47
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Expert Witness. Neither Frey nor Daubert Solved the Problem. What Can Be Done?

Pages 79-101 | Published online: 21 Jul 2010

References

  • Weiler et al 'A measure of malpractice'.
  • Ibid.
  • Green Bendectin and Birth Defects; Sanders 'The Benedictin litigation'.
  • Ibid.
  • Sanders , J . 1993 . 'From science to evidence: the testimony on causation in the Bendectin cases' . Stanford Law Review , 46 ( 1 ) : 25 – 26 .
  • Ibid.
  • Green Bendectin and Birth Defects.
  • Weiler et al 'A measure of malpractice'.
  • Sanders 'The Benedictin litigation'.
  • Green Bendectin and Birth Defects.
  • Sanders 'From science to evidence'.
  • Diamond , SS and Casper , JD . 1992 . 'Blindfolding the jury to verdict consequences: damages, experts, and the civil jury' . Law and Society Review , 26 : 513
  • Sanders 'From science to evidence'.
  • Ibid.
  • Ibid.
  • Green Bendectin and Birth Defects.
  • Ibid.
  • Amerit , A and Baltussen , R . 1997 . 'The interpretation of results of economic evaluation: explicating the value of health' . Health Economics , 6 : 625
  • Morow , RH and Bigant , JH . 1995 . 'Health policy approaches to measuring and valuing human life: conceptual and ethical issues' . AmericanJournal of Public Health , 85 : 1356 – 1360 .
  • Economies , WA . 1995 . 'QALYs and medical ethics-a health economist's view' . Health Care Analysis , 3 : 221 – 226 .
  • Brooten , D . 1997 . 'Methodological issues linking costs and outcomes' . Medical Care , 35 ( Suppl 11 ) NS87-NS95
  • Feurer , ID . 1994 . 'Evaluating peer reviews, pilot testing of a grading instrument' . Journal of the American Medical Association , 272 : 98 – 100 .
  • V van Roogen . 1999 . 'Development of the review quality instrument (RQI) for assessing peer review of manuscripts' . Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , 52 : 625 – 629 .
  • Berlin , JA and Rennie , D . 1999 . 'Measuring the quality of trials, the quality of quality scales' . Journal of the American Medical Association , 282 : 1083 – 1085 .
  • The Standard of Reporting Trials Group 'A structured reporting· of randomized
  • Sanders 'The Benedictin litigation'.
  • Green Bendectin and Birth Defects.
  • Diamond and Casper 'Blindfolding the jury to verdict consequences'.
  • Byrne , John A. 1996 . Informed Consent , Angell Science on Trial
  • Lubit , BW . 1998 . 'The time has come for doing science: a call for the rigorous application of Daubert standards for the admissibility of expert evidence in the impending silicone breast implant litigation" . New York Law School Litigation Review , 42 : 147 – 178 .
  • Koenig , T and Rustad , M . 1995 . 'His and her tort reform: gender injustice in disguise' . Washington Law Review , 70 ( 1 ) : 43 – 44 .
  • Strauss , G . 1998 . 'Implant suit settled for $3.2 B. Judge OKs Dow Corning agreement' . USA Today , 9 July : 1A
  • Higgins , M . 1998 . 'Mass tort makeover?' . American Bar Association Journal , November : 53
  • Strauss , G . 1998 . 'Payments detailed in implant lawsuit' . USA Today , 10 November : B1
  • Hensler , DR and Peterson , M . 1993 . 'Understanding mass personal injury litigation: a social legal analysis' . Brookings Law Review , 59 : 961 – 1061 .
  • Angell Science on Trial.
  • Ibid.
  • !bid; Snyder 'Silicone breast implants'.
  • Gross , SR . 1991 . 'Expert evidence' . Wisconsin Law Review , : 1113 – 1135 .
  • Brewer , S . 1998 . 'Scientific expert testimony and intellectual due process' . Yale Law Journal , 107 : 1535 – 1557 .
  • Jasanoff , S . 1995 . Science at the Bar: Law, Science, and Technology in America , 285 Cambridge , MA : Harvard University Press .
  • Vidmar , N . 1995 . Medical Malpractice and the American Jury. Confronting the Myths about Jury Incompetence, Deep Pockets, and Outrageous Damage Awards , 318 Ann Arbor , MI : University of Michigan Press .
  • Annas , GJ . 1994 . 'Scientific evidence in the courtroom, the death of the Frey rule' . New England Journal of Medicine , 330 : 1018 – 1021 .
  • Weiler , PC . 1993 . A Measure of Malpractice: Medical Injury, Malpactice Litigation, and Patient Compensation , Cambridge , MA : Harvard University Press .
  • Ibid.
  • Ibid.
  • Ibid.
  • Ibid.
  • Ibid.
  • Ibid.
  • Ibid.
  • Green , MC . 1996 . Bendectin and Birth Defects, the Challenges of Mass Toxic Substances Litigation , 91 – 92 . Philadelphia , PA : University of Pennsylvania Press .
  • Sanders , J . 1992 . 'The Bendectin litigation: a case study in the life cycle of mass torts' . Hastings Law Journal , 43 : 301
  • Ibid.
  • Faigman , DL . 1997 . Modern Scientific Evidence . The Law and Science of Expert Testimony , : 354 369
  • 1999 . Pocket Part 70 , MN , , USA : West Publishing Co. .
  • Ibid.
  • Green Bendectin and Birth Defects; Diamond and Casper 'Blindfolding the jury to verdict consequences'.
  • Sanders 'From science to evidence'.
  • Ibid.
  • Gross . 1996 . “ 'Expert evidence' ” . In Science on Trial, the Clash of Medical Evidence and the Law in the Breast Implant Case , Edited by: Angell , M . 256 New York : WV Norton .
  • Angell Science on Trial.
  • Snyder , JW . 1997 . 'Silicone breast implants: can emerging judicial, legal, and scientific concepts be reconciled' . Journal of Legal Medicine , : 133 – 220 .
  • Angell Science on Trial.
  • Ibid.
  • Anderson , N . 1997 . 'Lawsuit science: lessons learned from the silicone breast implant controversy' . New York Law School Litigation Review , 41 : 401 – 407 .
  • Stombler , RE . 1993 . 'Breast implants and the FDA: past, present and future' . Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons , 78 ( 6 ) : 11 – 15 . Angell Science on Trial
  • Kessler , DA . 1992 . 'The basis of the FDA's decision on breast implants' . New England Journal of Medicine , 326 : 1713 – 1715 .
  • Angell Science on Trial.
  • Dresser , R . 1997 . 'Breast implants revisited: beyond science on trial' . Wisconsin Law Review , : 705 – 776 . 714
  • Dresser et al 'Breast implants revisited'; Hensler and Peterson 'Understanding mass personal injury litigation'.
  • Diamond and Casper 'Blindfolding the jury to verdict consequences'.
  • Brief of the New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Association, and the Annals of Internal Medicine as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondent (New Engl J Med).
  • Brief of the New Engl J Med; Brief Amici Curiae of Bloembergen.
  • Brief of the New Engl J Med.
  • Brief of the AMA; Brief of the New Engl J Med; Brief Amicus Curiae of Feinstein.
  • Brief of the New Engl J Med; Brief Amicus Curiae of Feinstein.
  • Brief of the New Engl J Med.
  • Green Bendectin and Birth Defects.
  • Mahaney , EKL . 1996 . 'Assessing the fitness of novel scientific evidence in the post-Daubeert era' . Environmental Law , 26 : 1161 – 1185 . 1164
  • Dreyfus , RC . 1995 . 'Is science a special case? The admissibility of scientific evidence after Daubert v. Merrell Dow' . Texas Law Review , 73 : 1779 – 1864 .
  • Ibid.
  • Ibid.
  • Hamilton , HG . 1998 . 'The movement from Frey to Daubert: where do the states stand?' . Jurimetrics Journal , 38 : 201 – 213 .
  • Kaufman , HH . 1989 . 'Head injury: presence of confounding factors and variability of course' . International Journal of Technological Assessment and Health Care , 5 : 631 – 638 .
  • Beerbineger , JD . 1998 . Outcome research and surgeons' Surgery , 124 : 477
  • 1998 . PCV Gerszten Outcomes Research . A Review, Neurosurgery , 43 : 1146
  • Cook , D and Giacomini , M . 1999 . 'The Trials and Tribulations of Clinical Practice Guidelines' . Journal of the American Medical Association , 281 : 1950
  • Ibid.
  • Ibid.
  • Ibid.
  • Ibid.
  • Ibid.
  • Black , B . 1994 . 'Science and the law in the wake of Daubert' . Texas Law Review , 72 : 715 – 744 .
  • Ibid.
  • Ibid.
  • Ibid.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.