Critical issues in the inclusion of students who use augmentative and alternative communication: An educational team perspective

References

• Coots, J. J., Bishop, K. D., Grenot-Scheyer, M., & Falvey, M. A. (1995). Practices in general education: Past and present. In M. Falvey (Ed.), Inclusive and heterogeneous schooling (pp. 5–17). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, K. A., Koppenhaver, D. A., Yoder, D. E., & Nance, J. (1997). Integrated communication and literacy instruction for a child with multiple disabilities. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, /2,142–150.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, K. A., & Koppenhaver, D. A. (1998). Using the "Write Talk-nology" with Patrick. Teaching Exceptional Children, 31(1), 58–64.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, K., Graham, N., Sailor, W., & Goetz, L. (1995). Use of inte-grated, general education and community settings as primary contexts for skill instruction for students with severe and multi-ple disabilities. Behavior Modification, 19, 33–58.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giangreco, M. (2000). Related services research for students with low-incidence disabilities: Implications for speech-language pathologists in inclusive classrooms. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 3/, 230–239.
   Google Scholar
• Giangreco M., Dennis, R., Cloninder, C., Edelman, S., & Schattman, R. (1993). "I've counted Jon": Transformational experiences of teachers educating students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 59, 359–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, L. (1995). Inclusion for persons who are deaf-blind: What does the future hold? In N. Haring & L. Romer (Eds.), Welcom - ing students who are deaf-blind into typical classrooms: Facili - tating school participation, learning, and friendships (pp. 3–16). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Greenbaum, T. L. (1993). The handbook for focus group research. New York: Lexington.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, P., Alwell, M., Farron-Davis, F., & Goetz, L. (1996). Creat-ing socially supportive environments for fully included students who experience multiple disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 21, 53–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, P., & Farron-Davis, F. (1992). A preliminary investigation of IEP quality and content associated with placement in general education versus special education classes. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 17, 247–253.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, P., Farron-Davis, F., Beckstead, S., Curtis, D., & Goetz, L. (1994). Evaluating the effects of placement of students with severe disabilities in general education versus special classes. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 200–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, P., Hirose-Hatae, A., Doering, K., Karasoff, P., Goetz, L. (2000). "Community is what I think everyone is talking about." Research in Remedial and Special Education, 21, 305–317.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, P., Staub, D., Alwell, M., & Goetz, L. (1994). Achievement by all students within the context of cooperative learning groups. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 290–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppenhaver, D. A., Spadorcia, S. A., & Erickson, K. A. (1998). How do we provide inclusive literacy instruction for children with disabilities? In S. B. Neuman & K. A. Roskos (Eds.), Children achieving: Best practices in early literacy (pp. 77–96). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A. (1993). Quality control in focus group research. In D. L. Morgan (Ed). Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 65–89). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A. (1998a). Moderating focus groups. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A. (1998b). Developing questions for focus groups. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A. (1998c). Analyzing and reporting focus group results. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. (1988). Focus groups as qualitative research. New-bury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. (1993). Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Neary, T., & Halvorsen, A. (1994). Inclusion education guidelines. Sacramento, CA: PEERS Outreach Project, California State Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, C. A., Donaldson, J., & Pezzoli, M. (1990). Some benefits nonhandicapped adolescents perceive for themselves from their social relationships with peers who have severe handicaps. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 15, 241–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainforth, B., York, J., & McDonald, C. (1992). Collaborative teams for students with severe disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Soto, G., Muller, E., Hunt, P., & Goetz, L. (2001). Professional skills for serving students who use AAC in general education classrooms: A team perspective. Language, Speech, and Hear - ing Services in Schools, 32,51–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, P. (1999). Conversations about inclusion. Teaching Exceptional Children, 31, 54–59.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, D. W., & Shamdasani, P. N. (1990). Focus groups: The - of)/ and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sturm, J. (1998). Educational inclusion of AAC users. In D. Beukel-man & P. Mirenda (Eds.). Augmentative and alternative com - munication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults (pp. 391–424). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. A. (1999). Inclusion: Empirical guidelines and unan-swered questions. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 34, 119–133.
   Google Scholar