An investigation of different degrees of dysarthric speech as input to speaker-adaptive and speaker-dependent recognition systems

References

• Bamberg, P. G. (1990). Adaptable phoneme-based models for large-vocabulary speech recognition. Proceedings of the Tuto-rial and Research Workshop on Speech Characterization in Speech Technology (pp. 1–10). Edinburgh: European Speech Communication Association.
   Google Scholar
• Darley, F., Aronson, A., & Brown, J. (1975). Motor speech disor-ders. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
   Google Scholar
• Elenius, K., & Blomberg, M. (1986). Voice input for personal com-puters. In G. Bristow (Ed.), Electronic speech recognition (pp. 361–372). London: Collins Professional and Technical Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrier, L., Shane, H., Ballard, H., Carpenter, T., & Benoit, A. (1995). Dysarthric speaker's intelligibility and speech charac-teristics in relation to computer speech recognition. Augmenta-tive and Alternative Communication, 11, 165–175.
   Google Scholar
• Fried-Oken, M. (1985). Voice recognition device as a computer interface for motor and speech impaired persons. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 66,678–681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartelius, L., & Svensson, P. (1990). Dysartritest (Swedish Dysarthria Test). Hagersten, Sweden: Psykologiforlaget AB.
   Google Scholar
• Lariviere, J., MacKinnon, E., & Risebrough, N. (1993). Is speech recognition worth it? In B. Granstrom, S. Hunnicutt, & K-E. Spens (Eds.), Speech and language technology for disabled persons: Proceedings of a European Speech Communication Association Workshop (pp. 95–98). Stockholm: European Speech Communication Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, W. C., Blackstone, S., & Poock, G. (1987). Dysarthric speech input to expert systems, electronic mail, and daily job activities. Proceedings of the Voice I/O Systems Applications Conference (pp. 33–43). Washington, DC: American Voice I/O Society.
   Google Scholar
• Magnuson, T., & Blomberg, M. (2000). Acoustic analysis of dysarthric speech and some implications for ASR. In the Speech, Music, and Hearing Quarterly Progress and Status Report #1/2000 (pp. 19–30). Stockholm: Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan.
   Google Scholar
• Martinson, M. (1990). Mör gifter sig [Mother gets married] (rev ed.). Stockholm: Bokforlagte Natu och Kultur.
   Google Scholar
• Noyes, J., & Frankish, C. (1992). Speech recognition technologies for individuals with disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 297–303.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, K., & Yampolsky, S. (2000). Automatic speech recognition and a review of its functioning with dysarthric speech. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 48–60.
   Google Scholar
• Rosengren, E. (2000). Perceptual analysis of dysarthric speech in the ENABL project. In the Speech, Music, and Hearing Quar-terly Progress and Status Report #1/2000 (pp. 13–18). Stock-holm: Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan.
   Google Scholar
• Rosengren, E., & Hunnicutt, S. (1990). A speech recognition-con-trolled predicting word processor. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6,109.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, D. G., & Tobias, J. (1986). Enhanced communication for a severely disabled dysarthric individual using speech recogni-tion and speech synthesis. Proceedings of the 9th Annual Con-ference on Rehabilitation Technology: Employing Technology (pp. 304–306). Washington, DC: RESNA.
   Google Scholar
• Talbot, N. (2000). Improving the speech recognition in the ENABL project. In the Speech, Music, and Hearing Quarterly Progress and Status Report #1/2000 (pp. 31–38). Stockholm: Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas-Stonell, N., Kotler, A., Leeper, H., & Doyle, P. (1998). Computerized speech recognition: Influence of intelligibility and perceptual consistency on recognition accuracy. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14, 51–56.
   Google Scholar
• Wachtmeister, H., & Granstrom, B. (1990, November). A voice operated system for environment control. Proceedings of the European Conference on the Advancement of Rehabilitation Technology (paper 13.1). Maastricht, The Netherlands: Euro-pean Conference on the Advancement of Rehabilitation Tech-nology.
   Google Scholar