Embodied Simulation of Others Being Touched in 1-Year-Old Infants

References

• Bolognini, N., Rossetti, A., Fusaro, M., Vallar, G., & Miniussi, C. (2014). Sharing social touch in the primary somatosensory cortex. Current Biology, 24, 1513–1517. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.05.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremner, A. J., Mareschal, D., Lloyd-Fox, S., & Spence, C. (2008). Spatial localization of touch in the first year of life: Early influence of a visual spatial code and the development of remapping across changes in limb position. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 149–162. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.137.1.149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownell, C. (2013). Early development of prosocial behavior: Current perspectives. Infancy, 18, 1–9. doi:10.1111/infa.12004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buccino, G., Lui, F., Canessa, N., Patteri, I., Lagravinese, G., Benuzzi, F., … Rizzolatti, G. (2004). Neural circuits involved in the recognition of actions performed by non-conspecifics: An fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 114–126. doi:10.1162/089892904322755601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bufalari, I., Aprile, T., Avenanti, A., Di Russo, F., & Aglioti, S. M. (2007). Empathy for pain and touch in the human somatosensory cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 2553–2561. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caetano, G., Jousmäki, V., & Hari, R. (2007). Actor’s and observer’s primary motor cortices stabilize similarly after seen or heard motor actions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 9058–9062. doi:10.1073/pnas.0702453104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon, E. N., & Woodward, A. L. (2012). Infants generate goal-based action predictions. Developmental Science, 15, 292–298. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01127.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., & Shelton, J. R. (1998). Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain: The animate-inanimate distinction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Casartelli, L., & Molteni, M. (2014). Where there is a goal, there is a way: What, why and how pareto-frontal mirror network can mediate imitative behaviours. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Review, 47, 177–193. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coll, M. P., Bird, G., Catmur, C., & Press, C. (2015). Cross-modal repetition effects in the mu rhythm indicate tactile mirroring during action observation. Cortex, 63, 121–131. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.08.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowell, J., & Decety, J. (2015). Precursors to morality in development as a complex interplay between neural, socio-environmental, and behavioral facets. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 112, 12657–12662. doi:10.1073/pnas.1508832112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuevas, K., & Paulus, M. (2016). Development of action mirroring. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 34, 1–5. doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidov, M., Zahn-Waxler, C., Roth-Hanania, R., & Knafo, A. (2013). Concern for others in the first year of life: Theory, evidence, and avenues for research. Child Development Perspectives, 7, 126–131. doi:10.1111/cdep.12028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vignemont, F. (2014). Shared body representations and the “Whose” system. Neuropsychologia, 55, 128–136. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.08.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decety, J. (2007). A social cognitive neuroscience model of human empathy. In E. Harmon-Jones, & P. Winkielman (Eds.), Social neuroscience: Integrating biological and psychological explanations of social behavior (pp. 246–270). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Ebisch, S. J. H., Ferri, F., Salone, A., Perrucci, M. G., D’Amico, L., Ferro, F. M., … Press, C. (2011). Differential involvement of somatosensory and interoceptive cortices during the observation of affective touch. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 1808–1822. doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebisch, S. J. H., Perrucci, M. G., Ferretti, A., Del Gratta, C., Romani, G. L., & Gallese, V. (2008). The sense of touch: Embodied simulation in a visuotactile mirroring mechanism for observed animate or inanimate touch. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1611–1623. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review in Psychology, 51, 665–697. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.665
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairhurst, M. T., Löken, L. S., & Grossman, T. (2014). Physiological and behavioral responses reveal human infants’ sensitivity to pleasant touch. Psychological Science, 25, 1124–1131. doi:10.1177/0956797614527114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falck-Ytter, T., Gredebäck, G., & Von Hofsten, C. (2006). Infants predict other people’s action goals. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 878–879. doi:10.1038/nn1729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fries, P., Reynolds, J. H., Rorie, A. E., & Desimone, R. (2001). Modulation of oscillatory neuronal synchronization by selective visual attention. Science, 291, 1560–1563. doi:10.1126/science.1055465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossmann, T. (2015). The development of social brain functions in infancy. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 1266–1287. doi:10.1037/bul0000002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson, R. P. (1993). Understanding persons: The role of affect. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from autism (pp. 204–227). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S., Slaughter, V., & Carey, S. (1998). Whose gaze will infants follow? The elicitation of gaze-following in 12-month-olds. Developmental Science, 1, 233–238. doi:10.1111/1467-7687.00036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keysers, C., Kaas, J. H., & Gazzola, V. (2010). Somatosensation in social perception. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 417–428. doi:10.1038/nrn2833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuehn, E., Müller, K., Turner, R., & Schütz-Bosback, S. (2014). The functional architecture of S1 during touch observation described with 7 TfMRI. Brain Structure and Function, 219, 119–140. doi:10.1007/s00429-012-0489-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmeier, V. A., Bloom, P., & Wynn, K. (2004). Do 5-month-old infants see humans as material objects? Cognition, 94, 95–103. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legerstee, M. (1992). A review of the animate-inanimate distinction in infancy: Implications for models of social and cognitive knowing. Infant and Child Development, 1, 59–67. doi:10.1002/edp.2430010202
   Google Scholar
• Markova, G., & Legerstee, M. (2006). Contingency, imitation, and affect sharing: Foundations of infants’ social awareness. Developmental Psychology, 42, 132–141. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, P. J., Saby, J. N., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2013). Infant bran responses to object weight: Exploring goal-directed actions and self-experience. Infancy, 18, 942–960. doi:10.1111/infa.12012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mundy, P., Card, J., Fox, N. (2000). EEG correlates of the development of infant joint attention skills. Developmental Psychobiology, 36, 325–338.
   Google Scholar
• Nyström, P., Ljunghammar, T., Rosander, K., & Von Hofsten, C. (2011). Using mu rhythm perturbations to measure mirror neuron activity in infants. Developmental Science, 14, 327–335. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2012.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulus, M. (2014). How and why do infants imitate? An ideomotor approach to social and imitative learning in infancy (and beyond). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 1139–1156. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0598-1
   Google Scholar
• Paulus, M., Hunnius, S., & Bekkering, H. (2013). Neurocognitive mechanisms subserving social learning in infancy: Infants’ neural processing of the effects of others’ actions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8, 774–779. doi:10.1093/scan/nss065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulus, M., Kühn-Popp, N., Licata, M., Sodian, B., & Meinhardt, J. (2013). Neural correlates of prosocail behavior in infancy: Different neurophysiological mechanisms support the emergence of helping and comforting. NeuroImage, 66, 522–530. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pihko, E., Nangini, C., Jousmäki, V., & Hari, R. (2010). Observing touch activates human primary somatosensory cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 1836–1843. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07192.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pineda, J. A. (2005). The functional significance of mu rhythms: Translating “seeing” and “hearing” into “doing”. Brain Research Reviews, 50, 57–68. doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2005.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quadrelli, E., & Turati, C. (2015). Origins and development of mirroring mechanisms: A neuroconstructivist framework. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/bjdp.12110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakison, D. H., & Poulin-Dubois, D. (2001). Developmental origin of the animate–inanimate distinction. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 209–228. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy, V. (2008). How infants know minds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, V. M., Striano, T., & Iacoboni, M. (2011). Neural correlates of dyadic interaction during infancy. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 124–130. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2011.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Reviews in Neuroscience, 27, 169–192. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Brain Research Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 131–141. doi:10.1016/0926-6410(95)00038-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saby, J. N., & Marshall, P. J. (2012). The utility of EEG band power analysis in the study of infancy and early childhood. Developmental Neuropsychology, 37, 253–273. doi:10.1080/87565641.2011.614663
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saby, J. N., Marshall, P. J., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2012). Neural correlates of being imitated: An EEG study in preverbal infants. Social Neuroscience, 7, 650–661. doi:10.1080/17470919.2012.691429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saby, J. N., Metzoff, A. N., & Marshall, P. J. (2013). Infants’ somatotopic neural responses to seeing human actions: I’ve got you under my skin. Plos ONE, 8, e77905. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saby, J. N., Metzoff, A. N., & Marshall, P. J. (2015). Neural body maps in human infants: Somatotopic responses to tactile stimulation in 7-month-olds. NeuroImage, 118, 74–78. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer, M., Flor, H., Heinze, H. J., & Rotte, M. (2006). Dynamic modulation of the primary somatosensory cortex during seeing and feeling a touched hand. NeuroImage, 29, 587–592. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer, M., Xu, B., Flor, H., & Cohen, L. G. (2009). Effects of different viewing perspectives on somatosensory activations during observation of touch. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 2722–2730. doi:10.1002/hbm.20701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimada, S., & Hiraki, K. (2006). Infant’s brain responses to live and televised action. NeuroImage, 32, 930–939. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, T., Seymour, B., O’Doherty, J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2004). Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science, 303, 1157–1162. doi:10.1126/science.1093535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapel, J. C., Hunnius, S., Van Elk, M., & Bekkering, H. (2010). Motor activation during observation of unusual versus ordinary actions in infancy. Social Neuroscience, 5, 451–460. doi:10.1080/17470919.2010.490667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, D. N. (1985). Affect attunement. In J. D. Call, E. Galenson, & R. L. Tyson (Eds.), Frontiers of infant psychiatry (Vol. 2, pp. 3–14). New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Streltsova, A., & McCleery, J. P. (2014). Neural time-course of the observation of human and non-human object touch. Social, Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9, 333–341. doi:10.1093/scan/nss142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevarthen, C. (1979). Communication and cooperation in early infancy: A description of primary intersubjectivity. In M. Bulkow (Ed.), Before speech: The beginning of interpersonal communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trevarthen, C., & Aitken, K. J. (2003). Infant intersubjectivity: Research, theory, and clinical applications. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 3–48. doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turati, C., Natale, E., Bolognini, N., Senna, I., Picozzi, M., Longhi, E., & Cassia, V. M. (2013). The early development of human mirror mechanisms: Evidence from electromyographic recordings at 3 and 6 months. Developmental Science, 16, 793–800. doi:10.1111/desc.12066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72, 655–684. doi:10.1111/cdev.2001.72.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward, A. L. (1998). Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor’s reach. Cognition, 69, 1–34. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00058-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahn-Waxler, C., Radke-Yarrow, M., Wagner, E., & Chapman, M. (1992). Development of concern for others. Developmental Psychology, 28, 126–136. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.28.1.126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar