Evaluation of cytotoxic and genotoxic potential of avobenzone and octocrylene on human skin fibroblast cells

References

• Abou-Dahech M, Boddu SH, Bachu RD, Babu RJ, Shahwan M, Al-Tabakha MM, Tiwari AK. 2022. A mini-review on limitations associated with UV filters. Arab J Chem. 15:104212. ISSN 1878-5352. doi:10.1016/j.arabjc.2022.104212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Jamal MS, Griffith JL, Lim HW. 2014. Photoprotection in ethnic skin. Dermatologica Sin. 32(4):217–224. doi:10.1016/j.dsi.2014.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armeni T, Damiani E, Battino M, Greci L, Principato G. 2004. Lack of in vitro protection by a common sunscreen ingredient on UVA-induced cytotoxicity in keratinocytes. Toxicology. 203(1-3):165–178. doi:10.1016/j.tox.2004.06.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes PW, Robson TM, Neale PJ, Williamson CE, Zepp RG, Madronich S, Wilson SR, Andrady AL, Heikkilä AM, Bernhard GH, et al. 2022. Environmental effects of stratospheric ozone depletion, UV radiation, and interactions with climate change: UNEP environmental effects assessment panel, update 2021. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 21(3):275–301. doi:10.1007/s43630-022-00176-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooke DN, Burns JS, Crookes MJ. 2008. UV-filters in cosmetics – prioritisation for environmental assessment. SCHO1008BPAY-E-P. Bristol: Environment Agency, Rio House, Waterside Drive, Aztec West, Almondsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities (CEC). 2006. Commission recommendation of 22 September 2006 on the efficacy of sunscreen products and the claims made relating thereto. Off J Eur Union. 39–43. [accessed 2006 Sept 22]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/IT/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32006H0647&from=EN.
   Google Scholar
• Cordelli E, Bignami M, Pacchierotti F. 2021. Comet assay: a versatile but complex tool in genotoxicity testing. Toxicol Res. 10(1):68–78. doi:10.1093/toxres/tfaa093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa S, Coelho P, Costa C, Silva S, Mayan O, Santos LS, Gaspar J, Teixeira JP. 2008. Genotoxic damage in pathology anatomy laboratory workers exposed to formaldehyde. Toxicology. 252(1-3):40–48. doi:10.1016/j.tox.2008.07.056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damiani E, Greci L, Parsons R, Knowland J. 1999. Nitroxide radicals protect DNA from damage when illuminated in vitro in the presence of dibenzoylmethane and a common sunscreen ingredient. Free Radic Biol Med. 26(7-8):809–816. doi:10.1016/S0891-5849(98)00292-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Coba F, Aguilera J, Korbee N, de Gálvez MV, Herrera-Ceballos E, Álvarez-Gómez F, Figueroa FL. 2019. UVA and UVB photoprotective capabilities of topical formulations containing mycosporine-like amino acids (MAAs) through different biological effective protection factors (BEPFs). Mar Drugs. 17(1):55. doi:10.3390/md17010055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLeo VA, Clark S, Fowler J, Poncet M, Loesche C, Soto P. 2009. A new ecamsule-containing SPF 40 sunscreen cream for the prevention of polymorphous light eruption: a double-blind, randomized, controlled study in maximized outdoor conditions. Cutis. 83(2):95–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dondi D, Albini A, Serpone N. 2006. Interactions between different solar UVB/UVA filters contained in commercial suncreams and consequent loss of UV protection. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 5(9):835–843. doi:10.1039/b606768a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Orazio J, Jarrett S, Amaro-Ortiz A, Scott T. 2013. UV radiation and the skin. Int J Mol Sci. 14(6):12222–12248. doi:10.3390/ijms140612222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egambaram OP, Kesavan Pillai S, Ray SS. 2020. Materials science challenges in skin UV protection: a review. Photochem Photobiol. 96:779–797. doi:10.1111/php.13208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilaberte Y, Trullàs C, Granger C, de Troya-Martín M. 2022. Photoprotection in outdoor sports: a review of the literature and recommendations to reduce risk among athletes. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 12(2):329–343. doi:10.1007/s13555-021-00671-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González S, Aguilera J, Berman B, Calzavara-Pinton P, Gilaberte Y, Goh CL, Lim HW, Schalka S, Stengel F, Wolf P, Xiang F. 2022. Expert recommendations on the evaluation of sunscreen efficacy and the beneficial role of Non-filtering ingredients. Front Med (Lausanne). 9:790207. doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.790207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabicova K, Fedorova G, Burkina V, Steinbach C, Schmidt-Posthaus H, Zlabek V, Kroupova HK, Grabic R, Randak T. 2013. Presence of UV filters in surface water and the effects of phenylbenzimidazole sulfonic acid on rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) following a chronic toxicity test. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 96:41–47. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.06.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog B, Wehrle M, Quass K. 2009. Photostability of UV absorber systems in sunscreens. Photochem Photobiol. 85(4):869–878. doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.2009.00544.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jesus A, Sousa E, Cruz MT, Cidade H, Lobo JMS, Almeida IF. 2022. Uv filters: challenges and prospects. Pharmaceuticals. 15(3):263. doi:10.3390/ph15030263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazar GM, Baillet A, Fructus AE. 1996. Evaluation of in vitro percutaneous absorption of UV filters used in sunscreen formulations. Drug Cosmet Ind. 158:50–62.
   Google Scholar
• Manová E, Goetz NV, Hauri U, Bogdal C, Hungerbühler K. 2013. Organic UV filters in personal care products in Switzerland: a survey of occurrence and concentrations. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 216(4):508–514. doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2012.08.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markiewicz E, Idowu OC. 2019. DNA damage in human skin and the capacities of natural compounds to modulate the bystander signalling. Open Biol. 9(12):190208. doi:10.1098/rsob.190208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori S, Wang SQ. 2021. Sunscreens. In: Wolverton SE, editor. Comprehensive dermatologic drug therapy. 4th ed. Elsevier; p. 565–575.e2, ISBN 9780323612111. doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-61211-1.00050-4.
   Google Scholar
• Nohynek GJ, Schaefer H. 2001. Benefit and risk of organic ultraviolet filters. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 33(3):285–299. doi:10.1006/rtph.2001.1476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunes AR, Vieira ÍGP, Queiroz DB, Leal ALAB, Morais SM, Muniz DF, Calixto-Junior JT, Coutinho HDM. 2018. Use of flavonoids and cinnamates, the main photoprotectors with natural origin. Adv Pharmacol Sci. 28:5341487. doi:10.1155/2018/5341487.
   Google Scholar
• Paris C, Lhiaubet-Vallet V, Jiménez O, Trullas C, Miranda MÁ. 2009. A blocked diketo form of avobenzone: photostability, photosensitizing properties and triplet quenching by a triazine-derived UVB-filter. Photochem Photobiol. 85(1):178–184. doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.2008.00414.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruszkiewicz JA, Pinkas A, Ferrer B, Peres TV, Tsatsakis A, Aschner M. 2017. Neurotoxic effect of active ingredients in sunscreen products, a contemporary review. Toxicol Rep. 4:245–259. doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2017.05.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scalia S, Coppi G, Iannuccelli V. 2011. Microencapsulation of a cyclodextrin complex of the UV filter, butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane: In vivo skin penetration studies. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 54(2):345–350. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2010.09.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh NP, McCoy MT, Tice RR, Schneider EL. 1988. A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp Cell Res. 175(1):184–191. doi:10.1016/0014-4827(88)90265-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tampucci S, Burgalassi S, Chetoni P, Monti D. 2018. Cutaneous permeation and penetration of sunscreens: formulation strategies and In vitro methods. Cosmetics. 5(1):1. MDPI AG. doi:10.3390/cosmetics5010001.
   Google Scholar
• Tice RR, Agurell E, Anderson D, Burlinson B, Hartmann A, Kobayashi H, Miyamae Y, Rojas E, Ryu JC, Sasaki YF. 2000. Single cell gel/comet assay: guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing. Environ Mol Mutagen. 35(3):206–221. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2280(2000)35:3<206::AID-EM8>3.0.CO;2-J.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar