Solving multiple windowed STFT phase retrieval problems in phase and amplitude respectively

References

• Harrison RW. Phase problem in crystallography. J Opt Soc Amer A. 1993;10(5):1046–1055.
   Google Scholar
• Miao J, Ishikawa T, Shen Q, et al. Extending x-ray crystallography to allow the imaging of noncrystalline materials, cells, and single protein complexes. Annu Rev Phys Chem. 2008;59(1):387–410.
   Google Scholar
• Bunk O, Diaz A, Pfeiffer F, et al. Diffractive imaging for periodic samples: retrieving one-dimensional concentration profiles across microfluidic channels. Acta Crystallogr. 2007;63(4):306–314.
   Google Scholar
• Fienup C, Dainty J. Phase retrieval and image reconstruction for astronomy. Image Recovery: Theor Appl. 1987;231:275.
   Google Scholar
• Stepanova IE, Gudkova TV, Salnikov AM, et al. A new approach to analytical modeling of Mars's magnetic field. Appl Math Sci Eng. 2022;30(1):41–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther A. The question of phase retrieval in optics. Optica Acta Int J Opt. 1963;10(1):41–49.
   Google Scholar
• Geng Y, Wen X, Tan J, et al. Noise-robust phase retrieval by optics path modulation with adaptive feedback. Opt Commun. 2022;515:128199.
   Google Scholar
• Fienup JR, Guizarsicairos M. Phase retrieval with transverse translation diversity: a nonlinear optimization approach. Opt Express. 2008;16(10):7264–7278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maiden AM, Humphry MJ, Zhang F, et al. Superresolution imaging via ptychography. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2011;28(4):604–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trebino R, Guang Z, Zhu P, et al. The measurement of ultrashort laser pulses. 2018 2nd URSI Atlantic Radio Science Meeting (AT-RASC); IEEE; 2018. p. 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Kane DJ. Principal components generalized projections: a review [invited]. J Opt Soc Am B. 2008;25(6):A120–A132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin W, Zhang R, Xu X, et al. Phaseless signal recovery from triple-window short-time Fourier measurements. Int J Phys Conf Ser. 2020;1617:012081. IOP Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Grohs P, Liehr L, Rathmair M. Multi-window STFT phase retrieval: lattice uniqueness. Preprint 2022. Available from: arXiv:2207.10620.
   Google Scholar
• Li L, Cheng C, Han D, et al. Phase retrieval from multiple-window short-time Fourier measurements. IEEE Signal Process Lett. 2017;24(4):372–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Y, Wang A, Wang W. Multi-source phase retrieval from multi-channel phaseless STFT measurements. Signal Process. 2018;144:36–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grohs P, Koppensteiner S, Rathmair M. Phase retrieval: uniqueness and stability. SIAM Rev. 2020;62(2):301–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaganathan K, Oymak S, Hassibi B. Sparse phase retrieval: uniqueness guarantees and recovery algorithms. IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process. 2017;10(4):770–781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun DL, Smith Iii JO. Estimating a signal from a magnitude spectrogram via convex optimization. arXiv. 2012;1209.2076. DOI:10.48550/arXiv.1209.2076
   Google Scholar
• Bendory T, Eldar YC. Non-convex phase retrieval from STFT measurements. IEEE Trans Inform Theor. 2018;64(99):1–1.
   Google Scholar
• Pfander GE, Salanevich P. Robust phase retrieval algorithm for time-frequency structured measurements. SIAM J Imaging Sci. 2019;12(2):736–761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexeev B, Bandeira AS, Fickus M, et al. Phase retrieval with polarization. SIAM J Imaging Sci. 2014;7(1):35–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwen MA, Viswanathan A, Wang Y. Fast local correlation measurements. SIAM J Imaging Sci. 2016;9(4):1655–1688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwen MA, Preskitt B, Saab R, et al. Phase retrieval from local measurements: improved robustness via eigenvector-based angular synchronization. Appl Comput Harmon Anal. 2020;48:415–444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendory T, Eldar YC. Phase retrieval from STFT measurements via non-convex optimization. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP); 2017. p. 4770–4774.
   Google Scholar