Genetically Modified Crops: Towards Agricultural Growth, Agricultural Development, or Agricultural Sustainability?

References

• Challa, O.; Ramamurthy, V.; Venugopalan, M.V. Dynamics of Land Use in Relation to Green Revolution in India. Land Cover and Land Use, Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems; EOLSS-UNESCO Publications: Oxford, UK, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Pingali, P. L.; Raney, T. From the Green Revolution to the Gene Revolution: How will the Poor Fare? ESA Working Paper No. 05-09; European Seed Association: Brussels, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Bazuin, S.; Azadi, H.; Witlox, F. Application of GM crops in Sub-Saharan Africa: Lessons learned from Green Revolution. J. Biotechnol. Adv. 2011, 29, 908–912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu, P.; Scholten, B. A. Technological and social dimensions of the Green Revolution: Connecting pasts and futures. Int. J. Agric. Sustain. 2012, 10, 109–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pingali, P. L.; Heisey, P. W. Cereal-crop productivity in developing countries: Past trends and future prospects. In Agricultural Science Policy; Alston, J.M., Pardey, P.G., Taylor, M., Eds.; IFPRI & Johns Hopkins University Press: Washington, DC, 2001; pp 56–82.
   Google Scholar
• Fuglie, K.; Nin-Pratt, A. A changing global harvest. In Global Food Policy Report; The International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI): Washington, DC., 2012; pp 14–27. http://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/publications/gfpr2012_ch02.pdf ( accessed July 23, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Delude, C. W.; Mirvis, K. Genetically modified food crops. Your World 2000, 10, 1–16. http://biomed.brown.edu/arise/resources/docs/yw10_1.pdf ( accessed April 5, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Kuyek, D. Genetically Modified Crops in Africa: Implications for Small Farmers; Genetic Resources Action International: Barcelona, 2002; pp 1–20. www.grain.org ( accessed June 25, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Chopra, P.; Kamma, A. Genetically modified crops in India. 2005. http://paraschopra.com/publications/gm.pdf ( accessed April 10, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Scoones, I.; Glove, D.Africa’s biotechnology battle. Nature 2009, 460, 797–798.
   Google Scholar
• Qaim, M.; Zilberman, D. Yield effect of genetically modified crops in development countries. Science 2009, 299, 900–902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azadi, H.; Ho, P. Genetically modified and organic crops in developing countries: A review of options for food security. Biotechnol. Adv. 2010, 28, 160–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speiser, B.; Stolze, M.; Oehen, B.; Gessler, C, P.; Weibel, F.; Bravin, E.; Kilchenmann, A.; Widmer, A.; Charles, R.; Lang, A.; Stamm, C.; Triloff, P.; Tamm, L.; Sustainability assessment of GM crops in a Swiss agricultural context. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2013, 33, 21–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juma, C. The New Harvest—Agricultural Innovations in Africa; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Agricultural biotechnologies in developing countries: Options and opportunities in crops, forestry, livestock, fisheries and agro-industry to face the challenges of food insecurity and climate change (ABDC-10). Presented at the FAO International Technical Conference, Guadalajara, Mexico, March 1–4 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Azadi, H.; Schoonbeek, S.; Mahmoudi, H.; Derudder, B.; De Maeyer, P.; Witlox, F. Organic agriculture and sustainable food production system: Main potentials. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2011, 144, 92–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Fund for Agricultural Development. Food prices: Smallholder farmers can be part of the solution. 2012. http://www.ifad.org/operations/food/farmer.htm ( accessed April 17, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• The World Bank. Agricultural Growth for the Poor: An Agenda for Development; The World Bank: Washington DC, 2005; pp 29–31.
   Google Scholar
• Briney, A. Green Revolution: History and overview of the Green Revolution. 2008. http://geography.about.com/od/globalproblemsandissues/a/greenrevolution.htm ( accessed January 6, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Thurlow, J.; Benin, S.; Diao, X.; Kalinda, H.; Kalinda, T. Agricultural Growth and Investment Options for Poverty Reduction in Zambia; Discussion Paper 00791; International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC., 2008; pp 2–26.
   Google Scholar
• Ponting, C. A New Green History of the World: The Environment and the Collapse of Great Civilizations; Random House: New York, 2007; 244 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Oasa, E. K. The political economy of international agricultural research in glass. In The Green Revolution Revisited: Critique and Alternatives; Glaeser, B.; Ed. Allen & Unwin: xx, 1987; pp 13–55.
   Google Scholar
• International Food Policy Research Institute. Green Revolution: Curse or blessing. International Food Policy Research Institute. 2002. http://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/pubs/pubs/ib/ib11.pdf ( accessed July 23, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Rosset, P. Lessons from the Green Revolution. 2000. www.foodfirst.org/media/opeds/2000/4-greenrev.html ( accessed January 3, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Timmer, P. C. Agriculture and Pro-Poor Growth:An Asian Perspective; Working Paper Number 63; Center of Global Development: Washington, DC., 2005; pp 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. G.; Mellor, J. W. The role of agriculture in economic development. Am. Econ. Rev. 1961, 51, 566–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, R.; Conway, E. B. After the Green Revolution: Sustainable Agriculture for Development; Earthscan Publications: London, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Gollin, D.; Parente, S.; Rogerson, R. The role of agriculture in development. Am. Econ. Rev. 2002, 92, 160–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmer, C. P. Agriculture and economic development. In Handbook of Agricultural Economics; Gardner, B.; Rausser, G, Eds.; Elsevier: Philadelphia, 2002; Vol. 2, pp 1893–1943.
   Google Scholar
• Diao, X.; Hazell, P.; Resnick, D.; Thurlow, J. The Role of Agriculture in Development, Implications for Sub-Saharan Africa; Research Report No. 153; International Food Policy Research Institute, xx, 2007. doi:10.2499/9780896291614RR153.
   Google Scholar
• WiseGEEK. Clear answers for common questions. 2012. http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-agricultural-development.htm ( accessed March 13, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. What We Do. Agricultural development strategy overview. 2011. http://www.gatesfoundation.org/agriculturaldevelopment/Pages/overview.aspx ( accessed February 18, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Caritas International, the Catholic relief agency. Questions raised on high-tech foods. Paper presented at conference on “Feeding the World: The Moral Imperative of Biotechnology,” Gregorian University, Rome, September 24, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Chandra, G.M. Global Summit: Green Revolution—II, Growth Engine for Transformation. 2011. http://www.assocham.org/agriculture/summit-green-rev2/presentations/gr2_MC_Goel.pdf ( accessed May 13, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• India Resource Center. Green Revolution—Inequitable and inadequate. 2003. http://www.indiaresource.org/news/2003/4103.html ( accessed November 22, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• International Fund for Agricultural Development. Development effectiveness. 2012. http://www.ifad.org/deveffect/index.htm ( accessed April 18, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, H. Agricultural Development, Growth and Equity: 40 Years of Experience; Publication on international agricultural research, CGISR Secretariat, IFAD. Fourth United Nations Conference on the Least Developed Countries (LDC IV), 1998. http://library.cgiar.org/bitstream/handle/10947/152/craw04.pdf?sequence=1 ( accessed January 19, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• The World Bank Report. World Development: Agriculture for Development; The World Bank: Washington DC, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Gender Impact Strategy for Agricultural Development. 2008. http://www.gatesfoundation.org/learning/Documents/gender-impact-strategy.pdf ( accessed February 2, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• De Janvry, A.; Sadoulet, E. Agricultural growth and poverty reduction: Additional evidence. World Bank Res. Observ. 2010, 25, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravallion, M.; Chen, S. China’s (uneven) progress against poverty. J. Dev. Econ. 2007, 82, 1–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, G.; Cunningham, S.; Deutsch, L.; Erickson, J.; Quinlan, A.; Raez-Luna, E.; Tinch, R.; Troell, M.; Woodbury, P.; Zens, S. The risks and benefits of genetically modified crops: A multidisciplinary perspective. Conserv. Ecol. 2000, 4, 13. http://www.consecol.org/vol4/iss1/art13 ( accessed November 16, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Kang, D. S. Environmental problems of the Green Revolution with a focus on Punjab, India. In International Dimensions of the Environmental Crisis; Barrett, R., Ed.; Westview: Boulder, CO, 1982; pp 198–205.
   Google Scholar
• Pimentel, D. Green revolution agriculture and chemical hazards. Sci. Total Environ. 1996, 188, 86–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abhilash, P. C.; Singh, N. Pesticide use and application: An Indian scenario. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 165, 1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hole, F. Agricultural sustainability in the semi-arid Near East. Climate Past 2007, 3, 193–203. www.clim-past.net/3/193/2007/ ( accessed January 25, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• United States Agency International Development (USAID). Agricultural Biotechnology for Development; USAID: Washington, DC, 2009. http://www.usaid.gov/our_work/pdfs/2009/usaid_biotech_broc_eng_090407.pdf ( accessed October 5, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Agriculture and Natural Resources Team. Agricultural Sustainability; Department for International Development (DFID), UK: London, 2004; pp 5–21.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Legal definition of sustainable agriculture. 2009. http://www.csrees.usda.gov/nea/ag_systems/in_focus/sustain_ag_if_legal.html ( accessed November 25, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Committee on Twenty-First Century Systems Agriculture; National Research Council. Toward Sustainable Agricultural Systems in the 21st Century; National Academies Press: Washington, D.C, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. A.; Farm, S.; Georgia, C.; Baide, J. M. R.; Molnar, J. J. Barriers to the Adoption of Sustainable Agricultural Practices: Working Farmer and Change Agent Perspectives. Final Report; The Southern Region Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program (SARE) and the Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn University: Auburn, AL, July 30, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, P. Applying the Principles of Sustainable Farming: Fundamentals of Sustainable Agriculture; ATTRA–National Sustainable Agriculture Information Service: Fayetteville, AK, 2003. http://attra.ncat.org/attra-pub/trans.html#Composts ( accessed April 19, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Pretty, J.; Hine, R. Reducing food poverty with sustainable agriculture: A summary of new evidence. SAFE—World Research Project. 2001. www2.essex.ac.uk/ces/Research/Programmes/SAFEWexecsummfinalreport.htm ( accessed July 19, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Ghimire, A. A Review on Organic Farming for Sustainable Agriculture. Department of Agriculture Extension and Rural Sociology; Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science: Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal, 2002; pp 4–24.
   Google Scholar
• UK Cooperative Extension Service. Sustainable Agriculture; Cooperative Extension Service, University of Kentucky College of Agriculture: Lexington, KY; April 2008. http://www.uky.edu/Ag/CDBREC/introsheets/sustainableag.pdf ( accessed April 19, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Dei Congressi, P. J. F.; Kennedy, P. The growing demand for land: Risks and opportunities for smallholder farmers. Presented at IFAD, Governing Council, 18–19 February 2009. http://www.ifad.org/events/gc/32/roundtables/2.pdf ( accessed January 18, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Kaundinya, R. Impact of Agri Biotechnology in Agricultural Growth; Advanta India and ABLE-AG (Association of Biotech Led Enterprises—Agriculture Group): xx, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Tibbs, H. Sustainability. Deeper News 1999, 10, 1–76. http://www.hardintibbs.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/tibbs_sustainable.pdf ( accessed April 5, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Scandizzo, P. L.; Savastano, S. The adoption and diffusion of gm crops in United States: A real option approach. AgBioForum 2010, 13, 142–157.
   Google Scholar
• Brookes, G.; Barfoot, P. Biotech crops: Evidence, outcomes and impacts 1996–2007. Focus on income, well being and food security. 2009. http://www.pgeconomics.co.uk/page/23/ ( accessed March 20, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Gomez-Barbero, M.; Rodriguez-Cerezo, E. Modeling Socio-Economic Impacts of the GM Adoption; European Commission, Seville, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Haffman, E. W. Production, identity preservation, and labeling in a marketplace with genetically modified and non-genetically modified foods. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 3–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookes, G.; Barfoot, P. GM Crops: Global Socio-economic and Environmental Impacts 1996–2010; PG Economics: Dorchester, UK, 2012. http://www.pgeconomics.co.uk/page/33/global-impact-2012 ( accessed January 31, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Evenson, R. E. GMOs: Prospects for Increased Crop Productivity in Developing Countries; Economic Growth Center, Yale University: New Haven, CT, 2003. http://www.econ.yale.edu/growth_pdf/cdp878.pdf ( accessed April 30, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Ronald, P. Plant genetics, sustainable agriculture and global food security. Genetics 2011, 188, 11–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Que, Q.; Chilton, M. D. M.; de Fontes, C. M.; He, C.; Nuccio, M.; Zhu, T.; Wu, Y. S.; Chen, J.; Shi, L. Trait stacking in transgenic crops challenges and opportunities. GM Crops 2010, 1, 220–229.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• James, C. Preview: Global Status of Commercialized Transgenic Crops: 2003; ISAAA Briefs No. 30. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications: Ithaca, NY, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• James, C. Brief 44: Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2012; ISAAA Press Release. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications: Ithaca, NY, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Rudi, L. M.; Azadi, H.; Witlox, F. Reconcilability of socio-economic development enhancement and environmental improvement in the context of Sub-Saharan Africa. Glob. Planet. Change 2012, 86, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qaim, M.; Matuschke I. Impacts of genetically modified crops in developing countries: A survey. Q. J. Int. Agric. 2005, 44, 207–227.
   Google Scholar
• Kameswara Rao, C. The Berlin group on genetically modified crops in developing countries. Curr. Sci. 2006, 91, 1305–1306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitale, J. D.; Vognan, G.; Ouattarra, M.; Traore, O. The commercial application of GMO crops in Africa: Burkina Faso’s decade of experience with Bt cotton. AgBioForum 2010, 13, 320–332.
   Google Scholar
• Qaim, M.; Cap, E. J.; de Janvry, A. Agronomics and sustainability of transgenic cotton in Argentina. AgBioForum 2003, 6, 41–47.
   Google Scholar
• Raney, T. Economic impact of transgenic crops in developing countries. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2006, 17, 174–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J. Peer-reviewed surveys indicate positive impact of commercialized GM crops. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28, 319–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookes, G.; Barfoot, P. GM Crops: Global Socio-economic and Environmental Impacts 1996–2010; PG Economics: Dorchester, UK, May 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Qaim, M.; Kathage, J. Economic impacts and impact dynamics of Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) cotton in India. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012, 109, 11652–11656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhary, B. Plant domestication and resistance to herbivory. Int. J. Plant Genomics, 2013, 2013. doi:10.1155/2013/572784.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fritz, T. Bread or trough. Animal feed, competition for land and food security. 2013. http://fdcl-berlin.de/fileadmin/fdcl/Publikationen/Brot_oder_Trog/bread_or_trough_web.pdf ( accessed June 14, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• James, C. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2012; ISAAA Briefs No. 44. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications: Ithaca, NY, 2012. http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/44/executivesummary/ ( accessed July 17, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, S.-E.; Sørensen, M.; Pedersen, S.M.; Weiner, J. Feeding the world: Genetically modified crops versus agricultural biodiversity. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2013, 33, 651–662. doi:10.1007/s13593-013-0138-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera-Estrella, L. R. Genetically modified crops and developing countries. Plant Physiol. 2000, 124, 923–926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin, X. K. Genetically modified food from crops: Progress, pawns, and possibilities. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2008, 392, 333–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruse, M.; Castle, D. Genetically Modified Foods: Debating Biotechnology; Prometheus Books: Amherst, NY, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Vidal, J. GM crops promote superweeds, food insecurity and pesticides, say NGOs. Guardian, 19 October 2011. http://www.commondreams.org/news/2011/10/19/gm-crops-promote-superweeds-food-insecurity-and-pesticides-say-ngos ( accessed November 11, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Nuffield Council on Bioethics. The Use of Genetically Modified Crops in Developing Countries; Nuffield Council on Bioethics: London, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Aldred J. Worldwide increase in GM crops, report shows. Guardian News and Media, 13 February 2008. http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/feb/13/gmcrops.food/print ( accessed February 25, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Commission Green Biotechnology. Genetically Modified Insect Resistant Crops with Regard to Developing Countries; InterAcademy Panel Initiative on Genetically Modified Organisms: Berlin, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, P. J. Public Concerns over transgenic crops. Genome Res. 1999, 9, 1159–1162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garza, C.; Stover, P. General introduction: The role of science in identifying common ground in the debate on genetic modification of foods. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2003, 14, 182–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollmer, E.; Creamer, N.; Mueller, P. Sustainable agriculture and transgenic crops. 2007. http://faculty.chass.ncsu.edu/comstock/langure/ethics/Vollmer.pdf ( accessed June 1, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• James, C. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops; ISAAA Briefs No. 39). International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Application: Ithaca, NY, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Novy, A.; Ledermann, S.; Pray, C.; Nagarajan, L. Balancing agricultural development resources: Are GM and organic agriculture in opposition in Africa? AgBioForum 2011, 14, 142–157.
   Google Scholar
• International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA). Documented Benefits of GM Crops; ISAAA: Ithaca, NY, 2006. http://isaaa.org/resources/publications/pocketk/5/default.asp ( accessed May 13, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, J. H.; Ho, P.; Azadi H. Benefits of Bt cotton counterbalanced by secondary pests? Perceptions of ecological change in China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2011, 173, 985–994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, G. The Doubly Green Revolution: Food for All in the 21st Century; Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, C. S.; Thirtle, C. Potential economic impacts of terminator technologies: Policy implications for developing countries. Environ. Dev. Econ. 2003, 8, 187–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, F.; Butz, W. F. The Future of Genetically Modified Crops, Lessons from the Green Revolution; Rand Publishing: Santa Monica, CA, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Pray, C. E.; Huang, J.; Hu, R.; Rozelle, S. Five years of Bt cotton in China—The benefits continue. Plant J. 2002, 31, 423–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mal, P.; Manjunatha A.V.; Bauer, S.; Ahmed, M. N. Technical efficiency and environmental impact of Bt cotton and non-Bt cotton in North India. AgBioForum 2011, 14, 164–170.
   Google Scholar
• Qaim, M. Benefits of genetically modified crops for the poor: Household income, nutrition, and health. New Biotechnol. 2010, 27, 552–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultman, N.; Sierra, K.; Shapiro, A. Innovation and Technology for Green Growth. In Old Problems, New Solutions: Harnessing Technology and Innovation in the Fight Against Global Poverty; The 2012 Brookings Blum Roundtable Policy Briefs; Brookings Institution: Washington, DC, 2012; pp 31–40. http://www.brookings.edu/˜/media/research/files/reports/2012/10/blum%20roundtable/10%20green%20growth%20hultman%20sierra.pdf ( accessed July 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, S. J.; McDonald, J.; Falck-Zeped, J. Investment, regulation, and uncertainty: Managing new plant breeding techniques. GM Crops Food 2014, 5, 44–57.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fernandez-Cornejo, J.; Daberkow, S.; McBride, W. D. Decomposing the size effect on the adoption of innovations: Agrobiotechnology and precision farming. AgBioForum 2001, 4, 124–136.
   Google Scholar
• Areal, F. J.; Riesgo, L.; Rodríguez-Cerezo, E. Attitudes of European farmers towards GM crop adoption. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2011, 9, 945–957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. A. The nexus: Where science meets society. Science 2005, 310, 1634–1639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesseler, J.; Aerni, P. Sustainability and the bioeconomy. AgBioForum 2011, 14, 94–96.
   Google Scholar
• Fedoroff, N. V. Engineering food for all. Opinion Page. The New York Times, August 18, 2011. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/19/opinion/genetically-engineered-food-for-all.html?_r=0 ( accessed April 5, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, A. R. Farming systems of Australia: Exploiting the synergy between genetic improvement and agronomy. In Farming Systems of Australia; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009; pp 23–54. http://www2.unine.ch/repository/default/content/sites/spsw/files/shared/SPSW/Documents/Publication_speakers_Summer_school/Fischer/4.pdf ( accessed May 25, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. Land use and agriculture. India and path to environmental sustainability. ProQuest, February 20080. http://www.csa.com/discoveryguides/india/review4.php ( accessed June 2, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Qaim, M. The economics of genetically modified crops. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 2009, 1, 665–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Sustainable agricultural resources development. 2011. http://www.nationsencyclopedia.com/United-Nations-Related-Agencies/The-Food-and-Agriculture-Organization-of-the-United-Nations-FAO-SUSTAINABLE-AGRICULTURAL-RESOURCES-DEVELOPMENT.html ( accessed June 19, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Baik, B. E.; Ullrich, S. Barley for food: Characteristics, improvement, and renewed interest. J. Cereal Sci. 2008, 48, 233–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikipedia. Barley. 16 November 2011. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barley ( accessed June 15, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Wilm K. H. Genetic modification of food. Our Food, 2011. http://www.ourfood.com/Genetic_Modification_Food.html ( accessed May 14, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Ghasemi, S.; Karami, E.; Azadi, H. Knowledge, attitudes and behavioral intentions of agricultural professionals towards GM foods: A case study in Southwest Iran. Sci. Eng. Ethics 2013, 19, 1201–1227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Othmen, Y.; Bhassu, S. The role of biotechnology in sustainable agriculture for the future. 2011. http://ensearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Biotechnology-and-sustainable-agriculture-final.pdf ( accessed December 17, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Bigler, F.; Sanvido, O.; Romeis, J. Can Genetically Modified Plants Play a Role in Sustainable Crop Protection? ART Report. Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon Research Station (ART): Zurich, Switzerland, 2008. http://www.oecd.org/agriculture/crp/42582878.pdf ( accessed June 12, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Tutelya, V. A. Genetically Modified Food Sources: Safety Assessment and Control. Academic Press: Elsevier Inc., 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Zarrilli, S. Genetically modified organisms: A new dilemma for Africa. The African Technology Development Forum, 2005. http://www.atdforum.org ( accessed March 10, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Nottingham, S. Eat Your Genes: How Genetically Modified Food Is Entering Our Diet; Zed Books Ltd: London & New York, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Prakash, S. C. The genetically modified crop debate in the context of agricultural evolution. Plant Physiol. 2001, 126, 8–15. http://www.plantphysiol.org/content/126/1/8.full ( accessed July 16, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Wolt, D. J. Understanding Risk and Safety Assessment for Genetically Modified Plants; Biosafety Institute for Genetically Modified Agricultural Products, Iowa State University: Ames, IA, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Poveda, A.; Molla-Bauza, M. B.; del Campo Gomis, F. J.; Martinez, L. M. C. Consumer-perceived risk model for the introduction of genetically modified food in Spain. Food Policy 2009, 34, 519–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, W.; Balasubramanian, S. K. Public perceptions and willingness-to-pay a premium for non-GM Foods in the US and UK. AgBioForum 2001, 4, 221–231.
   Google Scholar
• Giger, E.; Prem, R.; Leen, M. Increase of agricultural production based on genetically modified food to meet population growth demands. Sch. Doc. Stud. (E. U.) J. 2009, 1, 98–124.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D. M. What’s wrong with genetically modified food? In Ethical Issues of the 21st Century; Adams, F., Ed.; Philosophy Documentation Center Press: Charlottesville, VA, 2004; pp 1–15. http://humanitiespolicy.unt.edu/topics/our_work/What's%20Wrong%20With%20Genetically%20Modified%20Food.pdf ( accessed April 5, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Nordlee, J. A.; Taylor, S. L.; Townsend, J. A.; Thomas, L. A.; Bush, R. K. Identification of a Brazil-nut allergen in transgenic soybeans. N. Engl. J. Med. 1996, 334, 726–728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prescott, V. E.; Campbell, P. M.; Moore, A.; Mattes, J.; Rothenberg, M. E.; Foster, P. S.; Higgins, T. J. V.; Hogan, S. P. Transgenic expression of bean alpha-amylase inhibitor in peas results in altered structure and immunogenicity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005. 53, 9023–9030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimaraes, V.; Drumare, M.-F.; Lereclus, D.; Gohar, M.; Lamourette, P.; Nevers, M. C.; Vaisanen-Tunkelrott, M.-L.; Bernard, H.; Guillon, B.; Créminon, C.; Wal, J.-M.; Adel-Patient, K. In vitro digestion of Cry1Ab proteins and analysis of the impact on their immunoreactivity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 3222–3231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yum, H. Y.; Lee, S. Y.; Lee, K. E.; Sohn, M. H.; Kim, K. E. Genetically modified and wild soybeans: An immunologic comparison. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2005, 26, 210–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, C. E.; Mellor, T. V. Determinants of corn rootworm resistant corn adoption in Indiana. AgBioForum 2005, 8, 197–204. http://www.agbioforum.org/v8n4/v8n4a01-alexander.html ( accessed June 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• GMO Compass. The western corn rootworm: On its way to European maize fields. 4 January 2006. http://www.gmocompass.org/eng/news/stories/190.western_corn_rootworm_its_way_european_maize_fields.html ( accessed July 19, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Malatesta, M.; Biggiogera, M.; Manuali, E.; Rocchi, M.B.L.; Baldelli, B.; Gazzanelli, G. Fine structural analyses of pancreatic acinar cell nuclei from mice fed on GM soybean. Eur. J. Histochem. 2003, 47, 385–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tudisco, R.; Lombardi, P.; Bovera, F.; D’Angelo, D.; Cutrignelli, M.I.; Mastellone, V.; Terzi, V.; Avallone, L.; Infascelli, F. Genetically modified soybean in rabbit feeding: Detection of DNA fragments and evaluation of metabolic effects by enzymatic analysis. Anim. Sci. 2006, 82, 193–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Netherwood, T.; Martín-Orúe, S.M.; O’Donnell, A.G.; Gockling, S.; Graham, J.; Mathers, J.C.; Gilbert, H.J. Assessing the survival of transgenic plant DNA in the human gastrointestinal tract. Nat. Biotechnol. 2004, 22, 204–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estabillo, A.V. Farmer’s group urges ban on planting Bt corn; says it could be cause of illnesses. Mindanews, 19th October 2004. http://www.mindanews.com/2004/10/19nws-btcorn.html ( accessed July 30, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Food Standards Agency. Extremely low risk of GM transfer. 2002. http://www.food.gov.uk/news/newsarchive/2002/jul/gm_reports ( accessed July 10, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Scutt, C. P.; Zubko, E.I.; Meyer, P. Techniques for the removal of marker genes from transgenic plants. Biochimie 2002, 84, 1119–1126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domingo J. L. Toxicity studies of genetically modified plants: A review of the published literature. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2007, 47, 721–733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakshi, A. Potential adverse health effects of genetically modified crops. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health B 2003, 6, 211–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pusztai, A.; Bardocz, S.; Ewen, S. W. B. Genetically modified foods: Potential human health effects. In Food Safety: Contaminants and Toxins; D’Mello, J.P.F., Ed.; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 2003; pp 347–372.
   Google Scholar
• Fontes, E. M. G.; Pires, C. S. S.; Sujit, E. R.; Panizzi, A. R. The environmental effects of genetically modified crops resistant to insects. Neotrop. Entomol. 2002, 31, 497–513.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D.; Andow, A.; Gepts, P.; Hallerman, E. M.; Power, A.; Tiedj, J. M.; Wolfenbarger, L. L. Genetically engineered organisms and the environment: Current status and recommendations. Ecol. Appl. 2005, 15, 377–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritz, E. Topic B: Genetically Modified Crops. Proceedings of the FAO Conference Northwestern University Model United Nations (NUMUN) Club: Norris University Student Center, Evanston, Illinois, USA, April 10–13, 2014. http://numun.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/FAO-Topic-B-Genetically-Modified-Crops.pdf ( accessed July 30, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Prasifka, P. L.; Hellmich, R. L.; Prasifka, J. R.; Lewis, L. C. Effects of Cry1Ab-expressing corn anthers on the movement of monarch butterfly larvae. Environ. Entomolol. 2007, 36, 228–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dively, G. P.; Rose, R.; Sears, M. K.; Hellmich, R. L.; Stanley-Horn, D. E.; Calvin, D. D.; Russo, J. M.; Anderson, P. L. Effects on monarch butterfly larvae (Lepidoptera: Danaidae) after continuous exposure to Cry1Ab expressing corn during anthesis. Environ. Entomol. 2004, 33, 1116–1125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binimelis, R.; Pengue, W.; Monterroso, I. Transgenic treadmill”: Responses to the emergence and spread of glyphosate-resistant johnsongrass in Argentina. Geoforum 2009, 40, 623–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandula, V. K.; Reddy, K. N.; Duke, S. O.; Poston, D. H. Glyphosate-resistant weeds: Current status and future outlook. Outlooks Pest Manage. 2005, 16, 183–187.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, W.G.; Owen, M. D. K.; Kruger, G. R.; Young, B. G.; Shaw, D. R.; Wilson, R. G.; Wilcut, J. W.; Jordan, D. L.; Weller, S. C. US farmer awareness of glyphosate-resistant weeds and resistance management strategies. Weed Technol. 2009, 23, 308–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, S. O. Taking stock of herbicide-resistant crops ten years after introduction. Pest Manage. Sci. 2005, 61, 211–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsanto. Management guide for marestail. 2008. http://www.monsanto.com/weedmanagement/Documents/Marestail.pdf ( accessed July 25, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Domingo J. L. Health risks of GM foods: Many opinions but few data. Science 2000, 288, 1748–1749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryme, I. F.; Lembcke, R. In vivo studies on possible health consequences of genetically modified food and feed–with particular regard to ingredients consisting of genetically modified plant materials. Nutr. Health 2003, 17, 1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patel, R.; Torres, R. J.; Rosset, P. Genetic engineering in agriculture and corporate engineering in public debate: Risk, public relations, and public debate over genetically modified crops. Int. J. Occup. Environ. Health 2005, 11, 428–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zdziarski, I M.; Edwards, J.W.; Carman, J.A.; Haynes, J. I. GM crops and the rat digestive tract: A critical review. Environ. Int. 2014, 73, 423–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weil J. H. Are genetically modified plants useful and safe? IUBMB Life 2005, 57, 311–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pusztai, A.; Bardocz, S. GMO in animal nutrition: Potential benefits and risks. In Biology of Nutrition in Growing Animals; Mosenthin, R., Zentek, J., ZŻebrowska, T., Eds.; Elsevier Limited, 2006; Vol. 4, pp 513–540.
   Google Scholar
• Wesseler, J.; Scatasta, S.; Fall, E.H. The environmental benefits and costs of genetically modified (GM) crops. In Genetically Modified Food and Global Welfare; Frontiers of Economics and Globalization; Vol. 10; Carter, C.A., Moschini, G., Sheldon, I., Eds.; Emerald Group Publishing: Bingley, UK, 2011; pp 173–199.
   Google Scholar
• Fredrickson D. S. A History of the Recombinant DNA Guidelines in the United States; Pergamon: Maryland, USA, 1979; pp 151–156. http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/FF/B/B/K/C/_/ffbbkc.pdf ( accessed December 26, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Talbot, B. Development of the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for Recombinant DNA Research; Public Health Report Vol. 98. National Institute of Health: Bethesda, MD, 1983; pp 361–368.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, H. Systemic risks of genetically modified crops: The need for new approaches to risk assessment. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2011, 23, 1–11. http://www.enveurope.com/content/23/1/7 ( accessed June 13, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• International Seed Federation (ISF). Agriculture under pressure. 2011. http://www.worldseed.org/isf/home.html ( accessed March 7, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Bakshi, S.; Dewan, D. Status of transgenic cereal crops: A review. Clon Transgen 2013, 3, 119.
   Google Scholar
• Schiøler, E.; Pinstrup-Andersen, P. Seeds of Contention; Oxford University. Press: Oxford, UK, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J. E. Peer-reviewed surveys indicate positive impact of commercialized GM crops. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28, 319–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rech, E. L.; Lopes, M. R. Insights into Brazilian agricultural structure and sustainable intensification of food production. Food Energy Security 2013, 1, 77–80.
   Google Scholar
• Fedoroff, N. V. The past, present and future of crop genetic modification. New Biotechnol. 2010, 27, 461–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S.; Just, D. R.; Pinstrup-Andersen, P. Bt-cotton and secondary pests. Int. J. Biotechnol. 2008, 10, 113–120.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z. J.; Lin, H.; Huang, J.; Hu, R.; Rozelle, S.; Pray, C. Bt cotton in China: Are secondary insect infestations offsetting the benefits in farmer fields? Agric. Sci. China 2009, 8, 83–90.
   Google Scholar
• Gassmann, A. J.; Petzold-Maxwell, J. L.; Keweshan, R.; Dunbar, M. W. Field-evolved resistance to Bt maize by western corn rootworm. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, 622–629. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borlaug, N. E. Ending world hunger. The promise of biotechnology and the threat of antiscience zealotry. Plant Physiol. 2000, 124, 487–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trewavas, A. GM food is the best option we have. In The Ethics of Food, A Reader for the Twenty-First Century; Pence, G, Ed.; Rowman: Lanham, MD, 2002; pp 148–155.
   Google Scholar
• Gruère, G. P.; Sun Y. Measuring the Contribution of Bt Cotton Adoption to India’s Cotton Yields Leap; International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Discussion Paper 1170. IFPRI: Washington, DC., 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hofs, J.-L.; Berti, F. Les cotonniers (Gossypium hirsutum L.) génétiquement modifiés, Bt: Quel avenir pour la petite agriculture familiale en Afrique francophone? Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ 2006, 10, 335–343.
   Google Scholar
• Gurian-Sherman, D. Failure to Yield—Evaluating the Performance of Genetically Engineered Crops; Union of Concerned Scientists: Cambridge, MA, 2009; 1–51.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Cornejo, J.; McBride, W. D. Adoption of Bioengineered Crops; Agricultural Economics Report 810. USDA Economic Research Service: Washington DC, 2002. http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/aer810/ ( accessed July 30, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Bullock, D.; Nitsi, E.I. GMO adoption and private cots savings: GR soybeans and Bt corn. In GMOs in Agriculture: Economics and Politics; Nelson, G.C., Ed.; Academic Press: Urbana, IL, 2001; pp 21–38.
   Google Scholar
• Benbrook, C. Evidence of the Magnitude and Consequences of the Roundup Ready Soybean Yield Drag from University-Based Varietal Trials in 1998; Ag BioTech InfoNet Technical Paper, Number 1, 13 July 1999. http://www.mindfully.org/GE/RRS-Yield-Drag.htm ( accessed July 28, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, R. W.; Roeth, F. W.; Nelson, L. A.; Shapiro, C. A.; Klein, R. N.; Knezevic, S. Z. Glyphosate-resistant soyabean cultivar yields compared with sister lines. Agron. J. 2001, 93, 408–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, B. L.; Subedi, K.D. Development, yield, grain moisture and nitrogen uptake of Bt corn hybrids and their conventional near-isolines. Field Crops Res. 2005, 93, 199–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, H. K. Green Revolution: History, Impact and Future; Studium Press: Houston, TX, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Pray, C. E.; Nagarajan, L. Role of biotechnology in stimulating agribusiness R&D investment in India. AgBioForum 2013, 16, 104–111.
   Google Scholar
• da Silva Dias, J. C. Plant Breeding for Harmony between Modern Agriculture Production and the Environment. Agri. Sci. 2015, 6, 87–116.
   Google Scholar
• Charles, D. Top five myths of genetically modified seeds, busted. http://www.npr.org/blogs/thesalt/2012/10/18/163034053/top-five-myths-of-genetically-modified-seeds-busted ( accessed June 25, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Zilberman, D.; Sexton, S. E.; Marra, M.; Fernandez-Cornejo, J. The economic impact of genetically engineered crops. The Choices Magazine, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, July 25, 2014, pp 1–8. http://www.choicesmagazine.org/magazine/print.php?article=129 ( accessed April 5, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, I. Killer seeds: The devastating impacts of Monsanto’s genetically modified seeds in India. Global Research. Center for Research on Globalization, 2012. http://www.globalresearch.ca/killer-seeds-the-devastating-impacts-of-monsanto-s-genetically-modified-seeds-in-india/28629 ( accessed June 14, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, R.; Buthelezi, T. J.; Ismael, Y.; Morse, S. Bt cotton, pesticides, labour and health—A case study of smallholder farmers in the Makhathini Flats, Republic of South Africa. Outlook Agric. 2003, 32, 123–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookes, G.; Barfoot, P. GM Crops: Global Socio-Economic and Environmental Impacts 1996–2007; PG Economic: Dorchester, UK, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Azadi, H.; Talsma, N.; Ho, P.; Zarafshani, K. GM crops in Ethiopia: A realistic way to increase agricultural performance? Trends Biotechnol. 2011, 29, 6–8.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, S. E.; Sørensen, M.; Pedersen, S. M.; Weiner, J. Feeding the world: Genetically modified crops versus agricultural biodiversity. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2013, 33, 651–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMichael, P.; Schneider, M. Food security politics and the Millennium Development Goals. Third World Q. 2011, 13, 119–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD). Agriculture at a Crossroads; Island Press: Washington, DC., 2009; pp 250.
   Google Scholar
• Ramjoue, C. A review of regulatory issues raised by genetically modified organisms in agriculture. CAB Rev. 2008, 3(096), 1–10. doi:10.1079/PAVSNNR20083096.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Adoption of genetically engineered crops in the U.S.: Extent of adoption. 2012. http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/adoption-of-genetically-engineered-crops-in-the us/documentation.aspx#.U9jlKOOSwv0 ( accessed July 30, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Ishii-Eitman, M.; Ching, L. L. The IAASTD review. Development 2008, 51, 570–573.
   Google Scholar
• James, C. Brief 46: Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2013. ISAAA Press Release. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications: Ithaca, NY, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Fagan, J.; Antoniou, M.; Robinson, C. GMO Myths and Truths: An Evidence-Based Examination of the Claims Made for the Safety and Efficacy of Genetically Modified Crops and Foods, 2nd ed.; Earth Open Source: London, 2014. www.earthopensource.org ( accessed July 19, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, N. GM crops escape into the American wild. Nature News, 6 August 2010. doi:10.1038/news.2010.393
   Google Scholar
• Li, B.; Li, N.; Duan, X.; Wei, A.; Yang, A.; Zhang, J. Generation of marker-free transgenic maize with improved salt tolerance using the FLP/FRT recombination system. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 145, 206–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J. E. Impacts of GE crops on biodiversity. ISB News Report, June 2011, p 4.
   Google Scholar
• Kolady, D. E.; Lesser, W. Genetically-engineered crops and their effects on varietal diversity: A case of Bt eggplant in India. Agric. Hum. Values 2012, 29, 3–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements. Organic agriculture—A guide to climate change and food security. 2009. http://www.nrccte.org/sites/default/files/publication-files/nrccte_roi_guidebook_web.pdf ( accessed June 25, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Wickson, F. Australia’s regulation of genetically modified crops: Are we risking sustainability? Aust. J. Emerg. Technol. Soc. 2004, 2, 36–47.
   Google Scholar
• Schoonbeek, S.; Azadi, H.; Mahmoudi, H.; Derudder, B.; De Maeyer, P.; Witlox, F. Organic agriculture and undernourishment in developing countries: Main potentials and challenges. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2013, 53, 917–928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouis, H.; E, Chassy B. M.; Ochanda J. O. Genetically modified food crops and their contribution to human nutrition and food quality. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2003, 14, 191–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruft, D. Impacts of genetically-modified crops and seeds on farmers. The Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center, The Dickinson School of Law of the Pennsylvania State University. November 2001. http://law.psu.edu/_file/aglaw/Impacts_of_Genetically_Modified.pdf ( accessed July 25, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• American Medical Association. Report 2 of the Council on Science and Public Health: Labeling of Bioengineered Foods; CSAPH Report 2-A-12. American Medical Association: AMA Plaza, Chicago. 2012. http://factsaboutgmos.org/sites/default/files/AMA%20Report.pdf ( accessed July 18, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), Board of Directors. Legally mandating GM food labels could mislead and falsely alarm consumers. 2012. http://www.aaas.org/news/releases/2012/media/AAAS_GM_statement.pdf ( accessed July 20, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, N. Legal issues shaping society’s acceptance of biotechnology and genetically modified organisms. Drake J. Agric. Law 2001, 6, 81–117.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, C. P.; Anderson, K. Genetically modified foods, trade, and developing countries: Is golden rice special? AgBioWorld, 2011. http://www.agbioworld.org/biotech-info/topics/goldenrice/specialgoldrice.html ( accessed July 25, 2014).
   Google Scholar