Might Temporal Logic Improve the Specification of Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs)?

References

• Aneshensel, C. S. (2002) Theory-Based Data Analysis for the Social Sciences, London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Asprem, E. (2016), “How Schrödinger’s Cat Became a Zombie: On the Epidemiology of Science-Based Representations in Popular and Religious Contexts,” Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 28, 113–140. DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djulbegovic, B., and Guyatt, G. H. (2017), “Progress in Evidence-Based Medicine: A Quarter Century On,” Lancet, 390, 415–423. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31592-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron, B., and Hastie, T. (2016), Computer Age Statistical Inference, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, G. T. H. (2020) “COVID-19 and the Epistemology of Epidemiological Models at the Dawn of AI,” Annals of Human Biology, 47, 506–513. DOI: 10.1080/03014460.2020.1839132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, G. T. H., Harrison, W., Law, G. R., and Textor, J. (2014a), “Graphical, Cross-Tabulatory and Relational: Which Is Best for Drawing DAGs?,” Proceedings of VI European Congress of Methodology, July 23, Vol. 6, p. 11.
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, G. T. H., Harrison, W., Law, G. R., and Textor, J. (2014b), “Teaching DAGs to Support MBChB Students Design, Analyze and Critically Appraise Clinical Research,” Proceedings of the 35th Annual Burwalls Meeting for Teachers of Medical Statistics, July 3, Vol. 35, p. 3.
   Google Scholar
• Elwert, F., and Winship, C. (2014), “Endogenous Selection Bias: The Problem of Conditioning on a Collider Variable,” Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 31–53. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eustace, S. (2018), “Technology-Induced Bias in the Theory of Evidence-Based Medicine,” Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 24, 945– 949. DOI: 10.1111/jep.12972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firpo Flyvbjerg, B., Ansar, A., Budzier, A., Buhl, S., Cantarelli, C., Garbuio, M., Glenting, C., Holm, M., Lovallo, D., Molin, E. J., and Rønnest, A. (2019), “On De-Bunking ‘Fake News’ in the Post-Truth Era: How to Reduce Statistical Error in Research,” Journal of the American Planning Association, 126, 409–411.
   Google Scholar
• Gilthorpe, M. S., Jiang, T., Tilling, K., Ellison, G. T. H., and Baxter, P. D. (2015), “Common Statistical Errors: Over-Adjustment for Confounders and Mediators in Lifecourse Research,” International Journal of Epidemiology, 44, Suppl 1, i36–i37. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyv097.126.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, G. J., Morris, T. T., Tudball, M. J., Herbert, A., Mancano, G., Pike, L., Sharp, G. C., Sterne, J., Palmer, T. M., Smith, G. D., and Tilling, K. (2020), “Collider Bias Undermines Our Understanding of COVID-19 Disease Risk and Severity,” Nature Communications, 11, 1–12. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-19478-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, H. E., Ellison, G. T. H., and Clement, S. (1999a), “Do the Psychosocial and Behavioral Changes That Accompany Motherhood Influence the Impact of Pregnancy on Long-Term Weight Gain,” Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 20, 65–79. DOI: 10.3109/01674829909075579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, H. E., Ellison, G. T. H., and Clement, S. (1999b), “Relative Importance of Heritable Characteristics and Lifestyle in the Development of Maternal Obesity,” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 53, 66–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbert, A., Griffith, G., Hemani, G., and Zuccolo, L. (2020), “The Spectre of Berkson’s Paradox: Collider Bias in Covid-19 Research,” Significance, 17, 6–7. DOI: 10.1111/1740-9713.01413.
   Google Scholar
• Hokimoto, T., ed. (2019), Advances in Statistical Methodologies and their Application to Real Problems, London: IntechOpen.
   Google Scholar
• Klonoff, D. C. (2020), “The Expanding Role of Real-World Evidence Trials in Health Care Decision Making,” Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 14, 174–179. DOI: 10.1177/1932296819832653.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krieger, N., and Davey Smith, G. (2016), “The Tale Wagged by the DAG: Broadening the Scope of Causal Inference and Explanation for Epidemiology,” International Journal of Epidemiology, 45, 1787–1808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Losilla, J. M., Oliveras, I., Marin-Garcia, J. A., and Vives, J. (2018), “Three Risk of Bias Tools Lead to Opposite Conclusions in Observational Research Synthesis,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 101, 61–72. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.05.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lübke, K., Gehrke, M., Horst, J., and Szepannek, G. (2020), “Why We Should Teach Causal Inference: Examples in Linear Regression with Simulated Data,” Journal of Statistics Education, 28, 133–139. DOI: 10.1080/10691898.2020.1752859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden, J. S. (2006), “An Insider’s View of the American and UK Medical Systems,” British Journal of General Practice, 56, 60–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. N., Heck, P. R., Holtzman, G. S., Anderson, S. M., Cai, W., Watts, D. J., and Chabris, C. F. (2019), “Objecting to Experiments That Compare Two Unobjectionable Policies or Treatments,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116, 10723–10728. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1820701116.
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch-Eaton, D. G., and Roberts, T. E. (2009), “The Doctor,” in Educating Professionals: Practice Learning in Health and Social Care, eds. M. Doel and S. M. Shardlow, Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 51–72.
   Google Scholar
• Porta, M., Vineis, P., and Bolúmar, F. (2015), “The Current Deconstruction of Paradoxes: One Sign of the Ongoing Methodological ‘Revolution’,” European Journal of Epidemiology, 30, 1079–1087. DOI: 10.1007/s10654-015-0068-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richiardi, L., Bellocco, R., and Zugna, D. (2013), “Mediation Analysis in Epidemiology: Methods, Interpretation and Bias,” International Journal of Epidemiology, 42, 1511–1519. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyt127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, D. (2019), “Empiricism, Sciences, and Engineering: Cognitive Science as a Zone of Integration,” Cognitive Processing, 20, 261–267. DOI: 10.1007/s10339-019-00916-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowley, J., Johnson, F., Sbaffi, L., and Weist, A. (2015), “Peer-Based Information Literacy Training: Insights From the NICE Evidence Search Student Champion Scheme,” Library and Information Science Research, 37, 338–345. DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2015.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sbaffi, L., Johnson, F., Griffiths, J., Rowley, J., and Weist, A. (2015), “NICE Evidence Search: Student Peers’ Views on Their Involvement as Trainers in Peer-Based Information Literacy Training,” Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41, 201–206. DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2014.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schelchter, M. D., and Forsythe, A. B. (1985), “Post-Hoc Selection of Covariates in Randomized Experiments,” Communications in Statistics Theory and Methods, 14, 679–699. DOI: 10.1080/03610928508828942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teater, B., Roy, J., Carpenter, J., Forrester, D., Devaney, J., and Scourfield, J. (2017), “Making Social Work Count: A Curriculum Innovation to Teach Quantitative Research Methods and Statistical Analysis to Undergraduate Social Work Students in the United Kingdom,” Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 37, 422–437. DOI: 10.1080/08841233.2017.1381216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennant, P. W. G., Arnold, K. F., Berrie, L., Ellison, G. T. H., and Gilthorpe, M. S. (2017), Advanced Modelling Strategies: Challenges and Pitfalls in Robust Causal Inference with Observational Data, Leeds: Leeds Institute for Data Analytics.
   Google Scholar
• Tennant, P. W. G., Harrison, W. J., Murray, E. J., Arnold, K. F., Berrie, L., Fox, M. P., Gadd, S. C., Keeble, C., Ranker, L. R., Textor, J., Tomova, G. D., Gilthorpe, M. S., and Ellison, G. T. H. (2020), “Use of Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) to Identify Confounders in Applied Health Research: Review and Recommendations,” International Journal of Epidemiology, 50, 620–632. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyaa213.
   Google Scholar
• Textor, J., van der Zander, B., Gilthorpe, M. S., Liśkiewicz, M., and Ellison, G. T. H. (2016), “Robust Causal Inference Using Directed Acyclic Graphs: The R Package ‘Dagitty’,” International Journal of Epidemiology, 45, 1887–1894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu, Y. K., and Greenwood, D. C., eds. (2012), Modern Methods for Epidemiology, Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• VanderWeele, T. J. (2019), “Principles of Confounder Selection,” European Journal of Epidemiology, 34, 211–219. DOI: 10.1007/s10654-019-00494-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanderWeele, T. J., and Shpitser, I. (2013). “On the Definition of a Confounder,” Annals of Statistics, 41, 196–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westreich, D., and Greenland, S. (2013). “The Table 2 Fallacy: Presenting and Interpreting Confounder and Modifier Coefficients,” American Journal of Epidemiology, 177, 292–298. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kws412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, F. (1983), “Hume’s Defence of Causal Inference,” Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review, 22, 661–694. DOI: 10.1017/S0012217300015316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar