Changing attitudes towards abortion in Europe

REFERENCES

• Simon JR. Abortion – Statutes, Policies, and Public Attitudes the World Over. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1998
   Google Scholar
• Department of Economic and Social Affairs – Popula- tion Division, United Nations. Abortion Policies: A Global Review. www.un.org/esa/population/publica- tions/abortion/abortion.htm. Accessed 29 March 2002
   Google Scholar
• Furedi A. Wrong but the right thing to do: public opinion and abortion. In Lee E, ed. Abortion Law and Politics Today. London: Macmillan Press, 1998: 159–71
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. Abortion Policies: An International Overview. Publication ST/ESA/SER.A/178. New York: United Nations, 1999
   Google Scholar
• The Center for Reproductive Law and Policy. Crafting an Abortion Law that Respects Women’s Rights: Issues to Consider. March 2000. www.crlp.org. Accessed 24 January 2002
   Google Scholar
• Alan Guttmacher Institute. Sharing Responsibility: Women, Society and Abortion Worldwide. New York: AGI, 1999
   Google Scholar
• WHO, Division of Reproductive Health. Unsafe Abortion: Global and Regional Estimates of Incidence and Mortality due to Abortion, with a Listing of Available Country Data, 3rd edn. Geneva: WHO, 1998
   Google Scholar
• UNFPA, Fondo delle Nazioni Unite per la popolazione. Lo stato della popolazione nel mondo, 1997. Rome: edizione italiana a cura di AIDOS, 1997
   Google Scholar
• Barroso C. Introduction. In Quality/Calidad/Qualité – From Patna to Paris: Providing Safe and Humane Abortion. The Population Council, 11; 1–3:2001
   Google Scholar
• Rahman A, Katzive L, Henshaw SK. A global review of laws on induced abortion 1985–1997. Int Fam Plann Perspect 1998;24:56–64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henshaw S. Abortions laws and practice world-wide. Choices 1997;26:2–6
   Google Scholar
• Ketting E. Abortion in Europe: the East-West divide. Choices 2000; 28:1
   Google Scholar
• De Sandre P, Ongaro F, Rettaroli R, Salvini S. Matrimonio e figli: tra rinvio e rinuncia: seconda indagine nazionale sulla fecondita. Bologna: Il Mulino, 1997
   Google Scholar
• Fiala C. Medical abortion – Where we are in Europe? Entre Nous 2000;47–48:16–17
   Google Scholar
• Thoss E, von Baross J. Mifegyne in Germany: were all the efforts in vain? Choices 2000;28:26–8
   Google Scholar
• Fielding SL, Edmunds E, Schaff EA. Having an abortion using mifepristone and home misoprostol: a qualitative analysis of women’s experiences. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2002;34:34–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rademakers J, Koster E, Jansen-van Hees ACV, Willems F. Medical abortion as an alternative to vacuum aspiration: first experiences with the abortion pill in The Netherlands. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2001;6:185–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arisi E. L’interruzione volontaria della gravidanza: la situazione europea. In 20 anni dalla legge sui consultori e sulla tutela della gravidanza e l’interruzione volontaria della gravidanza: riflessioni e prospettive, atti del convegno, Terni, 4–5 December 1998. Terni: TS & RC, 2000
   Google Scholar
• Franchini S, Gentilini M, Bianchi L, Piffer S, Plotegher V, Arisi E. L’interruzione volontaria di gravidanza nella Provincia Autonoma di Trento (1981–1999). Aspetti epidemiologici, strategie di prevenzione e ruolo dei consultori familiari. Centro Stampa, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Provincia Autonoma di Trento, 2001
   Google Scholar
• Task Force on Postovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation. Randomised controlled trial of levonor- gestrel versus the Yuzpe regimen of combined oral contraceptives for emergency contraception. Lancet 1998;352:428–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaggio G, von Hertzen H, Grimes DA, Van Look PFA. Timing of emergency contraception with levonor- gestrel or the Yuzpe regimen. Lancet 1999; 353:721
   Google Scholar
• Arisi E. Incidenza della IVG in Italia – Influenza della immigrazione e dell’uso dei metodi contraccettivi. In Societa’ Italiana della Riproduzione, Modena, 9–10 November 2001. Atti del week-end clinico, a cura di Annibale Volpe ed Angelo Cagnacci, MKT Consulting. Rome, 2002:16–21
   Google Scholar
• Relazione del Ministro della Sanita’ sulla attuazione della legge contenente norme per la tutela sociale della maternita’ e per l’interruzione volontaria di gravidanza (Legge 194/78); Dati preliminari 2000, dati definitivi 1999. 2 August 2001. www.sanita.interbusiness.it/ sanita/bacheca/maternita/default.htm. Accessed 13 September 2001
   Google Scholar
• Confalone N. Abortion legislation in Europe. Choices 2002;28:2–7
   Google Scholar
• Benagiano G, Pera A. Decreasing the need for abortion: challenges and constraints. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2000; 70:35–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowicka W, Tajak M. The effects of the anti-abortion act. In Nowicka W, ed. The Anti-abortion Law in Poland – The Functioning, Social Effects, Attitudes and Behaviors – The Report. Warsaw: Federation for Women and Family Planning, 2000:11–34
   Google Scholar
• Pyck D. Abortion in Belgium ten years on. Choices 2000;28:15–18
   Google Scholar
• Moshin V, Blaje M, Bodrug V. Abortion in Moldova. Choices 2000;28:22–5
   Google Scholar
• Tizzard J. Reproductive technology: new ethical dilemmas and old moral prejudices. In Lee E, ed. Abortion Law and Politics Today. London: Macmillan Press, 1998:184–97
   Google Scholar
• Nolan D. Abortion: should men have a say? In Lee E, ed. Abortion Law and Politics Today. London: Macmillan Press, 1998:216–31
   Google Scholar
• Kero A, Hogberg U, Lalos A. Contraceptive risk- taking in women and men facing legal abortion. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2001;6:205–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar