Nudges, emojis, and memes: Mapping interpassivity theory onto digital civic culture

Bibliography

• Aikin, S. F. “Poe’s Law, Group Polarization, and Argumentative Failure in Religious and Political Discourse.” Social Semiotics 23, no. 3June1, (2013): 301–317. doi:10.1080/10350330.2012.719728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Rawi, A. “Kekistanis and the Meme War on Social Media.” The Journal of Intelligence, Conflict, and Warfare 3, no. 1 (2020): 12–32. doi:10.21810/jicw.v3i1.2360.
   Google Scholar
• Asprem, E. “The Magical Theory of Politics: Memes, Magic, and the Enchantment of Social Forces in the American Magic War.” Nova Religio 23, no. 4 (2020): 15–42. doi:10.1525/nr.2020.23.4.15.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, L. “The Personalization of Politics Political Identity, Social Media, and Changing Patterns of Participation.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 644, no. 1 (2012): 20–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212451428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat, P., and O. Klein. Covert Hate Speech : White Nationalists and Dog Whistle Communication on Twitter. Palgrave Macmillan, 2020. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-41421-4_7.
   Google Scholar
• Boler, M., and E. Davis. “The Affective Politics of the ‘Post-Truth’ Era: Feeling Rules and Networked Subjectivity.” Emotion, Space and Society 27 (2018): 75–85. doi:10.1016/j.emospa.2018.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boncardo, R. “Interpassivity and the Impossible: From Art to Politics in Pfaller’s Interpassivity: The Aesthetics of Delegated Enjoyment.” (2018). doi:10.26021/328.
   Google Scholar
• Burnham, C. Does the Internet Have an Unconscious? Slavoj Zizek and Digital Culture. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Carpentier, N. Media and Participation: A Site of Ideological-Democratic Struggle. Intellect Ltd, 2011. doi:10.26530/OAPEN_606390.
   Google Scholar
• Carpentier, N. The Concept of Participation. If They Have Access and Interact, Do They Really Participate? Fronteiras – estudos midiáticos 14, no. 2.August31, (2012). https://doi.org/10.4013/fem.2012.142.10
   Google Scholar
• Cavell, S. “Passionate and Performative Utterance: Morals of an Encounter.” In Contending with Stanley Cavell, edited by S. Cavell and R. B. Goodman, 177–198, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C., S. Lee, and S. Shyam Sundar. “Interpassivity Instead of Interactivity? The Uses and Gratifications of Automated Features.” Behaviour & Information Technology 0, no. 0, March 2, (2023): 1–19. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2023.2184174.
   Google Scholar
• Cooren, F. Action and Agency in Dialogue: Passion, Incarnation and Ventriloquism. Dialogue Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2010. doi:10.1075/ds.6.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, J. Democracy and Other Neoliberal Fantasies: Communicative Capitalism and Left Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, J. “Affective Networks.” Mediatropes 2, no. 2 (2010): 19–44.
   Google Scholar
• De Liddo, A., B. Plüss, and A. Ardito. “Democratic Reflection: Nudging Citizens’ Democratic Engagement with Political Election Debates.” In Conference Companion Publication of the 2020 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. Virtual Event, USA: ACM, 2020. http://oro.open.ac.uk/73292/.
   Google Scholar
• De Vos, J. “Having an Eating Disorder and Still Being Able to Flourish? Examination of Pathological Symptoms and Well-Being as Two Continua of Mental Health in a Clinical Sample.” Frontiers in Psychology 9 (2018). doi:10.26021/267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dresner, E., and S. C. Herring. “Functions of the Nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and Illocutionary Force.” Communication Theory 20, no. 3 (2010): 249–268. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01362.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feenstra, R. A., and A. Casero-Ripollés. Democracy in the Digital Communication Environment: A Typology Proposal of Political Monitoring Processes. International Journal of Communication. 8 no.0.(September 15,2014):21.
   Google Scholar
• Fizek, S.“Interpassivity and the Joy of Delegated Play in Idle Games.” Transactions of the Digital Games Research Association, 3, no. 3, June18, (2018). 10.26503/todigra.v3i3.81
   Google Scholar
• Gekker, A. “Let’s Not Play: Interpassivity as Resistance in ‘Let’s Play’ Videos.” Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds 10, no. 3, October1 (2018): 219–242. doi:https://doi.org/10.1386/jgvw.10.3.219_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollanek, T. “Non-User-Friendly: Staging Resistance with Interpassive User Experience Design.” A Peer-Reviewed Journal About 8, no. 1,August15,(2019): 184–193. doi:10.7146/aprja.v8i1.115424.
   Google Scholar
• Hunnes, M. G. “Nudging: How Human Behavior is Affected by Design,” 2016. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Nudging%3A-How-human-behavior-is-affected-by-design-Hunnes/3e2726b10dd21f6a11fc01c068936d2220e669c8.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. L., and S. Andreas Schwartz. “The Return of the ‘Lurker’: A Longitudinal Study of Citizens’ Use of Social Media in Danish Elections 2011, 2015, and 2019.” Social Media + Society 7, no. 4 October1(2021): 20563051211063464. doi:10.1177/20563051211063463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johanssen, J., and S. Krüger. Media and Psychoanalysis: A Critical Introduction. London: Karnac Books, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Karppi, T. “Disconnect.” In Disconnect, 103–124. Facebook’s Affective Bonds. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2018. doi:10.5749/j.ctv65sz27.
   Google Scholar
• Know Your Meme. “KEK Manifesto | Kekistan.” Accessed March 23, 2023. https://knowyourmeme.com/photos/1294055-kekistan.
   Google Scholar
• Know Your Meme. “Meme Magic.” February 8, 2016. https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/meme-magic.
   Google Scholar
• Krzych, S. “ ‘There Is No Pandemic’: On Memes, Algorithms and Other Interpassive Forms of Right-Wing Disbelief.” CLCWeb: Comparative Literature & Culture, 24, no. 4, (January29,2023). 10.7771/1481-4374.4087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuldova, T. “On Fashion and Illusions: Designing Interpassive Indianness for India’s Rich.” 9783034327893 (2017): 273–290. doi:10.3726/b11234.
   Google Scholar
• Kuldova, T. “Interpassive Phenomena in Times of Economic Subordination: From Self-Playing Games via Cryptocurrency Mining to Dressing Up in Subversion.” (2018). doi:10.26021/248.
   Google Scholar
• Kushner, S. “Read Only: The Persistence of Lurking in Web 2.0.” First Monday, June 10, 2016. 10.5210/fm.v21i6.6789.
   Google Scholar
• Lippmann, W., C. Rossiter, and J. Lare. The Essential Lippmann: A Political Philosophy for Liberal Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Lovink, G. “Geert Lovink: Sad by Design.” March 30, 2019. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77yRN_rgyYk.
   Google Scholar
• Lovink, G. “Ups and Downs of Interpassivity: Email Dialogue Between Geert Lovink and Gijs van Oenen.” Theory & Event 15, no. 2 (2012). https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/478364.
   Google Scholar
• Lovink, G. “Stuck on the Platform, #1 – 2021.” hellerau, February 1, 2021. https://www.hellerau.org/en/stuck-on-the-platform-1-2021/.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, C., and C. Pieter Hoffmann. “The Dark Side of Online Participation: Exploring Non-, Passive and Negative Participation.” Information Communication & Society 20, no. 6, June3 (2017): 876–897. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1293129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannoni, O. “I Know Well, but All the Same …” in ‘“I KnowWell, but All the Same … ”’, 68–92. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003. doi:10.1515/9780822384724-005.
   Google Scholar
• Milner, R. M. “FCJ-156 Hacking the Social: Internet Memes, Identity Antagonism, and the Logic of Lulz.” Fibreculture Journal, no. 22 (2013). https://citehero.com/publications/fcj-156-hacking-the-social-internet-memes-identity-antagonism-and-the-logic-of-lulz-96363733
   Google Scholar
• Mozdeika, L. “Between Civic Virtue and Vice: Self-Censorship of Political Views on Social Media Among Norwegian Youth.” Nordicom Review 45, (2024). Preprint.
   Google Scholar
• Muhr, S. L., and M. Pedersen. “Faking It on Facebook.“ In Facebook and Philosophy: What’s on Your Mind?, edited by D. E. Wittkower, 265–276. Chicago: Open Court, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, C. T. “How Twitter Gamifies Communication”. In Applied Epistemology, edited by J. Lackey, 410–436. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198833659.003.0017.
   Google Scholar
• Ojala, M., M. Pantti, and S.-M. Laaksonen. “Networked Publics as Agents of Accountability: Online Interactions Between Citizens, the Media and Immigration Officials During the European Refugee Crisis.” New Media & Society 21, no. 2,February1(2019): 279–297. doi:10.1177/1461444818794592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penny, S. “Consumer Culture and the Technological Imperative: The Artist in Dataspace.” Innsbruck, 1993. https://simonpenny.net/1990Writings/consumerculture.html.
   Google Scholar
• Pfaller, R. Die Dirge Lachen an Unsere Stelle. Linz:, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Pfaller, R. On the Pleasure Principle in Culture: Illusions without Owners. London: Verso Books, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, W., and R. M. Milner. The Ambivalent Internet: Mischief, Oddity, and Antagonism Online. Cambridge, UK: Polity, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Picone, I., J. Kleut, T. Pavlíčková, B. Romic, J. Møller Hartley, and S. De Ridder. “Small Acts of Engagement: Reconnecting Productive Audience Practices with Everyday Agency.” New Media & Society 21, no. 9,September1,(2019): 2010–2028. doi:10.1177/1461444819837569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, T. “Participatory Technologies: Affordances for Development,” AICT-504:194. Springer International Publishing, 2017. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59111-7_17.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkis, M. “Interactivity Means Interpassivity.” Media Information Australia 69, no. 1: 13–16. ((August 1, 1993)).doi:10.1177/1329878X9306900104.
   Google Scholar
• Schölzel, H. “Backing Away from Circles of Control: A Re-Reading of Interpassivity Theory’s Perspectives on the Current Political Culture of Participation.” Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication 8, no. 2, November1, (2017): 187–203. doi:10.1386/ejpc.8.2.187_1.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, J. “Emily Post for Usenet,” 1983. https://groups.google.com/g/net.announce/c/8CsYPJuZ4Hg/m/8em44sgCCVYJ.
   Google Scholar
• Sidner, M., and S. Simon. “Decoding the Extremist Symbols and Groups at the Capitol Hill Insurrection.” CNN, January 9, 2021. https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/09/us/capitol-hill-insurrection-extremist-flags-soh/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, P. “Trump’s Occult Online Supporters Believe ‘Meme Magic’ Got Him Elected.” Vice, November 18, 2016. https://www.vice.com/en/article/pgkx7g/trumps-occult-online-supporters-believe-pepe-meme-magic-got-him-elected.
   Google Scholar
• The Story of Pepe: The True Face of Twitch, 2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxpbwpU9HAo.
   Google Scholar
• Törnberg, P., and J. Uitermark. “Tweeting Ourselves to Death: The Cultural Logic of Digital Capitalism.” Media, Culture & Society 44, no. 3(October 22, 2021): 574–590. doi:10.1177/01634437211053766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udupa, S. Extreme Speech| Nationalism in the Digital Age: Fun as a Metapractice of Extreme Speech.” International Journal of Communication. 13(0). (July 9, 2019):22.
   Google Scholar
• Van Oenen, G. “Interpassivity Revisited: A Critical and Historical Reappraisal of Interpassive Phenomena.” International Journal of Žižek Studies 2, no.2. (February17, 2016). http://www.zizekstudies.org/index.php/IJZS/article/view/80
   Google Scholar
• Van Oenen, G. “Languishing in Securityscape.” Online Open (2004). https://onlineopen.org/languishing-in-securityscape.
   Google Scholar
• Van Oenen, G. “A Machine That Would Go of Itself: Interpassivity and Its Impact on Political Life.” Theory & Event 9, no. 2 (2006). doi:10.1353/tae.2006.0030.
   Google Scholar
• Van Oenen, G. “Three Cultural Turns: How Multiculturalism, Interactivity and Interpassivity Affect Citizenship.” Citizenship Studies 14, no. 3 (2010): 293–306. doi:10.1080/13621021003731856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Oenen, G. “Interpassive Agency: Engaging Actor-Network-Theory’s View on the Agency of Objects.” Theory & Event 14, no. 2 (2011). doi:10.1353/tae.2011.0014.
   Google Scholar
• Westlund, O. “Advancing Research into Dark Participation.” Media and Communication 9, no. 1, February3 (2021): 209–214. doi:10.17645/mac.v9i1.1770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziehe, T. “ 'Normal Learning Problems’ in Youth : In the Context of Underlying Cultural Convictions.” In Contemporary Theories of Learning, 204–218. Routledge, 2018. doi:10.4324/9781315147277-15.
   Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. “Will You Laugh for Me, Please.” Accessed March 30, 2023. https://www.lacan.com/zizeklaugh.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. The Sublime Object of Ideology, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. The Plague of Fantasies. London: Verso, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. “The Interpassive Subject. Fetish Between Structure and Humanism.” 1998. https://www.lacan.com/zizek-pompidou.htm.
   Google Scholar