Optimal control analysis of coffee berry borer infestation in the presence of farmer's awareness

References

• Coffee FSP. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Vega F. Coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei (ferrari) (coleoptera: scolytidae). Encycl Entomol. 2004;1:575–576.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy ST, Moore D. Biological control of the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei, (ferrari) (coleoptera: scolytida): previous programmes and possibilities for the future. Biocontrol News Info. 1990;11:107–117.
   Google Scholar
• Fuad A. Studies on the diversity of insect pests in wild and cultivated coffee plantations in and around Jimma, southwest Ethiopia. Int J Biodivers Conserv. 2010;8(10):233–243.
   Google Scholar
• Vega FE, Mercadier G, Dowd PF, et al. Fungi associated with the coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei (ferrari)(coleoptera: scolytidae). Colloq Sci Int Cafe (C.R.). 1999;18:229–238.
   Google Scholar
• Burbano E, Wright M, Bright DE, et al. New record for the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei, in Hawaii. J Insect Sci. 2011;11(117):1–3. Available online: insectscience.org/11.117.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chaves B, Riley J. Determination of factors influencing integrated pest management adoption in coffee berry borer in Colombian farms. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2001;87(2):159–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damon A. A review of the biology and control of the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (coleoptera: scolytidae). Bull Entomol Res. 2000;90(6):453–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aristizabal LF, Bustillo AE, Arthurs SP. Integrated pest management of coffee berry borer: strategies from Latin America that could be useful for coffee farmers in Hawaii. Insects. 2016;7(1):6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercanta Coffee Hunter. Coffee berry borer: What is and what damages it causes; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Khan GA, Muhammad S, Khan MA. Information regarding agronomic practices and plant protection measures obtained by the farmers through electronic me dia. J Anim Plant Sci. 2013;23(2):647–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcano M, Bose A, Bayman P. A one dimensional map to study multiseasonal coffee infestation by the coffee berry borer. Math Biosci. 2021;333:Article ID 108530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horub KE, Julius T. A mathematical model for the vector transmission and control of banana xanthomonas wilt. J Math Res. 2017;9(4):101–113.
   Google Scholar
• Jeger MJ, Holt J, Van Den Bosch F, et al. Epidemiology of insect-transmitted plant viruses: modelling disease dynamics and control interventions. Physiol Entomol. 2004;29(3):291–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitri IR, Hanum F, Kusnanto A, et al. Optimal pest control strategies with cost-effectiveness analysis. Sci World J. 2021;2021:Article ID 6630193. doi:10.1155/2021/6630193.
   Google Scholar
• Marcano M, Bose A, Bayman P. A one-dimensional map to study multi-seasonal coffee infestation by the coffee berry borer. Math Biosci. 2021;333:Article ID 108530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez D, Cure JR, Cotes JM, et al. A coffee agroecosystem model: I. Growth and development of the coffee plant. Ecol Modell. 2011;222(19):3626–3639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez D, Cure JR, Gutierrez AP, et al. A coffee agroecosystem model: II. Dynamics of coffee berry borer. Ecol Modell. 2013;248:203–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez D, Cure JR, Gutierrez AP, et al. A coffee agroecosystem model: III. Parasitoids of the coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei). Ecol Modell. 2017;363:96–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melese AS, Makinde OD, Obsu LL. Modelling and analysis of pathogens impact on the plant disease transmission with optimal control. J Appl Nonlinear Dyn. 2022;11(3):499–521.
   Google Scholar
• Melese AS, Makinde OD, Obsu LL. Mathematical modelling and analysis of coffee berry disease dynamics on a coffee farm. Math Biosci Eng. 2022;19(7):7349–7373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotsa D, Houpa E, Bekolle D, et al. Mathematical modelling and optimal control of anthracnose. arXiv preprint arXiv:1307.1754. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Mbogne DJF, Thron C. Optimal control of anthracnose using mixed strategies. Math Biosci. 2015;269:186–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abraha T, Al Basir F, Obsu LL, et al. Pest control using farming awareness: impact of time delays and optimal use of biopesticides. Chaos Solit Fractals. 2021;146(2021):Article ID 110869.
   Google Scholar
• Al BasIr F, Banerjee A, Ray S. Role of farming awareness in crop pest management – a mathematical model. J Theoret Biol. 2019;461:59–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan GA, Muhammad S, Khan MA. Information regarding agronomic practices and plant protection measures obtained by the farmers through electronic media. J Anim Plant Sci. 2013;23(2):647–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunniffe NJ, Gilligan CA. Invasion, persistence and control in epidemic models for plant pathogens: the effect of host demography. J R Soc Interface. 2010;7(44):439–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abawari MA. A mathematical model for coffee berry borer management in coffee farm with optimal control [dissertation]. Adama (Ethiopia): ASTU; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhurya J, Basir FA, Takeuchic Y, et al. A mathematical model for pest management in Jatropha curcas with integrated pesticides – an optimal control approach. Ecol Complex. 2019;37:24–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson MA, Ruiz-Diaz CP, Manoukis NC, et al. Coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei), a global pest of coffee: perspectives from historical and recent invasions, and future priorities. Insects. 2020;11(12):882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotso Fotso Y, Grognard F, Tsanou B, et al. Modelling and control of coffee berry borer infestation. HAL Id: hal-01871508. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Driessche P, Watmough J. Reproduction numbers and subthreshold endemic equilibria for compartment models of disease transmission. Math Biosci. 2002;180(1-2):29–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mojeeb A, Osman E, Isaac AK. Simple mathematical model for malaria transmission. J Adv Math Comp Sci. 2017;25:1–24.
   Google Scholar
• LaSalle JP. The stability of dynamical systems. Philadelphia (PA): Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics; 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Chitnis N, Cushing JM, Hyman JM. Bifurcation analysis of a mathematical model for malaria transmission. SIAM J Appl Math. 2006;67(1):24–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury J, Al Basir F, Takeuchi Y, et al. A mathematical model for pest management in Jatropha curcas with integrated pestcides – an optimal control approach. Ecol Complex. 2019;37:24–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Basir F, Ray S. Impact of farming awareness based roguing, insecticide spraying and optimal control on the dynamics of mosaic disease. Ric Di Mat. 2020;69(1):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming WH, Rishel RW. Deterministic and stochastic optimal control. Vol. 1. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Takeuchi Y. Optimal control of infectious disease: information-induced vaccination and limited treatment. Phys A: Stat Mech Appl. 2020;542:123196.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes DL. Differential equations: classical to controlled. 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Pontryagin LS. Mathematical theory of optimal processes. London (UK): Routledge; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Lenhart S, Workman JT. Optimal control applied to biological models. London (UK): CRC Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Abraha T, Al Basir F, Obsu LL, et al. Pest control using farming awareness: impact of time delays and optimal use of biopesticides. Chaos Solit Fractals. 2021;146:110869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alemneh HT, Makinde OD, Theuri DM. Optimal control model and cost effectiveness analysis of maize streak virus pathogen interaction with pest invasion in maize plant. Egypt J Basic Appl Sci. 2020;7(1):180–193.
   Google Scholar