ETHICS, REGULATION AND THE NEW ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, PART I: ACCOUNTABILITY AND POWER

REFERENCES

• Adams, J. (1995) Risk, London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, N. (1998) '2010-theyear of the "digital familiar"', in N. Barrett(ed.) Into the Third Millennium: Trends Beyond the Year 2000, London: Bull Information Systems, pp. 27-37.
   Google Scholar
• Barzelay, M. with collaboration of Armajani, B.J. (1992) Breaking Through Bureaucracy: A New Vision for Managing in Government, Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society, London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. and Hart, P. (1996) Understanding Policy Fiascoes, New Brunswick: Transaction Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. (1998) The Quest for Responsibility: Accountability and Citizenship in Complex Organisations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braybrooke, D. and Lindblom, C.E. (1970) A Strategy of Decision: Policy Evaluation as a Social Process, New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caplan, P. (ed.) (2000) Risk Revisited, London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D.J. and Ellis, R.J. (eds) (1993) Politics, Policy and Culture, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cranor, C.F. (1988) 'Some public policy problems with risk assessment: how defensible is the use of the 95% confidence rule in epidemiology?', paper presented as part of the University of California Riverside Carcinogen Risk Assessment Project, Toxic Substance Research and Teaching Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Cranor, C.F. (1990) 'Some moral issues in risk assessment', Ethics.
   Google Scholar
• Day, P. and Klein, R.E. (1987) Accountabilities: Five Public Services, London: Tavistock Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dennett, D.C. (1998) Brainchildren: Essays on Designing Minds, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. (1966) Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. (1970) Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. (1972) 'Self-evidence', reprinted in M. Douglas (1999) [1975] Implicit Meanings: Selected Essays in Anthropology, London: Routledge, pp. 252-83.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. (ed.) (1982) Essays in the Sociology of Perception, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. (1986) How Institutions Think, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. (1990) 'Risk as forensic resource', in E.J. Burger (ed.) Risk, Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press, pp. 1-16.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. (1992) Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. (1994) 'Institutions are the product', paper presented at the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economies, École des Hautes Études Commerciales Paris, 15-17 July.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. (1996) 'Istituzioni: problemi teorici', in Enciclopedia delie Scienze Sociali, Rome, Fondata da Giovanna Trecanni, pp. 126-34.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. (1997) The depoliticisation of risk', in R.J. Ellis and M. Thompson (eds) (1997) Culture Matters: Essays in Honour of Aaron Wildavsky, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. and Hull, D. (eds) (1992) How Classification Works: Nelson Goodman Among the Social Sciences, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P. (1991) Democracy, Bureaucracy and Public Choice: Economic Explanations in Political Science, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, É. (1951) [1897] Suicide: a Study in Sociology, trans. J.A. Spaulding and G. Simpson, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, É. (1983) [lectures 1913-14] Pragmatism and Sociology, trans. J.C. Whitehouse, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; see also the selections reprinted in K.H. Wolff (ed.) (1960) Essays on Sociology and Philosophy by Emile Durkheim et al. with Appraisals of his Life and Thought, New York: Harper Torch, Harper and Row, pp. 386-436.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, É. (1984) [1893] ne Division of Labour in Society, trans. W.D. Halls, Basingstoke: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, É. and Mauss, M. (1963) [1902] in R. Needham (ed.) Primitive Classification, Chicago: University of Chicago Press; originally published as E. Durkheim and M. Mauss (1902) 'De quelques formes primitives de classification: contribution à l'étude des répresentations collectives', Anée sociologique, 6: 1-72.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R.J. and Thompson, M. (eds) (1997) Culture Matters: Essays in Honour of Aaron Wildavsky, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pardon, R. (1999) Mary Douglas: An Intellectual Biography, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1983) Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences, New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H., Hatch, T. and Torff, B. (1997) 'A third perspective: the symbol systems approach', in R.J. Sternberg and E.L. Grigorenko (eds) Intelligence, Heredity and Environment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 243-68.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1999) Runaway World: How Globalisation is Reshaping our Lives, London: Profile Books.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, N. (1970) 'Seven strictures on similarity', in L. Foster and J.W. Swanson (eds) Experience and Theory, London: Duckworth, pp. 19-30.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, E.W. and Lemons, M.P. (1997) 'An interactionist perspective on the genesis of intelligence', in R.J. Sternberg and E.L. Grigorenko (eds) Intelligence, Heredity and Environment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 323-40.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, J. and Rayner. S. (1985) Measuring Culture: a Paradigm for the Analysis of Social Organisation, New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1989) The Theory of Communicative Action: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason, vol. 2, trans. T. McCarthy, Boston, MA: Paperback Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haldane, J. (1989) 'Naturalism and the problem of intentionality', Inquiry, 32: 305-22.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbes, T. (1968) [1651] in C.B. Macpherson (ed.) Leviathan, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Hogwood, B.W., Judge, D. and MacVicar, M. (1998) 'Agencies and accountability', paper presented at the Whitehall Programme conference, University of Birmingham, 17-19 December.
   Google Scholar
• Hollander, R.D. (1991) 'Expert claims and social decision: science, politics and responsibility', in D.G. Mayo and R.D. Hollander (eds) Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Management, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 160-73.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C.C. and Jones, D.K.C. (eds) (1996) Accident and Design: Contemporary Debates in Risk Management, London: University College London Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffery, M. (1999) The Human Computer, London: Little, Brown and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Joffe, H. (1999) Risk and "The Other', Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaku, M. (1998) Visions: How Science will Revolutionise the 21st Century and Beyond, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kurzweil, R. (1999) ne Age of Spiritual Machines: How We Will Live, Work and Think in the New Age of Intelligent Machines, London: Orion Business Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C.E. (1959) 'The science of muddling through', Public Administration Review, 19: 79-88.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C.E. (1979) 'Still muddling, not yet through", Public Administration Review, 39: 517-26.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (ed.) (1999) Risk and Sociocultural Theory: New Directions and Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• March, J.G. and Olson J.-P. (1975) Organisational learning under ambiguity', European Journal of Political Research, 3: 147-71, reprinted in J.G. March (1988) Decisions and Organisations, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 335-58.
   Google Scholar
• March, J.G. and Olsen J.-P. (1995) Democratic Governance, New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mars, G. (1982) Cheats at Work: an Anthropology of Workplace Crime, London: Alien and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Mayo, D.G. (1991) 'Sociological versus meta-scientific views of risk assessment', in D.G. Mayo, and R.D. Hollander (eds) Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Management, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 248-79, at 271-2.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R.K. (1948) 'The self-fulfilling prophecy', in A. Rosenblatt and T.F. Gieryn (eds) (1982) Social Research and the Practising Professions, Cambridge, MA: AbT Books, pp. 248-67, reprinted in abbreviated form in RF. Sztompka (ed.) Robert K. Merton on Social Structure and Science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 183-201.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. (1992) Managerial Dilemmas: The Political Economy of Hierarchy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1971) [1965] The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory cf Groups, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. (1949) The Poverty cf Historicism, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Quine, W.V.O. (1960) Word and Object, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, S. (1992) 'Cultural theory and risk analysis', in S. Krimsky and D. Golding (eds) Social Theories of Risk, Westport, CT: Prager, pp. 83-116.
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O. (1998) 'Three decades of risk research: accomplishments and new challenges', Journal of Risk Research, 1: 49-72.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenhead, J. (ed.) Rational Analysis for a Problematic World: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and conflict, London: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartau, W. (1996) Information Warfare -- Cyberterrorism: Protecting your Personal Security in the Electronic Age, 2nd edn, New York: Thunder's Mouth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, M. and Thompson, M. (1990) Divided We Stand: Redefining Politics, Technology and Social Choice, Philadelphia, Penn.: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H.A. (1947) Administrative Behaviour, 1st edn, London: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. (1993) 'Perceived risk, trust and democracy', Risk Analysis, 8: 147-55, reprinted in R. Löfstedt and L. Frewer (eds) (1998) The Earthscan Reader in Risk and Modern Society, London: Earthscan, pp. 181-91.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. (1983) 'The aesthetics of risk: culture or context?', in R. Schwing and W. Albers (eds) (1983) Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe is Safe Enough?, New York: Plenum Press, pp. 273-85.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. (1997a) 'Rewriting the precepts of policy analysis', in R.J. Ellis and M. Thompson (eds), Culture Matters: Essays in Honour of Aaron Wildavsky, Boulder: CO: Westview Press, pp. 20-216.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. (1997b) 'Cultural theory and technology assessment', in F. Fischer and M. Hajer (eds) Living with Nature: Environmental Discourse as Cultural Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. (1997c) 'Cultural theory and integrated assessment', Environmental Modelling and Assessment, 2: 139-50.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M., Ellis, R.J. and Wildavsky, A. (1990) Cultural Theory, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vickers, Sir G. (1995) [1963] The Art of judgement: A Study of Policy-making, Centenary edition, London: Sage [London: Chapman and HaIl].
   Google Scholar
• von Mises, L. (1935) 'Economic calculation in the socialist commonwealth', in F.A. von Hayek (ed.) Collectivist Economic Planning: Critical Studies in the Possibilities of Socialism, London: Routledge, pp. 87-130.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, M. (1999) Virtual Organisms: the Startling World of Artificial Life, Basingstoke: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Warwick, K. (1998) In the Mind of the Machine: The Breakthrough in Artificial Intelligence, London: Arrow (Random House).
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1976) The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, trans. T. Parsons, London: Alien and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, A.M. (1966) 'Can technology replace social engineering?', University of Chicago Magazine, 59: 6-10, reprinted in A. H. Teich (ed.) (1997) Technology and the Future, 7th edn, New York: St Martin's Press, pp. 55-64.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, R.A. (1989) 'Intelligence and IQ: landmark issues and great debates', American Psychologist, 44: 98-104.
   Google Scholar
• Weizenbaum, J. (1984) [1976] Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Whitby, B. (1988) AI: A Handbook of Professionalism, Chichester: Ellis Harwood.
   Google Scholar
• Whitby, B. (1996) Reflections on Artificial Intelligence: The Legal, Moral and Ethical Dimensions, Exeter: Intellect Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A. (1988) Searching for Safety, New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Books.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O.E. (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting, New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winner, L. (1977) Autonomous Technology: Technics Out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B.R. (ed.) (1970) Rationality, Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Woolley, B. (1992) Virtual Worlds: A Journey in Hype and Hyperreality, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• 6, P. (1998) The Future of Privacy, Volume 1: Private Life and Public Policy, London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• 6, P. (1999a) 'Neo-Durkheimian institutional theory', paper presented at the University of Strathclyde Department of Government conference, Institutional Theory in Political Science, Ross Priory, 18-19 October.
   Google Scholar
• 6, P. (1999b) Morals for Robots and Cyborgs: Ethics, Society and Public Policy in the Age of Autonomous Intelligent Machines, Brentford: Bull Information Systems.
   Google Scholar
• 6, P. (2000) 'The governance of affect: the ritual organisation of emotion and the limits of emotional emancipation', paper presented at the final seminar in the series 'Affect, ethics and citizenship', co-ordinated by the University of East London, Birkbeck College, London, 1 June.
   Google Scholar
• 6, P. (2001 a, forthcoming) E-governance: Styles of Political Judgment in the Information Age Polity, London. Institute for Public Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• 6, P. (2001b, forthcoming) The Case for Preventive Government, London: Demos.
   Google Scholar