Use of picture dictionaries to promote written communication by students with hearing and cognitive impairments

References

• Beeson, P. M. (1999). Treating acquired writing impairment: Strengthening graphemic representations. Aphasiology, /3, 767–785.
   Google Scholar
• Boardmaker [Computer software]. (1997). Solana Beach, CA: Mayer-Johnson Co.
   Google Scholar
• Cumley, G. D., & Swanson, S. (1999). Augmentative and alterna-tive communication options for children with developmental apraxia of speech: Three case studies. Augmentative and Alter-native Communication, /5,110–125.
   Google Scholar
• Dowler, D. L., & Walls, R. T. (1996). Accommodating specific job functions for people with hearing impairments. Journal of Reha-bilitation, 62,35–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fried-Oken, M., & More, L. (1992). An initial vocabulary for non-speaking preschool children based on developmental and envi-ronmental language sources. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 41–56.
   Google Scholar
• Geyer, P. D. (1999). Conditions influencing the availability of accommodations for workers who are deaf or hard-of-hearing. Journal of Rehabilitation, 65,42–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godrey, N. W., & Costello, M. A. (1995). Communication issues and strategies for deaf-blind individuals. American Rehabilita-tion, 21, 40–45.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, S. L. (1992). Applications for youth with sensory impair-ments. In P. Wehman (Ed.), Life beyond the classroom: Tran-sition strategies for young people with disabilities (pp. 277–300). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Haring, T. G., Neetz, J. A., Lovinger, L., Peck, C., & Semmel, M. I. (1987). Effects of four modified incidental teaching procedures to create opportunities for communication. Journal of the Asso-ciation for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12, 218–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, K .W. (2001). Literacy strategies using augmentative com-munication for students with physical disabilities. Unpublished manuscript, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, K. W., Alberto, P. A., & Bowdin, J. (1995). Interactions of communication partners and students who are deaf-blind: A model. Journal of Visual Impairments and Blindness, 89, 391–401.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, K. W., Allgood, P., Davis, B., Arnold, S., Castelle, M., & Taber, T. (1996). Promoting nontask-related communication at vocational sites. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 12, 169–178.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, K. W., Allgood, P., Ware, S., Arnold, S., & Castelle, M. (1996). Initiating requests during community-based vocational training by students with mental retardation and sensory impair-ments. Research in Developmental Disabilities, /7,173–184.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, K. W., Ware, S., Allgood, P., & Castelle, M. (1996). Use of dual communication boards at vocational sites by students who are deaf-blind. Rehabilitation and Education for Blindness and Visual Impairment, 27, 180–192.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover, H. D., Hieronymus, A. N., Frisbie, D. A., & Dunbar, A. B. (1996). Iowa Test of Basic Skills (ITBS). Chicago: Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• Homer, R. D., & Baer, D. M. (1978). Multiple-probe technique: A variation on the multiple baseline. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 189–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaacson, S. L. (1996). Simple ways to assess deaf or hard-of-hearing students' writing skills. Volta Review, 98, 183–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R.(1981). The Picture Communication Symbols. Solana Beach, CA: Mayer-Johnson Co.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, A. P. (2000). Teaching functional communication skills. In M. E. Snell & F. Brown (Eds.), Instruction of students with severe disabilities (5th ed., pp. 453–492). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1983). K-ABC: Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• King, T. W. (1999). Assistive technology: Essential human factors. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Millikin, C. C. (1997). Symbol systems and vocabulary selection strategies. In S. L. Glennen & D. C. DeCoste (Eds.), Handbook of augmentative and alternative communication (pp. 97–148). San Diego: Singular.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P. (1985). Designing pictorial communication systems for physically able-bodied students with severe handicaps. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 58–64.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, R., & Bryan, A. (1980). Multiple-baseline and multiple-probe designs: Practical alternatives for special education assessment and evaluation. Journal of Special Education, 14, 325–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parnwell, E. C. (1993). The new Oxford picture dictionary. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polloway, E. A., & Patton, J. R. (1993). Strategies for teaching learners with special needs. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Psychological Corporation. (1996). Stanford Achievement Test Series (9th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Scherich, D. L. (1996). Job accommodations in the workplace for persons who are deaf or hard of hearing: Current practices and recommendations. Journal of Rehabilitation, 6,27–35.
   Google Scholar
• Sowers, J., & Powers, L. (1991). Vocational preparation and employment of students with physical and multiple disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (1974). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Cor-poration.
   Google Scholar
• Westling, D. L., & Fox, L. (2000). Teaching students with severe disabilities, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshinaga-ltano, C., & Downey, D. (1996). Development of school-aged deaf, hard of hearing, and normally hearing students' writ-ten language. Volta Review, 98, 3–8.
   Google Scholar