References
- Seal, B. S.; Lillehoj, H. S.; Donovan, D. M.; Gay, C. G. Alternatives to Antibiotics: A Symposium on the Challenges and Solutions for Animal Production. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 2013, 14, 78–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466252313000030.
- Barbut,S. Pale, Soft, and Exudative Poultry Meat–Reviewing Ways to Manage at the Processing Plant. Poultr. Sci. 2009, 88, 1506–1512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00118.
- Desai, M. A.; Jackson, V.; Zhai, W.; Suman, S. P.; Nair, M. N.; Beach, C. M.; Schilling, M. W. Proteome Basis of Pale, Soft, and Exudative-Like (Pse-Like) Broiler Breast (Pectoralis Major) Meat. Poultr. Sci. 2016, 95, 2696–2706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew213.
- Boleman, S. J.; Boleman, S. L.; Miller, R. K.; Taylor, J. F.; Cross, H. R.; Wheeler, T. L.; Koohmaraie, M.; Shackelford, S. D.; Miller, M. F.; West, R. L.; et al. Consumer Evaluation of Beef of Known Categories of Tenderness. J. Anim. Sci. 1997, 75, 1521–1524. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/1997.7561521x.
- Mancini, R. A.; Hunt, M. C. Current Research in Meat Color. Meat Sci. 2005, 71, 100–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.03.003.
- Bolormaa, S.; Pryce, J. E.; Kemper, K.; Savin, K.; Hayes, B. J.; Barendse, W.; Zhang, Y.; Reich, C. M.; Mason, B. A.; Bunch, R. J. Accuracy of Prediction of Genomic Breeding Values for Residual Feed Intake and Carcass and Meat Quality Traits in Bos Taurus, Bos Indicus, and Composite Beef Cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 91, 3088–3104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5827.
- Pannier, L.; Gardner, G. E.; Pearce, K. L.; Mcdonagh, M.; Ball, A. J.; Jacob, R. H.; Pethick, D. W.; Associations of Sire Estimated Breeding Values and Objective Meat Quality Measurements with Sensory Scores in Australian Lamb. Meat Sci. 2014, 96, 1076–1087. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.07.037.
- Jolanta, C. Capon Production-Breeding Stock, Rooster Castration and Rearing Methods, and Meat Quality – A Review. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2014, 14, 769–777. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2014-0050.
- Bendixen, E. The Use of Proteomics in Meat Science. Meat Sci. 2015, 71, 138–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.03.013.
- Pandey, A.; Mann, M. Proteomics to Study Genes and Genomes. Nature. 2000, 405, 837–846. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35015709.
- Wilkins, M. R.; Pasquali, C.; Appel, R. D.; Ou, K.; Golaz, O.; Sanchez, J. C.; Yan, J. X.; Gooley, A. A.; Hughes, G.; Humphery Smith, I.; et al. From Proteins to Proteomes: Large Scale Protein Identification by Two-Dimensional Electrophoresis and Amino Acid Analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 1996, 14, 61–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0196-61.
- Macbeath, G. Protein Microarrays and Proteomics. Nat. Genet. 2002, 32, 526–532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1037.
- Chen, L.; Su, W.; Chen, H.; Chen, D. Q.; Wang, M.; Guo, Y.; Zhao, Y. Y. Proteomics for Biomarker Identification and Clinical Application in Kidney Disease. Adv. Clin. Chem. 2018, 85, 91–113.
- Dias, M. H.; Kitano, E. S.; Zelanis, A.; Iwai, L. K. Proteomics and Drug Discovery in Cancer. Drug Discovery Today. 2016, 21, 264–277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2015.10.004.
- Kosová, K.; Urban, M. O.; Vítámvás, P.; Prášil, I. T. Drought Stress Response in Common Wheat, Durum Wheat, and Barley: Transcriptomics, Proteomics, Metabolomics, Physiology, and Breeding for an Enhanced Drought Tolerance. In Drought Stress Tolerance Plants. 2016, 2, 277–314.
- Remignon, H.; Molette, C.; Babile, R.; Fernandez, X. Current Advances in Proteomic Analysis and Its Use for the Resolution of Poultry Meat Quality Problems. World’s Poultr. Sci. J. 2006, 62, 123–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS200589.
- Delahunty, C.; Iii, J. R. Y. Protein Identification Using 2d-lc-ms/ms. Methods. 2005, 35, 248–255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2004.08.016.
- Ravi, I.; Baunthiyal, M.; Saxena, J. Advances in Biotechnology. Vet. Rec. 2014, 133, 53–56.
- Zolla, L. Foodomics to Investigate Meat Tenderness. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2013, 52, 47–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2013.05.017.
- Bendixen, E.; Danielsen, M.; Hollung, K.; Gianazza, E.; Miller, I. Farm Animal Proteomics – A Review. J. Proteomics. 2011, 74, 282–293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2010.11.005.
- Hanash, S. Disease Proteomics. Nature. 2003, 422, 226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01514.
- Lametsch, R.; Roepstorff, P.; Bendixen, E. Identification of Protein Degradation during Post-Mortem Storage of Pig Meat. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 5508–5512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf025555n.
- Bouley, J.; Chambon, C.; Picard, B. Mapping of Bovine Skeletal Muscle Proteins Using Two-Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis and Mass Spectrometry. Proteomics. 2004, 4, 1811–1824.
- Doherty, M. K.; Mclean, L.; Hayter, J. R.; Pratt, J. M.; Beynon, R. J. The Proteome of Chicken Skeletal Muscle: Changes in Soluble Protein Expression during Growth in a Layer Strain. Proteomics. 2004, 4, 2082–2093. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200300716.
- Hildrum, K. I.; Tornberg, E. Nordfood: Managing the Meat Tenderization Process: A Nordic Cooperation Project between Norwegian and Swedish Meat Industry and Research Institutes; Nordic Industria Fund: Oslo, 1998.
- Piras, C.; Roncada, P.; Rodrigues, P. M.; Bonizzi, L.; Soggiu, A. Proteomics in Food: Quality, Safety, Microbes, and Allergens. Proteomics. 2016, 16, 799–815. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.v16.5.
- Vlachos, A.; Arvanitoyannis, I. S.; Tserkezou, P. An Updated Review of Meat Authenticity Methods and Applications. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2013, 56, 1061–1096. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2012.691573.
- Wu, W.; Fu, Y.; Therkildsen, M.; Li, X. M.; Dai, R. T. Molecular Understanding of Meat Quality through Application of Proteomics. Food Rev. Int. 2015, 31, 13–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2014.961073.
- Sayd, T.; Morzel, M.; Chambon, C.; Franck, M.; Figwer, P.; Larzul, C.; Le Roy, P.; Monin, G.; Chérel, P.; Laville, E.; et al. Proteome Analysis of the Sarcoplasmic Fraction of Pig Semimembranosus Muscle: Implications on Meat Color Development. J. Agric Food Chemi. 2006, 54, 2732–2737. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf052569v.
- Bouley, J.; Meunier, B.; Chambon, C.; De, S. S.; Hocquette, J. F.; Picard, B. Proteomic Analysis of Bovine Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy. Proteomics. 2005, 5, 490–500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/()1615-9861.
- Hamelin, M.; Sayd, T.; Chambon, C.; Bouix, J.; Laville, E.; Milenkovic, D.; Leveziel, H.; Georges, M.; Clop, A.; Marinova, P. Proteomic Analysis of Ovine Muscle Hypertrophy. J. Anim. Sci. 2007, 84, 3266–3276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-162.
- Shao, J. H.; Deng, Y. M.; Jia, N.; Li, R. R.; Cao, J. X.; Liu, D. Y.; Li, J. R. Low-Field NMR Determination of Water Distribution in Meat Batters with NaCl and Polyphosphate Addition. Food Chem. 2016, 200, 308–314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.01.013.
- Teltathum, T.; Mekchay, S. Relationships between Pectoralis Muscle Proteomes and Shear Force in Thai Indigenous Chicken Meat. Kasetsart J. Nat. Sci. 2010, 44, 53–60.
- Supamit, M.; Tawatchai, T.; Sutkhet, N.; Petai, P. Proteomic Analysis of Tenderness Trait in Thai Native and Commercial Broiler Chicken Muscles. J. Poul. Sci. 2010, 47, 8–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.009033.
- Liu, X. D.; Jayasena, D. D.; Jung, Y.; Jung, S.; Kang, B. S.; Heo, K. N.; Lee, J. H.; Jo, C.; Differential Proteome Analysis of Breast and Thigh Muscles between Korean Native Chickens and Commercial Broilers. Asian-australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2012, 25, 895. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.11374.
- Miller, M. F.; Carr, M. A.; Ramsey, C. B.; Crockett, K. L.; Hoover, L. C. Consumer Thresholds for Establishing the Value of Beef Tenderness. J. Anim. Sci. 2001, 79, 3062–3068. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/2001.79123062x.
- Mennecke, B. E.; Townsend, A. M.; Hayes, D. J.; Lonergan, S. M. A Study of the Factors that Influence Consumer Attitudes toward Beef Products Using the Conjoint Market Analysis Tool1. J. Anim. Sci. 2007, 85, 2639–2659. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-495.
- Koohmaraie, M.; Geesink, G. H. Contribution of Postmortem Muscle Biochemistry to the Delivery of Consistent Meat Quality with Particular Focus on the Calpain System. Meat Sci. 2006, 74, 34–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.04.025.
- Marino, R.; Della Malva, A.; Albenzio, M. Proteolytic Changes of Myofibrillar Proteins in Podolian Meat during Aging: Focusing on Tenderness. J. Anim. Sci. 2015, 93, 1376–1387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8351.
- Charlotte, M.; Denis, B.; Rachel, T.; Margaret, D. Determinants of Meat Quality: Tenderness. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2003, 62, 337–347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/PNS2003248.
- Lana, A.; Zolla, L. Proteolysis in Meat Tenderization from the Point of View of Each Single Protein: A Proteomic Perspective. J. Proteomics. 2016, 147, 85–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2016.02.011.
- Zhao, C.; Tian, F.; Yu, Y.; Luo, J.; Mitra, A.; Zhan, F.; Hou, Y.; Liu, G.; Zan, L.; Updike, M. S.; et al. Functional Proteomic and Interactome Analysis of Proteins Associated with Beef Tenderness in Angus Cattle. Livestock Sci. 2014, 161, 201–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2013.11.030.
- Carlson, K. B.; Prusa, K. J.; Fedler, C. A.; Steadham, E. M.; Huff-Lonergan, E.; Lonergan, S. M. Proteomic Features Linked to Tenderness of Aged Pork Loins. J. Anim. Sci. 2017, 95, 2533–2546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2016.1122.
- Wang, Z.; He, F.; Rao, W.; Ni, N.; Shen, Q.; Zhang, D. Proteomic Analysis of Goatlongissimus Dorsimuscles with Different Drip Loss Values Related to Meat Quality Traits. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2016, 25, 425–431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-016-0058-y.
- Carvalho, M. E.; Gasparin, G.; Poleti, M. D.; Rosa, A. F.; Balieiro, J.; Carvalho, C.; Labate, C. A.; Heat Shock and Structural Proteins Associated with Meat Tenderness in Nellore Beef Cattle, a Bos Indicus Breed. Meat Sci. 2014, 96, 1318–1324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.11.014.
- Jia, X.; Ekman, M.; Grove, H.; F?rgestad, E. M.; Aass, L.; Hildrum, K. I.; Hollung, K.; Proteome Changes in Bovine Longissimus Thoracis Muscle during the Early Postmortem Storage Period. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6, 2720–2731. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/pr070173o.
- Lametsch, R.; Kristensen, L.; Larsen, M. R.; Therkildsen, M.; Oksbjerg, N.; Ertbjerg, P. Changes in the Muscle Proteome after Compensatory Growth in Pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2006, 84, 918–924. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/2006.844918x.
- Beldarrain, L. R.; Aldai, N.; Picard, B.; Sentandreu, E.; Navarro, J. L.; Sentandreu, M. A. Use of Liquid Isoelectric Focusing (Offgel) on the Discovery of Meat Tenderness Biomarkers. J. Proteomics. 2018, 183, 25–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2018.05.005.
- X Y, C.; Z Y, G.; S Q, J.; Jiang, Z. Y. Research Progress on Formation Mechanism and Regulation of Chicken Flavor. J. Anim. Nutr. 2019, 31, 500–508.
- Ianiłchi, D. A. N. I. E. L. A.; Nicolae, C.; Diaconescu, C.; Malos, G.; Malos, I. G. Study on the Factors Influencing Hydration and Water Retention Capacity of Meat. Lucrari Stiintifice Zootehnie Si Biotehnologii. 2013, 41, 220–224.
- Phongpa-Ngan, P.; Grider, A.; Mulligan, J. H.; Aggrey, S. E.; Wicker, L. Proteomic Analysis and Differential Expression in Protein Extracted from Chicken with a Varying Growth Rate and Water-holding Capacity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 13181–13187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf202622n.
- Stagsted, J.; Emøke Bendixen, A.; Andersen, H. J. Identification of Specific Oxidatively Modified Proteins in Chicken Muscles Using a Combined Immunologic and Proteomic Approach. J. Agric Food Chemi. 2004, 52, 3967–3974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf035503d.
- Hwang, I. H.; Park, B. Y.; Kim, J. H.; Cho, S. H.; Lee, J. M. Assessment of Postmortem Proteolysis by Gel-based Proteome Analysis and Its Relationship to Meat Quality Traits in Pig Longissimus. Meat Sci. 2005, 69, 79–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.06.019.
- Suman, S. P.; Hunt, M. C.; Nair, M. N.; Rentfrow, G. Improving Beef Color Stability: Practical Strategies and Underlying Mechanisms. Meat Sci. 2014, 98, 490–504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.06.032.
- Suman, S. P.; Joseph, P. Myoglobin Chemistry and Meat Color. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 4, 79–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-food-030212-182623.
- Nair, M. N.; Costa-Lima, B. R.; Schilling, M. W.; Suman, S. P. Proteomics of Color in Fresh Muscle Foods. Proteomics Food Sci. 2017, 163–175. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804007-2.00010-2.
- Wu, W.; Yu, Q. Q.; Fu, Y.; Tian, X. J.; Jia, F.; Li, X. M.; Dai, R. T. Towards Muscle-specific Meat Color Stability of Chinese Luxi Yellow Cattle: A Proteomic Insight into Post-Mortem Storage. J. Proteomics. 2015, 147, 108–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2015.10.027.
- Yu, Q.; Wu, W.; Tian, X.; Jia, F.; Xu, L.; Dai, R.; Li, X. Comparative Proteomics to Reveal Muscle-Specific Beef Color Stability of Holstein Cattle during Post-Mortem Storage. Food Chem. 2017, 229, 769–778. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.03.004.
- Yu, Q.; Wu, W.; Tian, X.; Hou, M.; Dai, R.; Li, X. Unraveling Proteome Changes of Holstein Beef M. Semitendinosus and Its Relationship to Meat Discoloration during Post-Mortem Storage Analyzed by Label-Free Mass Spectrometry. J. Proteomics. 2017, 154, 85–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2016.12.012.
- Desai, M. A.; Joseph, P.; Suman, S. P.; Silva, J. L.; Kim, T.; Schilling, M. W. Proteome Basis of Red Color Defect in Channel Catfish (Ictalurus Punctatus) Fillets. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 57, 141–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2014.01.001.
- Choe, J. H.; Nam, K.; Jung, S.; Kim, B.; Jo, C. Differences in the Quality Characteristics between Commercial Korean Native Chickens and Broilers. Korean J. Food Sci. Animal Resour. 2010, 30, 13–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2010.30.1.13.
- Jianliang, C.; Hanming, R.; Haochuan, C. Comparison of Volatile Flavor Characteristic of Different Kinds of Chicken Muscles. Mod. Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 25, 1129–1134.
- Brunton, N. P.; Cronin, D. A.; Monahan, F. J. Volatile Components Associated with Freshly Cooked and Oxidized Off-flavours in Turkey Breast Meat. Flavour Fragrance J. 2010, 17, 327–334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ffj.1087.
- Sentandreu, M. A.; Fraser, P. D.; Halket, J.; Patel, R.; Bramley, P. M. A Proteomic-Based Approach for Detection of Chicken in Meat Mixes. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 3374–3383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/pr9008942.
- Xiao, Z.;. Study on Changes of Flavor Compounds of Chinese Local Chicken with Different Age and Breed Based on Metabolomic; Nanjing Agricultural University: Jiang Su, 2018.
- Feng, Y.; Cai, Y.; Fu, X.; Zheng, L.; Xiao, Z.; Zhao, M. Comparison of Aroma-Active Compounds in Broiler Broth and Native Chicken Broth by Aroma Extract Dilution Analysis (AEDA), Odor Activity Value (OAV) and Omission Experiment. Food Chem. 2018, 265, 274–280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.05.043.
- Huaixiang, T.; Yajing, Z.; Xuan, W. U.; Lan, Q.; Chen, C.; Lizhong, X.; et al. Identification of Flavor Components of Chicken Bouillon Flavor Components by Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry and Electronic Nose. Food Sci. 2017, 38, 191–197. DOI:https://doi.org/10.7506/spkx1002-6630-2017-02031.
- Zhou, R.; Grant, J.; Goldberg, E. M.; Ryland, D.; Aliani, M. Investigation of Low Molecular Weight Peptides (< 1 kDa) in Chicken Meat and Their Contribution to Meat Flavor Formation. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, (99), 1728–1739. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.9362.
- Sabow, A. B.; Sazili, A. Q.; Zulkifli, I.; Goh, Y. M.; Ab Kadir, M. Z. A.; Abdulla, N. R.; Nakyinsige, K.; Kaka, U.; Adeyemi, K. D. A Comparison of Bleeding Efficiency, Microbiological Quality and Lipid Oxidation in Goats Subjected to Conscious Halal Slaughter and Slaughter following Minimal Anesthesia. Meat Sci. 2015, 104, 78–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.02.004.
- Chae, H. S.; Yoo, Y. M.; Jeong, S. G.; Ham, J. S.; Ahn, C. N.; Kim, D. H.; Jang, A. Effect of Transportation Distance of Broilers on Meat Grades and Pse Incidence. Korean J. Poult. Sci. 2009, 36, 9–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2009.36.1.009.
- Salwani, M. S.; Adeyemi, K. D.; Sarah, S. A.; Vejayan, J.; Zulkifli, I.; Sazili, A. Q. Skeletal Muscle Proteome and Meat Quality of Broiler Chickens Subjected to Gas Stunning Prior Slaughter or Slaughtered without Stunning. CyTA-J. Food. 2016, 14, 375–381.
- Zanetti, E.; Masi, A.; Pivato, M.; Tolin, S.; Trentin, A. R.; Guler, C.; Yalçin, S.; Cassandro, M. A Note on Protein Expression Changes in Chicken Breast Muscle in Response to Time in Transit before Slaughtering. Proteome Sci. 2013, 11, 34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-5956-11-34.
- Xing, T.; Wang, C.; Zhao, X.; Dai, C.; Zhou, G.; Xu, X. Proteome Analysis Using iTRAQ Reveals the Alterations in Stress-induced Dysfunctional Chicken Muscle. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 2913–2922. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.6b05835.
- Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K. S.; Faucitano, L.; Dadgar, S.; Shand, P.; González, L. A.; Crowe, T. G. Road Transport of Cattle, Swine and Poultry in North America and Its Impact on Animal Welfare, Carcass and Meat Quality: A Review. Meat Sci. 2012, 92, 227–243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.04.010.
- Carvalho, R. H.; Soares, A. L.; Honorato, D. C. B.; Guarnieri, P. D.; Pedrão, M. R.; Paião, F. G.; Oba, A.; Ida, E. I.; Shimokomaki, M. The Incidence of Pale, Soft, and Exudative (PSE) Turkey Meat at a Brazilian Commercial Plant and the Functional Properties in Its Meat Product. LWT - Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 59, 883–888. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2014.07.019.
- Langer, R. O. S.; Simões, G. S.; Soares, A. L.; Oba, A.; Rossa, A.; Shimokomaki, M.; Ida, E. I. Broiler Transportation Conditions in a Brazilian Commercial Line and the Occurrence of Breast PSE (Pale, Soft, Exudative) Meat and DFD-like (Dark, Firm, Dry) Meat. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2010, 53, 1161–1167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132010000500021.
- Xing, T.; Xu, X.; Jiang, N.; Deng, S. Effect of Transportation and Pre-Slaughter Water Shower Spray with Resting on Amp-Activated Protein Kinase, Glycolysis and Meat Quality of Broilers during Summer. Anim. Sci. J. 2016, 87, 299–307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.2016.87.issue-2.
- Xing, T.; Xu, X. L.; Zhou, G. H.; Wang, P.; Jiang, N. N. The Effect of Transportation of Broilers during Summer on the Expression of Heat Shock Protein 70, Postmortem Metabolism and Meat Quality. J. Anim. Sci. 2015, 93, 62–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-7831.
- Havenstein, G.; Ferket, P.; Qureshi, M. Carcass Composition and Yield of 1957 versus 2001 Broilers When Fed Representative 1957 and 2001 Broiler Diets. Poultr. Sci. 2003, 82, 1509–1518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.10.1509.
- Havenstein, G.; Ferket, P.; Qureshi, M. Growth, Livability, and Feed Conversion of 1957 versus 2001 Broilers When Fed Representative 1957 and 2001 Broiler Diets. Poultr. Sci. 2003, 82, 1500–1508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.10.1500.
- Fletcher, D. Broiler Breast Meat Color Variation, Ph, and Texture. Poultr. Sci. 1999, 78, 1323–1327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/78.9.1323.
- Berri, C. Breeding and Quality of poultry[M]//Poultry Meat Processing and Quality; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, 2004; pp 21–37.
- Rance, K. A.; Mcentee, G. M.; Mcdevitt, R. M. Genetic and Phenotypic Relationships between and within Support and Demand Tissues in a Single Line of Broiler Chicken. British Poul. Sci. 2002, 43, 518–527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0007166022000004426.
- Tawatchai, T.; Supamit, M. Proteome Changes in Thai Indigenous Chicken Muscle during Growth Period. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2009, 5, 679–685. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.5.679.
- Solem, C.; Koebmann, B.; Jensen, P. R. Control Analysis of the Role of Triosephosphate Isomerase in Glucose Metabolism in Lactococcus Lactis. IET Syst. Biol. 2008, 2, 64–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-syb:20070002.
- Jung, K. C.; Lee, K. Y.; Jang, B. G.; Choi, K. D.; Jeon, J. T.; Lee, J. H. Identification of Differentially Expressed Proteins at Four Growing Stages in Chicken Liver. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 21, 54–55.
- Zheng, A.; Luo, J.; Meng, K.; Li, J.; Bryden, W.; Chang, W.; Zhang, S.; Wang, L. X. N.; Liu, G.; Yao, B.; et al. Probiotic (Enterococcus Faecium) Induced Responses of the Hepatic Proteome Improves Metabolic Efficiency of Broiler Chickens (Gallus Gallus). BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-2371-5.
- Zheng, A.; Luo, J.; Meng, K.; Li, J.; Zhang, S.; Li, K.; Liu, G.; Cai, H.; Bryden, W. L.; Yao, B. Proteome Changes Underpin Improved Meat Quality and Yield of Chickens (Gallus Gallus) Fed the Probiotic Enterococcus Faecium. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 1167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-1167.
- Jung, K. C.; Lu, S. L.; Lee, Y. J.; Choi, K. D.; Choi, J. S.; Kim, Y. H.; Jang, B. G.; Kim, S. H.; Hahm, D. H.; Lee, J. H.; et al. Muscle Proteome Analysis for the Effect of Panax Ginseng Extracts in Chicken: Identification of Proteins Using Peptide Mass Fingerprinting. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2005, 18, 922–926. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2005.922.
- Peng, M.; Han, J.; Li, L.; Ma, H. Suppression of Fat Deposition in Broiler Chickens by (-)-hydroxycitric Acid Supplementation: A Proteomics Perspective. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 32580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32580.
- Liu, R.; Wang, H.; Liu, J.; Wang, J.; Zheng, M.; Tan, X.; Wen, J.; Cui, H.; Li, Q.; Zhao, G. Uncovering the Embryonic Development-related Proteome and Metabolome Signatures in Breast Muscle and Intramuscular Fat of Fast-and Slow-Growing Chickens. BMC Genom. 2017, 18, 816. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-4150-3.
- Ouyang, H.; Wang, Z.; Chen, X.; Yu, J.; Li, Z.; Nie, Q. Proteomic Analysis of Chicken Skeletal Muscle during Embryonic Development. Front. Physiol. 2017, 8, 281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00281.
- Junan, R.; Wensheng, H.; Yiqiang, G. E.; Ying, C. Progress in Meat Adulteration Detection Techniques. Food Sci. 2016, 37, 269–279. DOI:https://doi.org/10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201601043.
- Schilling, M. W.; Suman, S. P.; Zhang, X.; Nair, M. N.; Desai, M. A.; Cai, K.; Ciaramella, M. A.; Allen, P. J. Proteomic Approach to Characterize Biochemistry of Meat Quality Defects. Meat Sci. 2017, 132, 131–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.04.018.
- Karr, T. L. Application of Proteomics to Ecology and Population Biology. Heredity. 2008, 100, 200–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6801008.
- Kwasiborski, A.; Sayd, T.; Chambon, C.; Santé-Lhoutellier, V.; Rocha, D.; Terlouw, C. Pig Longissimus Lumborum Proteome: Part I. Effects of Genetic Background, Rearing Environment and Gender. Meat Sci. 2008, 80, 968–981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.04.028.
- Souza, R. R. T. D.; Luiz, C. M.; Elber, V. C.; Cristina, B. P. M.; Edvaldo, B.; Costa, B. K.; Gomes, R. A.; Ladeira, M. M.; Silva, M. T. D.; et al. Differences in Beef Quality between Angus (Bos Taurus Taurus) and Nellore (Bos Taurus Indicus) Cattle through a Proteomic and Phosphoproteomic Approach. PLoS One. 2017, 12, e0170294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170294.
- Zhao, J.; Liu, N.; Liu, K.; He, J.; Yu, J.; Bu, R.; Cheng, M.; De, W.; Liu, J.; Li, H.; et al. Identification of Genes and Proteins Associated with Anagen Wool Growth. Anim Genet. 2017, 48, 67–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/age.2017.48.issue-1.
- Zheng, A.; Chang, W.; Liu, G.; Ying, Y.; Jianke, L.; Shu, Z.; Cai, H.; Yang, A.; Chen, Z. Molecular Differences in Hepatic Metabolism between AA Broiler and Big Bone Chickens: A Proteomic Study. PLoS One. 2016, 11, e0164702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164702.
- Wang, G. J.; Zhou, G. Y.; Ren, H. W.; Xu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Guo, L. H.; Liu, N. Peptide Biomarkers Identified by LC–MS in Processed Meats of Five Animal Species. J. Food Compost. Anal. 2018, 73, 47–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2018.07.004.
- Montowska, M.; Fornal, E. Label-free Quantification of Meat Proteins for Evaluation of Species Composition of Processed Meat Products. Food Chem. 2017, 237, 1092–1100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.06.059.
- Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, H.; Zhao, W.; Guo, W.; Wang, S. Simultaneous Determination of Heat Stable Peptides for Eight Animal and Plant Species in Meat Products Using UPLC-MS/MS Method. Food Chem. 2018, 245, 125–131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.09.066.
- Zanetti, E.; Dalvit, C.; Molette, C.; Remignon, H.; Cassandro, M. A Proteomic Approach to Study Local Chicken Breeds Characterization. Italian. J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 8, 174–176.
- Zanetti, E.; Molette, C.; Chambon, C.; Pinguet, J.; Rã©mignon, H.; Cassandro, M. Using 2-DE for the Differentiation of Local Chicken Breeds. Proteomics. 2011, 11, 2613–2619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201000639.
- Surowiec, I.; Koistinen, K. M.; Fraser, P. D.; Bramley, P. M. Proteomic Approach for the Detection of Chicken Mechanically Recovered Meat. Meat Sci. 2011, 89, 233–237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.04.004.
- Sentandreu, M. A.; Sentandreu, E. Peptide Biomarkers as a Way to Determine Meat Authenticity. Meat Sci. 2011, 89, 280–285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.04.028.
- Montowska, M.; Pospiech, E. Species-specific Expression of Various Proteins in Meat Tissue: Proteomic Analysis of Raw and Cooked Meat and Meat Products Made from Beef, Pork and Selected Poultry Species. Food Chem. 2013, 136, 1461–1469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.09.072.
- Prandi, B.; Varani, M.; Faccini, A.; Lambertini, F.; Suman, M.; Leporati, A.; Tedeschi T.; Sforza, S. Species Specific Marker Peptides for Meat Authenticity Assessment: A Multispecies Quantitative Approach Applied to Bolognese Sauce. Food Control. 2019, 97, 15–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.10.016.
- Nalazek-Rudnicka, K.; Kłosowska-Chomiczewska, I.; Wasik, A.; Macierzanka, A. MRM–MS of Marker Peptides and Their Abundant as a Tool for Authentication of Meat Species and Meat Cuts in Single-cut Meat Products. Food Chem. 2019, 283, 367–374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.01.007.
- Fornal, E.; Montowska, M. Species-specific Peptide-Based Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Monitoring of Three Poultry Species in Processed Meat Products. Food Chem. 2019, 283, 489–498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.01.074.
- Montowska, M.; Fornal, E. Absolute Quantification of Targeted Meat and Allergenic Protein Additive Peptide Markers in Meat Products. Food Chem. 2019, 274, 857–864. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.08.131.
- Kim, G. D.; Seo, J. K.; Yum, H. W.; Jeong, J. Y.; Yang, H. S. Protein Markers for Discrimination of Meat Species in Raw Beef, Pork and Poultry and Their Mixtures. Food Chem. 2017, 217, 163–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.08.100.
- Kumazawa, Y.; Taga, Y.; Takashima, M.; Hattori, S. A Novel LC–MS Method Using Collagen Marker Peptides for Species Identification of Glue Applicable to Samples with Multiple Animal Origins. Heritage Sci. 2018, 6, 43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-018-0209-y.
- Binz, P. A.; Shofstahl, J.; Vizcaíno, J. A.; Barsnes, H.; Menschaert, G.; Clauser, K.; Lane, L.; Deutsch, E. W. PEFF: A Common Sequence Database Format for Proteomics, 2018.
- May, M.;. Technology Feature| Translating Big Data: The Proteomics Challenge. Science. 2018, 360(6394), 1255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.360.6394.1255-b.
- D’Alessandro, A.; Zolla, L. Meat Science: From Proteomics to Integrated Omics Towards System Biology. J. Proteomics. 2013, 78, 558–577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2012.10.023.
- Picard, B.; Lebret, B.; Cassar-Malek, I.; Liaubet, L.; Berri, C.; Le Bihan-Duval, E.; Hocquette J. F.; Renand, G. Recent Advances in Omic Technologies for Meat Quality Management. Meat Sci. 2015, 109, 18–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.05.003.