Is Specifications Grading Right for Me?: A Readiness Assessment to Help Instructors Decide

References

• Barre, Elizabeth. 2016. “Meaningful, Moral, and Manageable? The Grading Holy Grail.” Rice University Center for Teaching Excellence. http://cte.rice.edu/blogarchive/2016/2/9/grading.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Ruth, and Mordecai Nisan. 1986. “Effects of No Feedback, Task-Related Comments, and Grades on Intrinsic Motivation and Performance.” Journal of Educational Psychology 78 (3):210–6. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.78.3.210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlin, Kelsey, Maï Yasué, and I-Chant Andrea Chiang. 2018. “The Impact of Grades on Student Motivation.” Active Learning in Higher Education. doi: 10.1177/1469787418819728.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, Beth R. 2007. “Is It Worth the Effort? How Feedback Influences Students’ Subsequent Submission of Assessable Work.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 32 (5):571–81. doi: 10.1080/02602930601116912.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, Joe. 2019. “Beyond Standards-Based Grading: Why Equity Must Be Part of Grading Reform.” Phi Delta Kappan 100 (8):52–5. doi: 10.1177/0031721719846890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink, L. Dee. 2013. Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses. Revised and updated ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Macie. 2018. “What is Specifications Grading and Why Should You Consider Using It? | The Innovative Instructor.” The Innovative Instructor Blog (Blog). https://ii.library.jhu.edu/2018/04/11/what-is-specifications-grading-and-why-should-you-consider-using-it/.
   Google Scholar
• Howitz, William J., Kate J. McKnelly, and Renée D. Link. 2021. “Developing and Implementing a Specifications Grading System in an Organic Chemistry Laboratory Course.” Journal of Chemical Education 98 (2):385–94. doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Jason B. 2016. “Experimenting with Specifications Grading.” The Chronicle of Higher Education Blogs: ProfHacker (blog). March 23. https://www.chronicle.com/blogs/profhacker/experimenting-with-specifications-grading/61912.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, Alfie. 2012. “The Case against Grades.” Education Digest 77 (5):8–16.
   Google Scholar
• Link, L. J., and T. R. Guskey. 2019. "How Traditional Grading Contribute to Student Inequities and How to Fix It."
   Google Scholar
• Link, Laura J., and Thomas R. Guskey. 2019. “How Traditional Grading Contribute to Student Inequities and How to Fix It.” Curriculum in Context 45 (1):12–9.
   Google Scholar
• Mittell, Jason. 2016. “Rethinking Grading: An in-Progress Experiment.” Just TV (blog). February 17. https://justtv.wordpress.com/2016/02/16/rethinking-grading-an-in-progress-experiment/.
   Google Scholar
• Nilson, Linda. 2016. “Yes, Virginia, There’s a Better Way to Grade.” Inside Higher Ed. January 19. https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2016/01/19/new-ways-grade-more-effectively-essay.
   Google Scholar
• Nilson, Linda, and Claudia J. Stanny. 2014. Specifications Grading: Restoring Rigor, Motivating Students, and Saving Faculty Time. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pope, Lizzy, Holly B. Parker, and Sharon Ultsch. 2020. “Assessment of Specifications Grading in an Undergraduate Dietetics Course.” Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior 52 (4):439–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2019.07.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad, Priya V. 2020. “Using Revision and Specifications Grading to Develop Students’ Mathematical Habits of Mind.” PRIMUS 30 (8–10):908–25. doi: 10.1080/10511970.2019.1709589.
   Google Scholar
• Pulfrey, Caroline, Céline Buchs, and Fabrizio Butera. 2011. “Why Grades Engender Performance-Avoidance Goals: The Mediating Role of Autonomous Motivation.” Journal of Educational Psychology 103 (3):683–700. doi: 10.1037/a0023911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schinske, Jeffrey, and Kimberly Tanner. 2014. “Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently).” CBE Life Sciences Education 13 (2):159–66. doi: 10.1187/cbe.cbe-14-03-0054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talbert, Robert. 2018. “Return to Specs Grading: Calculus.” Ph.D. August 13. http://rtalbert.org/return-to-specs-grading-calculus/.
   Google Scholar
• Vitale, Sarah E., and David W. Concepción. 2021. “Improving Student Learning with Aspects of Specifications Grading.” Teaching Philosophy 44 (1):29–57. doi: 10.5840/teachphil2020121133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, Grant P, and Jay McTighe. 2005. Understanding by Design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Winkelmes, Mary-Ann, Matthew Bernacki, Jeffrey Butler, Michelle Zochowski, Jennifer Golanics, and Kathryn Harris Weavil. 2016. “A Teaching Intervention That Increases Underserved College Students’ Success.” Peer Review 18 (1–2). https://www.aacu.org/peerreview/2016/winter-spring/Winkelmes.
   Google Scholar