Assessing temporary product-specific subsidies: a time series intervention analysis

References

• Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J. 2010. Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: estimating the effect of California’s Tobacco Control Program. J Am Stat Assoc. 105:493–505. doi:10.1198/jasa.2009.ap08746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adda J, Cooper R. 2000. Balladurette and Juppette: a discrete analysis of scrapping subsidies. J Polit Econ. 108:778–806. doi:10.1086/316096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angeletos G-M, Panousi V. 2009. Revisiting the supply side effects of government spending. J Monet Econ. 56:137–153. doi:10.1016/j.jmoneco.2008.12.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barro RJ, Redlick CJ. 2011. Macroeconomic effects from government purchases and taxes *. Quart J Econ. 126:51–102. doi:10.1093/qje/qjq002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchard O, Perotti R. 2002. An empirical characterization of the dynamic effects of changes in government spending and taxes on output. Quart J Econ. 117:1329–1368. doi:10.1162/003355302320935043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box GEP, Tiao GC. 1975. Intervention analysis with applications to economic and environmental problems. J Am Stat Assoc. 70:70–79. doi:10.1080/01621459.1975.10480264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cryer JD, Chan K-S, 2009. Time series analysis. In: Springer texts in statistics. New York (NY): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• De Bondt GJ, Dieden HC, Muzikarova S, Vincze I. 2013. Introducing the ECB indicator on euro area industrial new orders. European Central Bank Occasional Paper, No. 149, Frankfurt am Main.
   Google Scholar
• Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB. 1977. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J Royal Stat Soc Ser B: Stat Methodol. 39:1–22. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dustmann C, Fitzenberger B, Schönberg U, Spitz-Oener A. 2014. From sick man of europe to economic superstar: Germany’s resurgent economy. J Econ Perspect. 28:167–188. doi:10.1257/jep.28.1.167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goolsbee AD, Krueger AB. 2015. A retrospective look at rescuing and restructuring general motors and chrysler. J Econ Perspect. 29:3–24. doi:10.1257/jep.29.2.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall RE. 2009. By how much does GDP rise if the government buys more output?. eca. 2009:183–249. doi:10.1353/eca.0.0069.
   Google Scholar
• Harris JR, Todaro MP. 1970. Migration, unemployment and development: a two-sector analysis. Am Econ Rev. 60:126–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey A, Chung C-H. 2000. Estimating the underlying change in unemployment in the UK. J Royal Stat Soc Ser A: Stat Soc. 163:303–309. doi:10.1111/1467-985X.00171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugh D, Mourougane A, Chatal O. 2010. The automobile industry in and beyond the crisis. OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 745. doi:10.1787/18151973.
   Google Scholar
• Hibbs, DA. 1974. On analyzing the effects of policy interventions: Box-Jenkins and Box-Tiao vs. structural equation models [Ph. D. thesis]. Cambridge (MA): Center for International Studies, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Holland PW. 1986. Statistics and causal inference. J Am Stat Assoc. 81:945–960. doi:10.1080/01621459.1986.10478354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyndman RJ, Khandakar Y. 2008. Automatic time series forecasting: The forecast package for R. J Stat Software. 27:1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbens, GW, Rubin DB. 2015. Causal inference for statistics, social, and biomedical sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones RH. 1980. Maximum likelihood fitting of ARMA models to time series with missing observations. Technometrics. 22:389–395. doi:10.1080/00401706.1980.10486171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komsta L, Novomestky F. 2022. moments: Moments, cumulants, skewness, kurtosis and related tests, R package version 0.14.1.
   Google Scholar
• Leuwer D, Süssmuth B. 2018. The exchange rate susceptibility of European core industries, 1995–2010. World Econ. 41:358–392. doi:10.1111/twec.12541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez Bernal J, Cummins S, Gasparrini A. 2016. Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial. Int J Epidemiol. 46:348–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menchetti F, Cipollini F, Mealli F. 2021. Estimating the causal effect of an intervention in a time series setting: the C-ARIMA approach. Preprint. Available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.06740.
   Google Scholar
• Menchetti F, Cipollini F, Mealli F. 2023. Combining counterfactual outcomes and ARIMA models for policy evaluation. Econometr Jol. 26:1–24. doi:10.1093/ectj/utac024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mian A, Sufi A. 2012. The effects of fiscal stimulus: evidence from the 2009 cash for clunkers program*. Quart J Econ. 127:1107–1142. doi:10.1093/qje/qjs024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miravete EJ, Moral MJ, Thurk J. 2018. Fuel taxation, emissions policy, and competitive advantage in the diffusion of European diesel automobiles. RAND J Econ. 49:504–540. doi:10.1111/1756-2171.12243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramey VA. 2011. Identifying government spending shocks: it’s all in the timing*. Quart J Econ. 126:1–50. doi:10.1093/qje/qjq008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth J, Sant’Anna PH, Bilinski A, Poe J. 2023. What’s trending in difference-in-differences? A synthesis of the recent econometrics literature. J Econometr. 235:2218–2244. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2023.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin DB. 1974. Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. J Educ Psychol. 66:688–701. doi:10.1037/h0037350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin DB. 1978. Bayesian inference for causal effects: the role of randomization. Ann Stat. 6:34–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffer AL, Dobbins TA, Pearson S-A. 2021. Interrupted time series analysis using autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models: a guide for evaluating large-scale health interventions. BMC Med Res Method. 21:58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiraldi P. 2011. Automobile replacement: a dynamic structural approach. RAND J Econ. 42:266–291. doi:10.1111/j.1756-2171.2011.00133.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweinfurth A. 2009. Car-scrapping schemes: An effective economic rescue policy? The Global Subsidies Initiative Policy Brief. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.
   Google Scholar
• Shumway RH, Stoffer DS. 1982. An approach to time series smoothing and forecasting using the EM algorithm. J Time Series Anal. 3:253–264. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9892.1982.tb00349.x.
   Google Scholar
• Shumway RH, Stoffer DS, 2011. Time series analysis and its applications. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stoffer DS. 1982. Estimation of parameters in a linear dynamic system with missing observations [Ph. D. dissertation]. Oakland (CA): University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Strulik H, Trimborn T. 2017. The spending multiplier in the medium run. German Econ Rev. 18:154–181. doi:10.1111/geer.12090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson R. 2001. Exchange rate exposure and competition: evidence from the automotive industry. J Financ Econ. 59:441–475. doi:10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00093-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar