References
- Ackerman, M. J., Ackerman, M. C., Steffen, L. J., & Kelley-Poulos, S. (2004). Psychologists’ practices compared to the expectations of family law judges and attorneys in child custody cases. Journal of Child Custody, 1(1), 41–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1300/J190v01n01_04
- American Psychological Association. (2010). Guidelines for child custody evaluations in family law proceedings. American Psychologist, 65, 863–867. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021250
- Amundson, J., & Lux, G. (2019). Tippins and Wittman revisited: Law, social science, and the role of the child custody expert 14 years later. An Interdisciplinary Journal, 57(1), 88–106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12398
- Association of Family and Conciliation Courts. (2006). Model standards of practice for child custody evaluation, https://www.afccnet.org/portals/0/modelstdschildcustodyevalsept2006.pdf
- Austin, W. G. (2001). Partner violence and risk assessment in child custody evaluations. Family Court Review, 39(4), 483–496. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.174-1617.2001.tb00627.x
- Austin, G. W., Jaffe, P., & Bonita, F. (1994). Custody and access assessors: Effects of background and experience on analogue case judgement. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences du Comportement, 26(4), 463–475. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0008-400X.26.4.463
- Behrens, J., & Smyth, B. (2010). Australian family law court decisions about relocation: Parents’ experiences and some implications for law and policy. Federal Law Review, 38 (1), 1–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22145/flr.38.1.1
- Birnbaum, R., & Saini, M. (2015). A qualitative synthesis of children’s experience of shared care post divorce. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 23, 109–132. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-02301005
- Bow, J. N., & Quinnell, F. A. (2001). Psychologists’ current practices and procedures in child custody evaluations: Five years after American Psychological Association guidelines. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 32(3), 261–268. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.32.3.261
- Bow, J. N., & Quinnell, F. A. (2004). Critique of child custody evaluations by the legal profession. Family Court Review, 42(1), 115–127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00637.x
- Bow, J. N. (2006). Review of empirical research on child custody practice. Journal of Child Custody, 3(1), 23–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1300/J190v03n01_02
- Bow, J. N., Quinnell, F. A., Zaroff, M., & Assemany, A. (2002). Assessment of sexual abuse allegations in child custody cases. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33(6), 566–575. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.33.6.566
- Brandt, R., Dawes, A., Africa, A., & Swartz, L. (2004). A thematic content analysis of psychologists’ reports in. South African Journal of Psychology, 34(2), 259–282. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/008124630403400206
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Caplan, P. J., & Wilson, J. (1990). Assessing the child custody assessors. Reports of Family Law, Third Series, 27(2), 121–134.
- Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.
- Gould, J. W., & Stahl, P. M. (2000). The art and science of child custody evaluations: Integrating clinical and forensic mental health models. Family Court Review, 38(3), 392–414. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.174-1617.2000.tb00581.x
- Grenyer, B. F. S., & Lewis, K. L. (2012). Prevalence, prediction, and prevention of psychologist misconduct. Australian Psychologist, 47(2), 68–76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-9544.2010.00019.x
- LaFortune, K. A., & Carpenter, B. N. (1998). Custody evaluations: A survey of mental health professionals. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 2(16), 207–224. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(199821)16:2 < 207::AID-BSL303 > 3.0.CO;2-P
- Lund, M. E. (2015). The place for custody evaluations in family peacemaking. Family Court Review, 53 (3), 407–417. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12162
- Nicholson, R. A., & Norwood, S. (2000). The quality of forensic psychological assessments, reports and testimony: Acknowledging the gap between promise and practice. Law and Human Behaviour, 24(1), 9–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005422702678
- O’Neill, A. T., Bussey, K., Lennings, C. J., & Seidler, K. M. (2018). The views of psychologists, lawyers, and judges on key components and the quality of child custody evaluations in Australia. Family Court Review, 56(1),64–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12323
- Ortega, C. J., & Berger, S. E. (2016). Qualitative analysis of current child custody evaluation practices. International Journal of Social, Behavioural, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 10(6), 2117–2128.
- Saini, M. A. (2008). Evidence Base of Custody and Access Evaluations. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 8(1), 111–129. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/brief-treatment/mhm023
- Saini, M., & Birnbaum, R. (2005). Linking judicial decision-making in joint custody awards with evidence-based practice: It is possible. Canadian Family Law Quarterly, 24, 139–165.
- Sanders, L., Geffner, R., Bucky, S., Ribner, N., & Patino, A. J. (2015). A qualitative study of child custody evaluators’ beliefs and opinions. Journal of Child Custody, 12(3–4), 205–230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15379418.2015.1120476
- Simon, R. A., & Stahl, P. M. (2014). Analysis in child-custody-evaluation reports: A crucial component. Family Law Quaterly, 48(1), 35–51. https://www.jstor.org/journal/familylawq
- Sparkes, A. C., & Smith, B. (2014). Qualitative research methods in sport, exercise, and health: From process to product. Routledge.
- Stahl, P. M. (2010). Conducting child custody evaluations: From basic to complex issues. Sage.
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. Handbook of qualitative research. Sage.
- Turoy-Smith, K. M., Powell, M. B., & Brubacher, S. P. (2018). Professionals’ views about child interviews for family law assessments. Family Court Review, 56(4), 607–622. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12379
- Zumbach, J., & Koglin, U. (2015). Psychological evaluations in family law proceedings: A systematic review of the contemporary literature. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 46(4), 221–234. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039329