Acknowledging Students' Collaborations through Peer Review: A Footnoting Practice

Bibliography

• Ambrose, S. A. et al. 2010. How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. W. & D. R. Krathwohl, eds. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Allyn & Bacon. Boston: Pearson Education Group.
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C. 1980. “A Relationship between Reading and Writing: The Conversational Model.” College English 41 (6): 656–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bean, J. C. 2011. Engaging Ideas. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Belcher, L. 2000. “Peer Review and Response: A Failure of the Process Paradigm as Viewed from the Trenches.” In Reforming College Composition: Writing the Wrongs, edited by R. Wallace, A. Jackson, & S. L. Wallace, S. L., Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 99–112.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S., M. D. Engelhart, E. J. Furst, W. H. Hill, & D. R. Krathwohl. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Company.
   Google Scholar
• Brammer, C. & M. Rees. 2007. “Peer Review from the Students' Perspective: Invaluable or Invalid?” Composition Studies 35 (2): 71–85.
   Google Scholar
• Bruffee, K. A. 1993. Collaborative Learning: Higher Education, Interdependence, and the Authority of Knowledge. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cartney, P. 2010. “Exploring the Use of Peer Assessment as a Vehicle for Closing the Gap between Feedback Given and Feedback Used.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (5): 551–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, K. & C. MacArthur. 2010. “Student Revision with Peer and Expert Reviewing.”Learning and Instruction 20: 328–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, K. & C. MacArthur. 2011. “Learning by Reviewing.” Journal of Educational Psychology 10 (1): 73–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, K. & C. D. Schunn. 2007. “Scaffolded Writing and Rewriting in the Discipline: A Web-Based Reciprocal Peer Review System.” Computers & Education 48 (3): 409–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, K., C. D. Schunn, & R. W. Wilson, 2006. “Validity and Reliability of Scaffolded Peer Assessment of Writing from Instructor and Student Perspectives.” Journal of Educational Psychology 98 (4): 891–901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, P. M. & S. A. Cohen, S. A. 2001. “The Effect of the Web on Undergraduate Citation Behavior 1996–1999.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 52 (4): 309–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donald, J. G. 2002. Learning to Think: Disciplinary Perspectives. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Emig, J. 1977. “Writing as a Mode of Learning.” College Composition and Communication 28 (2): 122–128.
   Google Scholar
• Flower, L. & J. R. Hayes. 1981. “A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing.” College Composition and Communication 32 (4): 365–387.
   Google Scholar
• Gottschalk, K. & K. Hjortshoj. 2004. The Elements of Teaching Writing: A Resource for Instructors in All Disciplines. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's.
   Google Scholar
• Graff, G. & C. Birkenstein. 2010. They Say, I Say: The Moves that Matter in Academic Writing. 2nd ed. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Grafton, A. 1997. The Footnote: A Curious History. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. & K. Sandmel. 2011. “The Process Writing Approach: A Meta-Analysis.” The Journal of Educational Research 104: 396–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, R. S. 2006. “Benefits and Problems with Student Teams: Suggestions for Improving Team Projects.” Journal of Education for Business 82 (1): 11–19.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, J. G. & J. Liu. 2005. “Guiding Principles for Effective Peer Response.” ELT Journal, 59 (1): 31–38.
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson, A. 2012. “Facilitating Productive Use of Feedback in Higher Education.” Active Learning in Higher Education 14 (1): 63–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallam, W. D. 1960. “A Focus on Footnotes.” The Journal of Higher Education 31 (2): 99–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeachie, W. & M. Svinicki. 2011. McKeachie's Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers. 13th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Middendorf, J. & D. Pace. 2004. “Decoding the Disciplines: A Model for Helping Students Learn Disciplinary Ways of Thinking.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 98: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, D. 1972. “Teach Writing as a Process Not a Product.” The Leaflet, 11–14.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. 2011. “Good Designs for Written Feedback for Students.” McKeachie's Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers, 13th ed., 108–124. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., A. Thomson, & C. Breslin. 2014. “Rethinking Feedback Practices in Higher Education: A Peer Review Perspective.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (1): 102–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilson, L. 2003. “Improving Student Peer Feedback.” College Teaching 51 (1): 34–38.
   Google Scholar
• Ozogul, G. & H. Sullivan. 2009. “Student Performance and Attitudes under Formative Evaluation by Teacher, Self and Peer Evaluators.” Educational Technology Research and Development 57 (3): 393–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paton, F. 2002. “Approaches to Productive Peer Review.” In Strategies for Teaching First-Year Composition, edited by D. Roen, 290–306. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, D. N. & G. Salomon. 1992. “Teaching for Transfer.” In International Encyclopedia of Education, 2nd ed., edited by T.N. Postlethwaite & T. Husen. Oxford: Pergamon Press. http://learnweb.harvard.edu/alps/thinking/docs/traencyn.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Ransdell, D. R. 2001. “Class Workshops: An Alternative to Peer-Group Review.” Teaching English in the Two Year College 29 (1): 32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Rieber, L. J. 2006. “Using Peer Review to Improve Student Writing in Business Courses.” Journal of Education for Business 81 (6): 322–326.
   Google Scholar
• Rollinson, P. 2006. “Using Peer Feedback in the ESL Writing Class.” ELT Journal 59 (1): 23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, L. 2008. “Textual Appropriation and Citing Behaviors of University Undergraduates.” Applied Linguistics 31 (1): 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smit, D. 2004. The End of Composition Studies. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. 1998. “Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities.” Review of Educational Research 68 (3): 249–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardle, E. 2007. “Understanding ‘Transfer’ from FYC: Preliminary Results of a Longitudinal Study.” WPA: Writing Program Administration 31 (1–2): 65–85.
   Google Scholar