Behav Stat. 35(2):215–247. doi:10.3102/1076998609346961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quart: Manag Inform Syst. 27(3):425–478. doi:10.2307/30036540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Xu S, Wang Z, Peng L, Wang C. 2013. International scientific collaboration of China: collaborating countries, institutions and individuals. Scientometrics. 95(3):885–894. doi:10.1007/S11192-012-0877-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Li J, Chen P. 2022. Factors influencing Chinese flower and seedling family farms’ intention to use live streaming as a sustainable marketing method: an application of extended theory of planned behavior. Environ, Develop Sustain. 24(3):4299–4322. doi:10.1007/s10668-021-01616-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheaton E, Kulshreshtha S. 2017. Environmental sustainability of agriculture stressed by changing extremes of drought and excess moisture: A conceptual review. Sustain (Switzerland). 9(6). doi:10.3390/su9060970.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. 2018, February. Pesticide residues in food. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/pesticide-residues-in-food.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. 2020, April 30. Food safety. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/food-safety.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson JS, Abiola VO. 2003. Standards and global trade: a voice for Africa. Stand Glob Tr. doi:10.1596/0-8213-5473-6.
   Google Scholar
• WITS Data. 2019. Vegetable exports by country US$000 2019. World Bank Integrated Trade Solutions. https://wits.worldbank.org/CountryProfile/en/Country/WLD/Year/LTST/TradeFlow/Export/Partner/by-country/Product/06-15_Vegetable.
   Google Scholar
• Wongprawmas R, Canavari M, Waisarayutt C. 2015a. A multi-stakeholder perspective on the adoption of good agricultural practices in the Thai fresh produce industry. Brit Food J. 117(9):2234–2249. doi:10.1108/BFJ-08-2014-0300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wongprawmas R, Canavari M, Waisarayutt C. 2015b. Food safety assurance system for fresh produce production in Thailand: a review. Qual Assur Saf Crop. 7(1):73–88. doi:10.3920/QAS2013.0255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Zhou X, Ren X, Wu S, Nan F, Wang Y, Tao R, Yue W, Zhang Z. 2017. China’s international scientific research collaboration-a bibliometric analysis. National Center for Science and Technology Evaluation (NCSTE) and Clarivate Analytics. 69:1–52.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Kim D, Yan E, Kim MC, Qi G. 2021. Analyzing China’s research collaboration with the United States in high-impact and high-technology research. Quant Sci Stud. 2(1):363–375. doi:10.1162/qss_a_00098.
   Google Scholar