533
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Discourse of quality and place in geographical indications: Applying convention theory to Japanese tea

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • European Commission. Farm to Fork Strategy. 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/food/horizontal-topics/farm-fork-strategy_en (accessed January 9, 2022).
  • Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries of Japan (MAFF). Strategy for Sustainable Food Systems, MeaDRI. 2021. https://www.maff.go.jp/e/policies/env/env_policy/meadri.html (accessed October 14, 2021).
  • Kohsaka, R.; Uchiyama, Y. Geographical Indications and Regional Trade Agreements: Facilitating International Partnerships for Sustainable Development. In Partnerships for the Goals; Filho, W.L., Azul, A.M., Brandli, L., Özuyar, P.G., and Wall, T., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp 1–13.
  • Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries of Japan (MAFF). About Geographical Indication Act. 2021. https://www.maff.go.jp/j/shokusan/gi_act/outline/index.html (accessed 20217 8). [in Japanese]. (accessed 20217 8). [in Japanese].
  • Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries of Japan (MAFF). Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries Intellectual Property Strategy 2025. 2021. https://www.maff.go.jp/j/kanbo/tizai/brand/b_senryaku/attach/pdf/index-25.pdf (accessed 20216 13). [in Japanese]. (accessed 20216 13). [in Japanese].
  • Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries of Japan (MAFF). Strategy to Implement the Export Increase of Agricultural, Forestry, and Fishery Products and Foods: Toward Conversion to Market-In Export. 2020. https://www.maff.go.jp/j/shokusan/export/e_action/attach/pdf/index-5.pdf (accessed 20216 −13). [in Japanese]. (accessed 20216 −13). [in Japanese].
  • Boltanski, L.; Thévenot, L. On Justification: Economies of Worth; Princeton University Press, 2006.
  • Wilkinson, J.;. Convention Theory and Consumption. In Encyclopedia of Consumer Culture, 1 ed.; Southerton, D., Ed.; Sage, 2011; pp 358–361.
  • Sekine, K.;. The Impact of Geographical Indications on the Power Relations between Producers and Agri-Food Corporations: A Case of Powdered Green Tea Matcha in Japan. In Geographical Indication and Global Agri-Food; Bonanno, A., Sekine, K., Feuer, H.N., Eds.; Routledge, 2019; pp 54–69.
  • Gangjee, D. S.;. Proving Provenance? Geographical Indications Certification and Its Ambiguities. World Dev. 2017, 98, 12–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.04.009.
  • Barbera, F.; Audifredi, S. In Pursuit of Quality. The Institutional Change of Wine Production Market in Piedmont. Sociol. Ruralis. 2012, 52.
  • Guthey, G. T.;. Agro-Industrial Conventions: Some Evidence from Northern California’s Wine Industry. Geogr. J. 2008, 174(2), 138–148. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2008.00275.x.
  • Ponte, S.;. Governing through Quality: Conventions and Supply Relations in the Value Chain for South African Wine. Sociol. Ruralis. 2009, 49(3), 236–257. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2009.00484.x.
  • Sato, J.;. Regional Economics of National Sake. in Japanese. Bunshindō: Tokyo, 2021.
  • Sato, J.; Kohsaka, R. Japanese Sake and Evolution of Technology: A Comparative View with Wine and Its Implications for Regional Branding and Tourism. J. Ethnic Foods. 2017, 4(2), 88–93. DOI: 10.1016/j.jef.2017.05.005.
  • Gwynne, R. N.;. Strategic Evolution of Chilean Wine Firms: Vertical Integration and Upgrading in Chile’s Colchagua Valley. Urbani Izziv. 2012, 23(2 Spec), 36–48. DOI: 10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2012-23-supplement-2-003.
  • Humphrey, J.;. Shaping Value Chains for Development: Global Value Chains in Agribusiness. Paper written for the Deutsche Gessellschaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) 2005.
  • Humphrey, J.; Schmitz, H. How Does Insertion in Global Value Chains Affect Upgrading in Industrial Clusters? Reg. Stud. 2002, 36(9), 1017–1027. DOI: 10.1080/0034340022000022198.
  • Gade, D. W.;. Tradition, Territory, and Terroir in French Viniculture: Cassis, France, and Appellation Contrôlée. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 2004, 94(4), 848–867.
  • Moran, W.;. The Wine Appellation as Territory in France and California. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 1993, 83(4), 694–717. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1993.tb01961.x.
  • Amerine, M.; Wagner, P. The Vine and Its Environments. In The University of California/Southeby Book of California Wine; Muscatine, D., Amerine, M., Thompson, B., Eds.; University of California Press: Berkeley: Berkeley, 1984; pp 86–124.
  • Kohsaka, R.; Tomiyoshi, M.; Saito, O.; Hashimoto, S.; Mohammend, L. Interactions of Knowledge Systems in Shiitake Mushroom Production: A Case Study on the Noto Peninsula, Japan. J. For. Res.-JPN. 2015, 20(5), 453–463. DOI: 10.1007/s10310-015-0491-4.
  • Kohsaka, R.; Ito, K.; Miyake, Y.; Uchiyama, Y. Cultural Ecosystem Services from the Afforestation of Rice Terraces and Farmland: Emerging Services as an Alternative to Monoculturalization. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2021, 497, 119481. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119481.
  • Kajima, S.; Tanaka, Y.; Uchiyama, Y. Japanese Sake and Tea as Place-Based Products: A Comparison of Regional Certifications of Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems, Geopark, Biosphere Reserves, and Geographical Indication at Product Level Certification. J. Ethnic Foods. 2017, 4(2), 80–87. DOI: 10.1016/j.jef.2017.05.006.
  • Kimura, J.; Rigolot, C. The Potential of Geographical Indications (GI) to Enhance Sustainable Development Goals (Sdgs) in Japan: Overview and Insights from Japan GI Mishima Potato. Sustainability. 2021, 13(2), 961. DOI: 10.3390/su13020961.
  • Kohsaka, R.;. Shrinking to Consider through Regional Resources and Knowledge on a Product and Problems for Sharing and Inheritance. In Shrinking Japanese Society: Hoping New Richness after a Crisis; Kohsaka, R., Ed.; in Japanese. Bensei Shuppan, 2019; pp212–238.
  • Kohsaka, R.; Matsuoka, H. Analysis of Japanese Municipalities with Geopark, MAB, and GIAHS Certification: Quantitative Approach to Official Records with Text-Mining Methods. SAGE Open. 2015, 5(4), 2158244015617517. DOI: 10.1177/2158244015617517.
  • Kohsaka, R.; Uchiyama, Y. The Influence of Affiliations with Agricultural Collectives on Attitudes of Fisherman Towards Conservation and Perceptions of the Local Environment. Journal of International Fisheries . 2016, 15, 1–21.
  • Quiñones-Ruiz, X. F.; Penker, M.; Belletti, G.; Marescotti, A.; Scaramuzzi, S.; Barzini, E.; Pircher, M.; Leitgeb, F.; Samper-Gartner, L. F. Insights into the Black Box of Collective Efforts for the Registration of Geographical Indications. Land Use Policy. 2016, 57, 103–116. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.05.021.
  • Tashiro, A.; Uchiyama, Y.; Kohsaka, R. Internal Processes of Geographical Indication and Their Effects: An Evaluation Framework for Geographical Indication Applicants in Japan. J. Ethnic Foods. 2018, 5(3), 202–210. DOI: 10.1016/j.jef.2018.07.004.
  • Tashiro, A.; Uchiyama, Y.; Kohsaka, R. Impact of Geographical Indication Schemes on Traditional Knowledge in Changing Agricultural Landscapes: An Empirical Analysis from Japan. J. Rural Stud. 2019, 68, 46–53. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.03.014.
  • Horie, H.;. Japanese Green Tea History and Future in Japanese. Vacuum and Surface Science.2019, 62(5), 299–301. DOI: 10.1380/vss.62.299.
  • Japan Tea Central Association and Nihoncha Instructor Association. Illustrated Reference Book of Japanese Tea;; in Japanese; Mainabi: Tokyo, 2014.
  • Matsumoto, S.; Kawada, M.; Kondo, S. Collection of Local Varieties of Camellia Sinensis Va. Sinensis in Hokuriku and Tohoku Districts. Shokutanhō. 1992, 8, 29–34. in Japanese
  • Studio TAC Creative. Encyclopedia of Japanese Tea: Learning How to Brew, How to Enjoy, and Culture; Studio TAC Creative: Tokyo, 2018.
  • Oyaizu, Y.; Policies for the Spread of Tea Cultivars on Shizuoka Prefecture. Proceedings of Vegetable and Tea Science 2004, 1, 79–85. [in Japanese].
  • So, S.; Shibagaki, Y. Research about Restructuring Direction of Tea Factories in Shizuoka Prefecture. Nōringyō Mondai Kenkyū. 2003, 1, 103–106. in Japanese
  • Kanoh, M.; Nohguchi, R. The Brand Strategy Adopting New Tea Varieties and the Organization Consists of the Farmers, Wholesalers, Consumers and the Agencies Concerned in the Tea-Growing Districts. Nōgyō Keiei Kenkyū. 2008, 46(1), 69–74. in Japanese.
  • Oyaizu, T.; Kuranuki, Y.; Nakamura, Y.; Hidaka, T.; Aoshima, Y. A New Cultivar ‘Tsuyuhikari’ for Green Tea. Chakenhō. 2003, 95, 1–15. in Japanese
  • Tokunaga, M.;. New Taste in Green Tea: A Novel Flabor for Familiar Drinks, Dishes, and Desserts; Kodansha: Tokyo, 2004.
  • Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries of Japan (MAFF). Current Outlook of Japanese Tea. 2021. https://www.maff.go.jp/e/policies/agri/attach/pdf/tea_202012.pdf (accessed June 18, 2021). [in Japanese].
  • Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries (MAFF). Situation and Problems of Fertilizer Application in Tea Cultivation. 2009. https://www.maff.go.jp/j/seisan/kankyo/nenyu_koutou/n_kento/pdf/3siryo4.pdf (accessed July 30, 2021). [in Japanese].
  • Takahashi, T.;. Tea Gardens: Development of Technology for Water Purification Utilizing Topographic Chains with Rice Paddies. Presented at Public Lecture Symposium, 228th Crop Science Society of Japan, Shizuoka City, Japan, July 2009. [in Japanese].
  • Ijichi, H.; About Practice of Organic Tea Cultivation in Kagoshima Prefecture. Presented at Information Exchange Meeting about Organic Tea, Tokyo, March 11, 2020. [in Japanese].
  • Ito, F.;. About Organic Cultivation of Tea. Information Exchange Meeting about Organic Tea. Presented at Information Exchange Meeting about Organic Tea, Tokyo, March 11, 2020. [in Japanese].
  • Otaishi, M.; Uchijima, Z.; Yamamoto, A. Relationship between Aerial Concentration of a Synthetic Sex Pheromone Component and Mating in the Disruption Field of the Smaller Tea Tortrix. Adoxophyes Sp. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Nihon Ōyō Dōbutsu Konchū Gakkaishi. 1991, 35(3), 207–211. in Japanese.
  • Yoshioka, T.;. Development of Alternative Technologies to Chemical Pesticides on Cha for Organic Cultivation and Cultivation with Less Chemical Pesticide. Chagyō Kenkyū Hōkoku. 2015, 119, 57–59. in Japanese
  • Yoshioka, T.; Sakaida, T. Control Effect of Communication Disruption Using Synthetic Sex Pheromones for the Smaller Tea Tortrix, Adoxophyes Honmai (Yasuda) (Lepidoptera: Tortrcidae), in Sloped Tea Fields. Research Report of Fukuoka Agricultural Research Center.2008,27.111–115.in Japanese
  • Edani, H.;. Concept and Practice of Cultural Landscape in Japan. Projects de Paysage.
  • Japan Patent Office. Search Page of Regional Collective Trademark. 2021. https://www.jpo.go.jp/system/trademark/gaiyo/chidan/index.html#ranking (accessed June 27, 2021). [in Japanese].
  • Wienerwald, B. R.; Wienerwald, B. R. 2021. https://www.bpww.at/en/node/82 (accessed January 10, 2022).
  • United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability Operating Unit Ishikawa/Kanazawa (UNU-IAS OUIK). The Road to Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS): United Nations University’s Journey with Local Communities. Kanazawa City, 2018.
  • Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries of Japan (MAFF). About Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems. 2020. https://www.maff.go.jp/j/nousin/kantai/giahs_1_1.html (accessed July 8, 2021). [in Japanese].
  • Inagaki, H.; Kusumoto, Y. Traditional Tea-Grass Integrated System in Shizuoka. Nōson Keikaku Gakkai Shi. 2021, 35(3), 365–368. in Japanese.
  • Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries of Japan (MAFF). Income Statistics of Productive Agriculture. 2021. https://www.maff.go.jp/j/tokei/kouhyou/sityoson_sansyutu/index.html (accessed 2021 -December -15). [in Japanese].
  • Kohsaka, R.;. Cases of Attempts on Agricultural Products and the Roles of Local Governments. In Strategies to Brand Production Areas of Agricultural, Forestry, and Fishery Products: Local Revitalization by Applying a Geographical Indication, Kohsaka, R., Ed. in Japanese; Gyôsei: Tokyo, 2015, 194–234.
  • Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries of Japan (MAFF). Register of Special Agricultural, Forestry, and Fishery Product. 2015. https://www.maff.go.jp/j/shokusan/gi_act/register/attach/pdf/5-5.pdf (accessed September 11, 2021). [in Japanese].
  • Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. Basic Resident Register of 2020. 2020. https://www.soumu.go.jp/main_sosiki/jichi_gyousei/daityo/jinkou_jinkoudoutai-setaisuu.html (accessed 20216 −20). [in Japanese]. (accessed 20216 −20). [in Japanese].
  • Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries of Japan (MAFF). 2015 Census of Agriculture and Forestry. 2016. https://www.maff.go.jp/j/tokei/census/afc/2015/top.html (accessed 20217 −30). [in Japanese]. (accessed 20217 −30). [in Japanese].
  • Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries of Japan (MAFF). Agricultural Production by City, Town, and Village. 2021. https://www.maff.go.jp/j/tokei/kouhyou/sityoson_sansyutu/ (accessed 20217 −30). [in Japanese]. (accessed 20217 −30). [in Japanese].
  • Council for Development and Promotion of Tea Industry in Fukuoka Prefecture.Summary of Tea Production in Fukuoka Prefecture. 2020. https://fukuoka-yamecha.jp/gaiyo/ (accessed 20217 −30). [in Japanese]. (accessed 20217 −30). [in Japanese].
  • Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications.Ranking of Average Consumption by Item among Prefectural Capitals and Ordinance Designated Cities from 2018 to 2020. 2021. https://www.stat.go.jp/data/kakei/index2.html#kekka (accessed 20221 −10). [in Japanese]. (accessed 20221 −10). [in Japanese].
  • Kagoshima Prefectural Government. Plan to Create the Future of “Kagoshima Tea.” 2019. https://www.pref.kagoshima.jp/ag06/documents/71400_20190325223604-1.pdf (accessed 20217 −30). [in Japanese]. (accessed 20217 −30). [in Japanese].
  • Aichi Prefectural Government. Promotion Plan of “Tea in Aichi.” 2021. https://www.pref.kagoshima.jp/ag06/documents/71400_20190325223604-1.pdf (accessed 20217 −30). [in Japanese]. (accessed 20217 −30). [in Japanese].
  • Simons, H.;. Case Study Research: In-Depth Understanding in Context. In The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research; Leavey, P., Ed.; OUP: Oxford, 2014; pp 455–470.
  • Yin, R. K.;. Case Study Research: Design and Methods`, 3rd ed.; Applied Social Research Methods; Sage, 2003.
  • Kizos, T.; Koshaka, R.; Penker, M.; Piatti, C.; Vogl, C. R.; Uchiyama, Y. The Governance of Geographical Indications. Brit. Food J. 2017, 119(12), 2863–2879. DOI: 10.1108/BFJ-01-2017-0037.
  • Allaire, G.; Daviron, B., Eds. Ecology, Capitalism and the New Agricultural Economy: The Second Great Transformation; Routledge, 2018.
  • Cheyns, E.; Ponte, P. Convention Theory in Anglophone Agri-Food Studies: French Legacies, Circulation and New Perspectives. In Ecology, Capitalism and the New Agricultural Economy: The Second Great Transformation; Allaire, G., Daviron, B., Eds.; Routledge, 2018; pp 71–94.
  • Wilkinson, J.; New, A. Paradigm for Economic Analysis? Recent Convergences in French Social Science and an Exploration of the Convention Theory Approach with a Consideration of Its Application to the Analysis of the Agrofood System. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Man. 1997, 26(3), 335–339.
  • Allaire, G.; Boyer, R. La Grande Transformation de l’Agriculture. French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA), 1995.
  • Renard, M. C.;. Fair Trade: Quality, Market, and Conventions. J. Rural Stud. 2003, 19(1), 87–96. DOI: 10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00051-7.
  • Ponte, S.;. Convention Theory in the Anglophone Agro-Food Literature: Past, Present and Future. J. Rural Stud. 2016, 44, 12–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.12.019.
  • Belletti, G.; Rojo-Abuin, J. M.; Bartolini, C. Stages of Innovation for Adopting Differential Quality in Olive-Oil Geographical Indications. Presented at the Second International Conference on Agriculture in an Urbanizing Society, Reconnecting Agriculture and Food Chains to Societal Needs, Rome, Italy, September 14-17, 2015; pp. 171–172.
  • Kohsaka, R.; Miyake, Y. The Politics of Quality and Geographic Indications for Non-Timber Forest Products: Applying Convention Theory beyond Food Contexts. J. Rural Stud. 2021, 88, 28–39. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.10.006.
  • Quiñones-Ruiz, X. F.;. The Diverging Understandings of Quality by Coffee Chain Actors—Insights from Colombian Producers and Austrian Roasters. Sustainability. 2020, 12(15), 6137. DOI: 10.3390/su12156137.
  • Daviron, B.; Ponte, S. The Coffee Paradox: Global Markets, Commodity Trade and the Elusive Promise of Development; Zed Books, 2005.
  • Belletti, G.; Marescotti, A.; Sanz-Cañada, J.; Vakoufaris, H. Linking Protection of Geographical Indications to the Environment: Evidence from the European Union Olive-Oil Sector. Land Use Policy. 2015, 48, 94–106. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.05.003.
  • Morgan, K. J.; Marsden, T. K.; Murdoch, J. Worlds of Food: Place, Power and Provenance in the Food Chain; Oxford: OUP, 2006.
  • Nyberg, D.; Wright, C. Corporate Corruption of the Environment: Sustainability as a Process of Compromise. Brit. J. Sociol. 2013, 64(3), 405–424. DOI: 10.1111/1468-4446.12025.
  • Boltanski, L.; Thévenot, L. The Reality of Moral Expectations: A Sociology of Situated Judgment. Philos. Explor. 2000, 3(3), 208–231. DOI: 10.1080/13869790008523332.
  • Latour, B.;. To Modernize or to Ecologize? This Is the Question. In Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millennium; Castree, N., Willems-Braun, B., Eds.; Routledge: London and New York, 1998.
  • Lamont, M.; Thévenot, L. Une Justification Écologique? Conflits Dans L´Aménagement de La Nature. Rev. Fr. Sociol. 1993, 34(4), 495–524. DOI: 10.2307/3321928.
  • Eymard-Duvernay, F.;. Conventions de Qualité Et Formes de Coordination. Rev. Écon. 1989, 40(2), 329–360.
  • Diaz-Bone, R.;. Convention Theory, Classification and Quantification. Hist. Soc. Res. 2016, 48–71.
  • Diaz-Bone, R.;. Economics of Convention and Its Perspective on Knowledge and Institutions. In Knowledge and Institutions; Glückler, J., Suddaby, R., Lenz, R., Eds.; Springer: Cham, 2018; pp 69–88.
  • Shizuoka Prefectural Government. Technology to Store Raw Tea Leaves for the Increase of Covered Aroma from Covered Tea. 2008. http://www.pref.shizuoka.jp/sangyou/sa-820/seika/2008gijutupanhu/016.pdf (accessed 2021 −7 −9). [in Japanese].
  • Kinoshita, T.; Tsujii, H.; Hiei, K.; Kanada, A. Influence on Yield and Quality of Tencha by Different N-Fertilizer Application. Research Bulletin of the Aichi-ken Agricultural Research Center. 2005, 37, 11–16. in Japanese
  • Japan Patent Office. The Introduction of Registration Cases of Regional Collective Trademarks: Categorical Display: Tea. 2020. https://www.jpo.go.jp/system/trademark/gaiyo/chidan/shoukai/sanpinbetsu/11cha.html. (accessed 2020 −9 −11). [in Japanese].
  • Penker, M.; Scaramuzzi, S.; Edelmann, H.; Belletti, G.; Marescotti, A.; Casabianca, F.; Quiñones-Ruiz, X. F. Polycentric Structures Nurturing Adaptive Food Quality Governance-Lessons Learned from Geographical Indications in the European Union. J. Rural Stud. 2022, 89, 208–221. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.11.023.
  • Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries of Japan (MAFF). Application on Nomination on Application for the Registration of Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems and Application for the Registration of Japanese Nationally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems. 2021. https://www.maff.go.jp/j/nousin/kantai/giahs_14_2.html (accessed July 8, 2021). [in Japanese].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.