Ultrasound Safety:

REFERENCES

• Moore RM, Jeng LL, Kaczmarek RG, Placek PJ. Use of diagnostic imaging procedures and fetal monitoring devices n the care of pregnant women. Public Health Reports. 1990; 105(5):471–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringa V, Blondel B, Breart G. Ultrasound in obstetrics: do published evalu-ative studies justify its routine use? In: J Epidem. 1989;18(3):489–497.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor KM. A prudent approach to ultrasound imaging of the fetus and newborn. Birth. 1990; 17(4):218–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. Ethics in obstetric ultrasound. J Ultra-sound Med. 1989;8:493–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart HF, Moore RM. Development of health risk evaluation data for diag-nostic ultrasound: an historical perspective. J Clin Ultrasound. 1984; 12:493–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Ultrasound in preg-nancy. Technical Bulletin No.116. Chicago, IL: ACOG; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Wells PNT. The prudent use of diagnostic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1987;13(7):391–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medical Research Council. Report on an ad hoc meeting to discuss the risks and benefits of obstetrical ultrasound. London: MRC; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Bioeffects considerations for the safety of diagnostic ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med. 1988;7:S1–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brambati B, Tului L, Simoni G, Travi M. Genetic diagnosis before the eighth gestational week. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77(2):318–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touwen BCL. Motility in the fetus and young infant: implications for neu-rological development. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1989;43:27–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstensen EL, Gates All. The effects of pulsed ultrasound on the fetus. J Ultrasound Med. 1984;3:145–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reese EA, Assimakopoulos E, Zheng X, Hagay Z, Hobbins JC. The safety of obstetric ultrasonography: concern for the fetus. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;76: 139–146.
   Google Scholar
• Soothill PW, Nicolaides KH, Rodeck CH, Campbell S. Amniotic fluid and fetal tissues are not heated by obstetric ultrasound scanning. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;94:675–677.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carstensen EL. Acoustic cavitation and the safety of diagnostic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1987;13(10):597–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Child SZ, Carstensen EL, Lam SK. Effects of ultrasound on Drosophilia: III. Exposure of larvae to low-temporal-average-intensity, pulsed irradiation. Ultra-sound Med Biol. 1981;7:167–173.
   Google Scholar
• Ellisman MH, Palmer DE, Andre MP. Diagnostic levels of ultrasound may disrupt myelination. Exp Neurol. 1987;98(1):78–92.
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien WD. Dose-dependent effect of ultrasound on fetal weight in mice. J Ultrasound Med. 1983;2:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Child SZ, Hoffman D, Strassner D, Carstensen EL, Gates AH, Cox C et al. A test of I2T as a dose parameter for fetal weight reduction from exposure to ultra-sound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1989; 15(1):39–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry FJ, Erdmann WA, Johnson LK, Baird Al. Ultrasonic toxicity study. Ul-trasound Med Biol. 1978;3:351–366.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anderson DW, Barrett JT. Ultrasound: a new immunosuppressant. Clin Im-munol Immunopathol. 1979;14:18–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liebeslcind D, Padawar J, Wolley R, Bases R. Diagnostic ultrasound: time-lapse and transmission electron microscope studies of cells insonated in vitro. Br J Cancer. 1982;45 (Supp1.5):176–186.
   Google Scholar
• Child SZ, Carstensen EL, Gates All, Hall WJ. Testing for the teratogenicity of pulsed ultrasound in mice. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1988;14:493–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai BB, Sosolik RC, Ciaravino V, Teale JM. Effect of fetal exposure to ultrasound on the development of functional, antigen-specific B lymphocytes in fetal and neonatal balb/c mice. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1989;15(6):575–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarantal AE Hendrickx SG. Evaluation of the bioeffects of prenatal ultra-sound exposure in the cynomolgus macaque (Macaca fascicularis): I. Neonatal/in-fant observations. Teratology. 1989;39:137–147.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tarantal AF, Hendrickx SG. Evaluation of the bioeffects of prenatal ultra-sound exposure in the cynomolgus macaque (Macaca fascicularis): H. growth and behavior during the first year. Teratology. 1989;39:149–162.
   Google Scholar
• Determining risk to subjects: exposure to ultrasound. IRBA Review of Hu-man Subjects Research. 1987;9(3): 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Ziskin MC, Petitti DB. Epidemiology of human exposure to ultrasound: a critical review. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1988;14(2):91–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons EA, Dyke C, Toms M, Cheang M, Math M. In utero exposure to diagnostic ultrasound: a 6-year follow-up. Radiology. 1988;166: 687–690.
   Google Scholar
• Stark CR, Orleans M, Haverkamp AD, Murphy J. Short- and long-term risks after exposure to diagnostic ultrasound in utero. Obstet Gynecol. 1984; 63:194–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellman LM, Duffus GM, Donald I, Sunden B. Safety of diagnostic ultra-sound in obstetrics. Lancet. 1970;1:1133–1135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheidt PD, Stanley F, Bryla DA: One year follow-up of infants exposed to ultrasound in utero. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978;113:2119–2121.
   Google Scholar
• Bakketeig LS, Eik-Nes SH, Jacobsen G, Ulstein MK, Brodtkorb CJ, Bals-tad P, Ericksen BC, Jorgensen NP: A randomized controlled trial of ultrasono-graphic screening in pregnancy. Lancet. 1984;2:207–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartwright RA, McKinney PA, Hopton PA, Birch JM, Hartley Al, Mann JR, et al. Ultrasound examinations in pregnancy and childhood cancer. Lancet. 1984;2:999–1000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnier-Wilson, Waterhouse JA. Obstetrical ultrasound and childhood ma-lignancies. Lancet. 1984;2:997–999.
   Google Scholar
• David H, Weaver JB, Pearson JF. Doppler ultrasound and fetal activity. Br Med J. 1975;2:62–64.
   Google Scholar
• Hertz RH, Timor-Tritsch I, Dierker LJ, Chik L, Rosen MG. Continuous ul-trasound and fetal movements. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979;135:152–154.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Powell-Phillips WD, Towell ME. Doppler ultrasound and subjective as-sessment of fetal activity. Br Med J. 1979;2:101–102.
   Google Scholar
• Saint-Anne Dargassies S. The Neuro-Motor and Psycho-Affective Develop-ment of the Infant. New York, NY: Elsevier; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Mole R. Possible hazards of imaging and doppler ultrasound in obstetrics. Birth. 1986;13:23–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meire FIB. The safety of diagnostic ultrasound. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;94:1121–1122.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• British Institute of Radiology. The safety of diagnostic ultrasound. Report of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Sparling JW, Wilhelm IJ, MacLeod AM, Green S, Katz V, Huntington GS, Blanchard G, Aydlett L. Developing a taxonomy of fetal movement: the first step in a longitudinal collaborative study. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 1990;10:43–46.
   Google Scholar
• Folio MR, Fewell RR. Peabody Developmental Motor Scales and Activity Cards. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Howell DC. Statistical Methods for Psychology. Boston, MA: Duxbury Press; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Thun-Hohenstein L, Largo RH, Molinari L, Kundu S. Duc G. Early fine motor and adaptive development in high-risk appropriate for gestational age pre-teini and healthy term children. Eur J Pediatr. 1991;150:562–569.
   Google Scholar
• Forslund M, Bjerre I. Follow-up of preterm children. II.growth and devel-opment at four years of age. Early Hum Dev. 1990;24:107–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Largo RH, Molinari L, Kundu S, Hunziker U, Duc G. Neurological out-come in high-risk weight appropriate for gestational age preterm children at early school age. Eur. J Pediatr. 1990;149:835–844.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen SE, Parmelee AH, Beckwith L, Sigman M. Cognitive development in preterm births:birth to 8 years. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1986;7(2):102–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman SL, Jacobs BS, Werthmann MW. Preterms of low medical risk: spontaneous behaviors and soothability at expected date of birth. Infant Behavior and Development. 1982;5:3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Miller U. Miller Assessment for Preschoolers. San Antonio, TX: Psycho-logical Corporation; 1988.
   Google Scholar