4,766
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Data Science Ethos Lifecycle: Interplay of Ethical Thinking and Data Science Practice

, &
Pages 228-240 | Published online: 18 Jul 2022

References

  • Abebe, R., Aruleba, K., Birhane, A., Kingsley, S., Obaido, G., Remy, S. L., and Sadagopan, S. (2021). “Narratives and Counternarratives on Data Sharing in Africa,” in Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 329–341. DOI: 10.1145/3442188.3445897.
  • Adhikari, A., DeNero, J., and Jordan, M. I. (2021), “Interleaving Computational and Inferential Thinking: Data Science for Undergraduates at Berkeley,” Harvard Data Science Review, 3(2). DOI: 10.1162/99608f92.cb0fa8d2.
  • Akrich, M. (1992). “The De-Scription of Technological Objects,” in Shaping Technology/Building Society, eds. W. E. Bijker and J. Law, pp. 205–224, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Ayling, J., and Chapman, A. (2021), “Putting AI Ethics to Work: Are the tools fit for purpose?,” AI and Ehics. DOI: 10.1007/s43681-021-00084-x.
  • Barocas, S., Biega, A. J., Fish, B., Niklas, J., and Stark, L. (2020), “When Not to Design, Build, or Deploy,” in Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 695. DOI: 10.1145/3351095.3375691.
  • Barocas, S., and boyd, d. (2017), “Engaging the Ethics of Data Science in Practice,” Communications of the ACM, 60, 23–25. DOI: 10.1145/3144172.
  • Bates, J., Cameron, D., Checco, A., Clough, P., Hopfgartner, F., Mazumdar, S., Sbaffi, L., Stordy, P., and de la Vega de León, A. (2020), “Integrating Fate/Critical Data Studies into Data Science Curricula: Where are We Going and How Do We Get There?” in FAT* 2020 – Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 425–435. DOI: 10.1145/3351095.3372832.
  • Baumer, B., Garcia, R., Kim, A., Kinnaird, K., and Ott, M. (2022), “Integrating Data Science Ethics Into an Undergraduate Major: A Case Study,” Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education, 30, 15–28. DOI: 10.1080/26939169.2022.203804.
  • Benjamin, R. (2019), Race after Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code, Cambridge: Polity Press. DOI: 10.1093/sf/soz162.
  • Birhane, A. (2021), “Algorithmic Injustice: A Relational Ethics Approach,” Patterns, 2, 100205. DOI: 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100205.
  • Blumenstock, J., Cadamuro, G., and On, R. (2015), “Predicting Poverty and Wealth from Mobile Phone Metadata,” Science, 350, 1073–1076. DOI: 10.1126/science.aac4420.
  • Bowker, G. C., and Star, S. L. (1999), Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences, Cambridge, MA. MIT Press.
  • Browne, S. (2015), Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness, Durham, NC: Duke University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9780822375302.
  • Butler, J. (2005), Giving an Account of Oneself (Vol. 1st), New York: Fordham University Press. Available at http://discovery.lib.harvard.edu/?itemid=%7Clibrary/m/aleph%7C009831658.
  • Christiansen, E. (2014), “From “Ethics of the Eye” to “Ethics of the Hand” by Collaborative Prototyping,” Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 12, 3–9. DOI: 10.1108/JICES-11-2013-0048.
  • Costanza-Chock, S. (2020), Design Justice: Community-Led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Crenshaw, K. (1991), “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color,” Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299. DOI: 10.2307/1229039.
  • Deville, P., Linard, C., Martin, S., Gilbert, M., Stevens, F. R., Gaughan, A. E., Blondel, V. D., and Tatem, A. J. (2014), “Dynamic Population Mapping using Mobile Phone Data,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 15888–15893. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1408439111.
  • D’Ignazio, C., and Klein, L. F. (2020), Data Feminism, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Edwards, P. N., Jackson, S. J., Chalmers, M. K., Bowker, G. C., Borgman, C. L., Ribes, D., Burton, M., and Calvert, S. (2013), “Knowledge Infrastructures: Intellectual Frameworks and Research Challenges,” working paper. Available at http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/97552.
  • Elish, M. C. (2019), “Moral Crumple Zones: Cautionary Tales in Human-Robot Interactions,” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 5, 40–60. DOI: 10.17351/ests2019.260.
  • Fiesler, C., Garrett, N., and Beard, N. (2020), “What Do We Teach When We Teach Tech Ethics?: A Syllabi Analysis,” in Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 289—-295. DOI: 10.1145/3328778.3366825.
  • Foucault, M. (1990), The History of Sexuality. Volume 1: An Introduction, London: Random House. Available at https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/55036/the-history-of-sexuality-by-michel-foucault/.
  • Foucault, M. (2008), The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–79, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230594180.
  • Freire, P. (1970), Pedagogy of the Oppressed, New York: Herder and Herder.
  • Gibran, M. K. (2010), The Condemnation of Blackness: Race, crime, and the making of modern urban America, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Grosz, B. J., Grant, D. G., Vredenburgh, K., Behrends, J., Hu, L., Simmons, A., and Waldo, J. (2019), “Embedded EthiCS: Integrating ethics across CS education,” Communications of the ACM, 62, 54–61. DOI: 10.1145/3330794.
  • Hamid, S. (2020, August 31), “Community Defense: Sarah T. Hamid on Abolishing Carceral Technologies,” Logic Magazine. Available at https://logicmag.io/care/community-defense-sarah-t-hamid-on-abolishing-carceral-technologies/.
  • Haraway, D. (1988), “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective,” Feminist Studies, 14, 575–599. DOI: 10.2307/3178066.
  • Harding, S. (1992), “Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What is “Strong Objectivity”?,” The Centennial Review, 36, 437–470.
  • Hoffmann, A. L. (2019), “Where Fairness Fails: Data, Algorithms, and the Limits of Antidiscrimination Discourse,” Information, Communication & Society, 22, 900–915. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2019.1573912.
  • Hoffmann, A. L., and Cross, K. A. (2021), “Teaching Data Ethics: Foundations and Possibilities from Engineering and Computer Science Ethics Education,” available at https://digital.lib.washington.edu:443/researchworks/handle/1773/46921.
  • Hooks, B. (2014), Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom, New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203700280.
  • Hutchby, I. (2001), “Technologies, Texts and Affordances,” Sociology, 35, 441–456. DOI: 10.1177/S0038038501000219.
  • Hutchins, E. (1991), “The Social Organization of Distributed Cognition,” in Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, eds. L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, and S. D. Teasley, pp. 283–307, Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Iliadis, A., and Russo, F. (2016), “Critical Data Studies: An Introduction,” Big Data & Society, 3, 1–7. DOI: 10.1177/2053951716674238.
  • Janeja, V. (2019, April 4), “Do No Harm: An Ethical Data Life Cycle |S&T Policy FellowsCentral,” AAAS Science and Technology Policy Fellowships. Available at https://www.aaaspolicyfellowships.org/blog/do-no-harm-ethical-data-life-cycle.
  • Jasanoff, S. (2004), States of Knowledge: The co-Production of Science and Social Order, New York: Routledge.
  • Jasanoff, S. (2016), The Ethics of Invention: Technology and the Human Future, New York: WW Norton & Company.
  • Jasanoff, S., and Kim, S.-H., eds. (2015), Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power, Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press. Available at https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/D/bo20836025.html.
  • Jobin, A., Ienca, M., and Vayena, E. (2019), “Artificial Intelligence: The Global Landscape of Ethics Guidelines,” Nature Machine Intelligence, 1, 389–399. DOI: 10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2.
  • Joyce, K. A., Darfler, K., George, D., Ludwig, J., and Unsworth, K. (2018), “Engaging STEM Ethics Education,” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 4, 1–7. DOI: 10.17351/ests2018.221.
  • Keller, S. A., Shipp, S. S., Schroeder, A. D., and Korkmaz, G. (2020), “Doing Data Science: A Framework and Case Study,” Harvard Data Science Review, 2. DOI: 10.1162/99608f92.2d83f7f5.
  • Kishimoto, K. (2018), “Anti-Racist Pedagogy: From Faculty’s Self-reflection to Organizing Within and Beyond the Classroom,” Race Ethnicity and Education, 21, 540–554. DOI: 10.1080/13613324.2016.1248824.
  • Koopman, C. (2017, March 15), “The Power Thinker: Why Foucault’s Work on Power is More Important than Ever,” Aeon. Available at https://aeon.co/essays/why-foucaults-work-on-power-is-more-important-than-ever.
  • Koopman, C. (2019), How We Became Our Data: A Genealogy of the Informational Person, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI: 10.7208/9780226626611.
  • Lambek, M., Das, V., Fassin, D., and Keane, W. (2015), Four Lectures on Ethics: Anthropological Perspectives, Chicago, IL: Hau Books.
  • Latour, B. (1992), “Where are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts,” In Shaping Technology/Building Society, eds. W. E. Bijker and J. Law, pp. 225–258, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Leonelli, S. (2015), “What Counts as Scientific Data? A Relational Framework,” Philosophy of Science, 82, 810–821. DOI: 10.1086/684083.
  • Leonelli, S. (2019), “Data Governance is Key to Interpretation: Reconceptualizing Data in Data Science,” Harvard Data Science Review, 1. DOI: 10.1162/99608f92.17405bb6.
  • Leonelli, S. (2020), “Learning from Data Journeys,” in Data Journeys in the Sciences, eds. S. Leonelli, and N. Tempini, pp. 1–24, Cham: Springer. Available at https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-37177-7.
  • Lévinas, E. (1969), Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority, Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
  • Markham, A. (2006), “Method as Ethic, Ethic as Method,” Journal of Information Ethics, 15, 37–55. DOI: 10.3172/JIE.15.2.37.
  • Markham, A. N., Tiidenberg, K., and Herman, A. (2018), “Ethics as Methods: Doing Ethics in the Era of Big Data Research—Introduction,” Social Media + Society, 4, 1–9. DOI: 10.1177/2056305118784502.
  • Mentis, H., and Ricks, V. (2021, June), “Making Lessons Stick [Mozilla].” Teaching Responsible Computing Playbook. Available at https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/what-we-fund/awards/teaching-responsible-computing-playbook/topics/lessons-stick/.
  • Meretoja, H. (2018), The Ethics of Storytelling: Narrative Hermeneutics, History, and the Possible, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Morley, J., Floridi, L., Kinsey, L., and Elhalal, A. (2020), “From What to How: An Initial Review of Publicly Available AI Ethics Tools, Methods and Research to Translate Principles into Practices,” Science and Engineering Ethics, 26, 2141–2168. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-019-.00165-5.
  • Mhlambi, S. (2020, July 8), “From Rationality to Relationality: Ubuntu as an Ethical and Human Rights Framework for Artificial Intelligence Governance.” Carr Center for Human Rights Policy. Available at https://carrcenter.hks.harvard.edu/publications/rationality-relationality-ubuntu-ethical-and-human-rights-framework-artificial.
  • Murphy, M. (2017), The Economization of Life, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Nakamura, L. (2012, January 31), “Prospects for a Materialist Informatics: An Interview with Donna Haraway.” Electronic Book Review. Available at http://electronicbookreview.com/essay/prospects-for-a-materialist-informatics-an-interview-with-donna-haraway/.
  • National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (2018), Data Science for Undergraduates: Opportunities and Options. National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine. DOI: 10.17226/25104.
  • National Academy of Engineering (2016), NAE Annual Report 2016. National Academy of Engineering. Available at https://nae.edu/174319/NAE-Annual-Report-2016.
  • Neff, G., Tanweer, A., Fiore-Gartland, B., and Osburn, L. (2017), “Critique and Contribute: A Practice-Based Framework for Improving Critical Data Studies and Data Science,” Big Data, 5, 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2016.0050.
  • Nelson, A. H., Jenkns, D., Zanti, S., Katz, M., and Berkowitz, E. (2020), A Toolkit for Centering Racial Equity throughout Data Integration. Actionable Intelligence for Social Policy, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
  • Nolan, D., and Stoudt, S. (2021), “The Promise of Portfolios: Training Modern Data Scientists,” Harvard Data Science Review, 3.3. DOI: 10.1162/99608f92.3c097160.
  • O’Neil, C. (2016), Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy, New York: Crown.
  • Orlikowski, W. J. (2000), “Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations,” Organization Science, 11, 404–428. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600.
  • Pink, S., and Lanzeni, D. (2018), “Future Anthropology Ethics and Datafication: Temporality and Responsibility in Research,” Social Media + Society, 4, 1–9. DOI: 10.1177/2056305118768298.
  • Puschmann, C., and Burgess, J. (2014), “Metaphors of Big Data,” International Journal of Communication, 8, 1690–1709.
  • Ricøeur, P. (1988), Time and Narrative, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Ricøeur, P. (1992), Oneself as Another, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Riley, D. (2003), “Employing Liberative Pedagogies in Engineering Education,” Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 9, 137–158. DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v9.i2.20.
  • Saltz, J., Skirpan, M., Fiesler, C., Gorelick, M., Yeh, T., Heckman, R., Dewar, N., and Beard, N. (2019), “Integrating Ethics Within Machine-learning Courses,” ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 19, 1–26. DOI: 10.1145/3341164.
  • Sawyer, S., and Jahari, M. H. (2014), “Sociotechnical Approaches to the Study of Information,” in Computing Handbook (3rd ed), eds. H. Topi and A. Tucker, pp. 1–27. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  • Selbst, A. D., Friedler, S. A., Venkatasubramanian, S., Vertesi, J., Boyd, D., and Venkatasubrama, S. (2019), “Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems,” in Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT* ’19), 59–68. DOI: 10.1145/3287560.3287598.
  • Shearmur, R. (2015), “Dazzled by Data: Big Data, the Census and Urban Geography,” Urban Geography, 36, 965–968. DOI: 10.1080/02723638.2015.1050922.
  • Shilton, K. (2013), “Values Levers: Building Ethics into Design,” Science, Technology, & Human Values, 38, 374–397.
  • Sloane, M., and Moss, E. (2019), “AI’s Social Sciences Deficit,” Nature Machine Intelligence, 1, 330–331. DOI: 10.1038/s42256-019-0084-6.
  • Stark, L., and Hoffmann, A. L. (2019), “Data Is the New What? Popular Metaphors & Professional Ethics in Emerging Data Culture,” Journal of Cultural Analytics, 1–22. DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/2xguw.
  • Stodden, V. (2020), “The Data Science Life Cycle: A Disciplined Approach to Advancing Data Science as a Science,” Communications of the ACM, 63, 58–66. DOI: 10.1145/3360646.
  • Tanweer, A., Gade, E. K., Krafft, P. M., and Dreier, S. K. (2021), “Why the Data Revolution Needs Qualitative Thinking,” Harvard Data Science Review, 3(1). DOI: 10.1162/99608f92.eee0b0da.
  • Verbeek, P.-P. (2006), “Materializing Morality: Design Ethics and Technological Mediation,” Science, Technology, & Human Values, 31, 361–380. DOI: 10.1177/0162243905285847.
  • Wodajo, K., and Ebert, I. (2021, October 15), “Reimagining Corporate Responsibility for Structural (In)justice in the Digital Ecosystem: A Perspective from African Ethics of Duty,” Afronomics Law. Available at https://www.afronomicslaw.org/category/analysis/reimagining-corporate-responsibility-structural-injustice-digital-ecosystem.
  • Zigon, J. (2019), “Can Machines Be Ethical? On the Necessity of Relational Ethics and Empathic Attunement for Data-Centric Technologies,” Social Research: An International Quarterly, 86, 1001–1022. DOI: 10.1353/sor.2019.0046.