92
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Essay Review

Pages 85-94 | Published online: 05 Nov 2010

References

  • Barnes , S. B. and Dolby , R. G. A. 1970 . The Scientific Ethos: a Deviant Viewpoint' . Archives Européennes de Sociologie , 11 : 3 – 25 . 3
  • Shapin , S. 1992 . 'Discipline and Bounding: the History and Sociology of Science Seen through the Externalism-Internalism Debate' . History of Science , 30 : 333 – 69 . 338
  • Giesecke , H. 1993 . Hitlers Pädogogen: Theorie und Praxis nationalsozialistischer Erziehung Weinheim and Munich A notable example is the Nazi sociology of knowledge presented in Alfred Baeumler's Männerbund und Wissenschaft (Berlin, 1934); on Baeumler's political pedagogics see eh. 3
  • Toulmin , S. 1955-56 . 'History and Philosophy of Science: a Pioneer Department' . Universities Quarterly , 10 : 346 – 58 . For a typical denunciation of the polemical character of earlier writings in the name of professional objectivity see (I am indebted to Anna-K. Mayer for drawing my attention to this issue and this article)
  • Plessner , H. 1990 . “ The Concept of Ideology and its Vicissitudes' ” . In Knowledge and Politics: the Sociology of Knowledge Dispute Edited by: Mehta , V. and Stehr , N. 241 – 60 . London and New York Perhaps the most explicit of the many 'anticipations' of the Strong Programme in SSK is to be found in
  • Fleck , L. 1979 . Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact [1935] Edited by: Bradley , F. and Trenn , T. J. Chicago, IL
  • Bottomore , T. and Goode , P. 1978 . Austro-Marxism Oxford Selections from Adler translated in
  • Borkenau , F. 1987 . “ The Sociology of the Mechanistic World-Picture' [1932] ” . In Science in Context Edited by: Hadden , R. W. Vol. 1 , 109 – 27 .
  • Grossmann , H. 1987 . “ The Social Foundation of Mechanistic Philosophy and Manufacture' [1935] ” . In Science in Context Edited by: Shalit , G. Vol. 1 , 129 – 80 . H. Plessner (note 6)
  • Fleck , C. 1993 . “ 'Marxistische Kausalanalysis und functionale Wissenschaftssoziologie. Ein Fall unterbliebenen Wissenstransfers' ” . In Wien-Berlin-Prag. Der Aufstieg der wissenschaftlichen Philosophie. Zentenarien Rudolf Carnap-Hans Reichenbach-Edgar Zilsei Edited by: Haller , R. and Stadier , F. 501 – 24 . Vienna On reasons for the limited reception of Zilsel's writings see
  • Zilsel himself was strongly critical of academic philosophy and ways of writing, Wissenchaft und Weltanschauung. Aufsätze 1929-1933 (hereafter WW). ed. by G. Mozetic (Vienna. 1992), pp. 43-44.
  • The Social Origins of Modern Science (hereafter SOMS), Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 200, ed. by D. Raven, W. Krohn and R.S. Cohen (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000).
  • Translated from E. Zilsel, 'Philosophische Bemerkungen' [1929], in WW, pp. 31-44 (pp. 41-42).
  • Shapin , S. “ The Zilsel Thesis' ” . Edited by: Bynum , W. F. , Browne , E. J. and Porter , R. 450 See, for example, P. Rossi, 'Craftsman-and-Scholar Thesis' (note 3); (note 3)
  • Dahms , H.-J. “ 'Edgar Zilsels Projekt "the Social Roots of Science" und seine Beziehungen zur Frankfurter Schule' ” . Edited by: Haller , R. and Stadier , F. 474 – 500 . 487 – 90 . On Zilsel's thesis in relation to the theses of Borkenau and Grossmann see (note 9)
  • Zilsel , E. 1932-33 . 'Bemerkungen zur Wissenschaftslogik' . Erkenntnis , 3 : 143 – 61 . Zilsel's arguments are well analysed by
  • Rutte , H. “ 'Zu Zilsels erkenntnistheoretischen Ansichten in der Phase des Wiener Kreises' ” . Edited by: Haller , R. and Stadier , F. (note 9)
  • Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, 65 (1931), 475-524 (reprinted in WW, pp. 101-44).
  • E. Zilsel 'Materialismus und marxistische Geschichtsauffassung' [1931], in WW, pp. 77-87, and 'Partei, Marxismus, Materialismus, Neukantianismus' [1931], in WW, pp. 88-98.
  • E. Zilsel 'Bemerkungen zur Wissenschaftslogik' (note 21).
  • Burger , T. 1987 . Max Weber's Theory of Concept Formation: History, Laws and Ideal Types, expanded Durham, NC In these remarks I have been guided by
  • Ringer , F. 1997 . Max Weber's Methodology: the Unification of the Cultural and Social Sciences Cambridge, MA
  • Ibid., pp. 228-29. In the course of this ideal-typical characterization of science, Zilsel refers to 'disenchantment of the world (Max Weber)'. Zilsel's definition of science here is. in fact, close to that offered by H. Plessner in his explicitly ideal-typical and Weberian account of the origins of modern scientific research as an 'industrialisation of knowledge' that accompanied a general 'rationalisation of social life': 'Zur Soziologie der modernen Forschung und ihrer Organization in der deutschen Universität Tradition und Ideologie' [1924]. in Gesammelte Schriften (Frankfurt am Main, 1985). x, 7-30.
  • Zilsel , E. 1926 . Die Entstehung des Geniebegriffes. Ein Beitrag zur Ideengeschichte der Antike und des Frühkapitalismus 324 – 26 . Tübingen SOMS. pp. 204-05
  • Winch , P. 1958 . The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy London On the problematic distinction between anachronisms and anatropisms (impositions of concepts on cultures which lack them) legitimate for explanatory purposes and those which are illegitimate by virtue of false presuppositions, see
  • Jardine , N. 2000 . 'The Uses and Abuses of Anachronism in the History of the Sciences' . History of Science , 38 : 251 – 70 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.