Effectiveness of invasive reperfusion therapy and standard medical treatment in AMI

References

• DeFrances CJ, Hall MJ. 2005 National Hospital Discharge Survey. Adv Data 2007; 385: 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Eagle KA, Guyton RA, Davidoff R, Edwards FH, Ewy GA, Gardner TJ, Hart JC, Hellmann HC, Hillis LD, Hutter AM Jr, Lytle BW, Marlow RA, Nugent WC, Orszulak TA; American College of Cardiology; American Heart Associa-tion. ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guide-lines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery). Circulation 2004; 110: e340–437.
   Google Scholar
• Yusuf S, Zucker D, Peduzzi P, Fisher LD, Takaro T, Kennedy JW, Davis K, Killip T, Passamani E, Norris R. Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by theCoronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collabora-tion. Lancet 1994; 344: 563–70.
   Google Scholar
• Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, Colombo A, Holmes DR, Mack MJ, Stallle E, Feldman TE, van den Brand M, Bass EJ, Van Dyck N, Leadley K, Dawkins KD, and Mohr FW, for the SYNTAX Investigators; Percutane-ous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 961–72.
   Google Scholar
• Smith SC Jr, Feldman TE, Hirshfeld SW Jr, Jacobs AK, Kern MJ, King SB 3rd, Morrison DA, O'Neil WW, Schaff HV, Whitlow PL, Williams DO, Antman EM, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Hunt SA, Nishimura R, Ornato JP, Page RL, Riegel B; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Associa-tion Task Force on Practice Guidelines. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary interven-tion: a report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guide-lines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). Circu-lation 2006; 113: e166–286.
   Google Scholar
• Katritsis DG, Ioannidis JP. Percutaneous coronary interven-tion versus conservative therapy in nonacute coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Circulation 2005; 111: 2906–12.
   Google Scholar
• Bravata DM, Gienger AL, McDonald KM, Sundaram V, Perez MV, Varghese R, Kapoor JR, Ardehali R, Owens DK, Hlatky MA. Systematic review: the comparative effective-ness of percutaneous coronary interventions and coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Intern Med 2007; 147: 703–16.
   Google Scholar
• Romano PS, Chan BK. Risk-adjusting acute myocardial infarction mortality: are APR-DRGs the right tool? Health Serv Res 2000; 34: 1469-89.
   Google Scholar
• Office Of Statewide Health Planning And Development (OSHPD). California Hospital Outcomes Project. Heart Attack Outcomes 1996-1998. Volume 2: Technical Guide. OSHPD, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Tunstall-Pedoe H, Kuulasmaa K, Amouyel P, Arveiler D, Rajakangas AM, Pajak A. Myocardial infarction and coro-nary deaths in the World Health Organization MONICA Project. Registration procedures, event rates, and case-fatal-ity rates in 38 populations from 21 countries in four conti-nents. Circulation 1994; 90: 583–612.
   Google Scholar
• Bittner V, Hardison R, Kelsey SF, Weiner BH, Jacobs AK, Sopko G. Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels predict five-year outcome in the Bypass Angioplasty Revas-cularization Investigation (BARI). Circulation 2002; 106: 2537–42.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks MM, Jones RH, Bach RG, Chaitman BR, Kern MJ, Orszulak TA, Follmann D, Sopko G, Blackstone EH, Calif RM. Predictors of mortality and mortality from cardiac causes in the bypass angioplasty revascularization investiga-tion (BARI) randomized trial and registry. For the BARI Investigators. Circulation 2000; 101: 2682–9.
   Google Scholar
• h JH, Mercado N, Shlipak MG, Lemos PA, Boersma E, Lindeboom W, O'Neill WW, Wijns W, Serruys PW. Asso-ciation of chronic kidney disease with clinical outcomes after coronary revascularization: the Arterial Revasculariza-tion Therapies Study (ARTS). Am Heart J2005; 149: 512–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kurbaan AS, Bowker TJ, Ilsley CD, Foale RA, Sigwart U, Rickards AF. The effect of adjusting for baseline risk factors and post revascularisation coronary disease on comparisons between coronary angioplasty and bypass surgery. Int J Cardiol 2001; 77: 207–14.
   Google Scholar
• Soares PR, Hueb WA, Lemos PA, Lopes N, Martinez EE, Cesar LAM, Oliveira SA, Ramires JAF. Coronary revascu-larization (surgical or percutaneous) decreases mortality after the first year in diabetic subjects but not in nondiabetic subjects with multivessel disease: an analysis from the Med-icine, Angioplasty, or Surgery Study (MASS II). Circulation 2006; 114: 1420–4.
   Google Scholar
• Szczech LA, Best PJ, Crowley E, Brooks MM, Berger PB, Bittner V, Gersh BJ, Jones R, Calif RM, Ting HH, Whitlow PJ, Detre KM, Holmes D, for the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Investigators. Out-comes of patients with chronic renal insufficiency in the bypass angioplasty revascularization investigation. Circula-tion 2002; 105: 2253.
   Google Scholar
• Misura dell'Outcome - Risultati dello studio dei 43 indica-tori selezionati. Minister° della Salute, available from: http:// www. mattoni. minist ero s alute. it/m att oni/documenti/5_ Risultati_dello_studio_dei_43_indicatori_selezionati.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ho DE, Imai K, Ling G Stuart EA. Matching as nonpara-metric processing for reducing model dependence in para-metric causal inference. Political Analysis 2007; 15: 199–236.
   Google Scholar
• Statistical Analysis System [computer program]. Version 8.02. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Stata Statistical Software [computer program]. Release 8.0. College Station, Texas: Stata Corporation, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Sim I, Gupta M, McDonald K, Bourassa MG, Hlatky MA. A meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing coronary artery bypass grafting with percutaneous transluminal coro-nary angioplasty in multivessel coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1995; 76: 1025–9.
   Google Scholar
• Pocock SJ, Henderson RA, Rickards AF, Hampton JR, King SB 3rd, Hamm CW, Puel J, Hueb W, Goy JJ, Rodriguez A. Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing coronary angioplasty with bypass surgery. Lancet 1995; 346: 1184–9.
   Google Scholar
• Mercado N, Wijns W, Serruys PW, Sigwart U, Flather MD, Stables RH, O'Neill WW, Rodriguez A, Lemos PA, Hueb WA, Gersh BJ, Booth J, Boersma E. One-year outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with multiple stenting for multi system disease: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized clinical trials. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 130: 512–9.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman SN, TenBrook JA, Wolf MP, Pauker SG, Salem DN, Wong JB. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing coronary artery bypass graft with percutaneoustransluminal coronary angioplasty: one- to eight-year out-comes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41: 1293–304.
   Google Scholar
• Taggart DP. Coronary artery bypass grafting is still the best treatment for multivessel and left main disease, but patients need to know. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 82: 1966–75.
   Google Scholar
• Dzavik V, Ghali WA, Norris C, Mitchell LB, Koshal A, Saunders LD, Galbraith PD, Hui W, Faris P, Knudtson ML. Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Cor-onary Heart Disease (APPROACH) Investigators. Long-term survival in 11,661 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease in the era of stenting: a report from the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Cor-onary Heart Disease (APPROACH) Investigators. Am Heart J2001; 142: 119–26.
   Google Scholar
• Brener SJ, Lytle BW, Casserly IP, Schneider JP, Topol EJ, Lauer MS. Propensity analysis of long-term survival after surgical or percutaneous revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and high-risk features. Circulation 2004; 109: 2290–5.
   Google Scholar
• Smith PK, Calif RM, Tuttle RH, Shaw LK, Lee KL, Delong ER, Lilly RE, Sketch MH Jr, Peterson ED, Jones RH. Selection of surgical or percutaneous coronary inter-vention provides differential longevity benefit. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 82: 1420-8; discussion: 1428-9.
   Google Scholar
• Hannan EL, Racz MJ, Walford G, Jones RH, Ryan TJ, Bennett E, Culliford AT, Isom OW, Gold JP, Rose EA. Long-term outcomes of coronary-artery bypass grafting versus stent implantation. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 2174–8.
   Google Scholar
• Malenka DJ, Leavitt BJ, Hearne MJ, Robb JF, Baribeau YR, Ryan TJ, Helm RE, Kellett MA, Dauerman HL, Dacey LJ, Silver MT, VerLee PN, Weldner PW, Hettleman BD, Olm-stead EM, Piper WD, O'Connor GT. Northern New Eng-land Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. Comparing long-term survival of patients with multivessel coronary disease after CABG or PCI: analysis of BARI-like patients in northern New England. Circulation 2005; 112 (9 Suppl): 1371–6.
   Google Scholar
• Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbid-ity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care 1998; 36: 8–27.
   Google Scholar
• Seccareccia F, D'Errigo P, Rosato S, Maraschini A, Badoni G, Perucci CA, Fusco D, Colais P, D'Ovidio M, Barone AP. Testing studies concerning the cardiovascular issues of the “NHS Mattoni Project - Outcome assessment": preliminary results. G Ital Cardiol 2008; 9 (2-12); 5S-102S [in Italian].
   Google Scholar