350
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Phase-insensitive versus phase-sensitive ultrasound absorption tomography in the frequency domain

ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Article: 2252571 | Received 25 Aug 2022, Accepted 14 Aug 2023, Published online: 14 Sep 2023

References

  • Duric N, Littrup P, Poulo L, et al. Detection of breast cancer with ultrasound tomography: first results with the computed ultrasound risk evaluation (cure) prototype. Med Phys. 2007;34(2):773–785. doi: 10.1118/1.2432161
  • Gerhard Pratt R, Huang L, Duric N, et al. Sound-speed and attenuation imaging of breast tissue using waveform tomography of transmission ultrasound data. In: Hsieh J, Flynn MJ, editors. Medical Imaging 2007: Physics of Medical Imaging; 2007. Vol. 6510, p. 1523–1534. International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE.
  • Wiskin J, Borup DT, Johnson SA, et al. Non-linear inverse scattering: high resolution quantitative breast tissue tomography. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012;131(5):3802–3813. doi: 10.1121/1.3699240
  • Javaherian A, Cox B. Ray-based inversion accounting for scattering for biomedical ultrasound tomography. Inverse Probl. Oct 2021;37(11):115003. doi: 10.1088/1361-6420/ac28ed
  • Greenleaf JF, Bahn RC. Clinical imaging with transmissive ultrasonic computerized tomography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1981;BME-28(2):177–185. doi: 10.1109/TBME.1981.324789
  • Zeqiri B, Baker C, Alosa G, et al. Quantitative ultrasonic computed tomography using phase-insensitive pyroelectric detectors. Phys Med Biol. Jul 2013;58(15):5237–5268. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/15/5237
  • Gallego-Juarez JA. Piezoelectric ceramics and ultrasonic transducers. J Phys E: Sci Instrum. 1989;Oct 22(10):804–816. doi: 10.1088/0022-3735/22/10/001
  • Baker C, Sarno D, Eckersley R, et al. Phase-insensitive ultrasound tomography of the attenuation of breast phantoms. In: 2019 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), 2019; p. 1219–1222.
  • Kaupinmäki S, Cox B, Arridge S, et al. Pyroelectric ultrasound sensor model: directional response. Meas Sci Technol. Dec 2020;32(3):035106. doi: 10.1088/1361-6501/abc866
  • Boone JM, Brink JA, Edyvean S, et al. Radiation dose and image-quality assessment in computed tomography. J ICRU. April 2012;12(1):9–149.
  • Verdun FR, Racine D, Ott JG, et al. Image quality in CT: from physical measurements to model observers. Phys Med. 2015;31(8):823–843. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.08.007
  • Peli E. Contrast in complex images. J Opt Soc Am A. Oct 1990;7(10):2032–2040. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.7.002032
  • Pierce AD. Acoustics: an introduction to its physical principles and applications. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019.
  • Arridge SR. Optical tomography in medical imaging. Inverse Probl. Jan 1999;15(2):R41–R93. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/15/2/022
  • Arridge SR, Schweiger M. Photon-measurement density functions. Part 2: finite-element-method calculations. Appl Opt. Dec 1995;34(34):8026–8037. doi: 10.1364/AO.34.008026
  • Egbert GD, Kelbert A. Computational recipes for electromagnetic inverse problems. Geophys J Int. April 2012;189(1):251–267. doi: 10.1111/gji.2012.189.issue-1
  • Azhari H. Basics of biomedical ultrasound for engineers. Hoboken (NJ): IEEE Press, Wiley; 2010.
  • Feldman MK, Katyal S, Blackwood MS. Us artifacts. RadioGraphics. 2009;29(4):1179–1189. doi: 10.1148/rg.294085199PMID: 19605664.
  • Nasief H, Rosado-Mendez I, Zagzebski J, et al. Acoustic properties of breast fat. J Ultrasound Med Official J Am Inst Ultrasound Med. Oct 2015;34:2007–2016.
  • Chivers RC, Hill CR. Ultrasonic attenuation in human tissue. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1975;2(1):25–29. doi: 10.1016/0301-5629(75)90038-1
  • Bermúdez A, Hervella-Nieto L, Prieto A, et al. An optimal perfectly matched layer with unbounded absorbing function for time-harmonic acoustic scattering problems. J Comput Phys. 2007;223(2):469–488. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2006.09.018