The Cultural Self-Construals and the Romantic Relationship Experiences of Turkish Young Adults

References

• Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The self. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 680–740). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bejanyan, K., Marshall, T. C., Ferenczi, N., & Uchino, B. N. (2015). Associations of collectivism with relationship commitment, passion, and mate preferences: Opposing roles of parental influence and family allocentrism. PLoS One, 10, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, S. R., Delevi, R., & Fincham, F. D. (2010). Romantic relationships and the physical and mental health of college students. Personal Relationships, 17, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01248.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çelenk, O., Van de Vijver, F. J., & Goodwin, R. (2011). Relationship satisfaction among Turkish and British adults. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35, 628–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cingöz-Ulu, B., & Lalonde, R. N. (2007). The role of culture and relational context in interpersonal conflict: Do Turks and Canadians use different conflict management strategies? International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31, 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2006.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çok, F., & Atak, H. (2015). Emerging adulthood in Turkey: Does it (yet) exist? The Online Journal of Counseling and Education, 4, 46–75. https://idealonline.com.tr/IdealOnline/lookAtPublications/paperDetail.xhtml?uId=15320
   Google Scholar
• Coşkan, C., Phalet, K., Güngör, D., & Mesquita, B. (2015). Relationship context matters: Cultural differences in self-construals revisited. Cross-Cultural Research, 50, 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397115622179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane, A. R., Middleton, K. C., & Bean, R. A. (2000). Establishing criterion scores for the Kansas marital satisfaction scale and the revised dyadic adjustment scale. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 28, 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/019261800261815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, S., Morris, M., & Gore, J. (2002). Thinking about oneself and others: The relational-interdependent self-construal and social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Andrade, A. L., Wachelke, J. F. R., & Howat-Rodrigues, A. B. C. (2015). Relationship satisfaction in young adults: Gender and love dimensions. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 9, 19–31. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v9i1.157
   Google Scholar
• Demir, M. (2008). Sweetheart, you really make me happy: Romantic relationship quality and personality as predictors of happiness among emerging adults. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-007-9051-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyrdal, G. M., Røysamb, E., Nes, R. B., & Vittersø, J. (2011). Can a happy relationship predict a happy life? A population based study of maternal well-being during the life transition of pregnancy, infancy, and toddlerhood. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 947–962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-010-9238-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdem, G., Adli-Isleyen, M., Baltalarlı, N., & Kılıç, E. (2022). Low-Income Turkish Mothers’ Conceptions and Experiences of Family Life. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 6560. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.756278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel, E. J., Simpson, J. A., & Eastwick, P. W. (2017). The psychology of close relationships: Fourteen core principles. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 383–411. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, G. J. O., & Kerr, P. S. G. (2010). Through the eyes of love: Reality and illusion in intimate relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 627–658. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girme, Y. U., Agnew, C. R., VanderDrift, L. E., Harvey, S. M., Rholes, W. S., & Simpson, J. A. (2018). The ebbs and flows of attachment: Within-person variation in attachment undermine secure individuals’ relationship well-being across time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114, 397–421. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güngör, D., Karasawa, M., Boiger, M., Dinçer, D., & Mesquita, B. (2014). Fitting in or sticking together: The prevalence and adaptivity of conformity, relatedness, and autonomy in Japan and Turkey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45, 1374–1389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, J., & Oishi, S. (2006). Psychological needs and emotional well-being in older and younger Koreans and Americans. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 689–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halford, W. K., Leung, P. W., Hung-Cheung, C., Chau-Wan, L., Hiew, D. N., & van de Vijver, F. J. (2018). Relationship standards and relationship satisfaction in Chinese, Western, and intercultural couples living in Australia and Hong Kong, China. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 7, 127.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. B., Miller, R. B., Oka, M., & Henry, R. G. (2014). Gender differences in marital satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, 105–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kağıtçıbaşı, C. (2007). Family, self and human development across cultures: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kağıtçıbaşı, C., & Ataca, B. (2005). Value of children and family change: A three-decade portrait from Turkey. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 317–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00213.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kağıtçıbaşı, C., Baydar, N., Cemalcilar, Z., & Aydinli-Karakulak, A. (2018). Conceptualization, Measurement and Validation of Autonomy and Relatedness. [ Unpublished manuscript]. Department of Psychology, Koç University.
   Google Scholar
• Kamp Dush, C. M., Taylor, M. G., & Kroeger, R. A. (2008). Marital happiness and psychological well-being across the life course. Family Relations, 57, 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2008.00495.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karandashev, V. (2015). A cultural perspective on romantic love. Online Readings in Psychology & Culture, 5(4), htp://dx. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1135.
   Google Scholar
• Kluwer, E. S., Karremans, J. C., Riedijk, L., & Knee, C. R. (2019). Autonomy in relatedness: How need fulfillment interacts in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219867964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Guardia, J. G., & Patrick, H. (2008). Self-determination theory as a fundamental theory of close relationships. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 49(3), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le, B., & Agnew, C. R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the investment model. Personal Relationships, 10, 37–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6811.00035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. Y. S., Goldstein, S. E., & Dik, B. J. (2018). The relational context of social support in young adults: Links with stress and well-being. Journal of Adult Development, 25, 25–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire, K. C., & Kinney, T. A. (2010). When distance is problematic: Communication, coping, and relational satisfaction in female college students’ long-distance dating relationships. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 28, 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880903483573
   Google Scholar
• Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, B., Trommsdorff, G., Kağıtçıbaşı, C., & Mishra, R. C. (2012). Family models of independence/interdependence and their intergenerational similarity in Germany, Turkey, and India. Family Science, 3, 64–74.
   Google Scholar
• Medora, N. P., Larson, J. H., Hortacsu, N., & Dave, P. (2002). Perceived attitudes towards romanticism; a cross-cultural study of American, Asian-Indian, and Turkish young adults. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 33, 155–178. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.33.2.155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogolsky, B. (2009). Deconstructing the association between relationship maintenance and commitment: Testing two competing models. Personal Relationships, 16, 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2009.01212.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogolsky, B. G., & Bowers, J. R. (2012). A meta-analytic review of relationship maintenance and its correlates. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 343–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512463338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogolsky, B. G., Monk, J. K., Rice, T. M., Theisen, J. C., & Maniotes, C. R. (2017). Relationship maintenance: A review of research on romantic relationships. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 9, 275–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okutan, N., & Büyükşahin-Sunal, A. (2010). Romantik ilişkilerde bağlanım: Dindarlık algısı ve romantik ilişkilerle ilgili kalıpyargılar. Türk Psikoloji Yazılar, 13, 80–88. http://www.psikolog.org.tr/tr/yayinlar/dergiler/1031828/tpy1301996120100000m000127.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. W., & Waters, E. (2002). Four assumptions of multiple regression that researchers should always test. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8. http://ericae.net/pare/getvn.asp?v=8&n=2
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, H., Knee, C. R., Canevello, A., & Lonsbary, C. (2007). The role of need fulfillment in relationship functioning and well-being: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 434–457. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proulx, C. M., Helms, H. M., & Buehler, C. (2007). Marital quality and personal well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 576–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roisman, G. I., Clausell, E., Holland, A., Fortuna, K., & Elieff, C. (2008). Adult romantic relationships as contexts of human development: A multimethod comparison of same-sex couples with opposite-sex dating, engaged, and married dyads. Developmental Psychology, 44, 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.1.91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 16, 172–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(80)90007-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sağkal, A. S., & Özdemir, Y. (2019). Need satisfaction, partner attachment, and romantic relationship quality: A multiple mediation model. Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9, 163–180. https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.520839
   Google Scholar
• Sandberg, J. G., Busby, D. M., Johnson, S. M., & Yoshida, K. (2012). The brief accessibility, responsiveness, and engagement (BARE) scale: A tool for measuring attachment behavior in couple relationships. Family Process, 51, 512–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2012.01422.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandberg, J. G., Novak, J. R., Davis, S. Y., & Busby, D. M. (2016). The brief accessibility, responsiveness, and engagement scale: A tool for measuring attachment behaviors in clinical couples. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 42, 106–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumm, W. R., Nichols, C. W., Schectman, K. L., Grigsby, C. C., & Buckler, D. L. (1983). Characteristics of responses to the Kansas Marital satisfaction scale by a sample of 84 married mothers. Psychological Reports, 53, 567–572. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1983.53.2.567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. J. (2016). Turning point for a turning point advancing emerging adulthood theory and research. Emerging Adulthood, 4, 307–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696815624640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal, N., & Fraley, R. C. (2016). Broadening the investment model: An intensive longitudinal study on attachment and perceived partner responsiveness in commitment dynamics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33, 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407515584493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon, K. M., Elliot, A. J., Kim, Y., & Kasser, T. (2001). What’s satisfying about satisfying events? Comparing ten candidates’ psychological needs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sümer, N., & Cozzarelli, C. (2004). The impact of adult attachment on partner and self-attributions and relationship quality. Personal Relationships, 11, 355–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sümer, N., & Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2010). Culturally relevant parenting predictors of attachment security: Perspectives from Turkey. In P. Erdman & N. Kok-Mun (Eds.), Attachment: Expanding the cultural connections (pp. 157–179). Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vannoy, D., Dubeck, P. J., Guerin, G., & St-Onge, S. (1999). Challenges for work & family in the twenty-first century. Relations Industrielles, 54(3), 622–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitton, S. W., & Kuryluk, A. D. (2012). Relationship satisfaction and depressive symptoms in emerging adults: Cross-sectional associations and moderating effects of relationship characteristics. Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, S., & Goodwin, R. (2009). Experiencing marital satisfaction across three cultures: A qualitative study. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 1011–1028. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509347938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yum, Y. O., Canary, D. J., & Baptist, J. (2015). The roles of culture and fairness in maintaining relationships: A comparison of romantic partners from Malaysia, Singapore, and the United States. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 44, 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeytinoğlu-Saydam, S., Erdem, G., & Söylemez, Y. (2021). Psychometric properties of the brief accessibility, responsiveness and engagement scale in a community sample of Turkish adults. Family Relations, 70, 557–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Arnold, V., & Connolly, J. (2014). Intercorrelations of intimacy and identity dating goals with relationship behaviors and satisfaction among young heterosexual couples. Social Sciences, 3, 44–59. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci3010044
   Google Scholar