Phase-correlation Scale Effects in Atmospheric Optics

References

• FRIED , D. L. 1966 . J. opt. Soc. Am. , 56 : 1372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HUFNAGEL , R. E. and STANLEY , N. R. 1964 . J. opt. Soc. Am. , 54 : 52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FRIED , D. L. 1965 . J. opt. Soc. Am. , 55 : 1427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FRIED , D. L. 1975 . Radio Sci. , 10 : 71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PAPOULIS , A. 1965 . Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes , New York : McGraw-Hill . See, for example
   Google Scholar
• SCHNEIDERMAN , A. M. and KARO , D. P. 1979 . J. opt. Soc. Am. , 69 : 717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ABRAMOWITZ , M. and STEGUN , I. A. , eds. 1964 . Handbook of Mathematical Functions , 55 Washington : National Bureau of Standards . See, for example
   Google Scholar
• SCADDEN , R. J. and DAINTY , J. C. 1977 . Optics Commun. , 21 : 51 Two recent measurements are reported in, and LABEYRIE, A., 1976, Progress in Optics, Vol. XIV, edited by E. Wolf, (Amsterdam: North-Holland)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Our experience using small telescopes is consistent with the prediction that image wander should never exceed about 64 per cent of the seeing angle for r′ ≫ D
   Google Scholar
• KOLCHINSKII , I. G. 1957 . Astr. Zh. , 34 : 624
   Google Scholar
• LESE , W. G. Jr. 1969 . Memo Report 2014 , Maryland , , U.S.A : Ballistic Research Laboratories, Aberdeen Proving Ground .
   Google Scholar
• PEARLMAN , M. R. , BUFTON , J. L. , HOGAN , D. , KURTENBACH , D. and GOODWIN , K. 1972 . Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Special Report 357
   Google Scholar
• KARO , D. P. and SCHNEIDERMAN , A. M. 1976 . J. opt. Soc. Am. , 66 : 1252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MILLER , M. G. and KELLEN , P. F. Technical Digest of the topical meeting on Imaging in Astronomy . Cambridge, Massachusetts , U.S.A.. paper WB3; 1977, private communication
   Google Scholar
• KARO , D. P. and SCHNEIDERMAN , A. M. 1979 . Appl. Optics , 18 : 828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LAWRENCE , R. S. and STROHBEHN , J. W. 1970 . Proc. Inst. elect. electron. Engrs , 58 : 1523 Various forms for the structure function have been considered. See, for example, the discussion and references in, or FANTE, R. L., 1975, Proc. Inst. elect. electron. Engrs, 63, 1669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KARO , D. P. and SCHNEIDERMAN , A. M. 1976 . J. opt. Soc. Am. , 66 : 1065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calculations using the old theory for tilt only correction effects in various cases and measurements, generally for laser beams over horizontal paths, have not been so optimistic. See, for example, citations in [16]; YuRA, H. T., 1973, J. opt. Soc. Am., 63, 567; DOWLING, J. A., LIVINGSTON, P. M., 1973, J. opt. Soc. Am., 63, 846; CHIBA, T., 1971, Appl. Optics, 10, 2456; DUNPHY, J. R., KERR, J. R., 1974, J. opt. Soc. Am., 64, 1015; LUTOMIRSKI, R. F., WOODIE, W. L., BUSER, R. G., 1977, Appl. Optics, 16, 665; WANG, J. Y., 1977, J. opt. Soc. Am., 67, 383; and WANG, J. Y., MARKEY, J. K., 1978, J. opt. Soc. Am., 68, 78. An astronomical measurement in poor seeing with a compensated imaging device showed wavefront tilt to be “… less than 20 per cent of the correction …” (see MCCALL, S. L., BROWN, T. R., and PASSNER, A., 1977, Astrophys. J., b>211, 463)
   Google Scholar